Download Where`s the Evidence? A look at the role of nutrition in AMD Sarah

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Human nutrition wikipedia , lookup

Saturated fat and cardiovascular disease wikipedia , lookup

Nutrition wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
 Where’s the Evidence? A look at the role of nutrition in AMD Sarah MacIver, OD, FAAO Clinical Faculty, University of Waterloo, School of Optometry and Vision Science Head, Health Sciences Optometry Clinic [email protected] Learning Objectives: • To help educate on what ocular vitamins and nutrients have been shown to be beneficial in prevention of ocular conditions, particularly • To recognize what patients will benefit from these therapies and which ones will not • To recognize the potential side effects of the ocular vitamins and nutrients and potential complications with certain systemic conditions • To review what the current literature is saying about ocular vitamins and nutrients in 2013 • To recognize how ocular nutrition can be integrated into a primary care practitioners practice Presentation Outline and Key Points/Take Homes I. Role of Ocular Nutrition in Primary Eye Care • Prevention • Historical view on the role nutrition in eye care • Current view on the role of nutrition in eye II. AMD and nutrition, a review of the current evidence • 2014 = practicing preventative medicine for AMD and other eye conditions o Disease burden of AMD is rising world wide • How the pathophysiology and nutrition in AMD coincide o Modifiable vs. non – modifiable risk factors § Modifiable – Smoking, chronic sunlight exposure, obesity, high blood pressure, high Cholesterol, poor nutrition § Non-­‐modifiable -­‐ Age-­‐associated, GENETICS and family history, Caucasian § Nutrition influence on pathophysiology -­‐ Among environmental factors, smoking, obesity and dietary factors, including antioxidants and dietary fat intake influence onset and progression of AMD. o Review of AREDS 1 § 20% risk reduction in vision loss for patients with intermediate AMD § 25% risk reduction to advanced AMD for patients with intermediate AMD § Take home point: despite the vitamins; patients will still progress III. AREDS 2 Update Did the results change our clinical practice? •
•
•
CONCLUSIONS – Revised Formula o Vitamin C (500 mg) o Vitamin E (400 IU) o Lutein (10mg)/Zeaxanthin (2 mg) o Zinc (80 mg zinc oxide) o Copper (2 mg cupric oxide) Nutrition’s impact on AREDS 2 o Diabetes: 13% o Smoking Status: 50% former/7% current o Participants in the study had three to four times the average lutein and zeaxanthin intake of average Americans o Harvard Dietary Assessment • Baseline dietary intake of study nutrients were taken • Highly nourished – received higher scores than average American population o Serum levels at baseline 1. Took serum levels of nutrients at baseline and 1,3 and 5 year follow ups 2. Compared with National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey •
This cohort had statistically significant higher serum levels of nutrients than average Omega 3 supplements vs. dietary Omega-­‐3s: There are many studies that show the benefit of Omega-­‐3s which contradicts the results seen in AREDS 2 o Studies that prove efficacy are MOSTLY DIETARY o Other considerations: • Healthy cohort-­‐ additive benefit of adding more EPA/DHA into people’s diet that were already getting enough? • Triglyceride vs. Ethyl ester • Dosage – varying thoughts – high dose of DHA is shown to be beneficial to retina – only 350 mg was used in AREDS2 § NAT-­‐1 and NAT-­‐2 Study studied higher supplementation dosages • May be greater evidence if look at patients with long-­‐term sustained levels of omega-­‐3 The Zinc controversy o What should we be recommending 80mg vs. 25 mg • High levels of zinc have been associated with side effects of different severity – stomach upset to increased risk of cancer to alzheimers • The recommendation for the amount of zinc was not clear in the AREDS 2 review by Dr. Chew because both amounts were found to be adequate o
