Download Ethernet - Fujitsu

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Registered jack wikipedia , lookup

TV Everywhere wikipedia , lookup

Net neutrality law wikipedia , lookup

Wake-on-LAN wikipedia , lookup

Cracking of wireless networks wikipedia , lookup

Zero-configuration networking wikipedia , lookup

Recursive InterNetwork Architecture (RINA) wikipedia , lookup

Asynchronous Transfer Mode wikipedia , lookup

AppleTalk wikipedia , lookup

Net bias wikipedia , lookup

Multiprotocol Label Switching wikipedia , lookup

Computer network wikipedia , lookup

IEEE 802.1aq wikipedia , lookup

Piggybacking (Internet access) wikipedia , lookup

Passive optical network wikipedia , lookup

Network tap wikipedia , lookup

Power over Ethernet wikipedia , lookup

Airborne Networking wikipedia , lookup

Point-to-Point Protocol over Ethernet wikipedia , lookup

Quality of service wikipedia , lookup

Virtual LAN wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
Ethernet Services
Deployment and Technology
For California Telephone Association
Greg Rodgers
Sr. Manager, Market Development
Agenda
 Ethernet
 What is it
 Why is it important
 How big is the market
 Carrier Ethernet Solutions
 Definitions and applications
 Ethernet Services Defined (Metro Ethernet Forum - MEF)
 Ethernet-Line (E-Line)
 Ethernet-LAN (E-LAN)
 Ethernet Services and Opportunities




