Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
J Comp Physiol A (1993) 173:425-434 Journal of Comparative h iok, gy A Neu~'al, and 9 Springer-Verlag 1993 Long rise times of sound pulses in grasshopper songs improve the directionality cues received by the CNS from the auditory receptors R. Krahe, B. Ronacher Institut ffir Zoologie II, Universit~it Erlangen, Staudtstrasse 5, D-91058 Erlangen, Germany Accepted: 2 July 1993 Abstract. Auditory receptors of the locust (Locusta migratoria) were investigated with respect to the directionality cues which are present in their spiking responses, with special emphasis on how directional cues are influenced by the rise time of sound signals. Intensity differences between the ears influence two possible cues in the receptor responses, spike count and response latency. Variation in rise time of sound pulses had little effect on the overall spike count; however, it had a substantial effect on the temporal distribution of the receptor's spiking response, especially on the latencies of first spikes. In particular, with ramplike stimuli the slope of the latency vs. intensity curves was steeper as compared to stimuli with steep onsets (Fig. 3). Stimuli with flat ramplike onsets lead to an increase of the latency differences of discharges between left and right tympanic receptors. This type of ramplike stimulus could thus facilitate directional hearing. This hypothesis was corroborated by a Monte Carlo simulation in which the probability of incorrect directional decisions was determined on the basis of the receptor latencies and spike counts. Slowly rising ramps significantly improved the decisions based on response latency, as compared to stimuli with sudden onsets (Fig. 4). These results are compared to behavioural results obtained with the grasshopper Ch. biguttulus. The stridulation signals of the females of this species consist of ramplike pulses, which could be an adaptation to facilitate directional hearing of phonotactically approaching males. Key words: Grasshoppers - Auditory receptors - Directional hearing - Envelope rise time Abbreviations: HFR, high frequency receptor; ILD, interaural level difference; LFR, low frequency receptor; SPL, sound pressure level; WN, white noise Correspondence to: Dr. B. Ronacher Introduction In many grasshopper species acoustic communication guides the meeting of sexual partners. It plays a key role in preventing interspecific hybridization. The animals have to solve two basic problems, that is, first to recognize a conspecific's song, and then to localize the potential mate. In the grasshopper Chorthippus biguttulus both sexes stridulate, and it is mainly the task of the males to localize and to approach a rather stationary female, on the basis of the female's response song (for reviews, see Elsner and Popov 1978; von Helversen and yon Helversen 1987). The songs of males and females show the same basic pattern but differ in the rise time of sound pulses (von Helversen and von Helversen 1983; von Helversen 1993). The song of a male consists of sound pulses with very short rise times (in most cases less than 1 ms). In contrast, the female's song consists of sound pulses that rise and fall slowly (rise times of 4-7 ms, Fig. lb). This difference in the steepness of ramps is a decisive cue for determining a conspecific's sex, and Ch. biguttulus males show phonotactic behaviour only to signals with slowly rising ramps (von Helversen 1993). Males probably can only 'lateralize' a sound source, i.e. they determine whether the sound source is located on their left or on their right side (Rheinlaender 1984; von Helversen and Rheinlaender 1988). The phonotactic approach is based on a repetition of such left/right decisions. Because males are small (distance between the ears less than 2 mm), it is very unlikely that they can evaluate the physical interaural time differences (differences of 5-6 ~ts at most). Instead, they must rely on interaural level differences (ILD) that result from the diffraction of sound waves around the body and the pressure gradient properties of their ears (for reviews see Michelsen 1979, 1983; Lewis 1983). In detecting ILDs as small as 0.5 dB (yon Helversen and Rheinlaender 1988), however, the grasshopper males are superior to most vertebrates. A difference of only 2 dB allows an errorless decision towards the louder side (von Helversen and Rheinlaender 1988). 426 R. Krahe, B. Ronacher: Directionality cues in grasshopper's auditory receptor responses I L D s between the two ears have a twofold effect u p o n the t y m p a n i c receptor discharges: (i) The receptors of the ear stimulated with lower intensity will respond with a lower spike rate. (ii) In addition, the latency of the first spike will be increased, due to the intensity dependence of the receptor's latency ( M 6 r c h e n et al. 1978). In principle, the C N S of the animals might evaluate b o t h cues for directional hearing, spike c o u n t differences as well as response latency (see M 6 r c h e n et al. 1978; M 6 r c h e n 1980; Rheinlaender and M 6 r c h e n 1979; Rheinlaender and R 6 m e r 1980). Since the animals have no knowledge a b o u t the stimulus onset apart from their receptor responses, they c a n n o t determine latency differences but rather physiological time differences. N o t w i t h s t a n d i n g this reservation we will use the widely used term "latency difference". Behavioural tests have s h o w n that grasshoppers are indeed able to use artificially generated - interaural time differences (without I L D ) as a cue for orientation (yon Helversen and v o n Helversen 1983; von Helversen and Rheinlaender 1988). It was also possible to d e m o n s t r a t e time-intensity trading in behavioural tests (D. von Helversen, pers. comm.). As the males d e p e n d on the female's stridulation signals for localizing the s o u n d source, this study addressed the question of whether the shape of the female's signal, with its slowly rising ramps, could improve neuronal cues used for directional hearing. At first glance this appears counterintuitive, because the temporal precision of the spiking response p r o b a b l y would be reduced as c o m pared to rectangularly m o d u l a t e d signals. However, as suggested by A d a m (1977), a slowly rising signal could indeed be a d v a n t a g e o u s by virtue of p r o d u c i n g an additional gain in latency difference between the ears (shown schematically in Fig. la). The o u t s t a n d i n g precision of s o u n d lateralization of Ch. biguttulus males, of course, must have its basis in the directionality cues which are present in the responses of a u d i t o r y receptors from left and right ear. As a first step t o w a r d s u n d e r s t a n d i n g the capacities for directional hearing of grasshoppers, one has