Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Supporting Families Ciara Savage, Palliative Care Social Work Palliative Care Study Day 17th September 2009 Lecture Outline Context Practical Focus Challenges – Coping with anger, denial, family dynamics, etc. Solutions – What we can do Questions A FRIENDS STORY, 1990 Challenges Family Dynamics Coping with Anger Coping with Denial and Collusion Attending to Emotion Typical Timeline Breaking Bad News End of Life Care Time of Death Immediate Aftermath Coping with Family Dynamics We need to be aware of broader social /cultural issues that have an impact on family systems. We need to look at the individual contexts. Be mindful of a family’s journey MIND BODY Physical Attributes Medical Conditions Self Esteem Psychology Cognitive Intelligence SPIRIT Value Systems Laws Socio-Economic Policies Discrimination Oppression Culture/Ethnicity Resources Meaning Will Power Religion Determination Family History Relationships Communications Expectations Family Needs Family Networks Community/Society The whole person exists in context Environmental Needs - Housing –Money- Facilities-Material Conditions Framework for holistic assessment - the whole person exists in a context: From Good Pracices in Palliative Care : A Psycho social Perspective (1998) David Oliviere, Rosalind Hargreaves & Barbara Monroe. Impact of Illness on the Family Altschuler 1997 Socio-Cultural factors are important Life Stage is significant Stage of illness significant Common dilemmas: - living with uncertainty. - maintaining identities. - negotiating changes in roles and expectations. Balancing acceptance with hope as illness progresses. Impact of Illness on the Family Byng-Hall 1997 Families often have a particular ‘way’ or ‘script’ for dealing with illness, and providing care. Our role in promoting innovative ways to cope with illness. Relationships between Professionals and Families Altschuler 1997 Boundary between the family and outside world, more permeable. Shift in definition of roles. Important to ensure the family-professional system functions effectively. Avoid de-skilling Actively listen to concerns Non-judgemental stance Relationships between Professionals and Families Altschuler 1997 Important to respect limits on what people feel they can share. Professional role – Provide space for families to consider impact of illness on dignity and quality of their lives. Allow family members to reach informed decisions they feel comfortable with. Relationships between Professionals and Families – effective communication Illness Narratives (Altschuler 1997) - a way of exploring the patients’ and families experience of illness - Illustrate strategies used to cope and manage illness - Highlight unique gains and losses to individual relationships - Method to explore parts of patients stories which may have been excluded. Purpose of Family Meetings Sharing of Information & Concerns Clarifying goals of care Diagnosis Treatment Plan Prognosis Providing space to attend to challenging issues. Coping with Anger Often misdirected at health professionals. Remain calm; acknowledge & legitimise feelings Establish cause. Is it justified? Who/ where is it focused? Aim for healthy discharge of feelings. (Faulkner, 1998) Coping with Anger – Altschuler 1997 Aim to direct the energy of ANGER into some ACTION Energy to Harness, not to Resist. Methods of dealing with anger Faulkner, A. BMJ 1998;316:130-132 Denial A valid coping mechanism for patients and their families. May be total (rare). May be ambivalent. Level of denial may change over time. (Faulkner, 1998) Question/ Prompt Collusion A situation where a group of people agree to keep information from or to misinform others. Generally an act of love and a need to protect a loved one from further pain. Fear that ‘truth’ will take away hope.(Faulkner 1998) A way to cope with denial. Patients commonly aware and also colluding. Collusion: How to diffuse it sensitively Modelling open communication at a team level. Explore the cost of collusion to the family. Explore fears. Promise not to give unwanted information. Never agree to withhold information. Necessary Collusion? Referred to by Helft, 2005. Believes that, “.. Except in instances where stark frankness is openly requested, a style of communication that allows patients to dictate most of the flow of prognostic information, or to avoid it, is an ethical strategy of prognostic communication.” Recommended manner of breaking bad news Faulkner, A. BMJ 1998;316:130-132 Breaking Bad News Its an UNCOMFORTABLE experience Goal – EMPATHY Diificult to do – be aware of how we screen our own pain Eg. Avoiding eye contact, rushing, turning away, inappropriate settings. Communication Studies have shown a correlation of perceived poor team communication styles with increased levels of family distress. (Morita et al, 2004) Revealed a strong need for emotional support for families. Lower levels of distress correlated with physicians willing to explore families’ feelings. Effective Communication Depends on all stakeholders. Avoid ambivalent language, can lead to misunderstandings. Needs of patients and carers do not always match. Demanding on professionals: ‘pig in the middle’ syndrome. (Faulkner, 1998) Providing space Re-tell story - Helping families hear bad news, come to terms with situation. Making sense of the ‘new reality’ Meaning Making Attending to emotion – however it presents itself. Aim to ensure families feel we have understood their fears/dilemmas. “Despite the urgency to get things right, there is no one best way of saying goodbye,and what is often most important is accepting differences in what each person can tolerate.” Altschuler, 1997 Hug, 1990