Download Scapular Kinematics: So how is the scapula supposed to move?

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts
Transcript
Scapular Kinematics: So how is the scapula supposed to move?
Lori Michener PhD, ATC, PT, SCS
Department of Physical Therapy
Rm 100, West Hospital
Virginia Commonwealth University – Medical College of Virginia
Richmond, VA 23298
[email protected]
Methods of measurement of scapular kinematics
1. Two – dimensional: Radiographs, goniometers, video
2. Three – dimensional: Radiographs, digitizers, magnetic tracking device
Scapular Kinematics
Ant / Post
Tilting
Internal / External
Rotation
AC
Ant / Post
Tilting
Up / Down Rotation
q
Normal motion
q 3 Rotations:
Upward Rotation (UR) / Downward rotation (DR)
Internal rotation (IR) / External rotation (ER)
Anterior tilt (AT) / Posterior tilt (PT)
q 2 Positions / Translations:
Superior / Inferior
Anterior / Posterior
q Translations defined by clavicular motion because the scapula is constrained at AC jt
q
With GH elevation, via direct bone pins the scapula :
q Rotations:
q UR (Mean = 50°)
q ER (Mean = 24°)
q PT (Mean = 30°)
q Positions / Translations:
q Clavicular elevate (Mean = 10°)
q Clavicular retraction (Mean = 21°)
(McClure et al, JSES, 2001):
q
Scapulohumeral Rhyt hm
q 2:1 is standard
q 5:4 (Poppen & Walker, JBJS, 1976); 1.7: 1 (McClure et al, JSES, 2001); 1.5 – 2.4: 1 (Graichen et
al, Clin Ortho, 2000); 2.15 : 1, 0-30: 4.23 : 1 (> H), 91-120: 1.65: 1 (Padua D et al, MSSE,
2003)
Scapular Kinematic Control and Limitations by:
q Scapular muscles, RC muscles, Spine (thoracic and cervical), pathology of the
shoulder joint, ligaments, GH joint capsule, clavicle (via AC joint)
Scapular muscle fatigue and weakness:
q ↑ed UR w/ upper trap & serratus anterior fatigue (McQuade et al, JOSPT, 1998)
q ↓ed UR and PT w/ upper & lower trap fatigue (McQuade et al, Clin BIomech,1995)
q ↓ed PT, ER, UR w/ ↓ed serratus & ↑ed lower trap activity (SAIS) (Ludewig & Cook, Phys
Ther, 2000)
q
External load alters kinematics; fatigue??
(Pascoal et al, Clin Biomech, 2000; McQuade, 1995)
Rotator cuff muscle fatigue and weakness:
q ↓ed PT with infraspinatus & teres minor fatigue
q Same effect with RC tendonitis?
(Tsai et al, Arch Phys Med Rehab, 2003)
Muscle fatigue and weakness: scapular or rotator cuff muscles
q Alters scapular kinematics
q Less scapular stability?
q Is it a motor control issue, rather than strength?
q Altered GH kinematics?....evidence for this later
q Implication: overhead athletes / workers?