to assess quantitatively the directional cues present in receptor cell responses to different shapes of the s o u n d signals, as are found in the c o m m u n i c a t i o n signals. In this study we used M o n t e Carlo simulations with data from recordings from single a u d i t o r y receptors to investigate the possible contributions of response latency and spike c o u n t cues to directional hearing. Material and methods Animals. The animals used in the experiments were locusts (Locusta migratoria), preferentially males, which were obtained from a commercial supplier. The locust's auditory receptors are used as a model system for the receptors of Ch. biguttulus (see Discussion). Electrophysiological recordings and stimulation apparatus. The animals were briefly anaesthetized with CO2 and were attached to a free-standing holder (thickness 4 mm) by a wax-resin mixture. Head, legs, wings and gut were removed. The thorax was opened dorsally and the metathoracic ganglion was exposed and partially desheathed. In most experiments the ganglion was stabilized by ipsi -~-- oontra - - ~ - threshold ...... a b 100 m 80 >l- 60 Z LLI I-- 40 "I0 _z 20 o o C I I 10 20 FREQUENCY ~ 30 i i 40 50 [kHz] Fig. 1. a Schematic demonstration of the effects of stimulus rise time on latencies of ipsilateral and contralateral receptors. Dotted lines indicate an hypothetical receptor's threshold, arrows indicate crossing of threshold by the rising intensities of stimuli, b Pulse shape in stridulation signals of male (upper) and female (lower) Ch. biguttulus. Scale bar 50 ms. (Courtesy of D. and O. von Helversen). e Frequency spectra of left and right speaker minute needles. The whole torso was filled with locust Ringer solution (Pearson and Robertson 1981). The experiments were performed in an anechoic Faraday-cage at room temperature (22-25~ The recorded signals were amplified by a LIST LM-1 electrode amplifier and were stored on magnetic tape (RACAL store 4DS). The stimuli were delivered via two MOTOROLA speakers (PH10, 2.5-40 kHz) located 35 cm from the preparation on the left and right side. A computer (AIM 65, ROCKWELL) modulated the amplitudes of the white noise (WN; Fa. NOIZEG, 100 Hz-100 kHz) or sine wave stimuli. Sound intensities were adjusted with a Briiel & Kj~ier condenser microphone (1/2 inch) located at the site of the preparation and with a Brfiel & Kjfier measuring amplifier type 2209, and are given in dB re 2 • l0 s N/m 2 (SPL). Figure lc shows the frequency spectra of both speakers. For further details see Stumpner and Ronacher (1991). R. Krahe, B. Ronacher: Directionality cues in grasshopper's auditory receptor responses Intracellular or quasi-intracellular recordings were made with thin-walled borosilicate-glass microelectrodes, whose tips were filled with a 3-5% solution of Lucifer Yellow (ALDRICH) in 0.5 M LiCk After an experiment the thoracic ganglia were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde, dehydrated and cleared in methylsalicylate. The wholemount with the stained cell was viewed under a fluorescence microscope, photographed and drawn via a drawing tube. Auditory receptor fibres were recorded at the entrance of nerve 6 into the metathoracic ganglion complex. After penetration of a fibre, thresholds to W N and sine wave stimuli (2-25 kHz) were monitored. Receptors were classified according to R6mer's (1976) criteria. In order to compare thresholds with R6mer's data, thresholds were determined using rectangularly modulated stimuli (100 ms; WN or sinus). For all further tests sawtooth-shaped stimuli (WN) were presented, each 10 ms in duration, with an interval of 100 ms. Two stimulus types were used: one had the shape of a rising ramp, with steep cutoff, the second was a 'mirror image', i.e. it had a sudden onset and declined gradually (cf. insets in Fig. 2a). These two stimuli were chosen in order to have equal energy and frequency content. The shape and spectra of the stimuli as produced by the loudspeakers were controlled in microphone recordings and subsequent signal analysis. The power spectra of the two signals were virtually indistinguishable. The rise time of the steep onset was less than 0.5 ms. Intensities were varied in 5 dB steps, beginning at 5 dB or 10 dB, up to 40 dB above the receptor's threshold. Fifty stimuli of each type were presented at each intensity. If possible the same stimulation sequence was repeated via the loudspeaker located contralateral to the recording site. In some experiments longer 'song models' were used that were composed of 6 'syllables' separated by pauses of 25 ms to mimic stimuli used in behavioural experiments (yon Helversen, pers. comm.). Each 'syllable' consisted of six 10 ms-pulses, either with a rising ramp, or with a steep onset and falling ramp (same as above). Data evaluation. The recorded signals were transferred to a personal computer (Tandon AT 386 DX) via an AD-converter (DATA T R A N S L A T I O N DT 2821) and the program T U R B O L A B (STEMMER), and further analyzed with the program N E U R O LAB (Hedwig and Knepper 1992). The results are shown in form of latency diagrams and post-stimulus-time histograms. Monte Carlo simulations. In order to quantify the directional cues present in the responses of a single pair of receptor cells, we compared latencies and spike counts for stimulation with ipsilateral vs. contralateral sound incidence (90 ~ vs. 270~ The procedure shall be exemplified for the evaluation of response latency: The basis for a Monte Carlo simulation were two data sets of latencies of the first spikes, which were obtained at a given intensity (50 stimulus presentations for both directions, 90 ~ and 270~ Then one value out of 50 was randomly drawn from each of these two latency distributions, and the two values were compared. If the ipsi-latency was larger than the contra-latency this was scored as an 'error', if it was smaller, it was counted as 'correct'. There were also cases where the two values were exactly the same (within the limits of acuity of the data sampling (50 gs); see Discussion). This would correspond to an undetermined situation. One half of the 'undetermined cases' was added to the errors. These cases were very rare for latency evaluation, and did not influence the results. This procedure was repeated 1000 times, and the 'error' probabilities were assessed on this basis (see Figs. 4, 5). A similar evaluation was performed for the spike count data. An 'error' was assumed if the ipsi-spike count (spikes/stimulus) was smaller than the contra-spike count. With these data there was a higher probability of the two values being equal, which would lead to an undetermined situation. Again, one half of the undetermined cases was added to the errors (cf. also Rheinlaender and R6mer 1980). The ILDs found in behaviourat tests with Ch. biguttulus