* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Max Henderson
Mental health in Russia wikipedia , lookup
Moral treatment wikipedia , lookup
History of mental disorders wikipedia , lookup
History of psychiatric institutions wikipedia , lookup
Involuntary commitment internationally wikipedia , lookup
Abnormal psychology wikipedia , lookup
Emergency psychiatry wikipedia , lookup
Adherence management coaching wikipedia , lookup
THE CONFUSED/AGITATED PATIENT Max Henderson Session Objectives By the end of this session you should be able to: • Give a working definition of confusion/agitation associated with illness • Describe the common pattern of symptoms associated with confusion/agitation recognising their variability • Describe the conditions which are commonly associated with confusion/agitation in general hospital patients • Outline the core steps involved in assessment, recognising the main medical, physical and psychological causes of confusion/agitation • Give examples of general and pharmacological management that can be offered for management of confusion/agitation, in addition to addressing reversible causes where appropriate • Outline the legal considerations when managing a confused/agitated patient. Key topics to be covered in the presentation • Recognition of confusion/agitation – key symptoms • Common presentations of confusion/agitation • Assessment of the confused/agitated patient • Management of the confused/agitated patient • Legal considerations (Mental Capacity Act/Mental Health Act) Agitation • Physical signs Series of unintentional and purposeless motions Often repetitive • Underlying mental state Anxiety, fear, sadness ….etc • Feature of many disease states Hypoxia, hypoglycaemia Many psychiatric disorder Adverse effect of a number of medications BUT CAN ALSO BE COMPLETELY NORMAL!!! Confusion Loss of orientation +/Memory impairment Inability to focus attention Abnormal conscious level Range from mild to severe Acute to chronic Is a symptom not a diagnosis May indicate underlying pathology Delirium Confusion Behavioural change What is delirium? • The most common neuropsychiatric complication of medical illness • A (potential) medical emergency • Aka: Acute brain failure Acute confusional state Acute organic syndrome Cerebral insufficiency Encephalopathy Post-operative psychosis Toxic psychosis Http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XE58S4PjTDo Delirium Overview • Indicators of delirium • Characteristics • Key features • Types of delirium • Why is delirium often missed? Indicators of Delirium Changes or fluctuations in: Behaviour Cognitive function Perception Physical function Social behaviour Not able to hold a conversation when usually able to do so Characteristics •Acute/abrupt onset •Fluctuating course •Worse at night •Organic aetiology •Frequently under-diagnosed! Key Features •Inattention – in 97% •Level of inattention correlates with other cognitive impairment but NOT non-cognitive aspects •Disorientation least common feature •Psychosis in only 50%, florid in 20% •No association between psychosis and motoric state Types of delirium •Hyperactive (21%) Agitation Hallucinations Behavioural disturbance Irritability/anger Laughing/swearing/ euphoria Wandering •Mixed (43%) Alternates between hyperactive and hypoactive states •Hypoactive (29%) ↓ level of consciousness Somnolence Sparse or slow speech Staring Apathy •Unclassified (7%) Why is delirium so often missed? • Fail to appreciate there’s something wrong • Recognise something’s wrong but…. Too ready to accept confusion as “normal” • Wrong diagnosis Its depression (scary.. Don’t want to go there) Its dementia (incurable..whats the point) Thus… • You will only diagnose it if you consider it • Systematic approach increases likelihood you will think about it • Using a tool increases the likelihood you will get the diagnosis right Diagnosis of Delirium Detection of Delirium • Obvious if agitated/floridly psychotic • Up to half of cases missed though….. • Need to compare with baseline status Clinical diagnosis: - Cognitive impairment-MMSE, AMTS - Attention deficit- Digit span, months backwards, d-l-r-o-w Assessment Tools • Confusion Assessment Method • Memorial delirium assessment scale • Delirium rating scale • Delirium symptom interview • Confusion