Download CITATIONS TO THE WORK OF William J. Rapaport

CITATIONS TO THE WORK OF
William J. Rapaport
Department of Computer Science and Engineering
Department of Philosophy, Department of Linguistics,
and Center for Cognitive Science
State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY 14260-2500
[email protected]
http://www.cse.buffalo.edu/˜rapaport/
September 11, 2013
Summary: Listed below are 495 non-self-referential citations (plus 7 “miscellaneous” references), distributed as follows:
Year
1978
1979
1980
1982
1983
1984
1985
1986
1987
1988
1989
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
# citations:
1
3
3
5
7
2
4
25
7
14
28
32
30
24
29
17
18
Year
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
# citations
21
22
20
19
15
8
15
13
17
11
14
9
20
17
14
8
4
Note: Works cited are listed in chronological order.
1
1. Rapaport, William J. (1976), “On Cogito Propositions”, Philosophical Studies 29: 63–68.
1. Landini, Gregory (compiler) (1986), “Philosophical Bibliography of Hector-Neri Castañeda”, in James E.
Tomberlin (ed.), Hector-Neri Castañeda (Dordrecht, The Netherlands: D. Reidel): 395–434.
2. Rapaport, William J. (1976), Intentionality and the Structure of Existence, Ph.D. dissertation, Department
of Philosophy, Indiana University.
1. Zalta, Edward N. (1983), Abstract Objects: An Introduction to Axiomatic Metaphysics (Dordrecht, The
Netherlands: D. Reidel).
2. Orayen, Raûl (1984), “On the Inconsistency of Meinong’s Ontology”, in Jorge J. E. Gracia (ed.), Philosophical Analysis in Latin America (Dordrecht, The Netherlands: D. Reidel): 115–139.
3. Castañeda, Hector-Neri (1986), “Replies”, in James E. Tomberlin (ed.), Hector-Neri Castañeda (Dordrecht, The Netherlands: D. Reidel): 333–391
4. Landini, Gregory (compiler) (1986), “Philosophical Bibliography of Hector-Neri Castañeda”, in James E.
Tomberlin (ed.), Hector-Neri Castañeda (Dordrecht, The Netherlands: D. Reidel): 395–434.
5. Orilia, Francesco (1987), “Definite Descriptions and Existence Attribution”, Topoi 6: 133–138.
6. Zalta, Edward N. (1987), “Erzählung als Taufe des Helden: Wie man auf fiktionale Objeckte Bezug
nimmt” (German translation, by Arnold Günther, of “Referring to Fictional Characters”, paper (in English)
presented at the American Philosophical Association Pacific Division meeting (March 1985)), Zeitschrift
für Semiotik 9(1–2): 85–95.
7. Orilia, Francesco (1991), “Type-Free Property Theory, Bradley’s Regress and Meinong and Russell Reconciled”, Grazer Philosophische Studien 39: 103–125.
8. Orilia, Francesco (1994), “Belief Representation in a Deductivist Type-Free Doxastic Logic”, Minds and
Machines 4(2) (May): 163–203.
9. Orilia, Francesco (2002), Ulisse, il quadrato rotondo e l’attuale re di Francia (Pisa, Italy: Edizioni ETS).
10. Nelson, Michael (2012), “Existence”, in Edward N. Zalta (ed.), Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy,
http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/existence/
2
3. Rapaport, William J. (1978), “Meinongian Theories and a Russellian Paradox,” Noûs 12: 153–180;
errata, Noûs 13 (1979) 125.
1. Castañeda, Hector-Neri (1978), “Philosophical Method and the Theory of Predication and Identity”, Noûs
12: 189–210.
2. Parsons, Terence (1979), “The Methodology of Nonexistence”, Journal of Philosophy 76(11) (November):
649–662.
3. Routley, Richard (1979), Exploring Meinong’s Jungle and Beyond (Canberra: Australian National University, Research School of Social Sciences, Department of Philosophy).
4. Castañeda, Hector-Neri (1980), On Philosophical Method (Bloomington, IN: Noûs Publications).
5. Kalsi, Marie-Luise Schubert (1980), “On Meinong’s Pseudo-Objects”, Southwestern Journal of Philosophy 11: 115–123.
• “The following paper is a consequence of my reading [Rapaport 1978].” (p. 122, n. 1.)
6. McMichael, Alan; & Zalta, Ed (1980), “An Alternative Theory of Nonexistent Objects”, Journal of Philosophical Logic 9(3) (August): 297–313.
7. Fine, Kit (1982), “The Problem of Non-Existents”, Topoi 1: 97–140.
8. Jacquette, Dale (1982), “Meinong’s Theory of Defective Objects”, Grazer Philosophische Studien 15:
1–19.
9. Clark, Romane L. (1983), “Predication Theory: Guised and Disguised”, in James E. Tomberlin (ed.),
Agent, Language, and the Structure of the World: Essays Presented to Hector-Neri Castañeda, with His
Replies (Indianapolis: Hackett): 111–129.
10. Lambert, Karel (1983), Meinong and the Principle of Independence: Its Place in Meinong’s Theory of Objects and Its Significance in Contemporary Philosophical Logic (Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University
Press).
11. Paśniczek, Jacek (1983), “Meinongian Semantics: Some Perspectives”, Studies in Logic, Grammar, and
Rhetoric (Warsaw: Warsaw University, Białystok Branch), Vol. 3, pp. 39–84.
12. Zalta, Edward N. (1983), Abstract Objects: An Introduction to Axiomatic Metaphysics (Dordrecht, The
Netherlands: D. Reidel).
13. Fine, Kit (1984), “Critical Review of Parsons’ Non-Existent Objects”, Philosophical Studies 45: 95–142.
14. Landini, Gregory (1985), “Salvaging ‘The F-er Is F’: The Lesson of Clark’s Paradox”, Philosophical
Studies 48: 129–136.
15. Yourgrau, Palle (1985), “Sets, Aggregates, and Numbers”, Canadian Journal of Philosophy 15(4) (December): 581–592.
16. Landini, Gregory (compiler) (1986), “Philosophical Bibliography of Hector-Neri Castañeda”, in James E.
Tomberlin (ed.), Hector-Neri Castañeda (Dordrecht, The Netherlands: D. Reidel): 395–434.
17. Simons, Peter (1986), “Alexius Meinong: Gegenstände, die es nicht gibt”, in Josef Speck (ed.), Grundprobleme der großen Philosophen, Philosophie der Neuzeit IV (Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht):
91–127.
18. Orilia, Francesco (1987), Review of Edward N. Zalta’s Abstract Objects, in Noûs 21: 270–276.
19. Zalta, Edward N. (1987), “On the Structural Similarities between Worlds and Times”, Philosophical Studies 51(2) (March): 213–239.
20. Castañeda, Hector-Neri (1988), “Persons, Egos, and I’s: Their Sameness Relations”, in M. Spitzer, F. A. Uehlin,
& G. Oepen (eds.), Psychopathology and Philosophy (Berlin: Springer-Verlag): 210–234.
21. Castañeda, Hector-Neri (1988), “The Semantics of Thinking, Dia-Philosophical Pluralism, and Guise Theory”, Metaphilosophy 19(2) (April): 79–104.
3
22. Grim, Patrick (1988), “Logic and Limits of Knowledge and Truth”, Noûs 22: 341–367.
23. Simons, Peter M. (1988), “Über das, was es nicht gibt: Die Meinong-Russell-Kontroverse” (“On What
There Isn’t: The Meinong-Russell Controversy”), Zeitschrift für Semiotik 10(4): 399–426.
24. Zalta, Edward N. (1988), Intensional Logic and the Metaphysics of Intentionality (Cambridge, MA: MIT
Press).
25. Castañeda, Hector-Neri (1989), “Semantic Holism without Semantic Socialism: Twin Earths, Thinking,
Language, Bodies, and the World”, in Peter A. French; Theodore E. Uehling, Jr.; & Howard K. Wettstein
(eds.), Contemporary Perspectives in the Philosophy of Language II, Midwest Studies in Philosophy (Notre
Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press) 14: 101–126.
26. Castañeda, Hector-Neri (1989), Thinking, Language, and Experience (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press).
27. Jacquette, Dale (1989), “Mally’s Heresy and the Logic of Meinong’s Object Theory”, History and Philosophy of Logic 10: 1–14.
28. Maloney, J. Christopher (1989), The Mundane Matter of the Mental Language (Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press).
29. Orilia, Francesco (1989), “Identity across Frames”, in Ermanno Bencivenga et al. (eds.), Topoi, Supp. Vol.
4: 84–96.
30. Hirst, Graeme (1991), “Existence Assumptions in Knowledge Representation”, Artificial Intelligence 49:
199–242.
31. Linsky, Bernard; & Zalta, Edward N. (1991), “Is Lewis a Meinongian?”, Australasian Journal of Philosophy 69(4) (December): 438–453.
32. Orilia, Francesco (1991), “Type-Free Property Theory, Bradley’s Regress and Meinong and Russell Reconciled”, Grazer Philosophische Studien 39: 103–125.
33. Kroon, Frederick W. (1992), “Was Meinong Only Pretending?”, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 52: 499–527.
34. Simons, Peter (1992), Philosophy and Logic in Central Europe from Bolzano to Tarski: Selected Essays
(Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers).
35. Zalta, Edward N. (1992), “On Mally’s Alleged Heresy: A Reply”, History and Philosophy of Logic 13:
59–68.
36. Paśniczek, Jacek (1993), “The Simplest Meinongian Logic”, Logique et Analyse 143/144: 329–342.
37. Perszyk, Kenneth J. (1993), Nonexistent Objects: Meinong and Contemporary Philosophy (Dordrecht,
The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers).
38. Zalta, Edward N. (1993), “Twenty-Five Basic Theorems in Situation and World Theory”, Journal of Philosophical Logic 22: 385–428.
39. Paśniczek, Jacek (1994), “Ways of Reference to Meinongian Objects: Ontological Commitments of Meinongian Theories”, Logic and Logical Philosophy 2: 69–86.
40. Haller, Rudolf, & Fabian, Reinhard (1995), “Alexius Meinong und die Schule der Gegenstandstheorie”, in
Thomas Binder, Ulf Höfer, & Jutta Valent (eds.), Alexius Meinong: Die Grazer Schule der Gegenstandstheorie und Psychologie (Graz: Karl-Franzens-Universität Graz): 7–28.
• Reprinted in Kurt Freisitzer, Walter Höflechner, Hans-Ludwig Holzer, & Wolfgang Mantl (eds.), Tradition und Herausforderung: 400 Jahre Universität Graz (Graz, Austria: Akademische Druck- u.
Verlagsanstalt): 277–291.
41. Paśniczek, Jacek (1995), “Are Contradictions Still Lurking in Meinongian Theories of Objects?”, in Rudolf
Haller (ed.), Meinong and the Theory of Objects, Grazer Philosophische Studien 50: 293–303.
42. Parsons, Terence (1995), “Meinongian Semantics Generalized”, in Rudolf Haller (ed.), Meinong and the
Theory of Objects, Grazer Philosophische Studien 50: 145–161.
4
43. Jacquette, Dale (1996), Meinongian Logic: The Semantics of Existence and Nonexistence (Berlin: Walter
de Gruyter).
44. Tomberlin, James E. (1996), “Actualism or Possibilism”, Philosophical Studies 84: 263–281.
45. Landini, Gregory (1998), “Russell’s Intensional Logic of Propositions: A Resurrection of Logicism?”,
in Franceso Orilia & William J. Rapaport (eds.) (1998), Thought, Language, and Ontology: Essays in
Memory of Hector-Neri Castañeda (Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers): 61–93
46. Paśniczek, Jacek (1998), The Logic of Intentional Objects: A Meinongian Version of Classical Logic
(Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers).
47. Castañeda, Hector-Neri (1999), The Phenomeno-Logic of the I: Essays on Self-Consciousness, ed. by
James G. Hart & Tomis Kapitan (Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press).
48. Zalta, Edward N. (1999), “Natural Numbers and Natural Cardinals as Abstract Objects: A Partial Reconstruction of Frege’s Grundgesetze in Object Theory”, Journal of Philosophical Logic 28: 619–660.
49. Pelletier, Francis Jeffry; & Zalta, Edward N. (2000), “How to Say Goodbye to the Third Man”, Noûs 34(2):
165–202.
50. Orilia, Francesco (2002), Ulisse, il quadrato rotondo e l’attuale re di Francia (Pisa, Italy: Edizioni ETS).
51. Bělohrad, Radim (2003), “Novomeinongovské pojetı́ existence” (The Neo-Meinongian Conception of Existence), Filosofický Časopis 51(1): 57–69.
52. Millican, Peter (2004), “The One Fatal Flaw in Anselm’s Argument”, Mind 113(451) (July): 437–476.
53. Barbero, Carola (2005), Madame Bovary: Something like a Melody (Milan: Edizioni AlboVersorio).
54. Reicher, Maria E. (2005), “Russell, Meinong, and the Problem of Existent Nonexistents”, in Bernard
Linsky & Guido Imaguire (eds.), On Denoting: 1905–2005 (München: Philosophia Verlag): 167–193.
55. Barbero, Carola (2006), “Madame Bovary as a Higher-Order Object”, in Andrea Bottani & Richard Davies
(eds.), Modes of Existence: Papers in Ontology and Philosophical Logic (Heusenstamm, Germany: Ontos
Verlag): 173–190.
56. Barbero, Carola (2006), “Cry for a Shadow: Emotions and Object Theory”, in Venanzio Raspa (ed.),
Meinongian Issues in Contemporary Italian Philosophy (Heusenstamm, Germany: Ontos Verlag): 181–
211.
57. Zalta, Edward N. (2006), “Deriving and Validating Kripkean Claims Using the Theory of Abstract Objects”, Noûs 40(4): 591–622.
58. Zalta, Edward N. (2006), “Essence and Modality”, Mind 115(459) (July): 659–693.
59. Woods, John (2007), “Fictions and Their Logic”, in Dale Jacquette (ed.), Philosophy of Logic (Amsterdam:
Elsevier): 1061–1126.
60. Barz, Wolfgang (2008), “Aussersein des reinen Gegenstandes—ein Berührungspunkt zwischen Meinong
und Quine” (“Aussersein of Pure Objects—A Point of Contact between Meinong and Quine”), Zeitschrift
für philosophische Forschung 62(3): 358–384.1
61. Hieke, Alexander, & Zecha, Gerhard (2008), “Ernst Mally”, in Edward N. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2008 Edition)
[http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2008/entries/mally].
62. Reicher, Maria (2008), “Nonexistent Objects”, in Edward N. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of
Philosophy (Fall 2008 Edition)
[http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2008/entries/nonexistent-objects/].
63. Yagisawa, Takashi (2008), “Possible Objects”, in Edward N. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of
Philosophy (Fall 2008 Edition)
[http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2008/entries/possible-objects/].
