Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
U.S. Court Upholds Law Allowing Assisted Suicide Justices reject effort by attorney general to punish doctors By David Stout Herald Tribune 2005 International WASHINGTON- The U.S. Supreme Court on Tuesday upheld Oregon’s assisted-suicide law, declaring that the Bush administration had exceeded its authority in trying to undo the statute by punishing doctors who help people end the lives of their patients. 1. 2. In a 6-to-3 decision, which would apply to other states if their people chose to follow Oregon’s lead, the court held that John Ashcroft, who then was attorney general, went well beyond his authority and expertise when he ruled in 2001 that(doctors would lose their federal prescription privileges if they prescribed lethal doses of medications for patients. The Oregon law, called the Death with Dignity Act, was twice approved by the state’s voters. It is the only state law in the United States allowing doctor-assisted suicide and has been used by more than 200 people since it took effect in 1997. 3. The issues of euthanasia and assisted suicide remain highly controversial in the United States, as they do in Europe, where practices range from the relatively permissive approach of the Netherlands and Belgium, which allow doctors to end life in certain limited conditions, to outright bans in Poland and Greece. ___________________________ 1. a. What was the attorney general’s charge against the doctors? ___________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________ b. What punishment did he seek? ___________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________ ____________________________ 4. In the U.S. ruling Justice Anthony Kennedy, writing for the majority, acknowledged that the long-running battle over the Oregon law was part of a “political and moral debate.” But the issue for the court, he said, was a more technical, downto-earth one: Did the attorney general go beyond his powers under the Controlled Substances Act of 197O? 5. Clearly, he did, Justice Kennedy wrote, in an opinion joined by Justices John Paul Stevens, Sandra Day O’Connor, David Souter, Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Stephen Breyer. The Controlled Substances Act “gives the attorney general limited powers, to be exercised in specific ways,” the court ruled. Those limited powers, he said, do not include the ability to declare Illegitimate “a medical standard for care and treatment of patients that is specifically authorized under state law”. 6. In deferring to the will of Oregon lawmakers and voters, the high court majority said that Congress had explicitly envisioned a role for the states in regulating controlled substances when it enacted the 1970 law. Nothing in the act allows the attorney general to interpret prescriptions for assisted suicide as ‘drug abuse,” Kennedy wrote. 7. Moreover, the majority concluded, the language of the 1970 law signals a clear unwillingness to allow medical judgments to be made by an executive official who lacks medical expertise. And the former attorney general’s assertion that he was making a legal decision, not a medical one, does not hold up under scrutiny, the justices said. _________________________ 2. Give three reasons why the judges ruled against the attorney general. (para 5-7) i._________________________________________________ __________________________________________________ __________________________________________________ ii._________________________________________________ __________________________________________________ __________________________________________________ iii _________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________ __________________________ 8. The Death With Dignity Act took effect in 1997. It sets out specific, detailed procedures for patients who want to end their lives, and for doctors who want to help them. 9. Among other requirements, a patient must have a life expectancy of less than six months and must be mentally competent. The patient must be advised of all alternatives, like hospice care and pain management. And the doctor who prescribes the drugs may not administer them. 10. As of the last reporting period on the law, in 2004, 326 patients had received prescriptions for medications to end their lives, and 208 had actually used them. The ruling on Tuesday upheld one by the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, which had voided the former attorney general’s 2001 declaration. ______________________________ 3. What are 4 components of the Death with Dignity Act? i._______________________________________________ ii._______________________________________________ iii._______________________________________________ ______________________________ European Approaches 13. In Europe, approaches to the issue of assisted suicide range from outright bans in Poland and Greece to permission for doctors to end life under limited conditions in Belgium and the Netherlands. 14. A Dutch law that took effect in 2002 made the Netherlands the first country to legalize such practices. But euthanasia is allowed only if the patient’s condition is incurable and only if the patient is of sound mind, fully agrees to the procedure and faces a level of suffering considered unbearable. _____________________ 4. What does the second section of the article deal with? _______________________________________________ 5. How does the euthanasia law of Holland differ from that of Oregon? ________________________ 15. A committee comprising a doctor, a jurist and a medical ethicist checks that those criteria are met. 16. Thousands of Dutch citizens have died under those conditions. But controversy erupted again last year when a study found a score of cases in which doctors had reported the euthanasia of babies with spina bifida — a severe but often surgically correctable birth defect. The government is establishing a commission to regulate the still-illegal practice of ending the lives of newborns with untreatable pain. 17. The Belgian Parliament in September 2002 passed a law stating that a doctor would “not be committing an infraction” if a mentally competent adult suffering from an incurable disease or affliction and under constant or unbearable physical or psychological pain were allowed to die. 18. The Netherlands and Belgium are the only European Union countries to allow such practices, though others are debating the matter, amid sharp opposition from the Roman Catholic Church. Opinion polls in countries like Germany show considerable public support. 19. In Switzerland, a legal loophole allows trained counselors, not required to be physicians, to prepare a fatal overdose for someone who is terminally ill and has asked repeatedly to die. 20. The National Assembly in France adopted a law in 2004 defining a right for incurably ill patients, who are competent to make such a decision, to die by slowing or halting medical treatment. __________________________ 6. Name 3 other countries and explain their positions on euthanasia. ______________________ ____________________ ______________________ ____________________ ______________________ ____________________ ________________________ 21. But last year, the trial of a French mother, Marie Humbert, on criminal charges for helping end her son’s life before the 2004 law, stirred an impassioned debate. The son, Vincent Humbert, had been a 19-year-old firefighter in 2000 when a car crash left him nearly blind, mute and paralyzed from the neck down. His mother campaigned for three years in support of Vincent’s wish to die, but was turned down even by President Jacques Chirac. She unsuccessfully gave him an overdose of sedatives in 2003, and a doctor later turned off a life-support system and administered a lethal dose of drugs. 22. Early this month a state prosecutor dropped the charges against the mother and the doctor. ________________________ 7. What is the irony in the French mother’s act in 2003? (para 21) ___________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________ Good - Luck!!!!