Spinal posture
q ↑ed cervical flexion
q ↓ed UR & PT (Ludewig & Cook, J Occ Rehab, 1996)
q ↑ed thoracic flex (change of 12 degrees from upright ):
q ↑ed (sup) position, & ↓ed posterior tilt
q ↓ed GH abduction force (Kaebeatse et al, Arch Phys Med Rehab, 1999)
q Slouched posture vs. upright:
q ↓ed posterior tilt & ↓ed external rotation (Finley & Lee, Arch Phys Med Rehab, 2003)
Others
q
q
q
Ligaments, Clavicle : No evidence
Capsule: posterior
q Simulated tightness and clinical exam:
q ↓ed GH IR, limited cross-body adduction at 90 deg (PSTT), ↑ed superior
translation of HH (Tyler, et al, AJSM, 2000; Harryman et al; JBJS, 1990; Branch et al; AJSM, 1995)
Pathology
q SAIS, RCT, instability, AC jt arthritis, Humeral head position
Impingement Syndrome and scapular kinematics
q Kinematics (during glenohumeral elevation):
q ↓ed PT (Ludewig & Cook, Phys Ther, 2000., Lukasiewicz et al, JOSPT, 1999.,
McClure et al, JOSPT, 2002;
Endo et al, J Orthop Sci, 2001 (x-ray))
↓ed ER (Ludewig & Cook, Phys Ther, 2000; Hebert, LJ et al, Am Phys Med Rehab, 2002)
q ↓ed UR (Ludewig & Cook, Phys Ther, 2000; Endo et al, J Orthop Sci, 2001 (x-ray))
Position:
q ↑ed winging (AT & IR) (Warner JJ et al, 1992)
q ↑ed Sup & Med trans (Lukasiewicz et al, JOSPT, 1999)
Adequate scapular motion required for “maintenance” of adequate SA space
Pattern of decreased UR, ER, and PT has been demonstrated to decrease the area of the
SA space (Solem-Bertolf, Clin Ortho, 1993)
q
q
q
q
Rotator Cuff Full- thickness tears and scapular kinematics
q ↑ed humeral head superior translation during simulated or active GH elevation; in
patients or cadavers with FT RCT (Thompson, AJSM, 1996; Poppen & Walker, 1976; Deutsch, 1996;
Paletta, 1997; Yamaguchi, 2000)
q
q
No evidence of altered scapular kinematics
This may cause altered scapular position or kinematics with RC weakness
Glenohumeral instability and scapular kinematics
q Position: ↑ed winging (AT & IR) (Warner JJ et al, 1992)
q Abnormal scapular DR disrupts the “shelf mechanism” of the inferior glenoid fossa
support of the humeral head…resulting in inferior instability (Itoi et al; JSES; 1992)
Adhesive capsulitis and scapular kinematics
q Patients with shoulder adhesive capsulitis (n=10)
q Altered SHR, increased contribution of scapular upward rotation
q Altered in elevation in scaption, flexion, and abd (Vermeulen HM et al, Ann Rheum Dis, 2002)
q With a stiff GH joint, the ST articulation appears to be able to compensate to allow for
total shoulder ROM
Altered scapular kinematics
q Can we capture differences?
q With treatment or comparison to healthy?
q Consider the “robustness” of the neuromuscular system
q Is the “best” measure to examine kinematics with a combination of all 3 rotations or 3
rotations and 2 positions
q Is a larger insult needed to see “obvious” measurable differences?
Scapular Dyskinesis: Examination and Intervention in Patients with Upper Quarter Dysfunctions
Clinical Evaluation of the Scapula: Phil McClure PhD, PT Arcadia University
-1Existing Literature
Kibler Am J Sp Med 981
Sobush et al JOSPT 96 (Lennie Test)2
Odom et al Phys Ther 20013
Johnson et al JOSPT 20014
Basic Problem: Attempts to capture a 3-dimensional, dynamic phenomenon with static, 2dimensional measurements are likely to fail
Judgements Based on Visual Observation
Kibler et al. JSES 20025
Type 1 (Inf angle prominence)
TypeII (medial border prominence)
Type III (early scap elevation)
Intertester K=(0.31-0.42)
Intratester Κ=(0.40-0.59)
McClure et al JOSPT 2003 (abstract)6
7 prescribed tasks
Winging (medial or inf angle) OR Dysrhythmia (abnormal upward rot or elevation)
Intertester Kappa=0.6, 72% agreement
Tate et al JOSPT 2004 (abstract)7
-validation of visual judgements using 3D motion analysis
-Dyskinesia group showed ant tilt, internal rotation, protraction
Our Current Approach
Scapular Dyskinesia Test
- 5 test movement (flexion, abduction with and without weight, flip test)
- Winging OR Dysrhythmia
- posterior and superior view
Scapular Reposition Test
- alteration of symptoms during provocative tests by repositioning scapula
- move scapula toward posterior tilt and external rotation by grasping shoulder girdle from
behind and bringing forearm obliquely across medial border
- look for decreased pain or increased strength for + test
Other Important Considerations
Specific muscle testing
- Trapezius
- Serratus Anterior
- Distinguishing between true weakness (palsy) vs motor control deficit
Key Areas of Hypomobility
- upper thoracic extension
- pec minor
- posterior capsule
Scapular Dyskinesis: Examination and Intervention in Patients with Upper Quarter Dysfunctions
Clinical Evaluation of the Scapula: Phil McClure PhD, PT Arcadia University
-2References
1.