1 Library research sources unintentionally humorously mistranslate this as “Beside Itself of a True Item—Point of Contact between Opinion and
Quine”! The German for ‘opinion’ is ‘Meinung’.
5
64. Feit, Neil (2009), “Naming and Nonexistence”, Southern Journal of Philosophy 47: 239–262.
65. Marek, Johann (2009), “Alexius Meinong”, in Edward N. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2009 Edition)
[http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2009/entries/meinong/].
66. Voltolini, Alberto (2009), “Consequences of Schematism”, Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 8:
135–150.
67. Mousavian, Seyed N. (2010), “Neo-Meinongian Neo-Russellians”, Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 91:
229–259.
68. See also Miscellaneous items 2, 6, below.
4. Rapaport, William J. (1979), “An Adverbial Meinongian Theory”, Analysis 39: 75–81.
1. Castañeda, Hector-Neri (1979), “Philosophical Method and Direct Awareness of the Self”, in Grazer
Philosophische Studien 7/8: 1-58.
2. Fine, Kit (1982), “The Problem of Non-Existents”, Topoi 1: 97–140.
3. Landini, Gregory (compiler) (1986), “Philosophical Bibliography of Hector-Neri Castañeda”, in James E.
Tomberlin (ed.), Hector-Neri Castañeda (Dordrecht, The Netherlands: D. Reidel): 395–434.
4. Jacquette, Dale (1996), Meinongian Logic: The Semantics of Existence and Nonexistence (Berlin: Walter
de Gruyter).
5. Paśniczek, Jacek (1996), “The Relational vs. Directional Conception of Intentionality”, in Anna ZeidlerJaniszewska (ed.), Epistemology and History, Poznań Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the
Humanities, 47: 373–380.
6. Castañeda, Hector-Neri (1999), The Phenomeno-Logic of the I: Essays on Self-Consciousness, ed. by
James G. Hart & Tomis Kapitan (Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press).
7. Mousavian, Seyed N. (2010), “Neo-Meinongian Neo-Russellians”, Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 91:
229–259.
8. See also Miscellaneous item 2, below.
6
5. Rapaport, William J. (1981), “How to Make the World Fit Our Language: An Essay in Meinongian
Semantics”, Grazer Philosophische Studien 14: 1–21.
1. Fine, Kit (1982), “The Problem of Non-Existents”, Topoi 1: 97–140.
2. Paśniczek, Jacek (1983), “Meinongian Semantics: Some Perspectives”, Studies in Logic, Grammar, and
Rhetoric (Warsaw: Warsaw University, Białystok Branch), Vol. 3, pp. 39–84.
3. Yourgrau, Palle (1985), “Sets, Aggregates, and Numbers”, Canadian Journal of Philosophy 15(4) (December): 581–592.
4. Landini, Gregory (compiler) (1986), “Philosophical Bibliography of Hector-Neri Castañeda”, in James E.
Tomberlin (ed.), Hector-Neri Castañeda (Dordrecht, The Netherlands: D. Reidel): 395–434.
5. Grim, Patrick (1988), “Logic and Limits of Knowledge and Truth”, Noûs 22: 341–367.
6. Castañeda, Hector-Neri (1989), Thinking, Language, and Experience (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press).
7. Jacquette, Dale (1989), “Mally’s Heresy and the Logic of Meinong’s Object Theory”, History and Philosophy of Logic 10: 1–14.
8. Jahren, Neal (1990), “Can Semantics Be Syntactic?”, Synthese 82(3) (March): 309–328.
• Reprinted in James H. Fetzer, Epistemology and Cognition (Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer
Academic Publishers, 1991).
9. Hirst, Graeme (1991), “Existence Assumptions in Knowledge Representation”, Artificial Intelligence 49:
199–242.
10. Miller, Michael J.; & Perlis, Donald (1991), “Typicality Constraints and Range Defaults: Some Pros and
Cons of a Cognitive Model of Default Reasoning”, in Z.W. Ras & M. Zemankova (eds.), Methodologies
for Intelligent Systems: 6th International Symposium, ISMIS ’91, Charlotte, NC, USA, October 16–19,
1991, Proceedings (Berlin: Springer Lecture Notes in Computer Science 542): 560–569.
11. Kroon, Frederick W. (1992), “Was Meinong Only Pretending?”, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 52: 499–527.
12. Perszyk, Kenneth J. (1993), Nonexistent Objects: Meinong and Contemporary Philosophy (Dordrecht,
The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers).
13. Jacquette, Dale (1996), Meinongian Logic: The Semantics of Existence and Nonexistence (Berlin: Walter
de Gruyter).
14. Tomberlin, James E. (1996), “Actualism or Possibilism”, Philosophical Studies 84: 263–281.
15. Castañeda, Hector-Neri (1999), The Phenomeno-Logic of the I: Essays on Self-Consciousness, ed. by
James G. Hart & Tomis Kapitan (Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press).
16. Barbero, Carola (2005), Madame Bovary: Something like a Melody (Milan: Edizioni AlboVersorio).
17. Reicher, Maria (2008), “Nonexistent Objects”, in Edward N. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of
Philosophy (Fall 2008 Edition)
[http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2008/entries/nonexistent-objects/].
18. See also Miscellaneous item 2, below.
7
6. Rapaport, William J. (1982), “Unsolvable Problems and Philosophical Progress”, 1982 Prize Essay,
American Philosophical Quarterly 19: 289–298.
1. Anonymous (1983), “Comparative Bibliography”, History in Africa 10: 415–443.
2. Rescher, Nicholas (1985), The Strife of Systems: An Essay on the Grounds and Implications of Philosophical Diversity (Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press).
3. Landini, Gregory (compiler) (1986), “Philosophical Bibliography of Hector-Neri Castañeda”, in James E.
Tomberlin (ed.), Hector-Neri Castañeda (Dordrecht, The Netherlands: D. Reidel): 395–434.
4. Hite, Molly (2010), “Tonal Cues and Uncertain Values: Affect and Ethics in Mrs. Dalloway”, Narrative
18(3) (October): 249–275.
7. Rapaport, William J. (1983), “Meinong, Defective Objects, and (Psycho-)Logical Paradox”, Grazer
Philosophische Studien 18: 17–39.
1. Landini, Gregory (compiler) (1986), “Philosophical Bibliography of Hector-Neri Castañeda”, in James E.
Tomberlin (ed.), Hector-Neri Castañeda (Dordrecht, The Netherlands: D. Reidel): 395–434.
2. Simons, Peter (1986), “Alexius Meinong: Gegenstände, die es nicht gibt”, in Josef Speck (ed.), Grundprobleme der großen Philosophen, Philosophie der Neuzeit IV (Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht):
91–127.
3. Jacquette, Dale (1989), “Mally’s Heresy and the Logic of Meinong’s Object Theory”, History and Philosophy of Logic 10: 1–14.
4. Simons, Peter (1992), “On What There Isn’t: The Meinong-Russell Dispute”, in Peter Simons (ed.), Philosophy and Logic in Central Europe from Bolzano to Tarski: Selected Essays (Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers): 159–191.
5. Kroon, Frederick W. (1992), “Was Meinong Only Pretending?”, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 52: 499–527.
6. Perszyk, Kenneth J. (1993), Nonexistent Objects: Meinong and Contemporary Philosophy (Dordrecht,
The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers).
7. Haller, Rudolf, & Fabian, Reinhard (1995), “Alexius Meinong und die Schule der Gegenstandstheorie”, in
Thomas Binder, Ulf Höfer, & Jutta Valent (eds.), Alexius Meinong: Die Grazer Schule der Gegenstandstheorie und Psychologie (Graz: Karl-Franzens-Universität Graz): 7–28.
• Reprinted in Kurt Freisitzer, Walter Höflechner, Hans-Ludwig Holzer, & Wolfgang Mantl (eds.), Tradition und Herausforderung: 400 Jahre Universität Graz (Graz, Austria: Akademische Druck- u.
Verlagsanstalt): 277–291.
8. Paśniczek, Jacek (1995), “Are Contradictions Still Lurking in Meinongian Theories of Objects?”, in Rudolf
Haller (ed.), Meinong and the Theory of Objects, Grazer Philosophische Studien 50: 293–303.
9. Jacquette, Dale (1996), Meinongian Logic: The Semantics of Existence and Nonexistence (Berlin: Walter
de Gruyter).
10. Paśniczek, Jacek (1998), The Logic of Intentional Objects: A Meinongian Version of Classical Logic
(Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers).
11. Castañeda, Hector-Neri (1999), The Phenomeno-Logic of the I: Essays on Self-Consciousness, ed. by
James G. Hart & Tomis Kapitan (Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press).
12. Orilia, Francesco (2002), Ulisse, il quadrato rotondo e l’attuale re di Francia (Pisa, Italy: Edizioni ETS).
13. Mousavian, Seyed N. (2010), “Neo-Meinongian Neo-Russellians”, Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 91:
229–259.
14. See also Miscellaneous item 2, below.
8
8. Rapaport, William J. (1984), “Can Philosophy Solve Its Own Problems?” The [SUNY] News 13 (May/June
1984): F2–F3.
• Landini, Gregory (compiler) (1986), “Philosophical Bibliography of Hector-Neri Castañeda”, in James E.
Tomberlin (ed.), Hector-Neri Castañeda (Dordrecht, The Netherlands: D. Reidel): 395–434.
9
9. Rapaport, William J. (1984), Critical study of Richard Routley’s Exploring Meinong’s Jungle and Beyond,
in Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 44: 539–552.
1. Landini, Gregory (compiler) (1986), “Philosophical Bibliography of Hector-Neri Castañeda”, in James E.
Tomberlin (ed.), Hector-Neri Castañeda (Dordrecht, The Netherlands: D. Reidel): 395–434.
2. Hirst, Graeme (1991), “Existence Assumptions in Knowledge Representation”, Artificial Intelligence 49:
199–242.
3. Jacquette, Dale (1996), Meinongian Logic: The Semantics of Existence and Nonexistence (Berlin: Walter
de Gruyter).
4. Orilia, Francesco (2002), Ulisse, il quadrato rotondo e l’attuale re di Francia (Pisa, Italy: Edizioni ETS).
5. Mousavian, Seyed N. (2010), “Neo-Meinongian Neo-Russellians”, Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 91:
229–259.
6. See also Miscellaneous item 2, below.
10. Rapaport, William J. (1984), “Belief Representation and Quasi-Indicators”, M.S. Thesis Technical Report
215 (Buffalo: SUNY Buffalo Department of Computer Science).
1. Landini, Gregory (compiler) (1986), “Philosophical Bibliography of Hector-Neri Castañeda”, in James E.
Tomberlin (ed.), Hector-Neri Castañeda (Dordrecht, The Netherlands: D. Reidel): 395–434.
2. Pollock, John L. (1986), Contemporary Theories of Knowledge (Totowa, NJ: Rowman & Littlefield).
3. Castañeda, Hector-Neri (1989), Thinking, Language, and Experience (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press).
4. Pollock, John L., and Cruz, Joseph (1999), Contemporary Theories of Knowledge, Second Edition (Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield).
11. Rapaport, William J., & Shapiro, Stuart C. (1984), “Quasi-Indexical Reference in Propositional Semantic
Networks”, Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING-84,
Stanford University) (Morristown, NJ: Association for Computational Linguistics): 65–70.
1. Brachman, Ronald J., & Levesque, Hector J. (1985), “A Knowledge Representation Bibliography”, in
Brachman, Ronald J., & Levesque, Hector J. (eds.) Readings in Knowledge Representation (San Mateo,
CA: Morgan Kaufmann): 537–563, citation on p. 556.
2. Barnden, John A. (1986), “A Viewpoint Distinction in the Representation of Propositional Attitudes”,
Proceedings of the 5th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-86, Philadelphia) (Los Altos,
CA: Morgan Kaufmann): 411–415.
3. Barnden, John A. (1986), “Imputations and Explications: Representational Problems in Treatments of
Propositional Attitudes”, Cognitive Science 10: 319–364.
4. Landini, Gregory (compiler) (1986), “Philosophical Bibliography of Hector-Neri Castañeda”, in James E.
Tomberlin (ed.), Hector-Neri Castañeda (Dordrecht, The Netherlands: D. Reidel): 395–434.
5. Pollock, John L. (1986), Contemporary Theories of Knowledge (Totowa, NJ: Rowman & Littlefield).
6. Maida, Anthony S. (1989), “The Propositional Version of the Knowledge Representation Hypothesis”,
Technical Report CS-89-16 (University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Department of Computer
Science).
7. Maida, Anthony S. (1990), “The Society of Cognitive Scientists: A Metaphor for Belief Reasoning”,
Technical Report, Department of Computer Science, Pennsylvania State University.
8. Maida, Anthony S. (1991), “Maintaining Mental Models of Agents Who Have Existential Misconceptions”, Artificial Intelligence 50: 331–383.
9. Pollock, John L., and Cruz, Joseph (1999), Contemporary Theories of Knowledge, Second Edition (Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield).
10
12. Rapaport, William J. (1984), “Comments on Dibrell’s ‘Persons and the Intentional Stance’,” oral comments delivered at the Creighton Club/New York State Philosophical Association (April 1984; Cazenovia,
NY).
• Dibrell, William (1988), “Persons and the Intentional Stance”, Journal of Critical Analysis 9(1): 13–25.
13. Schagrin, Morton L.; Rapaport, William J.; & Dipert, Randall R. (1985), Logic: A Computer Approach
(New York: McGraw-Hill).
• Japanese translation, Logic and Algorithms, by Takemasa Ooya (Tokyo: McGraw-Hill Japan, 1986).
• Italian translation, Logica e Computer, by Gianfranco Forni, revised by Marco Colombetti (Milan: McGrawHill Libri Italia, 1986).
• Italian student edition, Logica e Computer, by Gianfranco Forni, adapted by Maria Cristina Valenti (Milan:
McGraw-Hill Libri Italia, Divisione scuola, 1986).
1. Tymoczko, Thomas (1986), Review of Schagrin, Rapaport, & Dipert 1985, Teaching Philosophy 9(1):
78–80.
2. Keyworth, Donald (1987), Review of Schagrin, Rapaport, & Dipert 1985, Computers & Philosophy 2(3).
3. Ketner, Kenneth Laine (1988), “Peirce and Turing: Comparisons and Conjectures”, Semiotica 68(1/2):
33–61.
4. Alchourròn, Carlos E., & Martino, Antonio A. (1989), “A Sketch of Logic without Truth”, in Proceedings
of the 2nd International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law (Vancouver) (New York: ACM
Press): 165–179.
5. Godlovitch, Stan (1990), “SANDY v 3.06—A Critical Review”, Computers & Philosophy 5(1): 24–60.
6. Evans, Fred (1993), Psychology and Nihilism: A Genealogical Critique of the Computational Philosophy
of Mind (Albany: SUNY Press).
