Download Willing Executioners of the Holocaust

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts
no text concepts found
Transcript
Willing
Executioners
of the
Holocaust
By: Shauna Delaney
Overview
• WWII lasted from 1939 to 1945
• The Final Solution was the Nazi plan for the complete
elimination of the Jewish People (11 million).
• During this time in order to carry out Hitler’s plans for the Final
Solution many Germans had to become actively involved.
• There are many reasons why the Germans willingly exterminated
the Jews.
• There have been many historical debates about the reasoning
behind the mass participation.
Questions
• Did Germans have feelings of Anti-Semitism before the war?
• Where Germans conscripted or did they sign up for the war and
Police Battalions?
• Did the Germans naturally have feelings of Anti-Semitism or
where they brought on through propaganda by the government?
• Did the Germans become indifferent to cope with the
psychological stress of the killings or did they just not care?
• What were some of the factors that lead to the Anti-Semitist
feelings around the time of WWII?
• What distinctions must be made between various types of war
crimes and the mind- sets of the men who committed them?
• What would create such a nationwide consensus on what to do
about the “Jewish Problem?”
• Why would so many Germans become actively involved in the
mass extermination of the Jews in WWII?
Thesis
• Many Germans become actively
involved in the mass extermination of
the Jews in WWII because of
conformity, obedience, and AntiSemitism forced upon the German
people by their Government.
Argument #1- Conformity
• The battalion had orders to kill Jews but each individual did not.
• To break ranks and to act with nonconformist behaviors was
beyond most men and it would be easier for them to just shoot.
• By breaking ranks non-shooters were leaving the “dirty work”
for their comrades. It was like refusing one’s share of an
“unpleasant collective obligation”
• Those men who did not shoot risked isolation, rejection, and
ostracism (A tight-knit unit among a hostile population, so the
individual literally has no where else to turn for support.)
• It was considered extremely disrespectful to one’s comrades
because not shooting indicates that he is “too good” and better
then the rest.
Argument #2- Obedience
• There was a known standard of obedience to orders in the military as
there still is today.
• The ruthless enforcement of discipline created a situation were most
individuals felt they had no choice but to kill.
• Men believed that disobedience surely meant concentration camp if
not immediately executed, possibly for their families as well.
• Trial after trial in postwar Germany, perpetrators said they were in a
situation of impossible “duress” and could not be held responsible for
their actions.
• Although no defense attorney or defendant in any of the hundreds of
postwar trials has been able to document a single case.
• But, even if the consequences of disobedience were not as dreadful as
thought, the men who complied could not have known that at the time.
Argument 3- Anti-Semitism
• Germans had been told for years, through literature, popular media, political
speeches and the medical establishment that the Jewish pose a threat to the
“Kultur” (the German concept and influence of a particular Germanic attitude,
spirit, temperament, ambition, achievement, and purpose.)
• It was not cultural propagandists who organized the “special treatment of the
Jews.” It was the public health officials, scientific journals, and physicians who
created the Anti-Semitist feelings. They ultimately believed that the Jews were
endangering their lives.
• The government did not want to hold back this information from the civilians.
This started many years before the outbreak of WWII.
• Germans felt that they had been chosen to accomplish this massive sanitation
project.
• Psychiatric professors believed in euthanasia, not as Nazis, but as responsible
physicians.
• Jews were believed to be “carriers of sickness” and it only reinforced their
beliefs when they were put into ghettos. They were horrible places where people
would live 15 to a room and real, not fantasized, diseases would rise.
• “If one sees others as polluted, infected matter dangerous to the culture, one
sees not human beings with feelings, capable of pain, and eliciting pity and
empathy.”
• This creates an enthusiasm to kill and remove the object provoking such intense
fear.
Counter Arguments
• The likelihood of any SS man ever having suffered punishment
for refusing to kill a Jew is very small. No case was able to
withstand scrutiny in the Nuremburg trials.
• If the majority of a group’s members opposes an act then the
social psychological pressure would work to prevent, not
encourage, individuals to undertake the opposed act.
• Germans had a natural hatred towards the Jews and the AntiSemitism was not brought on through the Government.
Sources
• Browning, Christopher R. "Daniel Goldhagens Willing
Executioners." Review Essay (2002).
• Fackenheim, Emil L., and David Patterson. "Why the Holocaust
Is Unique." Judaism 50.4 (2001).
• Glass, James M. Life Unworthy of Life. United States of America:
Harper Collins Publishers, Inc., 1997.
• Goldhagen, Daniel J. Hitler's Willing Executioners: Ordinary
Germans and the Holocaust. New York: Random House, Inc.,
1996.
• Klee, Ernst, Willi Dressen, and Volker Riess. Those Were the
Days. Great Britain: Hamish Hamilton, 1991.
• Van Liempt, Ad. Hitler's Bounty Hunters: The Betrayal of the
Jews. New York: Oxford International Publishers Ltd., 2005.
• Moses, A. D. "Structure and Agency in the Holocaust: Daniel J.
Goldhagen and His Critics." History & Theory 37.2 (1998).
Sources Cont.
• Rosen, James. "Willing Executioners." The American Spectator
(2005): 70-73.
• United States Holocaust Memorial Museum. Holocaust
Encyclopedia War Crime Trials. 2000. 21 Oct. 2006
<http://www.ushmm.org/wlc/en/>.
• The History Place. Holocaust Timeline. 1997. 21 Oct. 2006
<http://www.historyplace.com/worldwar2/holocaust/timeline.
html>.
• Browning, Christopher R. Ordinary Men: Reserve Police
Battalion 101 and the Final Solution in Poland. United States of
America: Harper Collins Publishers, Inc. 1992