Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Tumori, 93: 491-492, 2007 WHEN SHOULD TRASTUZUMAB BE STOPPED AFTER ACHIEVING COMPLETE RESPONSE IN HER2-POSITIVE METASTATIC BREAST CANCER PATIENTS? Manuela Beda, Umberto Basso, Cristina Ghiotto, and Silvio Monfardini Department of Medical Oncology, Istituto Oncologico Veneto-IOV, Padua, Italy We report the case of a woman with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer who achieved prolonged complete remission of multiple liver metastases after treatment with weekly trastuzumab plus paclitaxel but relapsed in the brain soon after stopping trastuzumab maintenance therapy which had been prosecuted for almost three years. In the absence of randomized trials, the optimal duration of trastuzumab administration after achieving complete remission of metastatic breast cancer remains questionable. Key words: brain metastasis, breast cancer, duration of treatment, HER2, trastuzumab. Introduction The association of trastuzumab and a taxane is the standard chemotherapy option for patients with metastatic HER2-positive breast cancer, with published complete remission rates of about 7-8%1,2 and a median time to progression of 6.92 to 11.7 months1. Following the design of the first registrative trials1,2, the drug prescription label recommends that trastuzumab be administered as far as the patient is responsive, but no data is available concerning the real benefit of such prolonged therapy and the potential long-term toxicities are practically unknown, especially for the cardiovascular system. At the same time, the huge costs associated with prolonged trastuzumab administration pose a serious limitation to its unconditioned use in the absence of demonstrated efficacy. Case report A 36-year-old white woman came to our observation 4 years ago with locally advanced breast cancer, clinical stage T3N2. In December 2002 neoadjuvant chemotherapy with epirubicin (70 mg/m 2 ) plus docetaxel (70 mg/m2) was administered for 4 cycles every 21 days, obtaining a partial clinical response. In April 2003 she underwent conservative surgery plus axillary node dissection for invasive ductal carcinoma, pT2N1, grade 3, with vascular invasion, 4 positive lymph nodes out of 12 removed, hormone receptor negative status, Mib1 10-15%, and HER2 positivity (DAKO HercepTest 3+). She received adjuvant chemotherapy with 4 cycles of CMF on days 1 and 8 every 28 days, plus radiation therapy to the right breast. Abdominal and brain CT scan performed in April 2003 were negative for recurrence. In February 2004 a liver MRI revealed multiple liver nodules (2 cm maximum diameter), which were confirmed to be breast cancer metastases by fine-needle aspiration biopsy. She immediately started first-line chemotherapy with weekly paclitaxel (80 mg/m2) and Herceptin (4 mg/kg first dose and 2 mg/kg thereafter). The first revaluation with MRI performed in June 2003 showed a complete response in the liver. We therefore decided to continue only with maintenance trastuzumab, which was given every 3 weeks. Subsequent chest and abdomen CT scans were performed every 3-4 months and were all negative, and cardiac monitoring with echocardiography did not show any signs of cardiac damage. In April 2006 the patient was still in complete remission, and we decided to stop trastuzumab after almost 3 years of absence of any signs or symptoms of disease. Unfortunately, after 2 months the woman reported episodes of transient headache and dizziness, with a slight impairment of movement of the upper right limb. She therefore underwent a brain CT scan in June 2006, which revealed multiple brain lesions with contrast enhancement. The patient was soon referred for whole-brain irradiation and at the end of radiotherapy restarted systemic chemotherapy with trastuzumab plus weekly paclitaxel, although chest and abdomen CT scan did not reveal any other sites of disease, because evidence of benefit from continued use of trastuzumab after first progression is accumulating3. Discussion HER2 is a membrane-bound protein with tyrosinekinase properties which is overexpressed in approximately 20% to 30% of breast cancers. Overexpression of HER2 protein has been shown to be associated with increased tumor proliferation and relative resistance to Correspondence to: Manuela Beda, MD, Divisione di Oncologia Medica, Istituto Oncologico Veneto, Via Gattamelata 64, 35126 Padova, Italy. Tel +39-049-8215931; fax +39-049-8215932; e-mail [email protected] Received November 17, 2006; accepted March 19, 2007. 