Download Roman names

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts
no text concepts found
Transcript
4A
4A: The Roman Name
The typical Athenian had but one given name (e.g. Socrates), but would identify himself formally (at least
from the late fifth century on) by adding the name of his father and of his deme (e.g. Socrates, son of
Sophroniscus, of the deme of Alopece). A Roman’s name usually will have at least three elements:
*The Praenomen — the “first” name; perhaps originally the only given name. Versus modern
western practice, relatively unimportant and generally quite colorless. We know of fewer than
100 praenomina in use; the Roman upper classes generally limited themselves to 15 or so
common praenomina, listed below with their abbreviated forms:
A. — Aulus
Ap(p). — Appius
C. — Gaius
Cn. — Gnaeus
D. — Decimus
L. — Lucius
M. — Marcus
M’. — Manius
N. — Numerius
P. — Publius
Q. — Quintus
Ser. — Servius
Sex. — Sextus
Sp. — Spurius
T. — Titus
Ti. — Tiberius
*The Nomen (nomen gentilicium) — the “family” name, designating the person’s gens (“clan”).
The most important of a Roman’s names. Often end in -ius; built off a praenomen, a place
name, or a cognomen.
*The Cognomen — most Romans had at least one cognomen, often more than one. The cognomen
could serve a variety of purposes: 1) It could distinguish a particular branch of a gens (e.g. M.
Tullius Cicero — a member of the “Ciceronian” branch of the “Tullian” gens; in the case of P.
Licinius Crassus Dives we find that the “Crassus” branch has been further subdivided into a
“Dives” sub-branch). 2) The cognomen could be honorific (e.g. P. Cornelius Scipio acquired
the additional cognomen “Africanus” after his victory in the Second Punic War). 3) In the case
of someone who had been adopted, the “adoptee” would assume the name of his adoptive
father but would add a cognomen which indicated the gens into which he originally had been
born (e.g. C. Octavius, on being adopted by C. Julius Caesar, becomes C. Julius Caesar
Octavianus). As a result, Roman names could become quite unwieldy: e.g. P. Cornelius Scipio
Aemilianus Africanus Numantinus.
Friends would use the nomen or cognomen in addressing one another: hence we refer to M. Tullius Cicero
as “Cicero”, while Chaucer will call the same man “Tullyus”. In a formal address one would employ
the praenomen with the nomen (or with the cognomen). If one was being extremely formal one would
say (e.g.): Marcus Tullius Marci filius Marci nepos Cornelia tribu Cicero (“Marcus Tullius Cicero, son
of Marcus, grandson of Marcus, of the Cornelian tribe”). To look a particular Roman up in a
dictionary, index, etc., look under the nomen or under the first specifying cognomen.
Women routinely had only one name: a feminine form of the nomen (or, occasionally, the cognomen) that
indicated her gens. Thus, all of M. Tullius Cicero’s daughters would have the name Tullia; all of C.
Julius Caesar’s daughters would have the name Julia; etc.
Slaves also had only one name, either their original name (especially if Greek) or a name indicative of their
country of origin, their character, appearance, etc.
Freedmen (former slaves) took the praenomen and nomen of their former masters and added their own
name (or an appropriate adjective) as their cognomen. M. Tullius Cicero’s slave Tiro, on gaining his
freedom, becomes M. Tullius Tiro; Terentius Lucanus’ slave, born in the Roman province of Africa,
becomes P. Terentius Afer (“the African”); etc.
Related documents