rating scale • Clock drawing test Differential Diagnosis •Lewy body dementia •Schizophrenia •Vascular dementia •Hypomania •Alzheimers dementia •Anxiety •Stupor •Depression •Coma Delirium Dementia Diagnostic criteria Diagnostic Criterium • Which one? ICD-10 DSM-IIIR DSM-IV ICD-11 DSM-V Definitions ICD 10 definition • Impairment in consciousness or attention DSM IV definition •Disturbed consciousness •Disturbed attention • Global cognitive impairment •Disturbed cognition • Psychomotor disturbance •Acute / subacute onset • Sleep-wake cycle disturbance • Emotional disturbance •Fluctuating symptoms ICD-10 (N=43) 17 25 13 1 8 42 DSM-III (N=80) 7 DSM-IV (N=106) 19 Pitkala 2003 DSM-III-R (N=83) Confusion about confusion • 5-fold difference in prevalence rates • Only 1:5 clinically diagnosed deliriums meet ‘caseness’ for both criteria • Remember HYPOactive forms • “But I know it when in see it…”? Problems • ICD-10 too limiting: must tick all boxes • What is consciousness? • What is clouding? • Must they have BOTH altered attention AND clouding of consciousness? • Is reduced attention evidence of impaired consciousness? • What do we do about a problem like dementia? Basic epidemiology Epidemiology General population 0.4% General populatio n (>55 yrs) 1.1% General hospital admission s 9-30% Elderly general hospital admission s 5-55% Elderly A&E attenders 17% Advanced cancer patients 25-85% Postoperative patients 5-75% Intensive Care Units 1250% Nursing home residents up to 60% Delirium is common in advanced disease • 25% - 85% in the literature • 42% showed cognitive impairment on admission to palliative care unit (Lawlor 2000) • 31% < 8 on AMTS at St Christopher’s Hospice Risk Factors Predisposing Precipitating •Increased age •Length of surgery •Pre existing cognitive impairment •Increased urea:creatinine •Severe illness (esp ↑ pain ↓ sleep) •Drugs – withdrawal or addition •Infection •Visual impairment •New # •Polypharmacy •Metabolic derangement Causes of delirium Causes of delirium: Drugs Opiates (especially if renal failure): dehydration and toxicity Sedatives e.g. benzodiazepiness GI drugs: cimetidine, ranitidine, metoclopramide NSAIDS Corticosteroids Anticholinergics e.g. amitriptyline Causes of deliruim Metabolic causes (18%) • Fluid imbalance • Electrolyte imbalance e.g. hypercalcaemia Trauma Infection • UTI, RTI Poorly controlled pain Hypoxia Constipation Poor glycaemic control Never forget… ALCOHOL WITHDRAWAL!!!!!!!!! Delirium Tremens • Associated with alcohol withdrawal • MEDICAL EMERGENCY – untreated mortality up to 35% • Typically appears 2-3 days after stopping drinking – more than just “bad withdrawal” • Delirium symptoms PLUS Diarrhoea Changes in BP Prominent VISUAL hallucinations, also occasionally TACTILE Patient commonly terrified Neuropathology of delirium Neuropathology of delirium • Several neurotransmitter systems implicated Serotonergic Noradrenergic Opiatergic Glutaminergic Histaminergic CHOLINERGIC: final common pathway-imbalance between cholinergic and dopaminergic activity • Inflammatory cascade Macrophage / monocyte activity Reduced oxygen carriage Cytokine activity altered BBB permeability Acetylcholine Dopamine Why does delirium matter? Delirium is associated with increased suffering Patient distress Increased mortality Increased length of stay Increased use of medication Family distress ? Staff distress Management of delirium Management Prevention Assessment Treatment Management Aims • Prevention is the best cure! (Inouye 1999) • Goal of returning the patient back to baseline cognitive functioning NOT behavioural control Prevention Prevention • All patients at the end of life are vulnerable • Strategies: Familiar healthcare team Avoid moving between wards Early assessment for risk factors (THINK DELIRIUM!) Maintain hydration and delirium Encourage cognitive activity Re-orientate regularly Support good sleep patterns Encourage mobilisation Recruit patient and family Evidence Based Thoughtfulness? Incidence of delirium reduced from 15% to 9.9% Total days of delirium reduced from 161 to 105 No change in delirium severity Total cost of interventions < $140 000 = $327 per patient Drug Primary Prevention • RCT of haloperidol prophylaxis (Kalisvaart 2005) • 430 hip-surgery patients randomised to 1.5mg haloperidol or placebo • No difference