for ipsi vs. contra stimulation with natural signals are 7-9 dB (yon Helversen 1984). However, a 90 ~ incidence of sound is the maximum, and a rather unlikely situation for localizing a sound source. More- 427 over, grasshoppers can use much smaller ILDs for a correct lateralization (see Introduction). We therefore also simulated smaller angles of sound incidence by comparing responses at smaller ILDs. Such values were obtained from the curves for ipsilateral stimulation by comparing, for example, latency (or spike count) data sets 5 dB apart from each other. In order to simulate even smaller ILDs of 1 or 2 dB (Figs. 4, 6), we obtained data sets by interpolation between measured data sets. To obtain the latency values, we linearly interpolated between the mean values of the measured data sets and moved the data set of the lower intensity along this axis towards the data set of the higher intensity. The generation of intermediate spike count distributions is more complicated. One has to generate new sets of whole numbers normally distributed around the linearly interpolated mean values. These simulations assumed that a comparison would take place between only two receptors from two ears with identical characteristics. In the next step, error probabilities were calculated on the basis of the evaluation of several parallel receptors (Fig. 6). The basis for these calculations were the data from 6 receptor cells that were recorded on one side in one animal. From this pool for example 15 latency values were drawn randomly from the 6 distributions at the higher and at the lower intensity (with the constraint that intensity-pairs from the same distribution were compared), and for each pair of latencies it was determined whether it would lead to a 'correct' or a 'wrong' decision. If the majority of decisions were correct this was counted as a correct decision of the animal. This procedure was repeated 1000 times. In order to reduce the chances of equal numbers of correct and wrong decisions (and therefore undetermined situations), we present data for odd numbers of receptors (see Fig. 6). Results were similar for even numbers, if the undetermined situations were partitioned 50:50 between correct and wrong decisions. Results Receptor responses I n o r d e r to c o m p a r e s t i m u l i o f e q u a l e n e r g y a n d f r e q u e n cy c o n t e n t , o n l y t h e r e s p o n s e s to " t r i a n g u l a r l y - s h a p e d " s t i m u l i are p r e s e n t e d . T h e i n t e n s i t y r e s p o n s e c u r v e s alm o s t c o i n c i d e for t h e t w o s t i m u l u s t y p e s ( s l o w l y a n d s t e e p l y rising r a m p s , Fig. 2a). C o n t r a l a t e r a l s t i m u l a t i o n r e s u l t e d in a p a r a l l e l shift o f the i n t e n s i t y r e s p o n s e c u r v e s b y a b o u t 8 d B ( r a n g e : 6 - 1 2 dB) as c o m p a r e d to i p s i l a t e r a l s t i m u l a t i o n (Fig. 2a). T h e n u m b e r o f s p i k e s in r e s p o n s e to t h e t w o s t i m u l u s t y p e s at a g i v e n i n t e n s i t y w a s a l m o s t t h e same within the dynamic range of the receptor's responses. O n l y at h i g h intensities, i.e. close to t h e cell's s a t u r a t i o n r a n g e , t h e s p i k e c o u n t t e n d e d to b e s o m e w h a t h i g h e r for s l o w l y r i s i n g r a m p s (Fig. 2a,b). I n c o n t r a s t , in t h e t e m p o r a l d i s t r i b u t i o n s o f s p i k e s a d i s t i n c t d i f f e r e n c e w a s visible ( P S T - h i s t o g r a m s in Fig. 2c). W i t h t h e s l o w l y r i s i n g r a m p , t h e first s p i k e o c c u r r e d later, a n d t h e t e m p o r a l scatter of spikes was higher. T y p i c a l d a t a o n t h e l a t e n c i e s o f a r e c e p t o r fibre a r e g i v e n in Fig. 3a for d i f f e r e n t intensities. F o r t h e s t i m u l i w i t h s u d d e n o n s e t s t h e l a t e n c y c u r v e b e c o m e s v e r y flat at i n t e n s i t i e s h i g h e r t h a n 1 5 - 2 0 d B a b o v e t h e cell's t h r e s h o l d ; s t a n d a r d d e v i a t i o n s a r e v e r y small, in m o s t cases less t h a n 0.5 m s (Fig. 3b). F o r t h e s l o w l y r i s i n g r a m p , in c o n t r a s t , t h e m e a n v a l u e s o f l a t e n c i e s a r e l a r g e r , a n d t h e c u r v e s h o w s a d i s t i n c t l y s t e e p e r slope. I n g e n e r a l , the respective standard deviations were also significantly l a r g e r for t h e s l o w l y rising r a m p (Fig. 3b). T h e s t e e p e r 428 R. Krahe, B. Ronacher: Directionality cues in grasshopper's auditory receptor responses 25 ..J r 3 E p00 1 ILl /l . / contra =_1~1~ ,4 >0 Z uJ I<[ .J 20 15 ' 1o - -~ . . . . ' . . . . 9. . . . ,---~--i o. 0 ' 60 70 a 80 INTENSITY 5 90 i-- 55 50 [dB] 60 70 INTENSITY a 4 65 75 80 85 [dB] a"s'" 4" / u~ E .J >0 Z MJ I< ._J 100 CO UJ u. 0 0. 00 0 1 2 3 4 o 51 SPIKES / 56 61 66 71 76 81 STIMULUS~ INTENSITY [ d B ] ~ 20 1 1 T Go E 65 dB _n~r%_ >. 0 Z uJ l- o < _I 1 75 dB t ~ 15 -o- contra 10 _l - o - 5 i 60 v' o I1. 1 0 0C 0 1o 20 T C .... o lO ;~0 t [msi Fig. 2. a Intensity response curve of a type 1 receptor to ipsilateral and contralateral stimulation with WN-sound pulses of different shape (see insets). Pulse duration 10 ms, rise time 10 ms or 0 ms. n = 50 per data point, bars indicate largest standard deviations. At 76 dB and at 81 dB (ipsi) and at 86 dB (contra) the slowly rising ramp evoked significantly more spikes (P <0.01). b Pairwise comparison of the number of spikes elicited by ramp stimuli (abscissa) and stimuli with steep onsets (ordinate). Data of 8 cells, stimulated 70 i 80 ipsi i go INTENSITY[dB] Fig. 3. a Intensity dependence of latencies of a low frequency receptor (type 1 or 3), for sound pulses of different shape (insets). Bars indicate standard deviations, h Comparison of standard deviations for these two stimuli. All differences are significant (P < 0.01 for 76 dB, P<0.001 for all others); n = 50. e Latency curves of a type l-low frequency receptor, for ipsilateral and contralateral stimulation (same cell as in Fig. 2a). Arrows indicate the respective ipsi-contra differences. Bars: SD, n = 50 < at different intensities. Stippled: bisectrix, thick: regression line. Correlation coefficient r = 0.989. e PST histograms of spike responses at three intensities (different cell than in a). Abscissa: time after stimulus onset, bin width 0.5 ms; ordinate: spikes per bin and stimulus presentation. 