Kibler WB. Role of the Scapula in Athletic Shoulder Function. Am J Sports Med. 1998;26(2):325337.
2.
Sobush DC, Simoneau GG, Dietz KE, Levene JA, Grossman RE, Smith WB. The Lennie Test for
Measuring Scapular Position in Healthy Young Adult Females: A Reliability and Validity Study. J
Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1996;23(1):39-50.
3.
Odom CJ, Taylor AB, Hurd CE, Denegar CR. Measurement of scapular asymetry and assessment
of shoulder dysfunction using the Lateral Scapular Slide Test: a reliability and validity study. Phys
Ther. Feb 2001;81(2):799-809.
4.
Johnson MP, McClure PW, Karduna AR. New method to assess scapular upward rotation in
subjects with shoulder pathology. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2001;31(2):81-89.
5.
Kibler WB, Uhl TL, Maddux JW, Brooks PV, Zeller B, McMullen J. Qualitative clinical
evaluation of scapular dysfunction: a reliability study. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. Nov-Dec
2002;11(6):550-556.
6.
McClure P, Tate A, Egner M, Greenberg E, Yops R, Neff N. Development and Inter-rater
Reliability Testing of a System of Classification for Scapular Dysfunction. Journal Orthopaedic
and Sports Physical Therapy. 2003;33(2):A23-24.
7.
Tate A, McClure P, Neff N. Validity of a Visual Classification System for Scapular Motion. J
Orth Sport Phys Ther. 2004;34:A42.
SCAPULAR DYSKINESIS: EXAMINATION AND INTERNVENTION IN PATIENTS WITH
UPPER EXTREMITY DYSFUNCTION
REHABILITATION CONSIDERATIONS
Tim L. Uhl PT, PhD, ATC Division of Athletic Training, Department of Rehabilitation Science, University of
Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40536, [email protected]
Description:
Rehabilitation goals following shoulder injury is to implement a continuum of exercises that
restores optimal function while protecting the anatomic integrity of the injured or repaired
tissues. The exercises should allow a progression of intensity and load that is within the healing
tissue’s capabilities. A key element in rehabilitation is the successful transition in the flow of
exercises from the protected exercises of the acute phase to the functional phase. Emphasis of
this presentation will be on the component of scapular muscle exercises. The scapular muscles
are not exercised in isolation of the other shoulder musculatures but need to work synergistically
with the other shoulder girdle musculature for upper extremity function. Exercise selection for
scapular musculature strengthening exercises based on EMG research is readily available. 7-9,26
This presentation attempts to organize the previous available information along with new
information obtained by the presenter into logical progression from low to high demand
exercises in order to better rehabilitate your patients.
Objectives:
To describe treatment interventions to facilitate mobility, strength and neuromuscular control of
the shoulder.
To provide evidence and or scientific rationale that is available to support these interventions.
Key Points:
•
Therapeutic Exercises are beneficial in rehabilitation of patients with
• Shoulder instability11
• Rotator cuff pathology 12,25
• Appear to be helpful in recover of associated scapular dysfunctions long thoracic
neuropathy and snapping scapula35
•
Proximal Stability
• Without proximal control distal structures are moving on poor foundation
• Motion and force applied by distal upper extremity initiates proximally 17,37
• Strength and endurance of upper extremity is dependent on trunk16
•
Posture of spine effects scapular position, motion, and shoulder strength14
•
Position and motion of the scapula effects glenohumeral joint function and subacromial
space
• Impingement patients have decreased scapular mobility19,21
• Tight pectoralis major decreases scapular motion 4
•
Neuromuscular Control of scapular musculature is diminished in the presence of
