Download Solo-Rubrics

I
Outstanding
TONE
SCORE
Bow Placement +
Bow Stroke
+
Vibrato+
EXPRESSION
SCORE
Dynamics+
Phrasing+
Style+
Appropriate Tempo +
INTONATION
SCORE
Accuracy+
Pitch Adj. Skills+
TECHNIQUE
SCORE
SCORE
Note/Rest Value+
Steady Pulse
+
w/Accomp.+
NOTE ACCURACY
14
SCORE
13
12
11
10
12
10
10
9
9
8
9
8
9
8
Nearly all rhythms performed correctly
11
Notes performed correctly
10
Minor defects in articulation/technique
11
12
9
Minor problems in certain ranges or
passages
11
Consistent articulation/technique
10
Frequent use of expressive elements
11
12
SCORE
11
III
Average
Focus/resonance affected by range/
dynamics;
Vibrato usually present
12
Sensitive, artistic, appropriate
dynamics, phrasing, style
and tempo
Appearance+
Poise+
Posture+
II
Excellent
12
Rhythms performed correctly
Correct Notes+
STAGE PRESENCE
13
Well centered, needed adjustments
made quickly
Bow Management +
Inst.& Bow Hold +
LH Position
+
Posture+
RHYTHMIC
ACCURACY
14
Consistent focus/resonance in all
ranges/dynamics;
Vibrato enhances tone
RATING
STRING SOLO
Time: Date: Name of Soloist: School: 10
9
8
Nearly all notes performed correctly
8
7
IV
Poor
6
5
Focus/resonance are inconsistent;
Vibrato inconsistent
8
7
6
4
V
Ineffective
3
Minimal focus/resonance;
Limited use of vibrato
5
4
3
Inconsistent use of expressive
elements
Minimal expressive elements
7
4
6
5
Problems evident with some
adjustments being made
7
6
5
Inconsistent articulation/technique
7
6
5
Inconsistent rhythmic accuracy
7
6
5
Inconsistent note accuracy
3
2
Numerous problems evident with little
adjustment being made
4
3
2
Minimal articulation/technique
4
3
2
Minimal rhythmic accuracy
4
3
Minimal note accuracy
2
1
Lack of focus/resonance;
No vibrato
2
2
1
Lack of expressive elements
1
Undeveloped intonation with no
adjustments being made
1
Lack of articulation/technique
1
Lack of rhythmic accuracy
1
Lack of note accuracy
4
3
2
1
0
Outstanding
Excellent
Average
Poor
Ineffective
TOTAL
POINTS
COMMENTS: RATING TABLE:
I 69-80 Pts
(Outstanding)
II 52-68 Pts
(Excellent)
III 33-51 Pts
(Average)
IV 14-32 Pts
(Poor)
V 6-13 Pts.
(Ineffective)
Signature of Adjudicator
*Please write constructive criticisms and helpful comments on the back.
I
Outstanding
TONE
SCORE
Breathing+
Embouchure+
Posture+
EXPRESSION
SCORE
Dynamics+
Phrasing+
Style+
Appropriate Tempo +
INTONATION
SCORE
Individual+
w/Accomp.+
TECHNIQUE
SCORE
Articulation+
Fingering/Slide+
RHYTHMIC
ACCURACY
SCORE
12
14
13
11
12
12
11
10
SCORE
10
SCORE
Appearance+
Poise+
Posture+
10
9
8
9
8
9
8
Nearly all rhythms performed correctly
11
Notes performed correctly
9
Strong articulation and technical
performance with minor defects
11
12
10
Minor problems in certain ranges and/
or dynamic levels or passages
11
12
9
Frequent use of expressive elements
11
Well centered, needed adjustments
made quickly
10
III
Average
Focus and resonance are affected by
range and dynamic levels
12
Musical, sensitive, artistic use of
dynamics, phrasing, style, & tempo
Rhythms performed correctly
Correct Notes+
Fingerings+
STAGE PRESENCE
13
II
Excellent
Accurate representation of articulation
and technical skills
Note/Rest Value+
Steady Pulse +
w/Accomp.+
NOTE ACCURACY
14
Focused and resonant in all ranges
and dynamic levels
RATING
WIND SOLO
Time: Date: Name of Soloist: School: 10
9
8
Nearly all notes performed correctly
8
7
IV
Poor
6
Focus and resonance are inconsistent
8
7
6
Inconsistent use of expressive
elements
7
6
5
Problems evident with some
adjustments being made
7
6
5
Inconsistent application of articulation
and technical skills
7
6
5
Inconsistent rhythmic accuracy
7
6
5
Inconsistent note accuracy
5
4
V
Ineffective
3
Seldom focused or resonant
5
4
3
Lacks expression most of the time
4
3
2
Numerous problems evident with little
adjustment being made
4
3
2
Minimal uniform articulation and
technical skills
4
3
2
Minimal rhythmic accuracy
4
3
Minimal note accuracy
2
2
1
Not focused or resonant
2
1
Notes are performed with minimal
expression
1
Undeveloped with no adjustments
being made
1
Lack of articulation and technical skills
1
Lack of rhythmic accuracy
1
Lack of note accuracy
4
3
2
1
0
Outstanding
Excellent
Average
Poor
Ineffective
TOTAL
POINTS
COMMENTS: RATING TABLE:
I 69-80 Pts
(Outstanding)
II 52-68 Pts
(Excellent)
III 33-51 Pts
(Average)
IV 14-32 Pts
(Poor)
V 6-13 Pts.