50 stimulus presentations per diagram R. Krahe, B. Ronacher: Directionality cues in grasshopper's auditory receptor responses slope of the upper curve in Fig. 3a corresponds to the above mentioned gain in latency difference (Fig. la), which could improve directional hearing. For an intensity decrease of, say, 5 dB the upper curve yields a larger difference in latency than the lower curve. However, the larger standard deviations would, at least partly, reduce this gain. In order to ascertain how these two opposing effects interact, we show in Fig. 3c latency curves for ipsiand contralateral stimulation. The distance between ipsia n d contra-curves is considerably larger for the stimulus with slowly rising ramp (arrows in Fig. 3c), and, most importantly, there is a better separation of the respective confidence intervals. This is especially obvious at high intensities, where steep ramps yield almost identical latencies. Determination of error probabilities based on the responses of a single pair of receptors These data suggest that slowly rising ramps increase the probability for correct right-left decisions. We tested this hypothesis by calculating the probabilities for incorrect directional decisions from the respective distributions of latencies in a Monte Carlo simulation (cf. Methods). As a first step it was assumed that the CNS would evaluate the responses of only one pair of receptor cells. This situation was approximated in the neurophysiological experiment by stimulating the receptor under study via the ipsilateral or via the contralateral loudspeaker (see Fig. 3c). The resuits of this simulation describe what information on sound direction can be drawn from a pair of left and right receptors, under optimal conditions (see Discussion). A first result of the Monte Carlo simulations is shown in Fig. 4a. With intensities up to 20 dB above the receptor's threshold the two types of stimuli yield similarly low error probabilities. However, at higher intensities the slowly rising ramps yield a next to zero probability of false decisions, while for steep ramps the error probabilities increase to values as high as 0.25. An evaluation of other receptor cells, including those with lower thresholds (type 2, 3 receptors), yielded very similar resuits. Thus, with slowly rising ramps the intensity range could be expanded over which directional cues are present in a bilateral pair of receptors. It has to be emphasized that the values used so far for the calculation of error probabilities characterize the optimal situation for directional hearing, i.e. stimuli delivered from a sound source located perpendicular to the animal's body axis. Grasshopper males, however, can use much smaller intensity differences for sound lateralization (see Introduction and von Helversen and Rheinlaender 1988). A similar calculation of error probabilities corresponding to an assumed interaural level difference of 2 dB is shown in Fig. 4b. In this case the probability of errors is substantially increased with both types of stimuli. The error probabilities were relatively constant over the intensity range tested (this applied also to other cells, except in some cases for very low and very high intensities). Stimuli with ramplike onsets are superior, yielding lower error probabilities. Figure 4c shows a pairwise comparison of 429 1.oo >" _ ~ In O na. tr O nntu ipsi- ILD 8 - 10 o.75 dB 0.50 0.2 5 0.00 65 60 a >p. contra 70 75 INTENSITY 1.00 80 85 ' 80 ' 85 [dBl ILD 2 dB I / I m < m 0 nn nO nnuJ 0.75 0.50 0.25 0.00 ' 65 60 b . ~ < II1 O tr a. nO nn'" ' 75 INTENSITY [dB] // ~y," 0,6 ILD 2 dB 0,4 ,/// t/o 0,2 // 0 o%oO )( 0 0 C ' 70 0,2 ERROR 0,4 0,6 PROBABILITY Fig. 4. a Probabilities of incorrect lateralization ('errors') calculated by a Monte Carlo simulation from the latencies of a single low frequency receptor to ipsilateral and contralateral stimulation (see text and Methods) 9 Same cell as in 3c. b Same calculation based on an assumed interaural level difference (ILD) of 2 dB. c Pairwise comparison of the error probabilities for the two stimulus types (ILD = 2 dB); 8 different receptors (6 type 1 and 2 type 3 receptors). Stippled: bisectrix. Crosses and bars near the axes indicate the respective mean values _ SD for ramp stimuli (ordinate) and steep onsets (abscissa) the error probabilities for the two types of stimuli, for 8 different cells (at 4-6 intensities, each). The data do not cluster around the bisectrix, but are shifted to the right. In only 4 cases did the stimulus with a steep ramp yield a lower error probability than the stimulus with a slowly 430 >. .J m < m o n- nO nngJ R. Krahe, B. Ronacher: Directionality cues in grasshopper's auditory receptor responses 1.00 spike count 0.75 0.50 0.25 a..~=.O, ~---- 0.00 60 i i i 70 80 90 INTENSITY >- __J_ m < m o n- [dB] 1.00 latency Possible reduction of error probabilities by sampling from several receptors 0.75 V 0.50 O. s l nO nnuJ 0.25 i 0.00 60 >- 70 80 INTENSITY [dB] 9O 1.00 v latency A --I m < o n- 9 latency 0.75 and spike count 0.50 i1. nO nnLU Figure 5 compares, for an ILD of 5 dB, the error probabilities resulting from an evaluation of spike count, of latency cues, and of a combined evaluation of both cues. Spike count evaluation yields similar values for slowly rising and steep ramps (Fig. 5a). This is expected because the intensity response functions are similar for both stimulus types (see Fig. 2a). For stimuli with sudden onsets, both spike count as well as response latency yield similarly high error probabilities (compare Fig. 5a and b). However, for ramp stimuli an evaluation of latency cues results in substantially lower error probabilities than spike counts (Fig. 5a,b). A correlated analysis of both cues yields no improvement in case of slowly rising ramps, while there is a moderate improvement for the other stimulus type (Fig. 5c). j~/~j 0.25 ,, 0.00 60 65 70 75 80 85 I I INTENSITY [dB] Fig. 5. Error probabilities for an assumed interaural level difference of 5 dB, based on spike count alone (a), response latency (b), and a correlated analysis of both (e), calculated from the data of a single pair of receptors. In e open symbols indicate error probabilities based on latency alone, filled symbols indicate those based on both cues rising ramp, and in 30 cases the reverse was true (P~0.001, sign test). In these 4 cases the data were obtained near the threshold of the respective cell. Moreover, the mean error probabilities (bars in Fig. 4c) differed in a highly significant way (0.252 ___ 0.083 vs. 0.400 -t- 0.077, P~O.O01). As mentioned in the Introduction, differences in spike count might also be used as a cue for sound direction. The results of Figs. 4 and 5 suggest that the information provided by a single pair of receptors is not sufficient to explain the accuracy of turning behaviour observed in behaving grasshopper males. Two possible mechanisms for reducing error probability are obvious: (i) Since the auditory organ of grasshoppers contains about 90 to 100 receptor cells (Gray 1960; Michel and Petersen 1982), the CNS could assess response latency and/or spike count from these parallel fibres, and thereby reduce the error probabilities. (ii) The