•
•
Clinical Implications o AREDS2 is only valid for a small subset of patients (bilateral, intermediate or advanced AMD) o Even with AREDS patients are going to progress o 25% reduced risk, extra 26% reduced risk = 33% reduced risk o We need to educate our patients on PREVENTION o AMD is a chronic disease and we as optometrists can play a huge role! o We know that eating healthy improves eye health – we need to educate our patients on this BEFORE they develop changes V. IV. Nutrition and Prevention of AMD • Dietary antioxidants • Lutein and Zeaxanthin (Carotenoids) • Growing body of evidence to support dietary intake of carotenoids and prevention of AMD • Consistent evidence that participants with > 2 risk alleles of either or both of the CFH or ARMS2 had a significantly reduced risk of early or any AMD if they frequently consumed food items rich in LZ. • Increased dietary lutein and Zeaxanthin and macular pigment optical density • Improved visual function with carotenoids • Dietary Omega-­‐3s • Clinical Implications: Nutrigenomics – Do Genetics matter •
The study of effects of foods and food constituents on gene expression •
May help direct what supplementation to give to each individual patient • Clarify Omega-­‐3s, Zinc, Vitamin A,C,E dosage • Clarify dosage nutrients for all ocular diseases that may respond • Seddon 1994: • Awh vs. Chew genotype analysis from AREDS 2 •
Carl Awh, MD has published that there is a demonstrated role for genotype-­‐
directed nutritional therapy in patients with moderate age-­‐related macular degeneration (AMD) •
•
Looked at two genetic polymorphisms Complement Factor H (CFH) and ARMS 2 Subjects who have 1 or 2 CFH risk alleles were more likely to benefit from the use of antioxidant supplements alone, rather than the full AREDS supplement •
•
•
• In these patients, treatment with zinc, either alone or as a component of the AREDS formulation, was associated with increased AMD progression compared to treatment with antioxidants alone Emily Chew, MD claims that an alternative statistical analysis performed by the National Eye Institute failed to find sufficient evidence to support genetic testing for this indication AWH conclusions: Individuals with moderate AMD could benefit from pharmacogenomic selection of nutritional supplements. In this analysis, patients with no CFH risk alleles and with 1 or 2 ARMS2 risk alleles derived maximum benefit from zinc-­‐only supplementation. Patients with one or two CFH risk alleles and no ARMS2 risk alleles derived maximum benefit from antioxidant-­‐only supplementation; treatment with zinc was associated with increased progression to advanced AMD. These recommendations could lead to improved outcomes through genotype-­‐directed therapy. CHEW conclusions: Conclusions: The AREDS supplements reduced the rate of AMD progression across all genotype groups. Furthermore, the genotypes at the CFH and ARMS2 loci did not statistically significantly alter the benefits of AREDS supplements. Genetic testing remains a valuable research tool, but these analyses suggest it provides no benefits in managing nutritional supplementation for patients at risk of late AMD. •
Importance of good methodology • Awh did a subgroup analysis with a similar design to Chew’s analysis, dividing AREDS study patients into nine separate genotype groups. • Demonstrated that this method was statistically underpowered even to demonstrate that AREDS supplements were better than placebo • Contrasting Study Findings: • Another important paper by Klein et al. reported that supplementation with AREDS antioxidants plus zinc resulted in a greater reduction in AMD progression (68%) in those with the low-­‐risk genotype for CFH than in those with the high-­‐risk genotype (11%) • This interaction was primarily related to the zinc component of the supplements • While the major benefit of