pathology 19,29,30
• Diminished force production of scapular musculature6
• Scapular muscular activation diminished due to imbalance and pain27,29,30
•
•
Exercises that facilitate posterior tilting and external rotation (retraction) of
scapula are critical for overhead function
Exercise that facilitate lateral translation and internal rotation (protraction) of
scapula are critical for accelerating sport implements and absorbing energy
•
•
Therapeutic Interventions need to address:
Proximal stability and posture
• Flexibility to reverse anterior tilt and internal rotation posture
• Shoulder mobility associated with improved function23
• Rehabilitation programs may positively effect posture and scapular position34
• Integrate the kinetic chain to facilitate activation of trunk24
• Transmission of force along kinetic chain typically incorporates rotation (Serape
muscles)
• Rehabilitation of the shoulder should incorporate exercises to promote erect
trunk posture and stable scapular position.31
•
Strengthening exercises should progress from low to high demand22
• Progressive resistive exercises can increase shoulder strength and improve
patient function23,34
• Avoiding inflaming healing tissues
• Pain inhibits muscle activation at a central level 5,28
• Altering central motor drive may effect muscle activation patterns for
movement
• Arm supported activities diminishes muscular demand36
• Progression of muscular demand can be monitored by load placed through arm33
•
Re-establish neuromuscular control of shoulder musculature
• Closed kinetic chain exercises promote joint compression and activation of
proximal musculature to provide stabilization1
• Scapular re-education can be accomplished through several tasks
• Consider upper trapezius/serratus anterior EMG ratio during exercise selection to
minimize superior scapular translation (shrug) and facilitate medial scapular
border control20
Clinical Application
Incorporation of rehabilitation techniques that address trunk, scapular, and humeral mobility and
control appear to effectively address impairment of diminished strength, motion, and pain
commonly seen in patients with musculoskeletal disorders. Gradual introduction of therapeutic
exercises while minimizing inflammation of healing tissue and restoring neuromuscular control is
the ultimate goal of re-establishing function.
Acute Phase Exercises graded by (%MVIC + S.D.)
Exercise
Deltoid
Supraspinatus
N.A. = Not available
Up.
Trap.
Ser.
Ant.
Low.
Trap.
Supine PROM15
3+1
1+6
1+2
2+2
2+2
Forward Bow15
2+1
5+6
2+3
5+4
2+2
Sidelying
Elevation10
10 + 6
2+6
2+3
11 + 7
8+5
Towel Slides10
12 + 7
7+7
4+3
7+4
1+1
Supine Pressup 1#15
11 + 4
3+7
1 +3
16 + 8
1+1
T-Bar10
24 + 9
9+9
9+8
17 + 6 10 + 10
Sub-acute Phase Exercises graded by (%MVIC + S.D.)
Exercise
Deltoid
SupraUp.
spinatus
Trap.
Ser. Ant.
Low.
Trap.
Wedge
Press-up15
20 + 9
8 + 11
11 + 11
17 + 8
2+1
Ball Rolls10
25 + 8
11 + 10
9+3
21 + 7
5+4
Ipsilateral
Step- up15
21 + 7
22 + 20
21 + 8
15 + 5
13 + 6
Active
Elevation10
32 + 8
19 + 12
19 + 9
23 + 7
19 + 8
Standing
Press-up15
30 + 11
30 + 17
24 + 8
29 + 13
9+5
PK
39 + 16
PK
34 + 23
PK
10 + 6
Rows with
elastic
tubing7,13
N.A.
N.A
AVG
9+2
AVG
9+6
AVG
5+4
Shrugs with
elastic
tubing13
Forward
Punch13
PK
44 + 25
PK
53 + 29
PK
31 + 24
AVG
10 + 6
AVG
13 + 8
AVG
5+4
N.A.
PK
39 + 23
PK
48 + 83
AVG
9+4
AVG
8+3
N.A.
PK
49 + 14
N.A.
N.A.
AVG
10 + 3
N.A. = Not available
PK = peak amplitude during phase
AVG = average amplitude during phase
Functional Phase Exercises graded by (%MVIC + S.D.)
Exercise
Deltoid
SupraUp.
spinatus
Trap.
Ser. Ant.
Low.
Trap.
Scaption >
120°9,32
72 + 13
64 + 28
79 + 19
96 + 24
61 + 19
Scaption <
80°2,9
91 + 26
82 + 27
72 + 19
62 + 18
50 + 21
Unilateral
Rows9,32
72 + 20
N.A.
63 + 17
14 + 6
45 + 17
N.A.
N.A.
79 + 18
43 + 17
97 + 16
Prone
Flexion @
135° ABD9
Diag Flex/
Horiz Add/
Ext. Rot.9
N.A.
N.A.