animals might sample over a longer period of time. Indeed, the stridulation signals of Ch. biguttulus, on which the behavioural data were obtained, consist of longer series of "syllables" (composed of 6 to 8 pulses), which are separated by pauses of 15 to 25 ms (values depending on temperature, cf. von Helversen 1972; von Helversen and von Helversen 1987). The total duration of female stridulation sequences ("songs") usually is approximately 1 s (songs of males are longer, von Helversen and von Helversen 1975). In experiments with model songs, however, males also show their typical turning response to songs that were artificially shortened to 450 ms duration. Figure 6 shows the reduction of error probabilities that could, in principle, be achieved by evaluation of information from several parallel receptors. Again, the best case has been taken as a basis, by comparing receptor fibres of equal sensitivity from left and right ear. A decision was counted as incorrect if in more than half of the cases the ipsi-latencies were larger than the contra-latencies (sampling accuracy: 50 ~ts; see Methods). The resulting error probabilities show a steep decrease between 1 cell and 10 cells, and a flatter decrease between 10 and 30 cells evaluated in parallel. The data of Fig. 6 do not follow a simple squareroot of N relationship. The curves for the two stimulus types are clearly separated. Most interestingly, the error probabilities for an evaluation of more than 30 receptor fibres approximate the values found in behaviour, but only for the stimuli with slowly rising ramp (error probabilities are below 0.01). The stimuli with steep onset still lead to an error probability of 0.1. R. Krahe, B. Ronacher: Directionality cues in grasshopper's auditory receptor responses >I- 0.50 p r o b a b l y cannot be explained on the basis of information provided by a single pair of receptors. Therefore, in the third section we will try to give an estimate of the possible i m p r o v e m e n t of directionality cues that could be attained by the evaluation of parallel receptors. D ID < W 0 nrt nO nnLU 431 0.25 Directionality cues present in the responses of auditory receptors 0.00 0 10 NUMBER 20 OF 20 40 CELLS Fig. 6. Decrease of error probabilities by evaluation of N parallel receptor fibres (abscissa), for an assumed interaural level difference of 2 dB. N varied from 1 to 31. Ordinate: error probability, as in Fig. 4. See text for details of the evaluation. Data are mean values over an intensity range of 36 dB. Bars indicate standard deviations. Curves based on the data of 6 different receptors recorded in one hemiganglion of a locust (5 type 1 and 1 type 3 receptors) With longer song models the latency cues do not change substantially: We measured the latencies for the first spike response to each syllable (in a 6 syllable song, cf. Methods). There was a small increase in latencies, mainly between the first and the second syllable, and the variances of latencies were somewhat higher for the 6th syllable than for the first. As in the simulations shown above, the stimuli with slowly rising r a m p still yielded smaller error probabilities. But, for a comparison of two single latencies at 2 dB difference, error probabilities were still in the range of 0.25 (or even higher in case of stimuli with sudden onsets). Because we do not know how the CNS would evaluate the latency cues in a longer song model, a tentative approximation would be to assume a kind of 'majority vote', like that used for the curves of Fig. 6 (cf. Methods). As can be seen from that figure, the latency evaluation of six to ten elements (first spikes to syllable onsets) would not reduce the error probabilties to the desired degree. As concerns spike count, this cue indeed improves with longer stimuli. Again the two types of stimuli yielded similar intensity response curves, and consequently the error probabilities were also similar for both stimuli. However, in a spike count evaluation for a model song of 480 ms duration (see above) the error probabilities for an assumed interaural level difference of 2 dB were reduced only to around 0.1, and thus did not attain the range found in behavioural experiments. Discussion The aim of this paper was to investigate the cues for directional hearing that are available for the CNS of a grasshopper from the responses of auditory receptors, with special emphasis on stimulus rise-times. There are two main results of this study which shall be discussed in turn: (i) Ramplike stimuli yield improved latency cues c o m p a r e d to stimuli with steep onsets. (ii) The precision of lateralization found in behavioural experiments most The data presented here (Figs. 3-5) show that stimuli with ramplike onsets can be advantageous for directional hearing in grasshoppers, and p r o b a b l y also in other animals with small interaural disparities and negligible physical time differences. Although with slowly rising ramps the spiking responses are triggered less precisely (Figs. 2c, 3b), this stimulus type yields an 'additional gain' in latency differences that outweighs the former effect. This has been demonstrated quantitatively by Monte Carlo simulations (Fig. 4) in which the opposing contributions of b o t h effects can be assessed. Thus A d a m ' s (1977) suggestion of the advantage of ramplike stimuli for directional hearing could be confirmed, and defended against a m a j o r objection raised against it: i.e. that the hypothetical gain in latency difference would be destroyed by an increase in variance. Slowly rising ramps a p p e a r to be especially advantageous at small interaural level differences (Fig. 4b,c). Interestingly, for small interaural level differences the error probabilities were rather independent of intensity, especially for the ramplike stimuli (Fig. 4b, 5b). In Fig. 3a,c the slope of the latency vs. intensity curves decreases with increasing intensity. The rather constant error probabilities of Fig. 4b thus indicate that the decrease in latency difference, which results from this shape of the curves, is compensated over a wide range by an equidirectional change in the standard deviations (Fig. 3b). The other available cue, spike count, yields similar values for both stimulus types (Fig. 5a). This means, however, that the use of ramplike communication signals would improve latency cues while not deterioriating the other possible directional cue, spike count. In the above simulations it was assumed that even a very small latency difference could be evaluated by auditory interneurones within the grasshopper's CNS. It is conceivable, however, that in the CNS time differences of a few hundred microseconds would perhaps lead to an ambiguous situation. Taking this into account, we performed the same simulation and assumed a threshold for the evaluation