in incidence • Reduced delirium severity • Halved length of delirium episode • Reduced post-op stay in hospital Assessment Before you see the patient Whilst you are seeing the patient After you have seen the patient Before you see the patient The problem: • Is there a problem? • What sort or problem is it? • Who has the problem? Who is being managed? Who has a problem? • Patient • Anxiety • Psychosis • Potential for harm e.g. wandering • Family • Apparent patient distress (? Restlessness ? Psychosis) • ability to communicate • Staff • Apparent patient distress • ability to communicate Before you see the patient Resources • Your memory • Reports from colleagues • Medical notes • (informant history) Whilst you are seeing the patient First engage brain…. what do you see? what do you hear? Best time of day? Minimise threat…… What will this be like for the patient??? After you have seen the patient • Are they how you thought they would be? • Evidence of fluctuation Within assessment Compared to last time • How do they make you feel? (=what will their relatives be feeling?) Treatment Key Management Strategies • Identify and treat underlying cause(s) if appropriate • Manage current symptoms - Non-pharmacological - Pharmacological What to treat • Few accounts of what delirium is like (but see Crammer BJPsych 2002) • Treat specific symptoms – especially anxiety • There is no drug treatment for either disorientation or wandering • Reserve antipsychotics for distressing hallucinations delusions or agitation? (http://www.leeds.ac.uk/lpop/documents/Delirium%20guidelines.doc) . Pharmacological Management • NICE recommended use if (and only if): - Patient is distressed - Considered a risk to themselves or others - Verbal and non-verbal de-escalation techniques unsuccessful “Pharmacological interventions are currently used in clinical practice to manage the symptoms of delirium but the evidence for this is limited” (NICE) Medication • To relieve symptoms • Antipsychotic medication - But significant risks • Anxiolytic medication - But significant risks - High quality evidence difficult to obtain Legal issues Mental Capacity Act 2005 • Came into force in 2007 - 2009 • Sets out a framework for decision-making on behalf of adults who lack capacity to make decisions themselves • Incorporates aspects of ‘common law’ – (codifies Best Interests) • Introduces ‘Lasting Power of Attorney’ to cover all aspects of a person’s care – medical and social care, housing, finances • Defines new role of Independent Mental Capacity Advocate (IMCAs) • Introduces a new criminal offence of ‘wilful neglect’ • Living wills/advance directives • Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards (amended by MHA 2007) The Mental Capacity Act 2005 A person’s ability to make a particular decision at a specific time or in a specific situation It is assumed that adults have capacity to make decisions unless proven otherwise Two stage process: Is there an impairment of mind or brain? Is the impairment sufficient to impair decision making capacity? Capacity Test (decision-specific not ‘global’): Can the person understand the information? Can the person retain the information (long enough to make a judgement)? Can the person use or weigh the information? Can the person communicate the decision? Failure in one or more parts of this test indicates lack of capacity Mental capacity law in practice Health professionals or decision makers will be exempt from liability if they have a reasonable belief that the person: (i) lacks capacity AND (ii) the decision is in the person’s best interests Reasonable use of restraint may be lawful to effect necessary treatment. Advance directives refusing treatment – now have legal power except where a patient is subject to compulsory treatment under the Mental Health Act ECHR ruled that it is never lawful to deprive a person of their liberty so the original MCA was amended by the MHA 2007 to set up a framework to legally detain/deprive compliant incapacitated persons in hospitals or nursing homes (DOLS). The Mental Health Act 2007 Implemented in October 2008 – unchanged provisions • Section 2 – 28 days assessment • Section 3 – up to 6 months treatment – renewable • Section 5(2) – up to 72 hours in order to arrange full assessment for Section 2 or Section 3