(Ineffective)
Signature of Adjudicator
*Please write constructive criticisms and helpful comments on the back.
I
Outstanding
TECHNIQUE
Hand Pos. (Right)
Hand Pos. (Left)
Instrument Setup
Appropriate Sticking
SCORE
+
+
+
+
-
RHYTHMIC
ACCURACY
Note/Rest Value
Steady Pulse
+ + -
Appl. of Rudiments
Correct Notes (Mallets)
Intonation (Timpani)
Ensemble w/accomp
+++ + + -
Playing Spot
Stick/Mallet Sel.
Tuning
15
16
SCORE
14
15
15
14
14
13
Accurate and appropriate for music
selection and instrument
SCORE
+ + +-
STAGE PRESENCE
Appearance
Poise
Posture
16
Musical, sensitive, artistic,
appropriate dynamics, phrasing, style
and tempo
+ ++ + -
TONE
14
Rhythms performed correctly
SCORE
NOTE ACCURACY
15
Accurate technical skills
SCORE
EXPRESSION
Dynamics
Phrasing
Style (Rolls)
Appropriate Tempo
16
12
11
RATING
PERCUSSION SOLO
Time: Date: Name of Soloist: School: II
Excellent
13
12
11
III
Average
10
9
Some minor defects in technical skills
13
12
11
10
Nearly all rhythms performed
correctly
13
12
11
10
Frequent use of expressive elements
12
11
10
Mostly accurate and appropriate for
music selection and instrument
10
9
8
8
IV
Poor
7
6
5
Inconsistent technical skills
9
8
7
8
6
7
6
Inconsistent use of expressive
elements
9
8
7
5
6
2
5
4
5
4
3
2
5
4
Minimal note accuracy
4
3
1
Lack of rhythmic accuracy
3
Notes are performed with minimal
expression
6
1
Lack of technical skills
Minimal rhythmic accuracy
Inconsistent accuracy and
application for music selection and
instrument
7
3
Minimal technical skills
Inconsistent rhythmic accuracy
9
4
V
Ineffective
2
1
Lacks expression most of the time
3
2
Lack of note accuracy
2
1
Characteristic tone for instrument and
music selection
Satisfactory tone for instrument and
music selection
Inconsistent tone for instrument and
music selection
Lacks characteristic tone for
instrument and music selection
Development in all
areas needed
5
4
3
2
1
Outstanding
Excellent
Average
Poor
Ineffective
SCORE
+++-
1
COMMENTS: TOTAL POINTS
RATING TABLE:
I 69-80 Pts
(Outstanding)
II 51-68 Pts
(Excellent)
III 32-50 Pts
(Average)
IV 17-31 Pts
(Poor)
V 6-18 Pts.
(Ineffective)
Signature of Adjudicator
*Please write constructive criticisms and helpful comments on the back.
I
Outstanding
TONE
SCORE
Breath Mgmnt.
+
Focus+
Freedom+
Resonance+
Posture+
EXPRESSION
SCORE
Dynamics
+
Phrasing
+
Stylistic Accuracy +
INTONATION
SCORE
16
15
14
MEMORIZATION
MEMORY
SCORE
10
9
9
10
8
No memory lapses
-3
6
6
6
5
7
6
5
-5
Memory lapses affected performance
3
4
2
5
2
Numerous problems evident with
minimal adjustment being made
4
3
Undeveloped intonation with no
adjustments being made
1
Lack of note accuracy
2
1
Minimal use of diction elements
Ineffective use of diction elements
3
2
Poor
-8
1
2
4
-7
1
Lacks expression most of the time
3
3
1
Proper tone production is not evident
Minimal note accuracy
5
-6
2
Notes are performed with minimal
expression
Average
-4
3
4
4
Inconsistent use of diction elements
6
4
5
5
V
Ineffective
Elements of proper tone production
are seldom present
Inconsistent note accuracy
Excellent
-2
7
7
7
7
Outstanding
6
Intonation problems evident with some
adjustments being made
8
Strong use of diction elements with
minor defects
8
8
8
9
7
Inconsistent use of expressive
elements
9
9
8
IV
Poor
Tone production is inconsistent
Nearly all notes performed correctly
9
-1
11
10
10
Expressive use of diction elements
0
10
Minor problems in certain ranges and/
or dynamic levels or passages
11
10
12
11
Notes performed correctly
SCORE
11
Frequent use of expressive elements
11
12
III
Average
Tone production is affected by range
and dynamic levels
12
12
12
13
Pitch is well centered/needed
adjustments made quickly
Appearance+
Facial Expression +
Poise+
II
Excellent
13
14
13
SCORE
Vowels+
Consonants+
Language+
Word Stress
+
STAGE PRESENCE
14
Proper tone production in all ranges
and dynamic levels
SCORE
Notes+
Rhythm+
Tempo+
DICTION/LANGUAGE
15
Musical, sensitive, artistic use of
dynamics, phrasing and stylistic
accuracy
Intervals+
Pitch Adj. Skills+
Adequate Breath+
NOTE ACCURACY
16
RATING
VOCAL SOLO
Time: Date: Name of Soloist: School: 1
Ineffective
-9
-10
-11
-12
Major memory lapses
TOTAL
POINTS
COMMENTS: RATING TABLE:
I 69-80 Pts
(Outstanding)
II 51-68 Pts
(Excellent)
III 32-50 Pts
(Average)
IV 15-31 Pts
(Poor)
V 6-14 Pts.
(Ineffective)
Signature of Adjudicator
*Please write constructive criticisms and helpful comments on the back.