66 + 10
100 + 24
39 + 15
72 + 24
56 + 48
64 + 26
82 + 36
N.A.
N.A
N.A
7+ 3
62 + 19
11 + 5
N.A.
N.A
50
140
30
79 + 20
78 + N.A.
66+ 18
9+3
74 + 21
N.A.
50 + N.A.
20+ 18
57 + 22
79 + 21
Military
Press26,32
Unilateral
shoulder
press supine
w/plus9
Push up
w/plus18
Prone
Horizontal
ABD3,9
Prone ER @
90°3,9
N.A. = Not available
References
1. Alexander CM, Harrison PJ. Reflex connections from forearm and hand afferents
to shoulder girdle muscles in humans. Exp Brain Res 2003; 148:277-282.
2. Alpert SW, Pink MM, Jobe FW, McMahon PJ, Mathiyakom W. Electromyographic
analysis of deltoid and rotator cuff function under varying loads and speeds. J
Shoulder Elbow Surg 2000; 9(1):47-57.
3. Blackburn TA, McLeod WD, White B, Wofford L. EMG analysis of posterior rotator
cuff exercises. J Athl Train 1990; 25:40-45.
4. Borstad JD, Ludewig PM. The effect of pectoralis minor length on scapular
kinematics in subjects without shoulder pathology. Journal of Orthopaedic and
Sports Physical Therapy 34[1], A16. 2004.
Ref Type: Abstract
5. Brox JI, Roe C, Saugen E, Vollestad NK. Isometric abduction muscle activation in
patients with rotator tendinosis of the shoulder. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1997;
78(11): 1260-1267:-1267.
6. Cools AM, Witvrouw E, Declercq GA, Vanderstraeten GG, Cambier DC. Evaluation
of isokinetic force production and associated muscle activity in the scapular
rotators during a protraction-retraction movement in overhead athletes with
impingement symptoms. British Journal of Sports Medicine 2004; 38:64-68.
7. Decker MJ, Hintermeister RA, Faber KJ, Hawkins RJ. Serratus anterior muscle
activity during selected rehabilitation exercises. Am J Sports Med 1999; 27(6):784791.
8. Ekstrom RA, Bifulco KM, Lopau CJ, Andersen CF, Gough JR. Comparing the
function of the upper and lower parts of the serratus anterior muscle using surface
electromyography. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2004; 34(5):235-243.
9. Ekstrom RA, Donatelli RA, Soderberg G. Surface electromyographic analysis of
exercises for the trapezius and serratus anterior muscles. J Orthop Sports Phys
Ther 2003; 33(5):247-258.
10. Gaunt B, Uhl TL, Humphrey L, Calico RM, McCluskey GM. Electromyography of
shoulder and scapular musculature during exercise strengthen progression. J
Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2004.
11. Gibson K, Growse A, Korda L, Wray E, MacDermid JC. The effectiveness of
rehabilitation for nonoperative management of shoulder instability:a systematic
review. Journal of Hand Therapy 2004; 17:229-242.
12. Grant HJ, Arthur A, Pichora DR. Evaluation of interventions for rotator cuff
pathology. Journal of Hand Therapy 2004; 17:274-299.
13. Hintermeister RA, Lange G, Schultheis J, Bey MJ, Hawkins RJ. Electromyographic
activity and applied load during shoulder rehabilitation exercises using elastic
resistance. Am J Sports Med 1998; 26(2):210-220.
14. Kebaetse M, McClure P, Pratt N. Thoracic position effect on shoulder range of
motion, strength, and three-dimensional scapular kinetics. Arch Phys Med Rehabil
1999; 80:945-950.
15. Lawson L, Klare K, Uhl TL. Electromyographic assessment of 13 shoulder
rehabilitation exercises. 2003.
Ref Type: Unpublished Work
16. Le Bozec S, Bouisset S. Do bimanual isometric push efforts in humans stop as a
consequence of postural muscle exhaustion? Neuroscience Letters 2004; 356:6165.
17. Le Bozec S, Lesne J, Bouisset S. A sequence of postural muscle excitation
precedes and accompanies isometric ramp efforts performed while sitting in
human subjects. Neuroscience Letters 2001; 303:72-76.