7. Floridi, Luciano (1999), Philosophy and Computing (London: Routledge).
8. Gabbay, Dov M.; & Woods, John (2003), Agenda Relevance: A Study in Formal Pragmatics, Vol. 1 of A
Practical Logic of Cognitive Systems (Amsterdam: Elsevier North-Holland).
9. Morineau, Thierry (2011), “Turing Machine Task Analysis: A Method for Modeling Affordnces in the
Design Process”, International Journal of Design Engineering 4(1): 58–70.
11
14. Rapaport, William J. (1985), “Meinongian Semantics for Propositional Semantic Networks”, Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (University of Chicago)
(Morristown, NJ: Association for Computational Linguistics): 43–48.
1. Habel, Christopher U. (1986), “Plurals, Cardinalities, and Structures of Determination”, Proceedings of
the 11th International Conference On Computational Linguistics (COLING-86, Bonn) (Morristown, NJ:
Association for Computational Linguistics): 62–64.
2. Castañeda, Hector-Neri (1989), Thinking, Language, and Experience (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press).
3. Israel, David (1989), Review of Rapaport 1986 [Item 20, above], Journal of Symbolic Logic 54(2): 617618.
4. Maida, Anthony S. (1989), “The Propositional Version of the Knowledge Representation Hypothesis”,
Technical Report CS-89-16 (University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Department of Computer
Science).
5. Maida, Anthony S. (1990), “The Society of Cognitive Scientists: A Metaphor for Belief Reasoning”,
Technical Report, Department of Computer Science, Pennsylvania State University.
6. Jahren, Neal (1990), “Can Semantics Be Syntactic?”, Synthese 82(3) (March): 309–328.
• Reprinted in James H. Fetzer, Epistemology and Cognition (Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer
Academic Publishers, 1991).
7. Hirst, Graeme (1991), “Existence Assumptions in Knowledge Representation”, Artificial Intelligence 49:
199–242.
8. Maida, Anthony S. (1991), “Maintaining Mental Models of Agents Who Have Existential Misconceptions”, Artificial Intelligence 50: 331–383.
9. Yagisawa, Takashi (2008), “Possible Objects”, in Edward N. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of
Philosophy (Fall 2008 Edition)
[http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2008/entries/possible-objects/].
10. See also Miscellaneous item 2, below.
15. Rapaport, William J. (1985), “Machine Understanding and Data Abstraction in Searle’s Chinese Room”,
Proceedings of the 7th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (University of California at
Irvine) (Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates): 341–345.
1. Cole, David; Fetzer, James H.; & Rankin, Terry L. (1990), Philosophy, Mind, and Cognitive Inquiry: Resources for Understanding Mental Processes (Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers).
2. Jahren, Neal (1990), “Can Semantics Be Syntactic?”, Synthese 82(3) (March): 309–328.
• Reprinted in James H. Fetzer, Epistemology and Cognition (Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer
Academic Publishers, 1991).
16. Rapaport, William J. (1985, unpublished), “Meinongian Semantics and Artificial Intelligence”, originally
scheduled to appear in Peter Simons (ed.), Essays on Meinong (Amsterdam: Rodopi Editions).
1. Barnden, John A. (1986), “Imputations and Explications: Representational Problems in Treatments of
Propositional Attitudes”, Cognitive Science 10: 319–364.
2. Jahren, Neal (1990), “Can Semantics Be Syntactic?”, Synthese 82(3) (March): 309–328.
• Reprinted in James H. Fetzer, Epistemology and Cognition (Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer
Academic Publishers, 1991).
3. Simons, Peter (1986), “Alexius Meinong: Gegenstände, die es nicht gibt”, in Josef Speck (ed.), Grundprobleme der großen Philosophen, Philosophie der Neuzeit IV (Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht):
91–127.
12
17. Rapaport, William J. (1985), “To Be and Not To Be”, Noûs 19: 255–271.
1. Landini, Gregory (compiler) (1986), “Philosophical Bibliography of Hector-Neri Castañeda”, in James E.
Tomberlin (ed.), Hector-Neri Castañeda (Dordrecht, The Netherlands: D. Reidel): 395–434.
2. Hirst, Graeme (1991), “Existence Assumptions in Knowledge Representation”, Artificial Intelligence 49:
199–242.
3. Orilia, Francesco (2002), Ulisse, il quadrato rotondo e l’attuale re di Francia (Pisa, Italy: Edizioni ETS).
4. Barbero, Carola (2005), Madame Bovary: Something like a Melody (Milan: Edizioni AlboVersorio).
5. See also Miscellaneous item 2, below.
18.
Rapaport, William J. (1985/1986), “Non-Existent Objects and Epistemological Ontology,” Grazer
Philosophische Studien 25/26: 61–95.
• Reprinted in Rudolf Haller (ed.), Non-Existence and Predication (Amsterdam: Rodopi, 1986).
1. Castañeda, Hector-Neri (1988), “Persons, Egos, and I’s: Their Sameness Relations”, in M. Spitzer,
F.A. Uehlin, & G. Oepen (eds.), Psychopathology and Philosophy (Berlin: Springer-Verlag): 210–234.
2. Castañeda, Hector-Neri (1988), “The Semantics of Thinking, Dia-Philosophical Pluralism, and Guise Theory”, Metaphilosophy 19(2) (April): 79–104.
3. Castañeda, Hector-Neri (1989), “Semantic Holism without Semantic Socialism: Twin Earths, Thinking,
Language, Bodies, and the World”, in Peter A. French; Theodore E. Uehling, Jr.; & Howard K. Wettstein
(eds.), Contemporary Perspectives in the Philosophy of Language II, Midwest Studies in Philosophy (Notre
Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press) 14: 101–126.
4. Hirst, Graeme (1991), “Existence Assumptions in Knowledge Representation”, Artificial Intelligence 49:
199–242.
5. Kroon, Frederick W. (1992), “Was Meinong Only Pretending?”, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 52: 499–527.
6. Perszyk, Kenneth J. (1993), Nonexistent Objects: Meinong and Contemporary Philosophy (Dordrecht,
The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers).
7. Paśniczek, Jacek (1994), “Ways of Reference to Meinongian Objects: Ontological Commitments of Meinongian Theories”, Logic and Logical Philosophy 2: 69–86.
8. Paśniczek, Jacek (1995), “Are Contradictions Still Lurking in Meinongian Theories of Objects?”, in Rudolf
Haller (ed.), Meinong and the Theory of Objects, Grazer Philosophische Studien 50: 293–303.
9. Jacquette, Dale (1996), Meinongian Logic: The Semantics of Existence and Nonexistence (Berlin: Walter
de Gruyter).
10. Paśniczek, Jacek (1998), The Logic of Intentional Objects: A Meinongian Version of Classical Logic
(Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers).
11. Castañeda, Hector-Neri (1999), The Phenomeno-Logic of the I: Essays on Self-Consciousness, ed. by
James G. Hart & Tomis Kapitan (Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press).
12. Barbero, Carola (2005), Madame Bovary: Something like a Melody (Milan: Edizioni AlboVersorio).
13. Barbero, Carola (2006), “Cry for a Shadow: Emotions and Object Theory”, in Venanzio Raspa (ed.),
Meinongian Issues in Contemporary Italian Philosophy (Heusenstamm, Germany: Ontos Verlag): 181–
211.
14. Marek, Johann (2009), “Alexius Meinong”, in Edward N. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2009 Edition)
[http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2009/entries/meinong/].
15. See also Miscellaneous item 2, below.
13
19. Rapaport, William J. (1986), “Philosophy, Artificial Intelligence, and the Chinese-Room Argument”,
Abacus 3 (Summer 1986) 6–17; correspondence, Abacus 4 (Winter 1987) 6–7, Abacus 4 (Spring 1987) 5–7.
1. Cole, David; Fetzer, James H.; & Rankin, Terry L. (1990), Philosophy, Mind, and Cognitive Inquiry: Resources for Understanding Mental Processes (Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers).
2. Jahren, Neal (1990), “Can Semantics Be Syntactic?”, Synthese 82(3) (March): 309–328.
• Reprinted in James H. Fetzer, Epistemology and Cognition (Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer
Academic Publishers, 1991).
3. Edgar, Stacey L. (1997), Morality and Machines: Perspectives on Computer Ethics (Sudbury, MA: Jones
and Bartlett), Ch. 12.
4. Mooney, Vincent John, III (1997), “Searle’s Chinese Room and Its Aftermath”, Report No. CSLI-97-202
(Stanford: Stanford University Center for the Study of Language and Information).
14
20. Rapaport, William J. (1986), “Logical Foundations for Belief Representation”, Cognitive Science 10:
371–422.
1. Nakhimovsky, Alexander (1988), “Aspect, Aspectual Class, and the Temporal Structure of Narrative”,
Computational Linguistics 14(2): 29–43.
2. Asher, Nicholas (1989), “Belief, Acceptance and Belief Reports”, Canadian Journal of Philosophy 19(3)
(September): 327–362.
3. Barnden, John A. (1989), “Towards a Paradigm Shift in Belief Representation Methodology”, Journal of
Experimental and Theoretical Artificial Intelligence 1: 133–161.
4. Cohen, L. Jonathan (1989), “Belief and Acceptance”, Mind 98(391) (July): 367–389.
5. Israel, David (1989), Review of Rapaport 1986, Journal of Symbolic Logic 54(2): 617-618.
6. Lindemann, Bernhard (1989), “What Knowledge Does It Take to Read a Newspaper?”, Journal of Literary
Semantics 18(1) (April): 50–65.
7. Maida, Anthony S. (1989), “The Propositional Version of the Knowledge Representation Hypothesis”,
Technical Report CS-89-16 (University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Department of Computer
Science).
8. Wilks, Yorick; Ballim, Afzal; & Dietrich, Eric (1989), “Pronouns in Mind: Quasi-Indexicals and the
‘Language of Thought’,” Computers and Artificial Intelligence 8: 493–503.
9. Dipert, Randall R. (1990), “The Structure of Agency: Issues in the Representation of Agency and Action”,
in Deepak Kumar (ed.), Current Trends in SNePS—Semantic Network Processing System, Lecture Notes
in Artificial Intelligence, No. 437 (Berlin: Springer-Verlag): 68–84.
10. Haas, Andrew R. (1990), “Sentential Semantics for Propositional Attitudes”, Computational Linguistics
16(4): 213–233.
11. Jahren, Neal (1990), “Can Semantics Be Syntactic?”, Synthese 82(3) (March): 309–328.
• Reprinted in James H. Fetzer, Epistemology and Cognition (Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer
Academic Publishers, 1991).
12. Maida, Anthony S. (1990), “The Society of Cognitive Scientists: A Metaphor for Belief Reasoning”,
Technical Report, Department of Computer Science, Pennsylvania State University.
13. Wyatt, Richard W. (1990), “Kinds of Opacity and Their Representations”, in Deepak Kumar (ed.), Current
Trends in SNePS—Semantic Network Processing System, Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, No. 437
(Berlin: Springer-Verlag): 124–144.
14. Ballim, Afzal; Wilks, Yorick; & Barnden, John (1991), “Belief Ascription, Metaphor, and Intensional
Identification”, Cognitive Science 15: 133–171.
15. Ballim, Afzal, & Wilks, Yorick (1991), Artificial Believers: The Ascription of Belief (Hillsdale, NJ:
Lawrence Erlbaum Associates).
16. Bingi, R.; Khazanchi, Deepak; & Yadav, Surya B. (1995), “A Framework for the Comparative Analysis
and Evaluation of Knowledge Representation Schemes”, Information Processing and Management 31(2):
233–247.
17. Maida, Anthony S. (1991), “Maintaining Mental Models of Agents Who Have Existential Misconceptions”, Artificial Intelligence 50: 331–383.
18. Miller, Michael J.; & Perlis, Donald (1991), “Typicality Constraints and Range Defaults: Some Pros and
Cons of a Cognitive Model of Default Reasoning”, in Z.W. Ras & M. Zemankova (eds.), Methodologies
for Intelligent Systems: 6th International Symposium, ISMIS ’91, Charlotte, NC, USA, October 16–19,
1991, Proceedings (Berlin: Springer Lecture Notes in Computer Science 542): 560–569.
19. Reichgelt, Han (1991), Knowledge Representation: An AI Perspective (Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing
Corp.)
15
20. Montgomery, Christine A.; Stalls, Bonnie Glover; Stumberger, Robert E.; Li, Naicong; Belvin, Robert S.;
Arnaiz, Alfredo; & Hirsh, Susan B. (1992), “Language Systems, Inc.: Description of the DBG System as
Used for MUC-4”, Proceedings of the 4th Conference on Message Understanding (McLean, VA) (Morristown, NJ: Association for Computational Linguistics): 197–206.
21. Ballim, Afzal (1993), “Propositional Attitude Framework Requirements”, Journal of Experimental and
Theoretical Artificial Intelligence 5(2&3): 89–100.
22. Chalupsky, Hans (1993), “Using Hypothetical Reasoning as a Method for Belief Ascription”, Journal of
Experimental and Theoretical Artificial Intelligence 5(2&3): 119–133.
23. Dipert, Randall R. (1993), Artifacts, Art Works, and Agency (Philadelphia: Temple University Press).
24. Livergood, Norman D. (1993), “Design Issues in the Simulation of Beliefs in Corporate Intelligence Systems: REALPOLITIK II”, International Journal of Man-Machine Studies 39: 99–112.
25. Von Eckardt, Barbara (1993), What Is Cognitive Science? (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).
26. Garfield, David A.S.; & Rapp, Charles (1994), “Application of Artificial Intelligence Principles to the
Analysis of ‘Crazy Speech’,” Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease 182(4): 205–211.
27. Orilia, Francesco (1994), “Belief Representation in a Deductivist Type-Free Doxastic Logic”, Minds and
Machines 4(2) (May): 163–203.
28. Wiebe, Janyce M. (1994), “Tracking Point of View in Narrative”, Computational Linguistics 20(2) (June):
233–287
29. Bingi, R.; Khazanchi, Deepak; & Yadav, Surya B. (1995), “A Framework for the Comparative Analysis
and Evaluation of Knowledge Representation Schemes”, Information Processing and Management 31:
233–247.
30. Orilia, Francesco (1995), “Knowledge Representation, Exemplification, and the Gupta-Belnap Theory of
Circular Definitions”, in Marco Gori & Giovanni Soda (eds.), Topics in Artificial Intelligence: Proceedings of the 4th Congress of the Italian Association for Artificial Intelligence (AI*IA ’95; Florence, Italy),
Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence 992: 187–198.
31. Dipert, Randall R. (1996), “Reflections on Iconicity, Representation, and Resemblance: Peirce’s Theory
of Signs, Goodman on Resemblance, and Modern Philosophies of Language and Mind”, Synthese 106:
373–397.