of latency differences (threshold values were varied between 0.1 and 0.5 ms). This additional assumption, however, does not improve the situation. Though the probabilities of incorrect decisions were reduced, the proportion of undetermined situations increased drastically, up to 100% at higher intensities for the stimulus with steep rise. Again, this increase was much less pronounced for ramplike onsets (data not shown). M6rchen et al. (1978) and M6rchen (1980) also give data on the latencies of auditory receptors of locusts. They report differences of up to 5 ms in latencies to ipsi- and contra-stimulation, even for stimuli with steep onsets (cf. Fig. 3c). However, these values were obtained with 25 kHz stimuli, which lead to a distinctly higher interaural level difference of approximately 20 dB (see also R6mer 1976). In addition, the latency vs. intensity-curves given in M6rchen et al. (1978) and R6mer (1976) - compared with the values of Fig. 3 432 R. Krahe, B. Ronacher: Directionality cues in grasshopper's auditory receptor responses - show a steeper slope in the near threshold range, which is accompanied by an enormous increase in standard deviations. However, this apparent difference is solely a consequence of stimulus duration: M6rchen used 22 ms tone pulses, R6mer used 20 or 100 ms stimuli, and with longer stimuli at very low intensities there is an increased probability for first spikes to have long latencies: At very low intensities a short (e.g. 10 ms) stimulus will often not evoke any spike. In contrast, with a longer stimulus there is still a chance that a spike will occur, even if none was elicited during the first 10 to 15 ms. Because of the drastic increase of standard deviations of latencies, the steeper slope of the curves in the near threshold range in M6rchen et al. (1978) would not yield a reduction in error probabilities. Comparison of neurophysiological data with behavioural results In behavioural tests with Ch. biguttulus it has been shown that grasshoppers can use intensity differences as well as time differences for directional hearing (von Helversen and von Helversen 1983; von Helversen and Rheinlaender 1988). Although the relevant behavioural data were obtained with Ch. biguttulus, we decided to use L. migratoria for neurophysiological recordings, mainly because of the advantages in recording from and culturing of locusts. The use of locust's auditory receptors as a model for receptors of other acridid grasshoppers was justified by earlier investigations in which essentially no differences were found at the level of tympanic receptor cells between L. migratoria and Ch. biguttulus, apart from a slight shift in characteristic frequencies (Ronacher and R 6 m e r 1985; Stumpner 1988; Stumpner and Ronacher, unpubl.). Even the m o r p h o l o g y and physiology of the auditory interneurones are very similar in both species (R6mer et al. 1988; Stumpner and Ronacher 1991). Therefore, it seems justified to compare the electrophysiological data presented here with behavioural results obtained on Ch. biguttulus. A more critical point for a quantitative comparison could be that the behavioural experiments were performed at higher temperatures (around 30~ Higher temperatures influence thresholds, spike count, and latencies of neurons (Heitler et al. 1977; Abrams and Pearson 1982; Ronacher and R 6 m e r 1985; Wolf 1986a). However, the shape of latency curves obtained at high temperatures (with rectangularly modulated signals) is very similar to the shape of latency curves obtained at r o o m temperature, except for a shift to lower values (Ronacher, unpubl.). We therefore are confident that the differences in experimental temperatures do not affect our model calculations too much for a comparison with behavioural data. As mentioned before, Ch. biguttulus males can lateralize a sound source at very small ILDs. An I L D of only 2 dB leads to a virtually errorless decision towards the louder side (von Helversen and Rheinlaender 1988). This difference would correspond to a sound source located approximately 10-15 ~ from the animal's longitudinal axis (Rheinlaender 1984; Wolf 1986b). Comparing these values with the error probabilities derived from the responses of a single pair of receptors, it becomes obvious that neither the evaluation of the latencies of the first spikes, nor an evaluation of spike counts, nor a correlated analysis of both cues yields the necessary accuracy for directional decisions (Figs. 4, 5). We conclude that the animals must use redundant cues. This could be achieved by using information from m a n y parallel receptors and/ or by sampling over a longer time period. According to our data there was not a sufficient improvement of the latency cue with longer song models. The spike count difference showed some improvement with these models (480 ms duration, see above), but the error probabilities were still around 0.1, which is approximately an order of magnitude too high. It has to be mentioned, however, that the accuracy of lateralization with shortened model songs has not yet been tested. Further behavioural studies must now follow, in order to know how m a n y syllables must be present in a song model to attain the above mentioned precision of lateralization behaviour. An evaluation of the response latencies of parallel receptor fibers might explain the directional sensitivity of behaving animals Each tympanal organ of L. migratoria accommodates 90 to 100 receptor cells (Michel and Petersen 1982), which can be classified morphologically into 4 types on the basis of their attachment sites in Mfiller's organ (Gray 1960; Michelsen 1971a,b; Stephen and Bennet-Clark 1982; Breckow and Sippel 1985). Receptor types differ considerably in their tuning and thresholds (Michelsen 1971a; R 6 m e r 1976). As the dynamic range of single receptors is restricted (20-25 dB), these differences in thresholds expand the dynamic range of the auditory organ ('range fractionation', Cohen 1964; Rheinlaender 1975). According to Michel and Petersen (1982) there exist approximately 20 low frequency receptors (LFR) of the most sensitive type (type 2 according to R 6 m e r 1976), and 60 LFR, belonging to type 1 and 3; G r a y (1960) reports 35 a-cells (type 1) and 12 b-cells (type 3), see Breckow and Sippel (1985) for the synonymization. Only 8-10 high frequency receptors (HFR, type 4) were found. The receptor types also differ somewhat in their shortest latencies (R6mer 1976; Halex et al. 1988). Type 1 L F R with high thresholds show the shortest latencies, while H F R have the longest latencies (R6mer 1976). If the CNS evaluates information from parallel receptors a major problem has to be solved: Because of the differences in best frequencies and thresholds of receptors, stimuli at medium to higher intensities must lead