Download NCI Precision Medicine Trials - American Association for Cancer

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts
no text concepts found
Transcript
NCI’s Precision Medicine Initiative for
Oncology – Operationalizing PublicPrivate Partnerships
Jeffrey S. Abrams M.D.
Associate Director, CTEP, DCTD
Acting Director for Clinical Research, DCTD
National Cancer Institute, NIH
AACR Genomics In Clinical Medicine
Think Tank
July 13-14, 2016
NCTN as a Network
in the Era of Precision Medicine
LAPS
Activated:
•
Lung-MAP (S1400) – led by SWOG
•
ALCHEMIST (A151216) – led by Alliance and ECOG-ACRIN
•
Exceptional Responders (9671) – open in NCTN and
beyond
•
NCI MATCH –led by ECOG-ACRIN
In development:
•
NCI Pediatric MATCH – led by COG
… It takes a network
…
NCI National Clinical Trials Network
2
Key Aspects of NCI Precision Medicine Trials

Single IND – multiple company partners working together within NCI IP
agreement framework

Public- private partnerships to extend the trials’ reach (FNIH, FOCR,
Companies)

Biopsies, NGS & other diagnostic tests paid for either by NCI or by company
partners – trials are very expensive

New educational issues for clinicians and patients – significance of
diagnostic tests – somatic (variants, allelic fraction) and germline

Correlative science: cfDNA, whole exome/genome, RNA seq
NCI Precision Medicine Trials: Lessons Learned
Multi-Lab Concordance for NGS testing is achievable
Assay turnaround time is adequate
Biopsies from sites nationwide are feasible
Central IRB is a critical component
Pre-screening is valuable
Multiple arms can be difficult to manage when new data
intrudes
 Adjuvant studies of rare variants are challenging






NCI’s Early Therapeutics Clinical Trials Network (ETCTN)
5
NCI-Designated Cancer Centers (clinical)
(Red= clinical centers gaining ETCTN opportunity under new program)
6
Recently developed NCI IND agents



Agents that have achieved FDA approval based in part on early development in CTEP collaborative early phase
programs
 Bortezomib- Mantle Cell Lymphoma
 Ipilumumab- Melanoma
 Lenalidomide and bortezomib- Multiple Myeloma
 Romidepsin- Peripheral T cell Lymphoma
 Sorafenib- Thyroid Cancer
 Ziv-aflibercept- Colorectal Cancer
 Dinutuximab (ch14.18)- Neuroblastoma
Pending FDA approval
 Nivolumab – Anal and Nasopharyngeal Cancer
 Pembrolizumab – Merkel Cell, Mycosis Fungoides
In pivotal trials based on development in CTEP program
 Cediranib and Oliparib- Ovarian Cancer
 Selumetinib- Uveal Melanoma
7
Molecularly Targeted Combinations: Accrual Data
 Active Studies 2011-2016: 263
 97 Investigational/Investigational
 127 Investigational/Commercial
 39 Commercial New indication
 29 Trials in review using investigational combinations
 Total Accrual: 11,432 across all histologies (phase 1, phase 2,
and pilot studies only – ETCTN and Cooperative Group Network)
NCI /Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program (CTEP)
8
NCI Drug Formulary Initiative: Industry-NCI/CTEP-Investigator Agreements
Common Data Sharing and IP Option Agreement Language
Funding Agreement/Protocol
Language or MTA (for non-clinical studies)
Simplified CRADA
Agreement
Institutions
Collaborator A
Investigational Agent A
Collaborator B
Investigational Agent B
NCI/DCTD
Network
Groups
Consortia
• Agreements encompass multiple trials/studies of mutual interest
• Framework accepted by Collaborators and Cancer Centers
NCI /Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program (CTEP)
9
Recommendations
 What is the threshold (of rarity) that defines the need
for national scale investigation (NCTN or private
sector)?
 Nationwide screening effort is needed to find molecular
subtype – new cost sharing structure seems necessary (gov’t,
industry, philanthropy)
 Central IRBs are critical for multi-arm studies and for studies of
rare diseases – system depends on volunteers
 Multiple agents are available for the target – Medical system
needs a “bake-off” study to rationalize care
NCI /Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program (CTEP)
10