18. Lear JL, Gross MT. An Electromyographical Analysis of the Scapular Stabilizing
Synergists During a Push-up Progression. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 1998;
28(3):146-157.
19. Ludewig PM, Cook TM. Alterations in shoulder kinematics and associated muscle
activity in people with symptoms of shoulder impingement. Phys Ther 2000;
80(3):276-291.
20. Ludewig PM, Hoff MS, Osowski EE, Meschke SA, Rupp S. Relative balance of
serratus anterior and upper trapezius muscle activity during push-up exercises. Am
J Sports Med 2004; 32(2):484-493.
21. Lukasiewicz AC, McClure P, Michener L, Pratt N, Sennett B. Comparison of 3dimensional scapular position and orientation between subjects with and without
shoulder impingement. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 1999; 29(10):574-586.
22. McCann PD, Wootten ME, Kadaba MP, Bigliani LU. A kinematic and
electromyographic study of shoulder rehabilitation exercises. Clin Orthop Rel Res
1993; 288:179-188.
23. McClure PW, Bialker J, Neff N, Williams G, Karduna A. Shoulder function and 3dimensional kinematics in people with shoulder impingement syndrome before and
after a 6-week exercise program. Phys Ther 2004; 84(9):832-848.
24. McMullen J, Uhl TL. A kinetic chain approach for shoulder rehabilitation. J Athl
Train 2000; 35(3):329-337.
25. Michener LA, Walsworth MK, Burnet EN. Effectiveness of rehabilitation for patients
with subacromial impingement syndrome:Subacromial impingement syndrome.
Journal of Hand Therapy 2004; 17:152-164.
26. Moseley JB, Jobe FW, Pink M, Perry J, Tibone J. EMG analysis of the scapular
muscles during a shoulder rehabilitation program. Am J Sports Med 1992;
20((2)):128-134.
27. Reddy AS, Mohr KJ, Pink MM, Jobe FW. Electromyographic analysis of the deltoid
and rotator cuff muscles in persons with subacromial impingement. J Shoulder
Elbow Surg 2000; 9(6):519-523.
28. Roe C, Brox JI, Saugen E, Vollestad NK. Muscle activation in the contralateral
passive shoulder during isometric shoulder abduction in patients with unilateral
shoulder pain. Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology 2000; 10(2): 69-77:77.
29. Ruwe PA, Pink M, Jobe FW, Perry J, Scovazzo ML. The normal and the painful
shoulders during the breastroke, electromyographic and cinematographic analysis
of twelve muscles. Am J Sports Med 1994; 22((6)):789-796.
30. Scovazzo ML, Browne A, Pink M, Jobe FW, Kerrigan J. The painful shoulder
during freestyle swimming, an electromyographic cinematographic analysis of
twelve muscles. Am J Sports Med 1991; 19((6)):577-582.
31. Smith J, Kotajarvi BR, Padgett DJ, Eischen JJ. Effect of scapular protraction and
retraction on isometric shoulder elevation strength. Archieves of Physical Medicine
and Rehabilitation 83, 367-370. 2002.
Ref Type: Abstract
32. Townsend H, Jobe FW, Pink M, Perry J. Electromyographic analysis of the
glenohumeral muscles during a baseball rehabilitation program. Am J Sports Med
1991; 19:264-272.
33. Uhl TL, Carver TJ, Mattacola CG, Mair SD, Nitz AJ. Shoulder musculature
activation during upper extremity weight-bearing exercise. J Orthop Sports Phys
Ther 2003; 33(3):109-117.
34. Wang C-H, McClure P, Pratt N, Nobilini R. Stretching and strengthening exercises:
their effect on three-dimensional scapular kinematics. Arch Phys Med Rehabil
1999; 80:923-929.
35. Warner JJ, Navarro RA. Serratus anterior dysfunction. Recognition and treatment.
Clin Orthop Rel Res 1998;(349):139-148.
36. Wise MB, Uhl TL, Mattacola CG, Nitz AJ, Kibler WB. The effect of limb support on
muscle activation during shoulder exercises. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2004;
13(6):614-620.
37. Zattara M, Bouisset S. Posturo-kinetic organisation during the early phase of
voluntary upper limb movement. 1 Normal subjects. Journal of Neurology,
Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry 1988; 51:956-965.