2
E-LAN - Layer 2 VPN
E-Line - Ethernet Private Line
Dedicated Customer Networks
Residential Broadband
Copyright 2005 Fujitsu Network Communications
December 2005
Ethernet as an Interface
 A universal “jack”
Internet
 To the network
 Within the network
 Easy to increase
bandwidth without
changing the port itself
 Single “jack” can support
multiple services on the
same port
 Well understood by
enterprises and equipment
vendors
 Monster volumes - low
cost
3
Routers
Video
servers
Ethernet
IP
Networ
k
DSLAMs
Data Storage
Arrays
Soft
switch
Enterprise
Networks
Universal Networking Currency for IP
> Transport service
> Switched service
> Internet access vehicle
> Infrastructure for residential broadband
Copyright 2005 Fujitsu Network Communications
December 2005
4
Copyright 2005 Fujitsu Network Communications
December 2005
Ethernet Services Forecast
Ethernet Services
Revenue Forecast
$12,000
 $0.5B industry grows to
$10B in 5 years
$10,000
$8,000
$M
 CAGR of near 50%
$6,000
$4,000
$2,000
$0
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
Source: Ovum-RHK, July 2005
 Metro services dominant
 Intercity services show
greatest growth potential
 Healthy revenue per port,
per month
5
US Ethernet Services Market, 2004
E-Line
E-Line
E-LAN
E-LAN
metro
intercity
metro
intercity
Ports
16,586
2,106
8,988
636
28,305
Revenue ($M)
Per port,
per month ($)
$288.7
$38.0
$155.9
$16.2
$498.8
$1,451
$1,504
$1,445
$2,123
$1,469
Copyright 2005 Fujitsu Network Communications
Source: Ovum-RHK, July 2005
December 2005
Total
Ethernet Services Utilization
 ATM, FR, Private Line are large
and slowly growing
 Ethernet services are < 5% of
ATM, FR, and PL revenue
 Important market inhibitors
have been
Estimated 2005 Service Revenue
 Lack of QoS capabilities
 Uniform and powerful
management and operations
 Ubiquity of service offerings
 Cross-elasticity with high margin
legacy services
Private Line = TDM-only services
Source: Heavy Reading
6
Copyright 2005 Fujitsu Network Communications
December 2005
Ethernet Transport Technology
 Many Ethernet services
deliberately utilize traditional
transport
 SONET MSPP still the top
choice for Ethernet transport
 Highly deployed and
understood
 Ethernet capable
Equipment used for
Ethernet services by %
 Co-existed with and relied
upon traditional transport
networks
 Technologies overlap
Source: Heavy Reading
 E.g., RPR over SONET or
MPLS over wavelength
7
Copyright 2005 Fujitsu Network Communications
December 2005
Ethernet Service Drivers - Customers
 Price per Megabit
 Higher bandwidth for less cost using less expensive interfaces
 Converged “best-effort” and high-priority services in single connection
 Dial-able Bandwidth
 Customer purchases “100 Mbps” facility, pays for 10 Mbps service
 Service provider scales bandwidth in-service to 20, 30, 50, etc. Mbps
 Perceived Value of VoIP
 Voice seen as “add-on” service to Ethernet
 Customer Needs Are Expanding
 HIPPA, Sarbanes-Oxley
 Disaster Recovery/Business Continuity (DR/BC)
 E-commerce expansion
 Heightened Network Survivability Requirements
 Service guarantees
 Looking To MEF for Certified Carrier Solutions
8
Copyright 2005 Fujitsu Network Communications
December 2005
Ethernet Service Drivers - Carriers
 Competitive Environment
 CLEC and start-up firms gaining traction with Ethernet-only services
 Offensive (revenue increase) and defensive (protect customer base) play
 Carriers Outgrowing Frame Relay Networks
 Ethernet currently more costly than Frame Relay
 Differentiated service offerings covers difference
 Standardized Delivery Solutions
 VLAN stacking, EoS, GFP, VCAT, LCAS, MPLS, RPR, link aggregation, services interworking
 Combinations of TDM and Ethernet services
 Ethernet-over-Copper (EoCu)
 Reduced complexity for adding new services or customers to network
 Ubiquity of Service Offerings Further Fuels Demand
 MEF Services Certification fuels consistency
 Triple-Play Offering Disruption
 Residential broadband overwhelms business customer traffic
 Migration to IPDSLAM
9
Copyright 2005 Fujitsu Network Communications
December 2005
“Ethernet” Is Pouring Into Carrier
Networks
~10,000,000+
subscribers
Dedicated Rings/ Networks
Switched Ethernet Services
Access services
~100,000
subscribers
10
Copyright 2005 Fujitsu Network Communications
December 2005
Carrier Ethernet Solutions
Carrier Ethernet Properties
Protection
• 50ms Protection
• No Spanning Tree
• MPLS Fast Reroute
Scalability
•
•
•
•
No VLAN Limitation
Services Mapped to LSPs
Optical Integration
Dialable bandwidth
Hard QoS
Carrier Class
Optical Ethernet
Service
Management
•
•
•
•
12
Fast service creation
Integrated third party management
Customer Network Management
Carrier class OAM capabilities
Copyright 2005 Fujitsu Network Communications
•
•
•
•
Connection Oriented Svcs
End to End CIR and EIR
Guaranteed end to end SLA
Traffic Engineered Ethernet
Integrated TDM
• Seamless integration of TDM
• Support existing voice applications
• Tested and Proven with large ILECs
December 2005
Enterprise and Carrier Ethernet
Connection-Less, Contention-Based
Routing Basis
MAC Address
Restoration
Spanning Tree
Protocol, Fast
STP
Switch
IP Address
OSPF, RSVP,
etc.
 Enterprise-centric
 Stochastic restoration
 Slower, less predictable
 Soft QoS
 Limited scalability
 Significantly trained personnel
Router
Connection-Oriented, Reservation-Based
Routing Basis
VLAN Tag,
Stacked Tags
VLAN Switch
Label