zinc and antioxidants was seen in patients with the low-­‐risk CFH genotype, all CFH genotypes (both high and low risk) benefited from zinc and antioxidants. Importantly, no harm was seen in those with CFH risk alleles. The authors also found no association between AREDS treatment assignment and having ARMS2 risk alleles. • Difficulties for developing good methodology for studying nutrition • Clinical Implications: o Due to the inconsistent methods and results,there is currently insufficient information to personalize recommendations for supplement use based on genotype o Current conclusions from the American Academy of Ophthalmology task force for genetics recommends avoiding routine genetic testing for genetically complex disorders like AMD until specific treatment or surveillance strategies have been shown in published trials to be of benefit to individuals with specific genotypes. V. Conclusions • Even with AREDS and nutrition, AMD patients are going to progress o 25% reduced risk, extra 26% reduced risk = 33% reduced risk • We need to be educating our patients on PREVENTION o AMD is a chronic disease and we as optometrists can play a huge role! § We know that eating healthy improves eye health – we need to educate our patients on this BEFORE they develop changes § Studies looking at dietary levels seem to have strongest evidence for prevention REFERENCES: AMD Genetic Testing and AREDS Supplementation: Are Zinc-­‐Free or Other Customized Supplements Really Warranted? http://www.sciencebasedhealth.com/Webpage.aspx?WebpageId=549 ). Seddon JM, Ajani UA, Sperduto RD, et al; Eye Disease Case-­‐Control Study Group. Dietary carotenoids, vitamins A, C, and E, and advanced age-­‐related macular degeneration. JAMA. 1994;272:1413-­‐1420 Wang J, Buitendijk G, et al. Genetic Susceptibility, Dietary Antioxidants, and Long Term Incidence of
AMD in 2 Populations. Ophthalmology 2014;121:667-675
Sobrin L, Seddon J. Nature and Nurture – Genes and Environment – predict onset and progression of
macular degeneration. Progress in Retinal and Eye Research (40) 2014:1-15
Ho L, van Leeuwen R, Witteman J, et al. Reducing the Genetic Risk of Age-­‐Related Macular Degeneration with Dietary Antioxidants, Zinc, and Omega-­‐3 Fatty Acids. The Rotterdam Study. Arch Ophthalmol. 2011; 129:758-­‐766 SanGiovanni J, Chew E., Agron E. The Relationship of Dietary Omega-­‐3 Long-­‐Chain Polyunsaturated Fatty Acid Intake with Incident Age-­‐Related Macular Degeneration. AREDS Report No. 23. Arch. Ophthalmol. 2008; 126:1274-­‐1279. Age-­‐Related Eye Disease Study Research Group. A Randomized, Placebo-­‐Controlled, Clinical Trial of High-­‐Dose Supplementation with Vitamins C and E, Beta Carotene, and Zinc for Age-­‐Related Macular Degeneration and Vision Loss. AREDS Report No. 8. Arch Ophthalmol 2001; 119:1417-­‐1436. Olson J, Erie J, Bakri S., Nutritional Supplementation and Age-­‐Related Macular Degeneration. Seminars in Ophthalmology 26(3); 131-­‐136. Wong I, Koo S., Chan C. Prevention of Age-­‐Related Macular Degeneration. Int. Ophthalmol (2011) 31; 73-­‐82. Age –Related Eye Disease Study Research Group. The Relationship of Dietary of Lipid Intake and Age-­‐Related Macular Degeneration in a Case-­‐Control Study. AREDS Report No.20. Arch Ophthalmol. 2007; 125:671-­‐679 Sin H., Liu D., Lam D. Lifestyle Modification, Nutritional and vitamins supplements for age-­‐related macular degeneration. Acta Ophthalmologica. 2012. Doi: 10.1111/j.1755-­‐
3768.2011.02357. Eye Disease Case-­‐Control Study Group. Antioxidant Status and Neovascular Age-­‐Related Macular Degeneration. Arch Ophthalmol.1993; 111: 104-­‐109. SanGiovanni J., Agron E., Meleth D. et al. Omega-­‐3 Long-­‐chain polyunsaturated fatty acid intake and 12-­‐year incidence of neovascular age-­‐related macular degeneration and central geographic atrophy: AREDS report 30, a prospective cohort study from the Age-­‐