to considerable differences in latencies and spike count in receptors belonging to different types. H o w m a n y receptors of the 4 groups will be excited will depend on the sound intensity and the frequency content of the signal. By sampling from all receptor types, the signal to noise ratio would be reduced, especially at higher intensities, where the most sensitive receptors are in their saturation range. This limitation applies to both cues, response latency and spike count. A solution to avoid these problems would be the existence of different interneurones, each evaluating only a subset of receptors belonging to R. Krahe, B. Ronacher: Directionality cues in grasshopper's auditory receptor responses one type. A possible n e u r o a n a t o m i c a l basis for such a receptor-type specific sampling are the t o n o t o p i c projection areas of different receptor types in the a u d i t o r y neuropile of the m e t a t h o r a c i c ganglion ( R 6 m e r 1985; R 6 m e r et al. 1988; Halex et al. 1988). Unfortunately, the n u m b e r of individual receptor cells that c o n n e c t to any particular a u d i t o r y interneurone is u n k n o w n . N e u r o a n a t o m i c a l d a t a and short synaptic delays indicate that SN1, SN2, BSN1, and T N 1 are m o n o s y n a p t i c a l l y connected to receptors ( M a r q u a r t 1985; R 6 m e r and M a r q u a r t 1984; R 6 m e r et al. 1988; see also Lakes et al. 1990; S t u m p n e r 1988; S t u m p n e r and R o n a c h e r 1991), while m o s t ascending n e u r o n s apparently have no direct c o n t a c t with receptors ( R 6 m e r and Rheinlaender 1983; R 6 m e r et al. 1988); two exceptions are A N 1 0 a n d T N 3 (Pearson et al. 1985). Further studies m u s t n o w follow to ascertain h o w directionality cues are further processed by a u d i t o r y interneurones of the m e t a t h o r a c i c ganglion complex. Behavioural tests with Ch. biguttulus have d e m o n strated that the rise time of c o m m u n i c a t i o n signals is i m p o r t a n t for pattern recognition, and especially for determining the sex of a conspecific signaller (von Helversen 1993). The present d a t a on a u d i t o r y receptor responses suggest that an additional function of this shape of stridulation signals p r o d u c e d by the females could be to i m p r o v e latency cues for directional hearing and thus facilitate the male's search and approach. It w o u l d be interesting to k n o w whether similar m e c h a n i s m s are also used by other species. In several treefrog species, for example, the pulse shape (rise time) of vocalizations is also i m p o r t a n t for species recognition ( G e r h a r d t and D o h e r t y 1988; see also G e r h a r d t 1982, 1988; D o h e r t y and Gerh a r d t 1984; for electrophysiological d a t a see e.g. Hall and Feng 1988; Feng et al. 1990, 1991; C o n d o n et al. 1991; G o o l e r and Feng 1992). It seems likely that in some of these species the shape of the c o m m u n i c a t i o n signals could also contribute to p r o d u c e physiological time differences between afferent discharges, a n d thus facilitate the localization of the s o u n d source (cf. e.g. Feng and C a p r a n i c a 1976; Jorgensen and G e r h a r d t 1991; K l u m p a n d G e r h a r d t 1989; Melssen a n d E p p i n g 1992; Rheinlaender et al. 1979; Rheinlaender and K l u m p 1988; Schmitz et al. 1992). Acknowledgements. We thank G. Rammes for providing some data and U. Habbe for his most valuable help with the Monte Carlo simulation programs. Carl Gerhardt, Ulrich Habbe, Dagmar von Helversen, Andreas Stumpner, and two anonymous referees gave helpful comments on the manuscript which are appreciated. References Abrams TW, Pearson KG (1982) Effects of temperature on identified central neurons that control jumping in the grasshopper. J Neurosci 2:1538-1553 Adam LJ (1977) The oscillatory summed action potential of an insects auditory nerve (Locusta migratoria, Acrididae). I. Its original form and time constancy. Biol Cybern 26:241-24 Breckow J, Sippel M (1985) Mechanics of the transduction of sound in the tympanal organ of adults and larvae of the locust. J Comp Physiol A 157:619-629 433 Cohen MJ (1964) The peripheral organization of sensory systems. In: Reiss RF (ed) Neural theory and modelling. Stanford University Press, Stanford, pp 273-292 Condon CJ, Chang SH, Feng AS (1991) Processing of behaviorally relevant temporal parameters of acoustic stimuli by single neurons in the superior olivary nucleus of the leopard frog. J Comp Physiol A 168:709-725 Doherty JA, Gerhardt HC (1984) Acoustic communication in hybrid treefrogs: sound production by males and selective phonotaxis by females. J Comp Physiol A 154:319-330 Eisner N, Popov AV (1978) Neuroethology of acoustic communication. Adv Insect Physiol 13:229-355 Feng AS, Capranica RR (1976) Sound localization in anurans. (I). Evidence of binaural interaction in dorsal medullary nucleus of bullfrogs (Rana catesbeiana). J Neurophysiol 39:871-881 Feng AS, Hall JC, Gooler DM (1990) Neural basis of sound pattern recognition in anurans. Prog Neurobiol 34:313-329 Feng AS, Hall JC, Siddique S (1991) Coding of temporal parameters of complex sounds by frog auditory nerve fibres. J Neurophysiol 65:424-445 Gerhardt HC (1982) Sound pattern recognition in some North American treefrogs (Anura: Hylidae): Implications for mate choice. Am Zool 22:581-595 Gerhardt HC (1988) Acoustic properties used in call recognition by frogs and toads. In: Fritzsch B, Ryan MJ, Wilczynski W, Hetherington TE, Walkowiak W (eds) The evolution of the amphibian auditory system. Wiley, New York, pp 455-483 Gerhardt HC, Doherty JA (1988) Acoustic communication in the gray treefrog, Hyla versicolor: evolutionary and neurobiological implications. J Comp Physiol A 162:261-278 Gooler DM, Feng AS (1992) Temporal coding in the frog auditory midbrain - The influence of duration and rise-fall time on the processing of complex amplitude-modulated stimuli. J Neurophysiol 67:1-22 Gray EG (1960) The fine structure of the insect ear. Phil Trans R Soc London B 243:75-94 Halex H, Kaiser W, Kalmring K (1988) Projection areas and branching patterns of the tympanal receptor cells in migratory locusts, Locusta migratoria and Schistocerca gregaria. Cell Tissue Res 253:517-528 Hall JC, Feng AS (1988) Influence of envelope rise time on neural responses in the auditory system of anurans. Hearing Res 36:261-276 Hedwig B, Knepper M (1992) Separation of synaptic and spike activity in intracellular recordings for selective analysis. J Neurosci Meth 42: 83-90 Heitler WJ, Goodman CS, Rowell CHF (1977) The effects of temperature on the threshold of identified neurons in the locust. J Comp Physiol 117:163-182 Helversen D von (1972) Gesang des Mfinnchens und Lautschema des Weibchens bei der Feldheuschrecke