32. Dipert, Randall R. (1997), “The Mathematical Structure of the World: The World as Graph”, Journal of
Philosophy 94: 329–358.
33. Kapitan, Tomis (1998), “On Depicting Indexical Reference”, in Franceso Orilia & William J. Rapaport
(eds.) (1998), Thought, Language, and Ontology: Essays in Memory of Hector-Neri Castañeda (Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers): 183–215.
34. Wiebe, Janyce; Wilson, Theresa; & Cardie, Claire (2005), “Annotating Expressions of Opinions and Emotions in Language”, Language Resources and Evaluation/ 39: 165–210.
35. See also Miscellaneous item 2, below.
16
21. Rapaport, William J. (1986), Review of Karel Lambert’s Meinong and the Principle of Independence, in
Journal of Symbolic Logic 51: 248–252.
• Orilia, Francesco (2002), Ulisse, il quadrato rotondo e l’attuale re di Francia (Pisa, Italy: Edizioni ETS).
22. Shapiro, Stuart C., & Rapaport, William J. (1986), “SNePS Considered as a Fully Intensional Propositional Semantic Network”, Proceedings of the 5th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-86,
Philadelphia) (Los Altos, CA: Morgan Kaufmann), Vol. 1, pp. 278–283.
1. Wilks, Yorick; & Ballim, Afzal (1986), “Multiple Agents and the Heuristic Ascription of Belief”, Memoranda in Computer and Cognitive Science MCCS-86-75 (Las Cruces, NM: New Mexico State University
Computing Research Laboratory).
2. Fox, Edward A.; Nutter, J. Terry; Ahlswede, Thomas; Evens, Martha; & Markowitz, Judith (1988), “Building a Large Thesaurus for Information Retrieval”, Proceedings of the 2nd Conference on Applied Natural
Language Processing (Austin, TX) (Morristown, NJ: Association for Computational Linguistics): 101–
108.
3. Ballim, Afzal, & Wilks, Yorick (1991), Artificial Believers: The Ascription of Belief (Hillsdale, NJ:
Lawrence Erlbaum Associates).
23. Wiebe, Janyce M., & Rapaport, William J. (1986), “Representing De Re and De Dicto Belief Reports
in Discourse and Narrative”, Special Issue on Knowledge Representation, Proceedings of the IEEE 74:
1405–1413.
1. Ballim, Afzal; Wilks, Yorick; & Barnden, John (1991), “Belief Ascription, Metaphor, and Intensional
Identification”, Cognitive Science 15: 133–171.
2. Nissan, Ephraim, & Shimony, Solomon Eyal (1996), “TAMBALACOQUE: For a Formal Account of the
Gist of a Scholarly Argument”, Knowledge Organization 23: 135–146.
3. Nissan, Ephraim (2001), “An AI Formalism for Competing Claims of Identification: Capturing the ‘Smemorato di Collegno’ Amnesia Case”, Computing and Informatics 20: 625–656.
4. Sonnenhauser, Barbara (2011), “ ‘Renarrative’ und Indirekte Rede im Bulgarischen”, Die Welt der Slaven:
Halbjahresschrift fur Slavistik 56 (1) (January): 131–154.
17
24. Rapaport, William J. (1986), “Searle’s Experiments with Thought”, Philosophy of Science 53: 271–279.
1. Jacquette, Dale (1989), “Adventures in the Chinese Room”, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research
49(4) (June): 605–623.
2. Cole, David; Fetzer, James H.; & Rankin, Terry L. (1990), Philosophy, Mind, and Cognitive Inquiry: Resources for Understanding Mental Processes (Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers).
3. Jahren, Neal (1990), “Can Semantics Be Syntactic?”, Synthese 82(3) (March): 309–328.
• Reprinted in James H. Fetzer, Epistemology and Cognition (Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer
Academic Publishers, 1991).
4. Cole, David (1991), “Artificial Intelligence and Personal Identity”, Synthese 88: 399–417.
5. Bombardi, Ron (1993), “The Education of Searle’s Demon”, Idealistic Studies 23: 5–18.
6. Lee, Cho-Sik (1993), Philosophy of Artificial Intelligence (in Korean) (Seoul: Korea University Press),
§7-2.
7. Melnyk, Andrew (1996), “Searle’s Abstract Argument against Strong AI”, Synthese 108: 391–419.
8. Maloney, J. Christopher (1998), “A Role for Conceptual Role Semantics”, in Franceso Orilia & William J.
Rapaport (eds.) (1998), Thought, Language, and Ontology: Essays in Memory of Hector-Neri Castañeda
(Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers): 169–180.
9. Reingold, Eyal, & Nightingale, Johnathan (1999), “John R. Searle’s Chinese Room”,
[http://www.psych.utoronto.ca/˜reingold/courses/ai/cache/searle.html].
10. Preston, John, & Bishop, Mark (eds.) (2002), Views into the Chinese Room: New Essays on Searle and
Artificial Intelligence (Oxford: Clarendon Press).
11. Moural, Josef (2003), “The Chinese Room Argument”, in Barry Smith (ed.), John Searle (Cambridge,
UK: Cambridge University Press): 214–260.
12. Cole, David (2004), “The Chinese Room Argument”, in Edward N. Zalta (ed.) The Stanford Encyclopedia
of Philosophy (Fall 2004 Edition), [http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2004/entries/chinese-room/].
13. Damper, Robert I. (2006), “The Logic of Searle’s Chinese Room Argument”, Minds and Machines 16(2):
163–183.
25. Bruder, Gail A.; Duchan, Judith F.; Rapaport, William J.; Segal, Erwin M.; Shapiro, Stuart C.; &
Zubin, David A. (1986), “Deictic Centers in Narrative: An Interdisciplinary Cognitive-Science Project”,
Technical Report 86-20 (Buffalo: SUNY Buffalo Department of Computer Science, September 1986).
1. Nakhimovsky, Alexander (1988), “Aspect, Aspectual Class, and the Temporal Structure of Narrative”,
Computational Linguistics 14(2): 29–43.
2. Wiebe, Janyce M. (1994), “Tracking Point of View in Narrative”, Computational Linguistics 20(2) (June):
233–287
3. Millis, Keith K. (1995), “Encoding Discourse Perspective during the Reading of a Literary Text”, Poetics
23: 235–253.
4. Zwaan, Rolf A.; Magliano, Joseph P.; & Graesser, Arthur C. (1995), “Dimensions of Situation Model
Construction in Narrative Comprehension”, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and
Cognition 21: 386–397.
18
26. Rapaport, William J.; Shapiro, Stuart C.; & Wiebe, Janyce M. (1986), “Quasi-Indicators, Knowledge
Reports, and Discourse”, Technical Report 86-15 (Buffalo: SUNY Buffalo Department of Computer Science); revised version published as Rapaport, Shapiro, & Wiebe 1997 (see item 47 below).
1. Castañeda, Hector-Neri (1989), Thinking, Language, and Experience (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press).
2. Maida, Anthony S. (1990), “The Society of Cognitive Scientists: A Metaphor for Belief Reasoning”,
Technical Report, Department of Computer Science, Pennsylvania State University.
3. Wyatt, Richard W. (1990), “Kinds of Opacity and Their Representations”, in Deepak Kumar (ed.), Current
Trends in SNePS—Semantic Network Processing System, Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, No. 437
(Berlin: Springer-Verlag): 124–144.
4. Chalupsky, Hans (1993), “Using Hypothetical Reasoning as a Method for Belief Ascription”, Journal of
Experimental and Theoretical Artificial Intelligence 5(2&3): 119–133.
27. Rapaport, William J. (1987), “Belief Systems”, in Stuart C. Shapiro (ed.), Encyclopedia of Artificial Intelligence (New York: John Wiley): 63–73.
• Lindemann, Bernhard (1989), “What Knowledge Does It Take to Read a Newspaper?”, Journal of Literary
Semantics 18(1) (April): 50–65.
• Maida, Anthony S. (1990), “The Society of Cognitive Scientists: A Metaphor for Belief Reasoning”,
Technical Report, Department of Computer Science, Pennsylvania State University.
19
28. Shapiro, Stuart C., & Rapaport, William J. (1987), “SNePS Considered as a Fully Intensional Propositional Semantic Network,” in Nick Cercone & Gordon McCalla (eds.), The Knowledge Frontier: Essays in
the Representation of Knowledge (New York: Springer-Verlag): 262–315.
1. Barnden, John A. (1989), “Towards a Paradigm Shift in Belief Representation Methodology”, Journal of
Experimental and Theoretical Artificial Intelligence 1: 133–161.
2. Maida, Anthony S. (1989), “The Propositional Version of the Knowledge Representation Hypothesis”,
Technical Report CS-89-16 (University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Department of Computer
Science).
3. Cravo, Maria R., & Martins, João P. (1990), “Path-Based Inference Revisited”, in Deepak Kumar (ed.),
Current Trends in SNePS—Semantic Network Processing System, Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence,
No. 437 (Berlin: Springer-Verlag): 15–26.
4. Dipert, Randall R. (1990), “The Structure of Agency: Issues in the Representation of Agency and Action”,
in Deepak Kumar (ed.), Current Trends in SNePS—Semantic Network Processing System, Lecture Notes
in Artificial Intelligence, No. 437 (Berlin: Springer-Verlag): 68–84.
5. Geller, James (1990), “Order Dependence of Declarative Knowledge Representation”, in Deepak Kumar
(ed.), Current Trends in SNePS—Semantic Network Processing System, Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, No. 437 (Berlin: Springer-Verlag): 41–54.
6. Kumar, Deepak (1990), “An Integrated Model of Acting and Inference”, in Deepak Kumar (ed.), Current
Trends in SNePS—Semantic Network Processing System, Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, No. 437
(Berlin: Springer-Verlag): 55–65.
7. Maida, Anthony S. (1990), “The Society of Cognitive Scientists: A Metaphor for Belief Reasoning”,
Technical Report, Department of Computer Science, Pennsylvania State University.
8. Nakhimovsky, Alexander (1990), “Topological and Metrical Invariants of Grammatical Meanings”, Proceedings of the European AI Conference (Stockholm): 1-3.
9. Ballim, Afzal; Wilks, Yorick; & Barnden, John (1991), “Belief Ascription, Metaphor, and Intensional
Identification”, Cognitive Science 15: 133–171.
10. Maida, Anthony S. (1991), “Maintaining Mental Models of Agents Who Have Existential Misconceptions”, Artificial Intelligence 50: 331–383.
11. Wiebe, Janyce M. (1991), “References in Narrative Text”, Noûs 25: 457–486.
• Reprinted in Judith Felson Duchan, Gail A. Bruder, & Lynne E. Hewitt (eds.), Deixis in Narrative: A
Cognitive Science Perspective (Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates): 263–286.
12. Woods, William A. (1991), “Understanding Subsumption and Taxonomy: A Framework for Progress”, in
John F. Sowa (ed.), Principles of Semantic Networks: Explorations in the Representation of Knowledge
(San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufmann): 45–94.
13. Cercone, Nick; Goebel, Randy; de Haan, John; & Schaeffer, Stephanie (1992), “The ECO Family”, Computers and Mathematics with Applications 23(2–5): 95–131.
• Reprinted in Lehmann, Fritz (ed.) (1992), Semantic Networks in Artificial Intelligence (Oxford: Pergamon Press): 95–131.
14. KQML Advisory Group; with Finin, Tim; McKay, Don; & Fritzson, Rich (1992), “An Overview of
KQML: A Knowledge Query and Manipulation Language” (unpublished ms.)]
[http://citeseer.ist.psu.edu/94713.html]
15. Markowitz, Judith A.; Nutter, J. Terry; & Evens, Martha W. (1992), “Beyond Is-A and Part-Whole: More
Semantic Network Links”, Computers and Mathematics with Applications 23(6–9): 377–390.
• Reprinted in Lehmann, Fritz (ed.) (1992), Semantic Networks in Artificial Intelligence (Oxford: Pergamon Press): 377–390.
20
16. Woods, William A., & Schmolze, James G. (1992), “The KL-ONE Family”, Computers and Mathematics
with Applications 23(2–5): 133–177.
• Reprinted in Lehmann, Fritz (ed.) (1992), Semantic Networks in Artificial Intelligence (Oxford: Pergamon Press): 133–177.
17. Ali, Syed S. (1993), “Node Subsumption in a Propositional Semantic Network with Structured Variables”,
Proceedings of the 6th Australian Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence.
18. Ali, Syed S. (1993), “A Structured Representation for Noun Phrases and Anaphora”, Proceedings of the
15th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates):
197–202.
19. Chalupsky, Hans (1993), “Using Hypothetical Reasoning as a Method for Belief Ascription”, Journal of
Experimental and Theoretical Artificial Intelligence 5(2&3): 119–133.
20. D’Aloisi, Daniela, & Castelfranchi, Cristiano (1993), “Propositional and Terminological Knowledge Representations”, Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Artificial Intelligence 5(2&3): 149–166.
21. Dipert, Randall R. (1993), Artifacts, Art Works, and Agency (Philadelphia: Temple University Press).
22. Funke, Douglas J.; Neal, Jeannette G.; & Paul, Rajendra D. (1993), “An Approach to Intelligent Automated
Window Management”, International Journal of Man-Machine Studies 38: 949-983.
23. Mamede, Nuno J. (1993), “SNePSR —A SNePS with Resources”, Journal of Experimental and Theoretical
Artificial Intelligence 5(2&3): 199–213.
24. Roberts, Lawrence D. (1993), How Reference Works: Explanatory Models for Indexicals, Descriptions,
and Opacity (Albany: SUNY Press).
25. Von Eckardt, Barbara (1993), What Is Cognitive Science? (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).
26. Wyatt, Richard (1993), “Reference and Intensions”, Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Artificial
Intelligence 5(2&3): 263–271.
27. Ali, Syed S. (1994), ”A Logical Language for Natural Language Processing”, Proceedings of the 10th
Biennial Canadian Artificial Intelligence Conference (Banff);
http://tigger.cs.uwm.edu/ syali/Publications/cscsi94.ps
28. Ali, Syed S. (1994), ”ANALOG: A Logical Language for Natural Language Processing”, American Association for Artificial Intelligence Fall 1994 Symposium Working Notes, Knowledge Representation for
Natural Language Processing (November 4–6, 1994; New Orleans: 1–11;
http://tigger.cs.uwm.edu/ syali/Publications/aaai-fall94-symp.pdf
29. Giraud-Carrier, Christophe G. (1994), “On Integrating Inductive Learning with Prior Knowledge and Reasoning”, unpublished Ph.D. dissertation (Brigham Young University Department of Computer Science)
[http://citeseer.ist.psu.edu/giraud-carrier94integrating.html].