Restoration
Ring, Redundant
& Shared Links,
Link Aggregation
MPLS Fast
Reroute
 Carrier-centric
 Deterministic restoration
 Rapid, predictable
 Hard QoS
 Segregated access & core
 Dramatically improves scalability
 NEBS, 99.999% reliability
MPLS-LSR
13
Copyright 2005 Fujitsu Network Communications
December 2005
More Carrier Ethernet Tools
TDM
Ethernet
 SONET
 Heavily embedded
 Ethernet-aware
 Standardized interconnect
MSPP
GigE
TDM
MSPP
MSPP
TDM
MSPP
TDM
Ethernet
 GFP, VCAT, LCAS
 RPR with Point-to-Multi-Point
 Converged TDM and Ethernet
Multi-Service
Provisioning Platform
Ethernet
 WDM
 Variety of network configurations
Wavelength Division Multiplexer
WDM
SAN
Ethernet
TDM
14
WDM
GigE
SAN
 CWDM
 DWDM
 Access and Long-Haul
 Ethernet “Mux-Ponder”
TDM
Copyright 2005 Fujitsu Network Communications
December 2005
Protection Comparisons
NETWORK
TECHNOLOGY
SERVICE
RESTORATION
TIME
Ethernet Switch with
Spanning Tree Protocol
(STP)
30 to 60 seconds
Ethernet Switch with Rapid
Spanning Tree Protocol
(RSTP)
1 to 3 seconds
Ethernet over MPLS using
Fast Reroute
Sub-50ms (or
slightly more, as the
network scales)
Ethernet over Resilient
Packet Rings (RPR)
Sub-50ms
Ethernet over SONET/SDH
Sub-50ms
Layer 1 Protection Switching
- Optical Ethernet
Sub-50ms
 Spanning tree remains
slower technique
 Ethernet-over-SONET
provides data protection
identical to TDM services
 RPR-over-SONET adds
multi-point and statistical
multiplexing capabilities
 MPLS Fast Reroute enables
core restoration
 Optical line switching
facilitates Ethernet access
systems and WDM
Source: Heavy Reading, August 2005
15
Copyright 2005 Fujitsu Network Communications
December 2005
A Word About QoS…
 QoS attributes for all MEF service types
 Frame delay
 Frame delay variation
 Frame loss
 Typical switching gear provides “Soft QoS” or Statistical QoS
 Handled on a hop-by-hop basis
 Ethernet uses P-bits in the VLAN tag header (4096 tags)
 ‘Priority’ marking: 3 bits – 8 levels
 Works well for aggregation but limited for core applications
 IP uses Diff Serv Code Points (DSCP) in the IP header
 ‘Priority’ marking: 6-bits – 64 levels
 These techniques work “on average”
 Connection-oriented protocols use more than priority
 MPLS/ATM/FR - QoS is associated with the connection
16
Copyright 2005 Fujitsu Network Communications
December 2005
A Word About Pseudowires
 A pseudowire encapsulates protocols into a connection-oriented
container
 Easily multiplexed and transported
 Correlation: Digital wrapper, IP Tunnel
 A pseudowire can also be thought of as a kind SONET VT1.5
 Bandwidth can be flexibly provisioned (or signaled)
 QoS can be guaranteed
 A pseudowire uses the MPLS frame format
 Placed into an MPLS tunnel for easy transport across an MPLS backbone
DS1
Adaptation
Function
VT
STS
PW
MPLS
FR/ATM/Ethernet
17
Copyright 2005 Fujitsu Network Communications
December 2005
Ethernet Services Definitions
Courtesy of Metro Ethernet Forum (MEF)
MEF Service Concept
Customer
Edge
(CE)
User Network
Interface
(UNI)
User Network
Interface
(UNI)
Customer
Edge
(CE)
Ethernet Virtual Connection
(EVC)
Metro Ethernet
Network (MEN)
Not necessarily a
real “connection”
Service
Attributes
Delivery technology
UNI: Standard Ethernet interface that is the point of demarcation between the
customer equipment and the service provider’s MEN
EVC: An instance of association of two or more UNIs that helps conceptualize
the service connectivity – frames can only be exchanged among the
associated UNIs
19
Copyright 2005 Fujitsu Network Communications
December 2005
E-line and E-LAN Service Types
Defined by MEF
Delivery technology is
UNSPECIFIED
Point-to-Point
EVC
 E-Line Service used to
create
 Private Line Services
 Ethernet Internet Access
 Point-to-Point Layer 2 VPNs
 E-LAN Service used to
create
 Multipoint Layer 2 VPNs
 “Transparent LAN Service”
Carriers can package services in different ways
MEN
CE
Ethernet access service to data network
20
Copyright 2005 Fujitsu Network Communications
UNI
E-Line Service type
Multipoint-to-Multipoint
EVC
UNI
UNI CE
CE
MEN
Ethernet over transport (SONET/DWDM)
Ethernet over switched network
CE
UNI
CE UNI
UNI CE
E-LAN Service type
December 2005
E-Line Services
 EPL is one point to point
service per port
 EVPL has multiple point to
point services per port
(service multiplexing)
Storage SP
Point-to-Point EVCs
(dedicated BW)
Ethernet
UNI
Ethernet
UNI
CE
Ethernet
UNI
CE
MEN
MEN
ISP
POP
Ethernet
UNI
CE
Internet
Ethernet Private Line
(EPL) using E-Line
Service type
21
Point-to-Point
EVCs
Ethernet
Service
UNI
Multiplexed
Ethernet
UNI
CE
Copyright 2005 Fujitsu Network Communications
CE
CE
Ethernet
UNI
Ethernet Virtual Private Line
(EVPL)
December 2005
E-LAN Services
 EPLAN is one multi-point
service per port
 EVPLAN has multiple multipoint services per port
(service multiplexing)
VLANs
Sales
Customer Service
Engineering
UNI 1
Multipoint-toMultipoint EVC
UNI
2
UNI 1
Multipoint-toMultipoint EVCs
UNI
2
MEN
UNI
VLANs
3 Engineering
UNI 4
VLANs
Sales
22
VLANs
Sales
Customer Service
Engineering
Copyright 2005 Fujitsu Network Communications
MEN
UNI 4
VLANs
Sales
December 2005
UNI
VLANs
3 Engineering
Ethernet Services Opportunities
Multi-Technology Network
Manageable, cheap
customer edge
device
IOF/Regional
Network using
SONET/DWDM
CE
MSPP
OC-48
RPR
CE
WDM
WDM
CE
LER
MSPP
MSPP
LER
LSR
LER
Ethernet Switch
using EFM
LSR
core
LER
access aggregation
CE
EoCu
CE
EoCu
access network
CE
CE
CE
CE