Chorthippus biguttulus L. J Comp Physiol 81:381-422 Helversen D von (1984) Parallel processing in auditory pattern recognition and directional analysis by the grasshopper Chorthippus biguttulus. J Comp Physiol A 154:837-846 Helversen D von (1993) 'Absolute steepness' of ramps as an essential cue for auditory pattern recognition by a grasshopper (Orthoptera; Acrididae; Chorthippus biguttulus L.). J Comp Physiol A 172:633-639 Helversen D yon, Helversen O yon (1975) Verhaltensgenetische Untersuchungen am akustischen Kommunikationssystem der Feldheuschrecken. I. Der Gesang yon Artbastarden zwischen Chorthippus biguttulus und Ch. mollis. J Comp Physiol 104:273-299 Helversen D yon, Helversen O von (1983) Species recognition and acoustic localization in acridid grasshoppers: a behavioral approach. In: Huber F, Markl H (eds) Neuroethology and behavioral physiology. Springer, Berlin, pp 95-107 Helversen D yon, Helversen O yon (1987) Innate receiver mechanisms in the acoustic communication of orthopteran insects. In: Guthrie DM (ed) Aims and methods in neuroethology. Manchester Univ Press, Manchester, pp 104-150 434 R. Krahe, B. Ronacher: Directionality cues in grasshopper's auditory receptor responses Helversen D von, Rheinlaender J (1988) Interaural intensity and time discrimination in an unrestraint grasshopper: a tentative behavioural approach. J Comp Physiol A 162:333-340 Jorgensen MB, Gerhardt HC (1991) Directional hearing in the gray treefrog Hyla versicolor: Eardrum vibrations and phonotaxis. J Comp Physiol A 169:177-183 Klump GM, Gerhardt HC (1989) Sound localization in the barking treefrog. Naturwissenschaften 76:35-37 Lakes R, Kalmring K, Engelhard KH (1990) Changes in the auditory system of locusts (Loeusta migratoria and Schistocerca gregaria) after deafferentation. J Comp Physiol A 166:553-563 Lewis B (1983) Directional cues for auditory localization. In: Lewis B (ed) Bioacoustics. Academic Press, London, pp 233-257 Marquart V (1985) Auditorische Interneurone im thorakalen Nervensystem von Heuschrecken. Morphologie, Physiologic und synaptische Verbindungen. Thesis, Universit/it Bochum Melssen WJ, Epping WJM (1992) Selectivity for temporal characteristics of sound and interaural time difference of auditory midbrain neurons in the grassfrog: A system theoretical approach. Hearing Res 60:178-198 Michel K, Petersen M (1982) Development of the tympanal organ in larvae of the migratory locust (Locusta migratoria). Cell Tissue Res 222:667-676 Michelsen A (1971a) The physiology of the locust ear I. Frequency selectivity of single sense cells in the isolated ear. Z Vergl Physiol 71:49-62 Michelsen A (1971b) The physiology of the locust ear. II. Frequency discrimination based upon resonances in the tympanum. Z Vergl Physiol 71:63 101 Michelsen A (1979) Insect ears as mechanical systems. Am Sci 67: 696-706 Michelsen A (1983) Biophysical basis of sound communication. In: Lewis B (ed) Bioacoustics. Academic Press, London, pp 1 38 M6rchen A (1980) Spike count and response latency: two basic parameters encoding sound direction in the CNS of insects. Naturwissenschaften 67:469 M6rchen A, Rheinlaender J, Schwartzkopff J (1978) Latency shift in insect auditory nerve fibers. Naturwissenschaften 65:656-657 Pearson KG, Robertson RM (1981) Interneurones coactivating hindleg flexor and extensor motoneurones in the locust. J Comp Physiol 144:391-400 Pearson KG, Boyan GS, Bastiani M, Goodman CS (1985) Heterogeneous properties of homologous interneurons in the ventral nerve cord of locusts. J Comp Neurol 233:133-145 Rheinlaender J (1975) Transmission of acoustic information at three neuronal levels in the auditory system of Decticus verrucivorus (Tettigoniidae, Orthoptera). J Comp Physiol 97:1-53 Rheinlaender J (1984) Das akustische Orientierungsverhalten von Heuschrecken, Grillen und Fr6schen: Eine vergleichende neuround verhaltensphysiologische Untersuchung. Habilitationsschrift, Univ Bochum Rheinlaender J, Klump G (1988) Behavioral aspects of sound localization. In: Fritzsch B, Ryan MJ, Wilczynski W, Hetherington TE, Walkowiak W (eds) The evolution of the amphibian auditory system. Wiley, New York, pp 297-305 Rheinlaender J, M6rchen A (1979) "Time-intensity trading" in locust auditory interneurones. Nature 281:672 674 Rheinlaender J, R6mer H (1980) Bilateral coding of sound direction in the CNS of the bushcricket Tettigonia viridissima L. (Orthoptera, Tettigoniidae). J Comp Physiol 140:101-111 Rheinlaender J, Gerhardt HC, Yager DD, Capranica RR (1979) Accuracy of phonotaxis by the green treefrog (Hyla cinerea). J Comp Physiol 133:247-255 R6mer H (1976) Die Informationsverarbeitungtympanaler Receptorelemente von Locusta migratoria (Acrididae, Orthoptera). J Comp Physiol 109:102-122 R6mer H (1985) Anatomical representation of frequency and intensity in the auditory system of Orthoptera. In: Kalmring K, Elsner N (eds) Acoustic and vibrational communication in insects. Parey, Berlin Hamburg, pp 25-32 R6mer H, Marquart V (1984) Morphology and physiology of auditory interneurons in the metathoracic ganglion of the locust. J Comp Physiol A 155:249-262 R6mer H, Rheinlaender J (1983) Electrical stimulation of the tympanal nerve as a tool for analyzing the response of auditory interneurones in the locust. J Comp Physiol 152:289-296 R6mer H, Marquart V, Hardt M (1988) The organization of a sensory neuropile in the auditory pathway of two groups of Orthoptera. J Comp Neurol 275:201-215 Ronacher B, R6mer H (1985) Spike synchronization of tympanic receptor fibres in a grasshopper (Chorthippus biguttulus L., Acrididae): A possible mechanism for the detection of short gaps in model songs. J Comp Physiol A 157:631-642 Schmitz B, White TD, Narins PM (1992) Directionality of phase locking in auditory nerve fibres of the leopard frog Rana pipiens pipiens. J Comp Physiol A 170:589-604 Stephen RO, Bennet-Clark HC (1982) The anatomical and mechanical basis of stimulation and frequency analysis in the locust ear. J Exp Biol 99:279-314 Stumpner A (1988) Auditorische thorakale Interneurone von Chorthippus biguttulus L.: Morphologische und physiologische Charakterisierung und Darstellung ihrer Filtereigenschaften fiir verhaltensrelevante Lautattrappen. Thesis, Univ Erlangen Stumpner A, Ronacher B (1991) Auditory interneurones in the metathoracic ganglion of the grasshopper Chorthippus biguttulus. I. Morphological and physiological characterization. J Exp Biol 158:391-410 Wolf H (1986a) Response patterns of two auditory interneurons in a freely moving grasshopper (Chorthippus biguttulus L.). I. Response properties in the intact animal. J Comp Physiol A 158: 689-696 Wolf H (1986b) Response patterns of two auditory interneurons in a freely moving grasshopper (Chorthippus biguttulus L). II. Representation of stimulus parameters relevant in behavior. J Comp Physiol A 158:697-703