30. Haller, Susan M. (1994), “A Model for Cooperative Interactive Plan Explanation”, Proceedings of the the
10th [IEEE] Conference on Artificial Intelligence for Applications (Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer
Society Press): 254–260.
31. Haller, Susan M. (1994), “Recognizing Digressive Questions Using a Model for Interactive Generation for
Interactive Generation”, Proceedings of the 7th International Workshop on Natural Language Generation
(Association for Computational Linguistics): 181–188.
32. Welty, Christopher A., & Ferrucci, David A. (1994), “What’s in an Instance?”, Technical Report 94-18
(Troy, NY: Renssselaer Polytechnic Institute Department of Computer Science).
33. Wiebe, Janyce M. (1994), “Tracking Point of View in Narrative”, Computational Linguistics 20(2) (June):
233–287
34. Haller, Susan M.; & Ali, Syed S. (1995), “Recognizing Text Plans”, Proceedings of the 4th Golden West
International Conference on Intelligent Systems (Raleigh, NC: ISCA): 76–80.
21
35. Orilia, Francesco (1995), “Knowledge Representation, Exemplification, and the Gupta-Belnap Theory of
Circular Definitions”, in Marco Gori & Giovanni Soda (eds.), Topics in Artificial Intelligence: Proceedings of the 4th Congress of the Italian Association for Artificial Intelligence (AI*IA ’95; Florence, Italy),
Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence 992: 187–198.
36. Campbell, Alistair; & Burhans, Debra (1996), “Interpretation: The Relationship between Language and
Ontology”, Proceedings of the 1996 AAAI Symposium on Knowledge Representation Systems Based on
Natural Language: 6–10.
37. Dipert, Randall R. (1996), “Reflections on Iconicity, Representation, and Resemblance: Peirce’s Theory
of Signs, Goodman on Resemblance, and Modern Philosophies of Language and Mind”, Synthese 106:
373–397.
38. Haller, Susan (1996), “Planning Text about Plans Interactively”, International Journal of Expert Systems
9: 85–112.
39. Matos, Pedro A., & Martins, João P. (1996), “Planning in a Commonsense Framework”, paper presented
in abstract form at AAAI 96 Workshop on Theories of Action and Planning;
http://www.cs.utep.edu/actions/aaai96/proceedings.html
40. Dipert, Randall R. (1997), “The Mathematical Structure of the World: The World as Graph”, Journal of
Philosophy 94: 329–358.
41. Goetz, Philip (1997), “Attractors in Recurrent Behavior Networks”, unpublished Ph.D. dissertation (SUNY
Buffalo Department of Computer Science).
42. Hartley, Roger T., & Barnden, John A. (1997), “Semantic Networks: Visualizations of Knowledge”, Trends
in Cognitive Sciences 1: 169–175.
43. McRoy, Susan W.; Ali, Syed S.; & Haller, Susan M. (1997), “Uniform Knowledge Representation for
Language Processing in the B2 System”, Natural Language Engineering 3: 123–145.
44. McRoy, Susan W.; Ali, Syed S.; & Haller, Susan M. (1997), “Mixed Depth Representations for Dialog Processing”, in Morton Ann Gernsbacher & Sharon J. Derry (eds.), Proceedings of the 20th Annual
Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (University of Wisconsin–Madison) (Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence
Erlbaum Associates): 687–692.
45. Bringsjord, Selmer, & Ferrucci, David A. (1998), ”Logic and Artificial Intelligence: Divorced, Still Married, Separated . . . ?”, Minds and Machines 8(2): 273–308.
46. Kumar, Deepak, & Meeden, Lisa (1998), “A Hybrid Connectionist and BDI Architecture for Modeling
Embedded Rational Agents”, Proceedings, AAAI Fall Symposium on Cognitive Robotics;
http://mainline.brynmawr.edu/ dkumar/Papers/cogrob98.ps
47. McRoy, Susan W. (1998), “Achieving Robust Human-Computer Communication”, International Journal
of Human-Computer Studies 48: 681-704.
48. Gu, H.; Halper, M.; Geller, J.; & Perl, Y. (1999), “Benefits of an OODB Representation for Controlled
Medical Terminologies”, Journal of the American Society for Information Science 6(4): 283–303.
49. McRoy, Susan W.; Ali, Syed S.; Restifficar, Angelo; & Channarukul, Songsak (1999), “Building Intelligent
Dialog Systems”, intelligence 10(1): 14-23.
50. Indurkhya, Bipin (2000), Review of Andy Clark, Jesús Ezquerro, & Jesús M. Larrazabal (eds.), Philosophy
and Cognitive Science, in Minds and Machines 10(3): 430-435.
51. McRoy, Susan W.; Ali, Syed S.; & Haller, Susan M. (2000), “Mixed Depth Representations for Dialog Processing”, in Łucja M. Iwańska & Stuart C. Shapiro (eds.), Natural Language Processing and Knowledge
Representation: Language for Knowledge and Knowledge for Language (Menlo Park, CA/Cambridge,
MA: AAAI Press/MIT Press): 283–299.
52. Geller, James; Gu, Huanying; Perl, Yehoshua; & Halper, Michael (2003), “Semantic Refinement and Error
Correction in Large Terminological Knowledge Bases”, Data & Knowledge Engineering 45: 1–32.
22
53. Lopes das Neves, Pedro Miguel (2007), “Development of Techniques to Control Reasoning using SNePS”,
unpublished master’s thesis, Engenharia Informática e Computadores, Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade Técnica de Lisboa.
54. Scally, Jonathan R.; Cassimatis, Nicholas L.; & Uchida, Hiroyuki (2012), “Worlds as a Unifying Element
of Knowledge Representation”, Biologically Inspired Cognitive Architectures 1: 14–22;
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bica.2012.03.004
23
29. Srihari, Sargur N.; Rapaport, William J.; & Kumar, Deepak (1987), “On Knowledge Representation
Using Semantic Networks and Sanskrit”, Technical Report 87-03 (Buffalo: SUNY Buffalo Department of
Computer Science).
• Briggs, Rick (1987), “Knowledge Representation and Inference in Sanskrit”, AI Magazine 8(2) (Summer):
99.
30. Nakhimovsky, Alexander, & Rapaport, William J. (1988), “Discontinuities in Narratives”, Proceedings
of the 12th International Conference of Computational Linguistics (COLING-88, Budapest): 465–470.
1. Wiebe, Janyce M. (1990), “Identifying Subjective Characters in Narrative”, Proceedings of the 13th International Conference On Computational Linguistics (COLING-90, Helsinki) (Morristown, NJ: Association
for Computational Linguistics): 401–406.
2. Wiebe, Janyce M. (1994), “Tracking Point of View in Narrative”, Computational Linguistics 20(2) (June):
233–287
3. Emmott, Catherine (1997), Narrative Comprehension: A Discourse Perspective (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
31. Peters, Sandra M.; Shapiro, Stuart C.; & Rapaport, William J. (1988), “Flexible Natural Language
Processing and Roschian Category Theory”, Proceedings of the 10th Annual Conference of the Cognitive
Science Society (Montreal) (Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates): 125–131.
1. Cline, Ben E., & Nutter, J. Terry (1990), “Implications of Natural Categories for Natural Language Generation”, in Deepak Kumar (ed.), Current Trends in SNePS—Semantic Network Processing System, Lecture
Notes in Artificial Intelligence, No. 437 (Berlin: Springer-Verlag): 153–162.
2. Wiebe, Janyce M. (1994), “Tracking Point of View in Narrative”, Computational Linguistics 20(2) (June):
233–287
24
32. Rapaport, William J. (1988), “Syntactic Semantics: Foundations of Computational Natural-Language
Understanding”, in James H. Fetzer (ed.), Aspects of Artificial Intelligence (Dordrecht, The Netherlands:
Kluwer Academic Publishers): 81–13.
• Preprinted as Technical Report 86-24 (Buffalo: SUNY Buffalo Department of Computer Science, December 1986).
• Reprinted in Eric Dietrich (ed.) (1994), Thinking Computers and Virtual Persons: Essays on the Intentionality of Machines (San Diego: Academic Press): 225–273.
1. Laymon, Ronald (1988), “Some Computers Can Add (Even If the IBM 1620 Couldn’t): Defending
ENIAC’s Accumulators against Dretske”, Behaviorism 16(1): 1–16; citation is to preprint version.
2. Cole, David; Fetzer, James H.; & Rankin, Terry L. (1990), Philosophy, Mind, and Cognitive Inquiry: Resources for Understanding Mental Processes (Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers).
3. Jahren, Neal (1990), “Can Semantics Be Syntactic?”, Synthese 82(3) (March): 309–328.
• Reprinted in James H. Fetzer, Epistemology and Cognition (Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer
Academic Publishers, 1991).
4. Cole, David (1991), “Artificial Intelligence and Personal Identity”, Synthese 88: 399–417.
5. Jackendoff, Ray (1991), “The Problem of Reality”, Noûs 25: 411–433.
• Reprinted as Ch. 8 of Ray Jackendoff, Languages of the Mind: Essays on Mental Representation
(Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1992): 157–183.
6. Korb, Kevin B. (1991), “Searle’s AI Program”, Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Artificial Intelligence 3(4): 283-296.
7. Bringsjord, Selmer (1992), What Robots Can and Can’t Be (Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers).
8. Lee, Cho-Sik (1993), Philosophy of Artificial Intelligence (in Korean) (Seoul: Korea University Press),
§7-2.
9. Fetzer, James H. (1994), “Mental Algorithms: Are Minds Computational Systems?”, Pragmatics and
Cognition 2: 1–29.
10. Shapiro, Stuart C. (1995), “Computationalism”, Minds and Machines 5: 517–524.
11. Fetzer, James H. (1996), Philosophy and Cognitive Science (New York: Paragon House), Ch. 3, pp. 45–47.
12. Melnyk, Andrew (1996), “Searle’s Abstract Argument against Strong AI”, Synthese 108: 391–419.
13. Narayanan, Ajit (1997), “Biomolecular Cognitive Science”, in Seán Ó Nualláin, Paul Mc Kevitt, & Eoghan
Mac Aogáin (eds.), Two Sciences of Mind: Readings in Cognitive Science and Consciousness (Amsterdam:
John Benjamins): 21–36.
14. Fetzer, James H. (1997), “Thinking and Computing: Computers as Special Kinds of Signs”, Minds and
Machines 7: 345–364.
15. Hauser, Larry (1997), “Searle’s Chinese Box: Debunking the Chinese Room Argument”, Minds and Machines 7(2): 199-226.
16. Mooney, Vincent John, III (1997), “Searle’s Chinese Room and Its Aftermath”, Report No. CSLI-97-202
(Stanford: Stanford University Center for the Study of Language and Information).
17. Horn, Robert E. (1998), “Can Computers Think? The History and Status of the Debate, Map 1 of 7”, in
Mapping Great Debates: Can Computers Think? (Bainbridge Island, WA: MacroVU).
18. Horn, Robert E. (1998), “Can Chinese Rooms Think? The History and Status of the Debate, Map 4 of 7”,
in Mapping Great Debates: Can Computers Think? (Bainbridge Island, WA: MacroVU).
19. Jørgensen, Stig W. (1999), “Is MT Translation? Reflections on a Recent Assault”, Journal of Experimental
and Theoretical Artificial Intelligence 11: 531–541.
25
20. Reingold, Eyal, & Nightingale, Johnathan (1999), “John R. Searle’s Chinese Room”,
[http://www.psych.utoronto.ca/˜reingold/courses/ai/cache/searle.html].
21. Fetzer, James H. (2001), Computers and Cognition: Why Minds Are Not Machines (Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers).
22. Zlatev, Jordan (2001), “The Epigenesis of Meaning in Human Beings, and Possibly in Robots”, Minds and
Machines 11(2): 155–195.
23. Kary, Michael, & Mahner, Martin (2002), “How Would You Know if You Synthesized a Thinking Thing?”,
Minds and Machines 12(1): 61–86.
24. Preston, John, & Bishop, Mark (eds.) (2002), Views into the Chinese Room: New Essays on Searle and
Artificial Intelligence (Oxford: Clarendon Press).
25. Dascal, Marcelo (2003), Interpretation and Understanding (Amsterdam: John Benjamins).
26. Moural, Josef (2003), “The Chinese Room Argument”, in Barry Smith (ed.), John Searle (Cambridge,
UK: Cambridge University Press): 214–260.
27. Wakefield, Jerome C. (2003), “The Chinese Room Argument Reconsidered: Essentialism, Indeterminacy,
and Strong AI”, Minds and Machines 13(2): 285–319.
28. Bringsjord, Selmer, & Arkoudas, Konstantine (2004), “The Modal Argument for Hypercomputing Minds”,
Theoretical Computer Science 317: 167–190.
29. Zambak, Aziz; & Vergauwen, Roger (2009), “Artificial Intelligence and Agentive Cognition: A LogicoLinguistic Approach”, Logique et Analyse, nouvelle série 52(205) (March): 57–96.
30. Dietrich, Eric (2010), “Analogical Insight: Toward Unifying Categorization and Analogy”, Cognitive Processing 11: 331–345.
26
33. Rapaport, William J. (1988), “To Think or Not To Think”, Noûs 22: 585–609.
1. Jahren, Neal (1990), “Can Semantics Be Syntactic?”, Synthese 82(3) (March): 309–328.
• Reprinted in James H. Fetzer, Epistemology and Cognition (Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer
Academic Publishers, 1991).
2. Cole, David (1991), “Artificial Intelligence and Personal Identity”, Synthese 88: 399–417.
3. Rheinwald, Rosemarie (1992), “Das ‘Chinesische Zimmer’ als Test des Turing-Tests? Zur Frage, ob
Maschinen denken können” (“The ‘Chinese Room’ as Test of the Turing Test? On the Question whether
Machines Can Think”), Philosophische Rundschau 39(1-2): 133–156.
4. Melnyk, Andrew (1996), “Searle’s Abstract Argument against Strong AI”, Synthese 108: 391–419.
5. Mooney, Vincent John, III (1997), “Searle’s Chinese Room and Its Aftermath”, Report No. CSLI-97-202
(Stanford: Stanford University Center for the Study of Language and Information).
6. Preston, John, & Bishop, Mark (eds.) (2002), Views into the Chinese Room: New Essays on Searle and
Artificial Intelligence (Oxford: Clarendon Press).
34. Wiebe, Janyce M., & Rapaport, William J. (1988), “A Computational Theory of Perspective and Reference in Narrative”, Proceedings of the 26th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (SUNY Buffalo) (Morristown, NJ: Association for Computational Linguistics): 131–138.
1. Galbraith, Mary (1989), “What Everybody Knew versus What Maisie Knew: The Change in Epistemological Perspective from the Prologue to the Opening of Chapter 1 in What Maisie Knew”, in Style 23(2,
Summer): 197–212.