Related Eye Disease Study. Am J Clin Nutr. 2009; 90:1601-­‐1607. SanGiovanni J., Chew E, Agron E. et al. Omega-­‐3 The relationship of dietary omega-­‐3 long chain polyunsaturated acid intake with incident age-­‐related macular degeneration: AREDS report 23. Am J Clin Nutr. 2008. 126: 1274-­‐9 Trieschmann M., Beatty S., Nolan J. et al. Changes in macular pigment optical density and serum concentrations of its constituent carotenoids following supplemental lutein and zeaxanthin: The LUNA study. Experimental Eye Research 2007. (84): 718-­‐728 Renzi L., Hammond B., Dengler M., et al. The relation between serum lipids and lutein and zeaxanthin in the serum and retina: Results from cross-­‐sectional, case control and case study designs. Lipids in Health and Disease 2012, 11:33. Doi:10.1186/1476-­‐511x-­‐
11-­‐33. Sangiovanni J, Chew E. The role of Omega-­‐3 long chain polyunsaturated fatty acids in health and disease of the retina. Progress in Retinal and Eye Research 2006. 87-­‐138 Mares JA, Voland R, Sondel SA, et al. Healthy Lifestyles Related to Subsequent Prevalence of Age-­‐Related Macular Degeneration. Arch Ophthalmol 2011. 129;470-­‐80. Knudtson KD, Klein R, Klein BEK. Physical activity and the 15-­‐year cumulative incidence of age-­‐related macular degeneration: the Beaver Dam Eye Study. British Journal of Ophthalmology 2006; 90: 1461-­‐63 Moeller SM, Parekh N, Tinker L, et al. Associations Between Intermediate Age-­‐Related Macular Degeneration and Lutein and Zeaxanthin in the Carotenoids in Age-­‐Related Eye Diseae Study (CAREDS). Arch Opthalmol. 2006; 124: 1151-­‐62 Seddon JM, Ajani UA, Sperduto RD. Dietary Carotenoids, vitamins A,C, and E, and advanced age-­‐related macular degeneration. Eye Disease Case-­‐Control Study Group. JAMA 1994. 272: 1413-­‐20 Huang H, Caballero B, Chang S, et al. The Efficacy and Safety of Mulivitamin and Mineral Supplement Use to Prevent Cancer and Chronic Disease in Adults: A Systemic Review for a National Institutes of the Health State-­‐of-­‐the-­‐Science Conference. Annals of Internal Medicine 2006. 145 (5) Delcourt C, Carriere I, Delage M, et al. Plasma Lutein and Zeaxanthin and Other Carotenoids as modifiable risk factors for age-­‐related macular degeneration and cataract: The POLA study. Invest Ophthalmol Sci 2006; 47:2329-­‐2335 Li B, Ahmed F, Bernstein PS, et al. Studies on the singlet oxygen scavenging mechanism of human macular pigment. Arch Biochem Biophys. 2010. 504: 56-­‐60 Richer S, Stiles W, Graham-­‐Hoffman K, et al. Randomized, double blind, placebo-­‐
controlled study of zeaxanthin and visual function in patients with atrophic age-­‐related macular degeneration: The Zeaxanthin and Visual Function Study (ZVF).Optometry 2011. 82:667-­‐680 Hollyfield, J. G., Bonilha, V. L., Rayborn, M. E., Yang, X. et al., Oxidative damage-­‐induced inflammation initiates age-­‐related macular degeneration. Nat. Med. 2008, 14, 194–198. Sabour-­‐Pickett S, Nolan J, Loughman J. A review of the evidence germane to the putative protective role of the macular carotenoids for age-­‐related macular degeneration. Mol Nutr. Food Res 2012, 56: 270-­‐286 Hodge, W. G., Barnes, D., Schachter, H. M., Pan, Y. I. et al.,Evidence for the effect of omega-­‐3 fatty acids on progression of age-­‐related macular degeneration: Asystematic review. Retina 2007, 27, 216–221. Chong, E. W., Kreis, A. J., Wong, T. Y., Simpson, J. A., Guymer, R. H., Dietary omega-­‐3 fatty acid and fish intake in the primary prevention of age-­‐related macular degeneration: a systematic review and meta-­‐analysis. Arch.Ophthalmol. 2008, 126, 826–833. The Age-­‐Related Eye Disease Study 2 (AREDS2) Research Group. Lutein + Zeaxanthin and Omega-­‐3 Fatty Acids for Age-­‐Related Macular Degeneration. The Age-­‐related eye disease study 2 (AREDS2) A randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2013. The Age-­‐Related Eye Disease Study 2 (AREDS2) Research Group. Lutein/Zeaxanthin for the Treatment of Age Related Cataract: AREDS2 Randomized Trial Report 4. JAMA Opthalmol. 2013