Access Network
 Use “best-fit” technology
 VLAN stacked tags used for switching and
priority within ring/connection
 Facility protection switching (optical) <50ms,
with link aggregation
24
Access Aggregation



Combination of L2 switching and aggregation with
adaptation to MPLS
VLAN (network) tags morph into MPLS hard QoS
Core
Copyright 2005 Fujitsu Network Communications


Label Switch Routers (LSR’s) added as MPLS traffic
grows
Leverage distance and multiplexing advantages of
SONET and DWDM
December 2005
Interesting Services
 Layer 2 Virtual Private Network (VPN)
 E-LAN using shared bandwidth
 VLAN-based in access, MPLS in core
 Settable CIR and EIR; “best-effort” to VoIP “low-latency” service
 High security
 End-to-End Quality of Service (QoS)
 Ethernet Private Line
 E-Line using dedicated bandwidth
 SONET and/or DWDM access and core
 Dedicated Internet Access
 Single-point LAN extension
 Remote office integration
 Mimics performance and ubiquity of TDM private line services
25
Copyright 2005 Fujitsu Network Communications
December 2005
Interesting Services
 Dedicated Customer Rings
 Wavelength and SONET Layer 1
 Mixed services
 SAN - FICON, ESCON, Fibre Channel
 TDM - T1, T3
 Ethernet - 10/100 Mb in 1Mb increments, Gigabit Ethernet, 10 GigE
 Geographic limitations
 Carrier-owned, customer-managed, self-contained network
 Residential Broadband
 SONET/DWDM Layer 1 transport
 FTTx using copper or fiber last-mile
 Switched digital video over copper (IP TV) or Passive Optical
Networking (PON)
 Massive impacts to core data network
26
Copyright 2005 Fujitsu Network Communications
December 2005
Residential Broadband Infrastructure
Places New Requirements on Ethernet
 Residential volumes
and bandwidth
drive network
scalability
requirements
 Video and VoIP
drive QoS and
reliability
requirements
27
Copyright 2005 Fujitsu Network Communications
December 2005
Adding Ethernet Services
To Existing Networks
CE
CE
CE
VLAN
Ethernet
Capable
NE
SONET or WDM
IOF / Backhaul / Co-Lo
 Support most or all MEF
formats
 EPL, EVPL, ELAN, EVPLAN





 CIR
 EIR
 Service guarantees
NE
For
Intercity
Services
ISP
VLAN
28
Hard QoS
High Scalability
Low “first-cost”
Rapid restoration
SLA-capable
 As services grow, populate
core with MPLS-LSR
Copyright 2005 Fujitsu Network Communications
December 2005
Fujitsu’s Complete Offering
FLASHWAVE® MSPP
“Ethernet-capable”
FLASHWAVE WDM
A-Series
Carrier Ethernet
29
FLASHWAVE 6400
Layer 2.5 Migration Edge
Services Interworking
Copyright 2005 Fujitsu Network Communications
Network Management
Full Services Portfolio
December 2005
Summary
 Ethernet Is Large and Important
 … And Growing
 Universal network currency for IP
 Significant Competitive Forces Are In Play Making Ethernet a “MustHave” Service Offering
 The Customer Value Proposition for Ethernet Services Will Continue
to Pick Up Momentum
 Triple-Play Services Will Disrupt Normal Loads on Ethernet
Infrastructure
 Carrier Ethernet Devices Provide Highly Reliable Platforms for
Providing SLA-Driven Services
 Customers Understand and Accept MEF Service Definitions and Will
Seek MEF-Certified Carrier Solutions
 Ethernet Provides Carriers With A New Vehicle for Offering Higher
Value Services
 Adding Ethernet Services Can Begin Slowly and Grow Over Time
30
Copyright 2005 Fujitsu Network Communications
December 2005
Copyright 2005 Fujitsu Network Communications, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FLASHWAVE® (and design)™ are trademarks of Fujitsu Network Communications Inc. (USA).
FUJITSU (and design)® and THE POSSIBILITIES ARE INFINITE™ are registered trademarks of Fujitsu Limited.
All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners.
31
Copyright 2005 Fujitsu Network Communications
December 2005