2. Mayer, Rolf (1990), “The Release of Information in Discourse: Compactness, Compression, and Relevance”, Journal of Semantics 7: 175–219.
3. Segal, Erwin M.; Duchan, Judith F.; & Scott, Paula J. (1991), “The Role of Interclausal Connectives in
Narrative Structuring: Evidence from Adults’ Interpretations of Simple Stories”, Discourse Processes 14:
27–54.
4. Montgomery, Christine A.; Stalls, Bonnie Glover; Stumberger, Robert E.; Li, Naicong; Belvin, Robert S.;
Arnaiz, Alfredo; & Hirsh, Susan B. (1992), “Language Systems, Inc.: Description of the DBG System as
Used for MUC-4”, Proceedings of the 4th Conference on Message Understanding (McLean, VA) (Morristown, NJ: Association for Computational Linguistics): 197–206.
5. Emmott, Catherine (1997), Narrative Comprehension: A Discourse Perspective (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
35. Rapaport, William J.; Segal, Erwin M.; Shapiro, Stuart C.; Zubin, David A.; Bruder, Gail A.; Duchan,
Judith F.; Almeida, Michael J.; Daniels, Joyce H.; Galbraith, Mary M.; Wiebe, Janyce M.; & Yuhan, Albert Hanyong (1989), “Deictic Centers and the Cognitive Structure of Narrative Comprehension”, Technical Report 89-01 (Buffalo: SUNY Buffalo Department of Computer Science, March 1989).
1. Millis, Keith K. (1995), “Encoding Discourse Perspective during the Reading of a Literary Text”, Poetics
23: 235–253.
27
36. Rapaport, William J.; Segal, Erwin M.; Shapiro, Stuart C.; Zubin, David A.; Bruder, Gail A.; Duchan,
Judith F.; & Mark, David M. (1989), “Cognitive and Computer Systems for Understanding Narrative
Text”, Technical Report 89-07 (Buffalo: SUNY Buffalo Department of Computer Science, August 1989).
1. Bringsjord, Selmer (1992), “Cinewrite: An Algorithm-Sketch for Writing Novels Cinematically, and Two
Mysteries Therein”, Instructional Science 21: 155–168
• Reprinted in Mike Sharples (ed.), Computers and Writing: Issues and Implementations (Dordrecht,
The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1992): 155–168.
2. Bringsjord, Selmer (1992), What Robots Can and Can’t Be (Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers).
3. Montgomery, Christine A.; Stalls, Bonnie Glover; Stumberger, Robert E.; Li, Naicong; Belvin, Robert S.;
Arnaiz, Alfredo; & Hirsh, Susan B. (1992), “Language Systems, Inc.: Description of the DBG System as
Used for MUC-4”, Proceedings of the 4th Conference on Message Understanding (McLean, VA) (Morristown, NJ: Association for Computational Linguistics): 197–206.
4. Wiebe, Janyce M. (1994), “Tracking Point of View in Narrative”, Computational Linguistics 20(2) (June):
233–287
5. Millis, Keith K. (1995), “Encoding Discourse Perspective during the Reading of a Literary Text”, Poetics
23: 235–253.
37. Rapaport, William J. (1990), “Representing Fiction in SNePS”, in Deepak Kumar (ed.), Current Trends
in SNePS—Semantic Network Processing System, Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, No. 437 (Berlin:
Springer-Verlag): 107–121; pre-printed in Deepak Kumar (ed.), “Proceedings of the First Annual SNePS
Workshop”, Technical Report 89-14 (Buffalo: SUNY Buffalo Department of Computer Science, December
1989): 89–98.
1. Bringsjord, Selmer (1992), “Cinewrite: An Algorithm-Sketch for Writing Novels Cinematically, and Two
Mysteries Therein”, Instructional Science 21: 155–168
• Reprinted in Mike Sharples (ed.), Computers and Writing: Issues and Implementations (Dordrecht,
The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1992): 155–168. [Citation is to TR 89-14.]
38. Rapaport, William J. (1990), “Computer Processes and Virtual Persons: Comments on Cole’s ‘Artificial
Intelligence and Personal Identity’ ”, Technical Report 90-13 (Buffalo: SUNY Buffalo Department of
Computer Science, May 1990).
1. Cole, David (1991), “Artificial Intelligence and Personal Identity”, Synthese 88: 399–417.
2. Bringsjord, Selmer (1992), What Robots Can and Can’t Be (Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers).
3. Hauser, Larry (1997), Review of Selmer Bringsjord’s What Robots Can and Can’t Be, in Minds and
Machines 7: 433–438.
28
39. Srihari, Rohini K., & Rapaport, William J. (1990), “Combining Linguistic and Pictorial Information: Using Captions to Interpret Newspaper Photographs”, in Deepak Kumar (ed.), Current Trends in SNePS—
Semantic Network Processing System, Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, No. 437 (Berlin:
Springer-Verlag): 85–96.
• Preprinted in Deepak Kumar (ed.), “Proceedings of the First Annual SNePS Workshop”, Technical Report
89-14 (Buffalo: SUNY Buffalo Department of Computer Science, December 1989): 67–77.
1. Bringsjord, Selmer (1992), “Cinewrite: An Algorithm-Sketch for Writing Novels Cinematically, and Two
Mysteries Therein”, Instructional Science 21: 155–168.
• Reprinted in Mike Sharples (ed.), Computers and Writing: Issues and Implementations (Dordrecht,
The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1992): 155–168. [Citation is to TR 89-14.]
2. Bringsjord, Selmer (1992), What Robots Can and Can’t Be (Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers) [citation is to TR 89-14]
3. Guglielmo, Eugene J., & Rowe, Neil C. (1996), “Natural-Language Retrieval of Images Based on Descriptive Captions”, ACM Transactions on Information Systems 14(3; July): 237–267.
40. Peters, Sandra L., & Rapaport, William J. (1990), “Superordinate and Basic Level Categories in Discourse: Memory and Context”, Proceedings of the 12th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society
(Cambridge, MA) (Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates): 157–165.
• Shapiro, Stuart C. (2000), “SNePS: A Logic for Natural Language Understanding and Commonsense Reasoning”, in Łucja M. Iwańska & Stuart C. Shapiro (eds.), Natural Language Processing and Knowledge
Representation: Language for Knowledge and Knowledge for Language (Menlo Park, CA/Cambridge,
MA: AAAI Press/MIT Press): 175–195.
41. Shapiro, Stuart C., & Rapaport, William J. (1991), “Models and Minds: Knowledge Representation for
Natural-Language Competence”, in Robert Cummins & John Pollock (eds.), Philosophy and AI: Essays
at the Interface (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press): 215–259.
1. Mamede, Nuno J. (1993), “SNePSR —A SNePS with Resources”, Journal of Experimental and Theoretical
Artificial Intelligence 5(2&3): 199–213.
2. Steinhart, Eric (1997), Review of Robert Cummins & John Pollock (eds.), Philosophy and AI: Essays at
the Interface, in Minds and Machines 7: 464–468.
3. Orilia, Francesco (1998), “Guise Theory, Property Theory, and Castañeda’s Philosophical
Methodology”, in Franceso Orilia & William J. Rapaport (eds.) (1998), Thought, Language, and Ontology: Essays in Memory of Hector-Neri Castañeda (Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic
Publishers): 39–59.
4. Indurkhya, Bipin (2000), Review of Andy Clark, Jesús Ezquerro, & Jesús M. Larrazabal (eds.), Philosophy
and Cognitive Science, in Minds and Machines 10(3): 430-435.
29
42. Rapaport, William J. (1991), “Predication, Fiction, and Artificial Intelligence”, Topoi 10: 79–111.
• Preprinted as Technical Report 90-11 (Buffalo: SUNY Buffalo Department of Computer Science, May
1990).
1. Bringsjord, Selmer (1992), “Cinewrite: An Algorithm-Sketch for Writing Novels Cinematically, and Two
Mysteries Therein”, Instructional Science 21: 155–168.
• Reprinted in Mike Sharples (ed.), Computers and Writing: Issues and Implementations (Dordrecht,
The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1992): 155–168. [Citation is to TR 90-11.]
2. Bringsjord, Selmer (1992), What Robots Can and Can’t Be (Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers).
3. Bringsjord, Selmer, & Ferrucci, David A. (2000), Artificial Intelligence and Literary Creativity: Inside the
Mind of BRUTUS, a Storytelling Machine (Mahway, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates).
4. Proudfoot, Diane (2006), “Possible Worlds Semantics and Fiction”, Journal of Philosophical Logic 35:
9–40.
43. Rapaport, William J. (1991), “Meinong, Alexius; I: Meinongian Semantics”, in Hans Burkhardt & Barry
Smith (eds.), Handbook of Metaphysics and Ontology (Munich: Philosophia Verlag): 516–519.
• Marek, Johann (2009), “Alexius Meinong”, in Edward N. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2009 Edition)
[http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2009/entries/meinong/].
44. Rapaport, William J. (1992), “Logic”, in Stuart C. Shapiro (ed.), Encyclopedia of Artificial Intelligence,
2nd edition (New York: John Wiley): 851–853.
• Shapiro, Stuart C. (2000), ”Propositional, First-Order, and Higher-Order Logics: Basic Definitions, Rules
of Inference, and Examples”, in Łucja M. Iwańska & Stuart C. Shapiro (eds.), Natural Language Processing and Knowledge Representation: Language for Knowledge and Knowledge for Language (Menlo Park,
CA/Cambridge, MA: AAAI Press/MIT Press): 379–395.
30
45. Shapiro, Stuart C., & Rapaport, William J. (1992), “The SNePS Family,” Computers and Mathematics
with Applications 23: 243–275.
• Reprinted in Fritz Lehmann (ed.), Semantic Networks in Artificial Intelligence (Oxford: Pergamon Press,
1992): 243–275.
1. Chalupsky, Hans (1993), “Using Hypothetical Reasoning as a Method for Belief Ascription”, Journal of
Experimental and Theoretical Artificial Intelligence 5(2&3): 119–133.
2. Cravo, Maria R., & Martins, João P. (1993), “SNePSwD: A Newcomer to the SNePS Family”, Journal of
Experimental and Theoretical Artificial Intelligence 5(2&3): 135–148.
3. Haller, Susan (1996), “Planning Text about Plans Interactively”, International Journal of Expert Systems
9: 85–112.
4. McRoy, Susan W.; Ali, Syed S.; & Haller, Susan M. (1997), “Uniform Knowledge Representation for
Language Processing in the B2 System”, Natural Language Engineering 3: 123–145.
5. McRoy, Susan W.; Ali, Syed S.; & Haller, Susan M. (1997), “Mixed Depth Representations for Dialog Processing”, in Morton Ann Gernsbacher & Sharon J. Derry (eds.), Proceedings of the 20th Annual
Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (University of Wisconsin–Madison) (Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence
Erlbaum Associates): 687–692.
6. McRoy, Susan W. (1998), “Achieving Robust Human-Computer Communication”, International Journal
of Human-Computer Studies 48: 681-704.
7. Hendler, James; & Stoffel, Kilian (1999), “Back-End Technology for High-Performance KnowledgeRepresentation Systems”, IEEE Intelligent Systems 14(3): 63–69.
8. Liu, Li-min; Halper, Michael; Geller, James; & Perl, Yehoshua (1999), “Controlled Vocabularies in
OODBs: Modeling Issues and Implementation”, Distributed and Parallel Databases 7(1): 37–65.
9. McRoy, Susan W.; Ali, Syed S.; Restifficar, Angelo; & Channarukul, Songsak (1999), “Building Intelligent
Dialog Systems”, intelligence 10(1): 14-23.
10. Restificar, Angelo C.; Ali, Syed S.; & McRoy, Susan W. (1999), “Detecting Arguments and Generating
Rebuttals in Human-Computer Dialog”, Working Notes of the AAAI Workshop on Mixed-Initiative Intelligence (AAAI-99; Orlando, FL);
http://www.cs.wright.edu/people/faculty/mcox/mii/papers/restificar.pdf
11. McRoy, Susan W.; Ali, Syed S.; & Haller, Susan M. (2000), “Mixed Depth Representations for Dialog Processing”, in Łucja M. Iwańska & Stuart C. Shapiro (eds.), Natural Language Processing and Knowledge
Representation: Language for Knowledge and Knowledge for Language (Menlo Park, CA/Cambridge,
MA: AAAI Press/MIT Press): 283–299.
12. Sowa, John F. (2000), Knowledge Representation: Logical, Philosophical, and Computational Foundations (Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole).
13. Stoffel, Kilian; Taylor, Merwyn; & Hendler, Jim (1997), “Efficient Management of Very Large Ontologies”, Proceedings of the 14th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-97, Providence, RI)
(Menlo Park, CA: AAAI Press, and Cambridge, MA: MIT Press): 442-447;
http://www.cs.umd.edu/projects/plus/Parka/aaai97.ps
14. Chalupsky, Hans (2000), “OntoMorph: A Translation System for Symbolic Knowledge”, in A.G. Cohn,
F. Giunchiglia, & B. Selman (eds.), Knowledge Representation 2000: Proceedings of the 7th International
Conference (KR-2000; Breckenridge, CO) (San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann).
15. Gomez, Fernando (2000), “Why Base the Knowledge Representation Language on Natural Language?”,
Journal of Intelligent Systems 10(2): 161–181.
16. Channarukul, Songsak; McRoy, Susan W.; & Ali, Syed S. (2001), “YAG: A Template-Based Text Realization System for Dialog”, International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems
9(6): 649–659.
31
17. McRoy, Susan W.; Ali, Syed S.; & Nalamlieng, Nipat (2003), “Equuleus: Presentation from Legacy Documents”, in Proceedings of the 15th IEEE International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence
(ICTAI’03) (Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society): 589–596.
18. McRoy, Susan W.; Channarukul, Songsak; & Ali, Syed S. (2003), “An Augmented Template-Based Approach to Text Realization”, Natural Language Engineering 9(4): 381–420.
19. Brown, Eric W.; Hersh, William; & Valencia, Alfonso (2004), “SIGIR 2003 Workshop on Text Analysis
and Search for Bioinformatics” [http://www.sigir.org/forum/2004D/brown sigirforum 2004d.pdf]
20. Campbell, Alistair E.R.; & Burhans, Debra T. (2006), “A Layered Heterogeneous Cognitive Robotics
Architecture”, in Michael Beetz, Kanna Rajan, Michael Thielscher, & Radu Bogdan Rusu (eds.), Cognitive
Robotics: Papers from the AAAI Workshop (Menlo Park, CA: AAAI Press Technical Report WS-06-03):
40–46.
21. Helbig, Hermann (2006), Knowledge Representation and the Semantics of Natural Language (Berlin:
Springer-Verlag).