492 some cytotoxic and endocrine therapies. Trastuzumab, a humanized monoclonal antibody directed against HER2 protein, has been shown to be an efficacious and well-tolerated treatment for HER2-overexpressing metastatic breast cancer, especially when it is used in combination with chemotherapy 4. Brain metastases from breast cancer typically occur in 10-15% of patients and are associated with a survival of 3-6 months. Recent series have shown that women with HER2-postive metastatic breast cancer receiving trastuzumab more frequently develop brain metastases, up to 2534% of cases5,6. CNS metastases in these patients may develop despite response achieved in extracerebral sites. This pattern of failure has mainly been attributed to the lack of penetration of trastuzumab to the CNS owing to its high molecular weight (145 kDa). Additionally, increased risk of CNS relapse may be associated with improved systemic control of extracerebral metastases and prolonged survival without brain protection (a sanctuary site)6. Finally, it was postulated that HER2/neu overexpression and/or amplification might predispose to brain metastases7. Our patient had a complete and long-lasting response of her liver metastases as long as trastuzumab was administered, and relapsed within 3 months after its cessation. Even if one might argue that the brain is a sanctuary that is not exposed to maintenance trastuzumab, the close time link between trastuzumab interruption and relapse makes us wonder if at least some type of biohumoral or immunological mechanisms might have played a role. M BEDA, U BASSO, C GHIOTTO, S MONFARDINI If the treatment had not been stopped, might the relapse have been avoided or at least delayed? No one has an answer. The high incidence of brain relapse in HER2positive breast cancer has prompted some authors to recommend close monitoring of the CNS in all HER2positive patients by means of CT or MRI brain scans (to be performed every 3 or 6 months), in order to allow early detection of brain metastases in asymptomatic patients and to improve the results of surgery or radiosurgery in these patients8. Others have provocatively advocated prophylactic cranial irradiation strategies in patients achieving complete response after systemic chemotherapy9. Since such intensive follow-up might enhance patients’ anxiety and further increase the cost of care of HER2-positive breast cancer, we think that proof of efficacy should be produced before recommending its indiscriminate use in the clinical practice. Our patient did not undergo brain CT scan at regular intervals, so cerebral disease might have been developing before maintenance trastuzumab was stopped. Yet, the rapid onset of symptoms soon after cessation of treatment supports our theory that the withdrawal of trastuzumab might have altered the biology of the disease and its complex interactions with the host. The objective efficacy of prolonged maintenance trastuzumab compared to observation in HER2-positive patients achieving complete response to first-line treatment should be tested in randomized trials. Meanwhile, the decision of whether trastuzumab should be stopped or not in such patients remains strongly controversial. References 1. Marty M, Cognetti F, Maraninchi D, Snyder R, Mauriac L, Tubiana-Hulin M, Chan S, Grimes D, Antón A, Lluch A, Kennedy J, O’Byrne K, Conte PF, Green M, Ward C, Mayne K, Extra JM: Randomized phase II trial of the efficacy and safety of trastuzumab combined with docetaxel in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2positive metastatic breast cancer administered as first-line treatment: the M77001 study group. J Clin Oncol, 23: 42474250, 2005 2. Slamon DJ, Leyland-Jones B, Shak S, Fuchs H, Paton V, Bajamonde A, Fleming T, Eiermann W, Wolter J, Pegram M, Baselga J, Norton L: Use of chemotherapy plus a monoclonal antibody against HER2 for metastatic breast cancer that overexpresses HER2. N Engl J Med, 344: 783-792, 2001. 3. Pusztai L, Esteva FJ: Continued use of trastuzumab (herceptin) after progression on prior trastuzumab therapy in HER-2-positive metastatic breast cancer. Cancer Invest, 24: 187-191, 2006. 4. Tomao F, Miele E, Spinelli GP, Russillo M, La Ferla G, Tomao S: Trastuzumab in metastatic breast cancer. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol, 27: 247-249, 2006. 5. Clayton AJ, Danson S, Jolly S, Ryder WD, Burt PA, Stewart AL, Wilkinson PM, Welch RS, Magee B, Wilson G, Howell A, Wardley AM: Incidence of cerebral metastases in patients treated with trastuzumab for metastatic breast cancer. Br J Cancer, 91: 639-643, 2004. 6. Bendell JC, Domchek SM, Burstein HJ, Harris L, Younger J, Kuter I, Bunnell C, Rue M, Gelman R, Winer E: Central nervous system metastases in women who receive trastuzumabbased therapy for metastatic breast carcinoma. Cancer, 97: 2972-2977, 2003. 7. Duchnowska R, Szczylik C: Central nervous system metastases in breast cancer patients administered trastuzumab. Cancer Treat Rev, 31: 312-318, 2005. 8. Puente Vazquez J, Lopez-Tarruella Cobo S, Garcia-Saenz JA, Casado Herraez A, Moreno Anton F, Sampedro Gimeno T, Bueno Muino C, Grande Pulido E, Martin Jimenez M, DiazRubio E: Brain metastases in metastatic breast cancer patients receiving trastuzumab-based therapies. Clin Transl Oncol, 8: 50-53, 2006. 9. Kirsch DG, Loeffler JS: Brain metastases in patients with breast cancer: new horizons. Clin Breast Cancer, 6: 115-124, 2005.