Download Shoulder Reconstruction

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts
no text concepts found
Transcript
Shoulder Reconstruction
Department of Orthopaedic, CKUH
Sen-Jen Lee
Reference: Orthopaedic Knowledge Update 6
Muscular Function and Anatomy of the
Glenohumeral Joint

Static stabilizer:
 Capsuloligamentous structures
•

Superior, middle, and inferior GH ligaments
Dynamic stabilizer:
 Rotator cuff muscles
•
•

Center the humeral head in the glenoid fossa
Long head of the biceps tendon
Proprioceptive mechanisms
 Ruffini receptors and pacinian corpuscles
 Ligamentomuscular reflex arcs
Anatomy
Arthroscopy of the Shoulder
As a diagnostic tool
 Arthroscopic subacromial decompression
 For treating frozen shoulder and rotator cuff
tears
 For treating superior labral tears (SLAP lesions)
 For treating dislocating or subluxating
shoulders

Rotator Cuff Disease

Etiology
 Mechanical impingement
 Compression of the supraspinatus tendon between the
acromion and the greater tuberosity
 Intrinsic degenerative processes within the aging tendon
Tendon inflammation, tendon and bursal fibrosis,
tendon tears (partial- or full-thickness), and cuff
tear arthropathy
 Acromial morphology

 Flat, curved, or hooked
Rotator Cuff Disease

In a biomechanical study
 The acromial undersurface and rotator cuff were in closest
proximity between 60° and 120° of elevation
 Contact was consistently centered on the supraspinatus
insertion

Intrinsic histological and mechanical properties
 The bursal-side layer: tendon bundles
 The joint-side layer: a complex of tendon, ligament, and joint
capsule
 The strain-to-yield point and ultimate failure stress
• Bursal-side layer were twice as great as those of the jointside layer
Impingement Syndrome
Common cause of shoulder pain
 Clinical diagnosis

 History and physical examination

Radiographs
 Supraspinatus outlet view:
•
Subacromial spurs and the morphology of the acromion
Functional impingement instability
 Internal impingement

 Impingement of the undersurface of the rotator cuff on the
posterior glenoid rim
Pathogenesis of Rotator Cuff Lesion
Overuse
10 Impingement
-Outlet Stenosis
20 Impingement
-Instability
10 Degeneration
-Insubstance tears
-Aging
-Avascularity
Extrinsic
Rotator Cuff Injuries
Tendinitis / Tendinosis
Intrinsic
Three Stages of Impingement Lesions

Stage I: edema and hemorrhage
 Reversible lesion, < 25 years old

Stage II: fibrosis and tendinitis
 Recurrent pain with activity, 25 - 40 years old.

Stage III: tears of the rotator cuff, biceps
ruptures, and bone changes
 Progressive disability, > 40 years old.
 Neer C.S ii, 1983
Impingement Syndrome
Extrinsic Factors



95 % of RCT are initiated by impingement wear rather than
circulatory impairment or trauma.
Shape and slope of the acromion.
Impingement wear, then “acute extension” of a tear.

Neer II, JBJS,1972 & Cli.Orthop, 1983
Intrinsic Factors
Partial articular-sided tears
with normal acromial
morphology
 Cuff degeneration (aging and
trauma)  RCT

Ozaki et al: JBJS, 1988
(A study in cadaver)

Inflammation  Angioblastic
hyperplasia  fibrosis,
calcification, RCT.
Nirschl et al: Instr. Course Lect. 1989
Diagnosis of Impingement Syndrome:
Hx, PE

Elevation
RCT: sensitivity: 91%
specificity: 75 %
Ext. R
Int. R.
Neer imp.sign
Imping. Test
Hawkin imp. sign
Painful arc
Supraspinatus test
Speed’s test
Lift-off test
Image Study of the Rotator Cuff
X-ray: scapular AP/Lat
 Arthrogram
 MRI
 Ultrasonogram

Ultrasonogram of the Shoulder(I)