22. Hsing, Michael; & Cherkasov, Artem (2006), “Integration of Biological Data with Semantic Networks”,
Current Bioinformatics 1: 273–290.
23. Rödder, Wilhelm; & Kulmann, Friedhelm (2006), “Recall and Reasoning—An Information Theoretical
Model of Cognitive Processes”, Information Sciences 176: 2439–2466.
24. Lopes das Neves, Pedro Miguel (2007), “Development of Techniques to Control Reasoning using SNePS”,
unpublished master’s thesis, Engenharia Informática e Computadores, Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade Técnica de Lisboa.
25. Mazuel, Laurent; & Sabouret, Nicolas (2008), “Generic Command Interpretation Algorithms for Conversational Agents”, Web Intelligence and Agent Systems 6: 43–57.
26. Ismail, Haythem; & Kasrin, Nasr (2010), “Focused Belief Revision as a Model of Fallible RelevanceSensitive Perception”, in R. Dillmann et al. (eds.), 33rd Annual German Conference on Artificial Intelligence, KI 2010 (Berlin: Springer-Verlag Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence 6359): 126–134.
32
46. Shapiro, Stuart C., & Rapaport, William J. (1992), “A Fully Intensional Propositional Semantic Network”, in Leslie Burkholder (ed.), Philosophy and the Computer (Boulder, CO: Westview Press): 75–91.
• Kumar, Deepak, & Meeden, Lisa (1998), “A Hybrid Connectionist and BDI Architecture for Modeling
Embedded Rational Agents”, Proceedings, AAAI Fall Symposium on Cognitive Robotics;
http://mainline.brynmawr.edu/ dkumar/Papers/cogrob98.ps
47. Rapaport, William J. (1993), “Because Mere Calculating Isn’t Thinking: Comments on Hauser’s ‘Why
Isn’t My Pocket Calculator a Thinking Thing?”’, Minds and Machines 3: 11–20.
1. Hauser, Larry (1997), “Searle’s Chinese Box: Debunking the Chinese Room Argument”, Minds and Machines 7(2): 199-226.
2. Preston, John, & Bishop, Mark (eds.) (2002), Views into the Chinese Room: New Essays on Searle and
Artificial Intelligence (Oxford: Clarendon Press).
48. Rapaport, William J. (1993), “Cognitive Science”, in Anthony Ralston & Edwin D. Reilly (eds.), Encyclopedia of Computer Science, 3rd edition (New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold): 185–189.
• Aamodt, A., & Nygard, M. (1995), “Different Roles and Mutual Dependencies of Data, Information, and
Knowledge: An AI Perspective on Their Integration”, Data and Knowledge Engineering 16: 191–222.
33
49. Rapaport, William J. (1995), “Understanding Understanding: Syntactic Semantics and Computational
Cognition”, in James E. Tomberlin (ed.), AI, Connectionism, and Philosophical Psychology, Philosophical
Perspectives, Vol. 9 (Atascadero, CA: Ridgeview): 49–88
• Reprinted in Toribio, Josefa, & Clark, Andy (eds.) (1998), Language and Meaning in Cognitive Science:
Cognitive Issues and Semantic Theory, Artificial Intelligence and Cognitive Science: Conceptual Issues,
Vol. 4 (New York: Garland): 73–88.
1. Gonzalez, Ruben (1997), “Hypermedia Data Modeling, Coding, and Semiotics”, Proceedings of the IEEE
85: 1111–1140.
2. Toribio, Josefa, & Clark, Andy (1998), “Introduction: Where Minds Meet Words”, in Toribio, Josefa, &
Clark, Andy (eds.) (1998), Language and Meaning in Cognitive Science: Cognitive Issues and Semantic
Theory, Artificial Intelligence and Cognitive Science: Conceptual Issues, Vol. 4 (New York: Garland):
vii–xii.
3. Kay, Kendrick (2001), “Machines and the Mind: Do Artificial Intelligence Systems Incorporate Intrinsic
Meaning?”, The Harvard Brain 8 (Spring),
[http://www.hcs.harvard.edu/˜husn/BRAIN/vol8-spring2001/ai.htm].
4. Preston, John, & Bishop, Mark (eds.) (2002), Views into the Chinese Room: New Essays on Searle and
Artificial Intelligence (Oxford: Clarendon Press).
5. Sivashanmugam, Kaarthik; Sheth, Amit; Miller, John; Verma, Kunal; Aggarwal, Rohit; & Rajasekaran,
Preeda (2003), “Metadata and Semantics for Web Services and Processes”, in Datenbanken und Informationssysteme, Festschrift zum 60. Geburtstag von Gunter Schlageter (Publication Hagen):
6. Cornejo, Carlos (2004), “Who Says What the Words Say? The Problem of Linguistic Meaning in Psychology”, Theory & Psychology 14(1): 5–28.
• Citation is to the Toribio & Clark reprint.
7. Ben Jacob, Eshel; & Shapira, Yoash (2005), “Meaning-Based Natural Intelligence vs. Information-Based
Artificial Intelligence”, in The Cradle of Creativity.
8. Ellis, Glenn W.; Ory, Eleanor C.; & Bhushan, Nalini (2005), “Organizing a K–12 AI Curriculum using
Philosophy of the Mind”, 2005 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, June 12–15, Portland, OR: The
Changing Landscape of Engineering and Technology (Washington, DC: American Society for Engineering
Education) (13 pp.)
9. Zambak, Aziz; & Vergauwen, Roger (2009), “Artificial Intelligence and Agentive Cognition: A LogicoLinguistic Approach”, Logique et Analyse, nouvelle série 52(205) (March): 57–96.
10. Dietrich, Eric (2010), “Analogical Insight: Toward Unifying Categorization and Analogy”, Cognitive Processing 11: 331–345.
50. Shapiro, Stuart C., & Rapaport, William J. (1995), “An Introduction to a Computational Reader of
Narratives”, in Judith Felson Duchan, Gail A. Bruder, & Lynne E. Hewitt (eds.), Deixis in Narrative: A
Cognitive Science Perspective (Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates): 79–105.
• Mueller, Erik T. (2004), “Understanding Script-Based Stories Using Commonsense Reasoning”, Cognitive
Systems Research 5(4) (December): 307–340.
51. Rapaport, William J., & Shapiro, Stuart C. (1995), “Cognition and Fiction”, in Judith Felson Duchan,
Gail A. Bruder, & Lynne E. Hewitt (eds.), Deixis in Narrative: A Cognitive Science Perspective (Hillsdale,
NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates): 107–128.
• Gander, Pierre (2005), Participating in a Story: Exploring Audience Cognition (Lund University Cognitive
Studies 119); http://www.pierregander.com/research/participating in a story.pdf
34
52. Rapaport, William J.; Shapiro, Stuart C.; & Wiebe, Janyce M. (1997), “Quasi-Indexicals and Knowledge
Reports”, Cognitive Science 21: 63–107.
• Reprinted in Francesco Orilia & William J. Rapaport (eds.), Thought, Language, and Ontology: Essays in
Memory of Hector-Neri Castañeda (Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1998): 235–294.
• Pre-printed as Rapaport, Shapiro, & Wiebe 1986; see item 25 above for further citations.
1. Gordon, Peter C.; & Hendrick, Randall (1998), “The Representation and Processing of Coreference in
Discourse”, Cognitive Science 22(4): 389–424.
2. Kaplan, Aaron N., & Schubert, Lenhart K. (2000), “A Computational Model of Belief”, Artificial Intelligence 120: 119–160.
3. Varnier, Giuseppe (2000), Review of Orilia, Francesco, & Rapaport, William J. (eds.) (1998), Thought,
Language, and Ontology: Essays in Memory of Hector-Neri Castañeda, in Minds and Machines 10(3):
448–452.
4. Bergler, Sabine; Doandes, Monia; Gerard, Christine; & Witte, René (2004), “Attributions”, in Yan Qu,
James G. Shanahan, & Janyce Wiebe (eds.), Exploring Attitude and Affect in Text: Theories and Applications (AAAI-EAAT 2004), SS-04-07 (Menlo Park, CA: AAAI Press): 16–19.
5. Corazza, Eros (2004), Reflecting the Mind: Indexicality and Quasi-Indexicality (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
53. Rapaport, William J. (1998), “How Minds Can Be Computational Systems”, Journal of Experimental and
Theoretical Artificial Intelligence 10: 403–419.
1. Whobrey, Darren (2001), “Machine Mentality and the Nature of the Ground Relation”, Minds and Machines 11(3): 307-346.
2. Bringsjord, Selmer, & Zenzen, Michael (2003), Superminds: People Harness Hypercomputation, and
More (Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers).
3. Bringsjord, Selmer, & Arkoudas, Konstantine (2004), “The Modal Argument for Hypercomputing Minds”,
Theoretical Computer Science 317: 167–190.
4. Floridi, Luciano (2004), “Open Problems in the Philosophy of Information”, Metaphilosophy 35(4): 554–
582.
5. Honingh, Aline (2004), “Coding Cultures” [http://staff.science.uva.nl/˜ahoningh/education].
6. Bringsjord, Selmer (2008), “The Logicist Manifesto: At Long Last Let Logic-Based Artificial Intelligence
Become a Field unto Itself”, Journal of Applied Logic 6(4) (December): 502–525.
7. Floridi, Luciano (2011), The Philosophy of Information (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
54. Rapaport, William J. (1998), “Prolegomena to a Study of Hector-Neri Castañeda’s Influence on Artificial Intelligence: A Survey and Personal Reflections”, in Francesco Orilia & William J. Rapaport, (eds.),
Thought, Language, and Ontology: Essays in Memory of Hector-Neri Castañeda (Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers): 345–367.
• Varnier, Giuseppe (2000), Review of Orilia, Francesco, & Rapaport, William J. (eds.) (1998), Thought,
Language, and Ontology: Essays in Memory of Hector-Neri Castañeda, in Minds and Machines 10(3):
448–452.
35
55. Orilia, Francesco, & Rapaport, William J. (eds.) (1998), Thought, Language, and Ontology: Essays in
Memory of Hector-Neri Castañeda, Philosophical Studies Series (Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers).
1. Varnier, Giuseppe (2000), Review of Orilia, Francesco, & Rapaport, William J. (eds.) (1998), Thought,
Language, and Ontology: Essays in Memory of Hector-Neri Castañeda, in Minds and Machines 10(3):
448–452.
2. Corazza, Eros (2004), Reflecting the Mind: Indexicality and Quasi-Indexicality (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
56. Rapaport, William J. (1999), “Implementation Is Semantic Interpretation”, The Monist 82: 109–130.
1. Arkoudas, Konstantine; & Bringsjord, Selmer (2007), “Computers, Justification, and Mathematical Knowledge”, Minds and Machines 17(2) (Summer): 185-202.
2. Turner, Raymond (2009), “The Meaning of Programming Languages”, APA Newsletter on Philosophy and
Computers 9(1) (Fall): 2–7.
3. Zambak, Aziz; & Vergauwen, Roger (2009), “Artificial Intelligence and Agentive Cognition: A LogicoLinguistic Approach”, Logique et Analyse, nouvelle série 52(205) (March): 57–96.
4. Dietrich, Eric (2010), “Analogical Insight: Toward Unifying Categorization and Analogy”, Cognitive Processing 11: 331–345.
5. Turner, Raymond (2010?), “Programming Languages as Mathematical Theories” (unpublished ms.?)
57. Rapaport, William J. (2000), “How to Pass a Turing Test: Syntactic Semantics, Natural-Language Understanding, and First-Person Cognition”, Journal of Logic, Language, and Information, 9(4): 467-490.
• Reprinted in James H. Moor (ed.), The Turing Test: The Elusive Standard of Artificial Intelligence (Dordrecht: Kluwer, 2003): 161–184.
1. Ronald, Edmund M.A., & Sipper, Moshe (2001), “Intelligence is Not Enough: On the Socialization of
Talking Machines”, Minds and Machines 11(4): 567–576.
2. Araujo Filho, J.E.; & Kieitz, K.H. (2003), “Adaptive Reference-Driven Decision-Making Process”, in
O. Nasraoui; H. Frigui; & J.M. Keller (eds.), IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems 1: 452–
457.
3. Honingh, Aline (2004), “Coding Cultures” [http://staff.science.uva.nl/˜ahoningh/education].
4. Lenski, Wolfgang (2004), “Towards a Theory of Information”, in Wolfgang Lenski (ed.), Logic versus
Approximation (Berlin: Springer-Verlag Lecture Notes in Computer Science 3075): 77–105.
5. Ariza, Christopher (2009), “The Interrogator as Critic: The Turing Test and the Evaluation of Generative
Music Systems”, Computer Music Journal 33(2) (Summer): 48–70.
6. Zambak, Aziz; & Vergauwen, Roger (2009), “Artificial Intelligence and Agentive Cognition: A LogicoLinguistic Approach”, Logique et Analyse, nouvelle série 52(205) (March): 57–96.
58. Rapaport, William J. (2000), “Cognitive Science”, in Anthony Ralston, Edwin D. Reilly, & David Hemmendinger (eds.), Encyclopedia of Computer Science, 4th edition (New York: Grove’s Dictionaries): 227–
233.
• Glick, Jonathan (ed.) (2001), “Cognitive Science: Good Places to Start”, AI Topics
[http://www.aaai.org/AITopics/html/cogsci.html].
36
59. Rapaport, William J., & Ehrlich, Karen (2000), “A Computational Theory of Vocabulary Acquisition”,
in Łucja M. Iwańska & Stuart C. Shapiro (eds.), Natural Language Processing and Knowledge Representation: Language for Knowledge and Knowledge for Language (Menlo Park, CA/Cambridge, MA: AAAI
Press/MIT Press): 347–375.
• Johnson, Frances L.; & Shapiro, Stuart C. (1999), “Says Who?—Incorporating Source Credibility Issues
into Belief Revision”, CSE Techinical Report 99-08 (Buffalo: SUNY Buffalo Department of Computer
Science & Engineering), [http://www.cse.buffalo.edu/˜shapiro/Papers/johsha99a.pdf].
60. Rapaport, William J. (2001–2005), “Some Definitions of ‘Artificial Intelligence’ ”,
[http://www.cse.buffalo.edu/˜rapaport/definitions.of.ai.html].
• Friedenberg, Jay, & Silverman, Gordon (2006), Cognitive Science: An Introduction to the Study of the
Mind (Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications).
61. Rapaport, William J. (2001–2009), “Intensionality vs. Intentionality”,
[http://www.cse.buffalo.edu/˜rapaport/intensional.html].
• Convertino, Gregorio; & Farooq, Umer (2004), “Interpreting Scenario-Based Design from an Information
Systems Perspective”, Proceedings of the Tenth Americas Conference on Information Systems (New York,
NY).
62. Rapaport, William J. (2002), “Holism, Conceptual-Role Semantics, and Syntactic Semantics”, Minds and
Machines 12(1): 3–59.
