Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Network Audit 2011-12 Patients with Confirmed Small Cell Lung Cancer Who Did Not Receive Chemotherapy Dr D N Leitch On Behalf of Lung Cancer NSSG NECN Introduction • National Lung Cancer Audit - “Chemotherapy rates for small cell lung cancer below the England and Wales average of 65 per cent should be reviewed” • Important clinical line of enquiry used in Peer Review • Required consideration in annual self assessment report • If gone as far as confirming diagnosis – Why no treatment? NLCA Results 2010 Patients Code RE9 RLN RNL RR7 RTD RTF RTR RVW RXP N36 Total LUCADA Total Actual number 181 273 232 221 317 343 351 314 424 2,656 32,347 Number of patients small cell % small cell receiving lung cancer chemotherapy 12 33 34 26 43 38 47 29 45 307 3,585 50.0% 69.7% 52.9% 69.2% 74.4% 57.9% 59.6% 65.5% 62.2% 63.2% 65.1% Methods • Retrospective case note audit • All Trusts participated • Patients diagnosed with lung cancer during 12 months 01.01.2010 to 31.12.2010 • Results match the current 2011 National Lung Cancer Audit (NLCA) report for 2010 patients • Results submitted to NECN, collated and analysed Number of Cases in Audit vs Expected Trust (N36) Number of Cases Small Cell Small Cell Chemotherapy Rate Expected Number Number in in Audit Audit RE9 12 50.0% 6 RLN 33 69.7% 10 8 (80%) RNL 34 52.9% 16 9 (56%) RR7 26 69.2% 8 7 (88%) RTD 43 74.4% 11 9 (82%) RTF 38 57.9% 16 8 (50%) RTR 47 59.6% 19 15 (79%) RVW 29 65.5% 10 7 (70%) RXP 45 62.2% 17 17 (100%) 307 63.2% 113 80 (71%) National NECN 3,585 65.1% 2334 Results • Patient characteristics • Investigation • Treatment Median Age = 74 years (IQR 66-90) CT Performed and MDT Discussion Survivors >100 days vs All Patients >100 days survival All Median Age (IQR) 78.5 (70-90) 74.0 (66-90) M:F 5:11 (45%) 30:49 (38%) Co-morbidity 14:2 (87.5%) 57/80 (71%) Stage 3b,4 12/16 (75%) 69/80 (75%) Performance Status 3,4 8/16 (50%) 51/80 (64%) Chemotherapy discussed 14/15 (88%) 62/77 (81%) Chemotherapy refused 7/10 (70%) 20/57 (35%) Seen by Oncologist 10/16 (63%) 47/79 (60%) Treated with radiotherapy 10/16 (63%) 22/47 (46%) Conclusions • NLCA data collection is improving each year – Good quality comprehensive data important • Process of audit is most valuable in reflecting on current practice – Surgical resection, histological confirmation, SCLC Chemotherapy • Actual figures in audit are not the figures reported in NLCA – preupload review may significantly improve NLCA data values • Almost all patients discussed at MDT meetings • Almost all patients had a CT Conclusions • • • • • • • • • Median age was 74 years Too many (44%) presented as emergencies vs 41% as 2WR Too many had poor WHO PS – 64% WHO = 3 or 4 Significant Co-morbidity 71% 81% Chemotherapy discussed with patient 25% patients refused chemotherapy 60% seen by oncologist If no chemotherapy – about 25% had radiotherapy Longer survivors – older, more co-morbidity, better WHO-PS more likely to refuse chemotherapy Actions • Review data before uploaded if possible • Ensure older patients with co-morbidity and better WHO – PS have full discussion, offer of chemotherapy and review with oncology • - Other suggestions?