High resolution, real-time equipment
A 7.5 MHz linear array transducer
 ATL’s high definition imaging (HDI) 5000 (NCKU)
Rotator Cuff Tear
Impingement Syndrome
Nonsurgical Treatment

Corticosteroid injections
•
•
•

Better pain relief and greater increases in active
motion
No more than 2 subacromial cortisone injections
Be avoided in patients with rotator cuff tear
Anti-inflammatory medications and physical
therapy
•
67% satisfactory results
Impingement Syndrome
Surgical Treatment

Open acromioplasty
 More excellent results

Arthroscopic acromioplasty




Reduced early perioperative morbidity
Easier rehabilitation
Decreased hospitalization time
Ability to detect and treat concomitant glenohumeral
pathology
 Better preservation of the deltoid origin
 A smaller surgical scar
Impingement Syndrome

Failure of arthroscopic acromioplasty
 Improper diagnosis
 Inadequate bone removal
 Technical errors
•
Overaggressive bone removal leading to deltoid injury or in rare
cases to acromial fracture
Partial-thickness Tears

Partial-thickness tears
 Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and arthroscopy
 Arthroscopic debridement and acromioplasty

Recent study:
(>50% thickness of the tendon )
 15/32 good results in arthroscopic debridement and
acromioplasty
 31/33 excellent or good results in arthroscopic
acromioplasty and mini-open repair
Full-thickness Tears

Symptomatic full-thickness rotator cuff tears
 Anterior acromioplasty and rotator cuff repair

Factors in decision-making





Severity and duration of symptoms
Functional limitations
Patient demands and expectations
Tear size, and tear location
Factors affect the results of rotator cuff repair
 Surgical technique
 The extent of damage to the cuff
 Postoperative rehabilitation
Treatments of Full-thickness Tears
Arthroscopically assisted or mini-open repair
 Massive rotator cuff tears

 Surgical options
•
•
•
•
Subacromial decompression and debridement
Mobilization and repair of existing local tendons
Transfer of a distant tendon (latissimus dorsi, teres major, or
trapezius)
Reconstruction using grafts or synthetic materials
Surgical Options
Open procedure:
Arthroscopic procedure:
Prosthetic Arthroplasty

Indications and results
 For osteoarthritic patient
• Excellent results in most patients
• Implant survivorship was 97% at 5 years and 93% at 8
years
 For RA and other inflammatory arthropathies
 For rotator cuff tear arthropathy
 For neurogenic shoulder arthroplasty
 For arthritis after previous instability surgery
 For young active patients with severe glenoid arthrosis
 For proximal humeral comminuted fracture
Prosthetic Arthroplasty

Challenge:
 Relieving pain (strength,
smoothness, mobility,
stability)
 Relative "stuffing" of the
glenohumeral joint
 Critical factor: soft-tissue
balance

Complications
 Glenoid and humeral
loosening
 Component instability
 Rotator cuff tears
 Periprosthetic fractures
 Infection
 Nerve injuries
 Implant dissociation
 Deltoid dysfunction
Glenohumeral Arthrodesis


Salvage procedure
Indication
 GH destruction, instability,
pain, and/or a flail
 Neurologic problems (such
as BPI)
 Tumors
 Infection

Fusion posture
 Flexion (< 15° )
 Abduction (< 15° )
 Internal rotation (40°< <
60° )
Adhesive Capsulitis

Frozen shoulder(a poorly defined syndrome)
 Both active and passive shoulder motion is lost (because
of soft-tissue contracture)

Adhesive capsulitis
 Idiopathic loss of shoulder motion
 Thickening and contracture of the joint capsule
 A fibrosing rather than an inflammatory one

Treatments




Physical therapy with stretching exercises
Manipulation under anesthesia
Arthroscopic capsular release
Open release
Long Thoracic Nerve Palsy
Weakness of the serratus anterior muscle
 Clinically:

 Periscapular pain,
 Winging of the scapula
 Difficulty elevating the arm above shoulder level

Causes
 Blunt trauma or stretching of the nerve
 Viral infection
 Iatrogenic trauma (during a mastectomy )

For symptomatic patients
 Pectoralis major transfer
Related documents