1. Goldstone, Robert L., & Rogosky, Brian J. (2002), “Using Relations within Conceptual Systems to Translate across Conceptual Systems”, Cognition 84: 295–320.
2. Dietrich, Eric (2003), “An ABSURDIST Model Vindicates a Venerable Theory”, TRENDS in Cognitive
Science 7(2, February): 57-59.
3. Goldstone, Robert L.; Feng, Ying; & Rogosky, Brian J. (2005), “Connecting to the World and Each Other”,
in D. Pecher & R. Zwaan (eds.), Grounding Cognition: The Role of Perception and Action in Memory,
Language, and Thinking (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press): 292–314.
4. Lin, Shou-de; & Verspoor, Karin (2008), “A Semantics-Enhanced Language Model for Unsupervised Word
Sense Disambiguation”, in A. Gelbukh (ed.), 9th International Conference on Computational Linguistics
and Intelligent Text Processing, CICLing 2008 (Berlin: Springer-Verlag Lecture Notes in Computer Science 4919): 287–298.
5. van Dantzig, Saskia; Pecher, Diane; Zeelenberg, René; & Barsalou, Lawrence W. (2008), “Perceptual
Processing Affects Conceptual Processing”, Cognitive Science 32: 579–590.
6. Zambak, Aziz; & Vergauwen, Roger (2009), “Artificial Intelligence and Agentive Cognition: A LogicoLinguistic Approach”, Logique et Analyse, nouvelle série 52(205) (March): 57–96.
63. Rapaport, William J., & Kibby, Michael W. (2002), “Contextual Vocabulary Acquisition: A Computational Theory and Educational Curriculum”, in Nagib Callaos, Ana Breda, and Ma. Yolanda Fernandez J.
(eds.), Proceedings of the 6th World Multiconference on Systemics, Cybernetics and Informatics (SCI 2002;
Orlando, FL) (Orlando: International Institute of Informatics and Systemics), Vol. II: Concepts and
Applications of Systemics, Cybernetics, and Informatics I, pp. 261–266.
1. Iwańska, Łucja M. (2004), “Comparing, Integrating Lexical Definitional Knowledge from Multiple Sources”,
in Dan Moldovan & Roxana Girju (eds.), HLT-NAACL 2004: Workshop on Computational Lexical Semantics (Association for Computational Linguistics): 84–91.
2. Rusu, Amalia (2007), “Exploiting the Gap in Human and Machine Abilities in Handwriting Recognition
for Web Security Applications”, Ph.D. dissertation (Buffalo: SUNY Buffalo Department of Computer
Science & Engineering).
37
64. Rapaport, William J. (2003), “What Is the ‘Context’ for Contextual Vocabulary Acquisition?”, in Peter P.
Slezak (ed.), Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Cognitive Science/7th Australasian Society
for Cognitive Science Conference (ICCS/ASCS-2003; Sydney, Australia) (Sydney: University of New South
Wales), Vol. 2, pp. 547–552.
1. Frishkoff, Gwen A.; Collins-Thompson, Kevyn; Perfetti, Charles A.; & Callan, Jamie (2008), “Measuring
Incremental Changes in Word Knowledge: Experimental Validatio and Implications for Learning and
Assessment”, Behavior Research Methods 40(4): 907–925.
2. de Sousa, Lucilene Bender (2011), “Aquisição Lexical através da Leitura” (“Lexical Acquisition through
Reading”), master’s thesis in Reading and Cognition (Santa Cruz do Sul, Brazil: Universidade de Santa
Cruz do Sul).
65. Rapaport, William J. (2003), “What Did You Mean by That? Misunderstanding, Negotiation, and Syntactic Semantics”, Minds and Machines: Journal for Artificial Intelligence, Philosophy, and Cognitive Science 13(3): 397–427.
1. Arrighi, Claudia, & Ferrario, Roberta (2004), “Abductive Reasoning, Interpretation and Collaborative
Processes”, paper presented at Model Based Reasoning 2004
[http://www-3.unipv.it/webphilos lab/courses/progra1.html].
2. Arrighi, Claudia, & Ferrario, Roberta (2005), “The Dynamic Nature of Meaning”, in Lorenzo Magnani &
Riccardo Dossena (eds.), Computing, Philosophy and Cognition: Proceedings of the European Computing
and Philosophy Conference (ECAP 2004) (London: [King’s] College [London] Publications): 295–312;
[http://www.loa-cnr.it/Files/extArrighiFerrario.pdf].
3. Arrighi, Claudia; & Ferrario, Roberta (2008), “Abductive Reasoning, Interpretation and Collaborative
Processes”, Foundations of Science 13: 75–87.
4. Georgescu, Alexandru V.; & Bărbat, Boldur E. (2008), “Modelling Time in Protensional Agents”,
8th WSEAS International Conference on Simulation, Modelling and Optimization (SMO ’08; Santander,
Cantabria, Spain, Sept. 23–25); http://www.wseas.us/e-library/conferences/2008/spain/smo/smo32.pdf
5. Kecskes, Istvan (2008), “Dueling Contexts: A Dynamic Model of Meaning”, Journal of Pragmatics 40:
385–406.
6. Zambak, Aziz; & Vergauwen, Roger (2009), “Artificial Intelligence and Agentive Cognition: A LogicoLinguistic Approach”, Logique et Analyse, nouvelle série 52(205) (March): 57–96.
7. Clouard, Régis; Renouf, Arnaud; & Revenu, Marinette (2010), “An Ontology-Based Model for Representing Image Processing Application Objectives”, International Journal of Pattern Recognition and Artificial
Intelligence 24(8): 1181–1208.
8. Clouard, Régis; Renouf, Arnaud; & Revenu, Marinette (2011), “Human-Computer Interaction for the
Generation of Image Processing Applications”, International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 69:
201–219.
66. Rapaport, William J. (2004), “Helping Students Apply Reasoning to Gaining Word Meanings from Context: Application of Artificial Intelligence and Verbal Protocol Data to Curriculum Design”, unpublished
presentation to the 49th Annual Convention of the International Reading Association (Reno, NV; 2004)
(with Michael W. Kibby).
• Gunning, Thomas G. (2006), Assessing and Correcting Reading and Writing Difficulties, 3rd Edition
(Boston: Pearson/Allyn & Bacon).
67. Rapaport, William J. (2005), “In Defense of Contextual Vocabulary Acquisition: How to Do Things
with Words in Context”, in Anind Dey, Boicho Kokinov, David Leake, & Roy Turner (eds.), Modeling and
Using Context: 5th International and Interdisciplinary Conference, CONTEXT 05, Paris, France, July 2005,
Proceedings (Berlin: Springer-Verlag Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence 3554): 396–409.
38
• Frishkoff, Gwen A.; Collins-Thompson, Kevyn; Perfetti, Charles A.; & Callan, Jamie (2008), “Measuring
Incremental Changes in Word Knowledge: Experimental Validatio and Implications for Learning and
Assessment”, Behavior Research Methods 40(4): 907–925.
39
68. Rapaport, William J. (2005), “Philosophy of Computer Science: An Introductory Course”, Teaching
Philosophy 28(4): 319–341.
1. Eden, Amnon H. (2007), “Three Paradigms of Computer Science”, Minds and Machines 17(2) (Summer):
135-167.
2. Tedre, Matti (2007), “Lecture Notes in the Philosophy of Computer Science”
[http://cs.joensuu.fi/˜mmeri/teaching/2007/philcs/].
3. Tedre, Matti (2007), “Know Your Discipline: Teaching the Philosophy of Computer Science”, Journal of
Information Technology Education 6: 105–122.
4. Dodig-Crnkovic, Gordana (2008), “Computing and Philosophy Global Course: What Can We Hope for
[from Computing]? What Should We Do [with Computing]? What Can We Know [about Computing and
by Computing]?”, APA Newsletter on Philosophy and Computers 8(2) (Fall): 38-41.
5. Müller, Vincent C. (2008), “What a Course on Philosophy of Computing Is Not”, APA Newsletter on
Philosophy and Computers 8(2) (Fall): 36–38.
6. Turner, Raymond, & Eden, Amnon (2008), Call for papers on the philosophy of computer science track
for the 7th European Conference on Computing and Philosophy and special issue of Minds and Machines,
[http://pcs.essex.ac.uk/ecap09/cfp.html].
7. Turner, Raymond, & Eden, Amnon (2009), “The Philosophy of Computer Science”, in Edward N. Zalta
(ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2009 Edition)
[http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2009/entries/computer-science/].
8. Tedre, Matti (2011), “Computing as a Science: A Survey of Competing Viewpoints”, Minds and Machines
21(3) (Fall): 361–387.
69. Rapaport, William J. (2005), “Implementation Is Semantic Interpretation: Further Thoughts”, Special
Issue on Theoretical Cognitive Science, Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Artificial Intelligence
17(4; December): 385–417.
1. Bringsjord, Selmer (2007), “Offer: One Billion Dollars for a Conscious Robot; If You’re Honest, You
Must Decline”, Journal of Consciousness Studies 14(7): 28–43.
2. Turner, Raymond, & Eden, Amnon (2008), Call for papers on the philosophy of computer science track
for the 7th European Conference on Computing and Philosophy and special issue of Minds and Machines,
[http://pcs.essex.ac.uk/ecap09/cfp.html].
3. Turner, Raymond, & Eden, Amnon (2009), “The Philosophy of Computer Science”, in Edward N. Zalta
(ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2009 Edition)
[http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2009/entries/computer-science/].
4. Turner, Raymond (2009), “The Meaning of Programming Languages”, APA Newsletter on Philosophy and
Computers 9(1) (Fall): 2–7.
70. Rapaport, William J. (2006), “How Helen Keller Used Syntactic Semantics to Escape from a Chinese
Room”, Minds and Machines: Journal for Artificial Intelligence, Philosophy, and Cognitive Science: 16(4):
381–436.
1. Wolfram Research Inc. (2008), “The Math behind Numb3rs”, Episode 410: Chinese Box,
[http://http://numb3rs.wolfram.com/410/].
2. Ford, Jason (2011), “Helen Keller Was Never in a Chinese Room”, Minds and Machines 21(1): 57–72.
3. Schweizer, Paul (2012), “The Externalist Foundations of a Truly Total Turing Test”, Minds and Machines
22(3) (Fall): 191–212.
40
71. Rapaport, William J. (compiler) (2007; updated frequently), “Can Programs Be Verified?”
[http://www.cse.buffalo.edu/∼rapaport/584/canprogsbeverified.html].
• Pincas, Uri (2011), “Program Verification and Functioning of Operative Computing Revisited: How about
Mathematics Engineering?”, Minds and Machines 21(2) (Summer): 337–359.
72. Shapiro, Stuart C.; Rapaport, William J.; Kandefer, Michael; Johnson, Frances L.; & Goldfain, Albert
(2007) “Metacognition in SNePS”, AI Magazine 28(1) (Spring): 17–31.
• Campbell, Alistair E.R.; & Burhans, Debra T. (2006), “A Layered Heterogeneous Cognitive Robotics
Architecture”, in Michael Beetz, Kanna Rajan, Michael Thielscher, & Radu Bogdan Rusu (eds.), Cognitive
Robotics: Papers from the AAAI Workshop (Menlo Park, CA: AAAI Press Technical Report WS-06-03):
40–46.
• Luger, George F. (2009), Artificial Intelligence: Structures and Strategies for Complex Problem Solving,
6th edition (Boston: Pearson/Addison-Wesley).
• Capraro, Gerard T.; & Wicks, Michael C. (2010), “Knowledge Based Systems and Metacognition in
Radar”, in Y. Bi & Mary-Ann Williams (eds.), KSEM 2010 (Berlin: Springer-Verlag Lecture Notes in
Artificial Intelligence 6291): 573–578.
• Capraro, Gerard T.; Wicks, Michael C.; & Schneible, Richard (2010), “Metacognition in Radar”,
Proceedings—2010 12th International Conference on Electromagnetics in Advanced Applications,
ICEAA’10, ISBN 978-142447368-7, DOI: 10.1109/ICEAA.2010.5651574: 693–696.
• Goertzel, Ben; Lian, Ruiting; Arel, Itamar; de Garis, Hugo; & Chen, Shuo (2010), “A World Survey
of Artificial Brain Projects, Part II: Biologically Inspired Cognitive Architectures”, Neurocomputing 74:
30–49.
• Kontos, John; Armaos, Joseph; & Malagardi, Ioanna (2011), “Metagnostic Deductive Question Answering with Explanation from Texts”, in C. Stephanidis (ed.), Universal Access in HCI, Part IV, HCH 2011
(Berlin: Springer-VErlag LNCS 6768): 72–80.
73. Rapaport, William J. (1999–2012) “How to Study: A Brief Guide”
[http://www.cse.buffalo.edu/∼rapaport/HOWTOSTUDY/]
• Ticket to Write: English Skills for Success 1E (Pearson Education, 2012).
41
Miscellaneous
1. There is a general reference to my work on Meinong in:
• Byrd, Michael (1986), Review of E. N. Zalta’s Abstract Objects: An Introduction to Axiomatic Metaphysics, in Journal of Symbolic Logic 51: 246–248.
2. There is a reference to “Rapaport’s studies” on Meinong in:
• Castañeda, Hector-Neri (1987), “Self-Consciousness, Demonstrative Reference, and the Self-Ascription
View of Believing”, in James E. Tomberlin (ed.), Philosophical Perspectives, 1: Metaphysics (Atascadero,
CA: Ridgeview Publishing Co.): 405–454.
3. There is a discussion of Cassie and the CVA project in:
• Gross, Neil (ed.) (1994), “ ‘Cassie’ Has Her Thinking Cap On”, Business Week (29 August): 82.
4. There is a discussion of Cassie and of my master’s student Min-Hung Liao’s MS thesis, “A Chinese-English
Machine Translation System” (1998), in:
• Port, Otis (ed.) (1995), “Computer Translators Better Getting” [sic], Business Week (11 December): 115.
5. There is an oblique citation to my teaching (actually more of an acknowledgment), in:
• Baiocco, Sharon A., & DeWaters, Jamie N. (1998), Successful College Teaching: Problem-Solving Strategies of Distinguished Professors (Boston: Allyn and Bacon): 285.
6. There is a reference to “the Clark-Rapaport paradox” (see Rapaport 1978 [item 3, above]) in:
• Poli, Roberto (1998), Review of D. Jacquette’s Meinongian Logic, in History and Philosophy of Logic 19:
117-119.
7. There is a reference to a webpage for one of my courses:
[http://www.cse.buffalo.edu/˜rapaport/572/S01/checkers.html]
(which is merely a newspaper article on computer checkers) in:
• Williams, Sam (2002), Arguing A.I.: The Battle for Twenty-First Century Science (New York: Random
House): 91.
42