Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Hyperechoic renal masses Jean-Yves Meuwly, MD Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Lausanne, Switzerland Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology Renal masses in the adult patient • Increased frequency of discovery because increasing use of imaging modalities • Increased incidence of renal cell carcinoma • Substantial fraction of solid renal masses are benign – – – 25% of masses smaller than 3 cm 30% of masses smaller than 2 cm 40% of masses smaller than 1 cm 1. Israel GM, Bosniak MA. How I do it: evaluating renal masses. Radiology 2005; 236:441-450. 2. Silverman SG, Gan YU, Mortele KJ, Tuncali K, Cibas ES. Renal masses in the adult patient: the role of percutaneous biopsy. Radiology 2006; 240:6-22. Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology Benign solid tumors • Angiomyolipoma – Most common benign solid renal tumor – Almost always diagnosed by using imaging alone – Hypervascular and contain fat • Oncocytoma – Presence of a prominent central scar – Spoke-wheel pattern on angiographic images • Metanephric adenoma • Leiomyoma • Adenoma Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology Angiomyolipoma • US pattern – Well defined hyperechoic mass – Small to huge size – Hypervascular when large • CT pattern – Hypodense on non-enhanced scan in 95.5% of cases – Homogeneous enhancement – Prolonged enhancement pattern • MRI pattern – Hyperintense on T1 weighted images – Hypointense on T2 weighted images – Loss of signal in chemical shift imaging (in phase – out of phase) 1. Duffy P, Ryan J, Aldous W. Ultrasound demonstration of a 1.5 cm intrarenal angiomyolipoma. J Clin Ultrasound 1977; 5:111-113. 2. Lee TG, Henderson SC, Freeny PC, Raskin MM, Benson EP, Pearse HD. Ultrasound findings of renal angiomyolipoma. J Clin Ultrasound 1978; 6:150-155. 3. Shawker TH, Horvath KL, Dunnick NR, Javadpour N. Renal angiomyolipoma: diagnosis by combined ultrasound and computerized tomography. J Urol 1979; 121:675-676. Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology 4. Bagley D, Appell R, Pingoud E, McGuire EJ. Renal angiomyolipoma: diagnosis and management. Urology 1980; 15:1-5. Typical angiomyolipoma Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology Typical angiomyolipoma? Papillary carcinoma! Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology Angiomyolipoma? Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology Angiomyolipoma? Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology Density measurement Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology Angiomyolipoma! Angiomyolipoma? Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology Angiomyolipoma? Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology Angiomyolipoma? Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology Densitity measurement Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology Angiomyolipoma! Angiomyolipoma? Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology Angiomyolipoma? Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology MRI T2 Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology T1 fat saturated Chemical shift imaging In phase Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology Out of phase Angiomyolipoma! Angiomyolipoma? Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology Enhanced CT Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology MRI haste In phase Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology T2 fat sat Out of phase Contrast enhanced MRI Complicated cyst Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology Angiomyolipoma? Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology Angiomyolipoma? Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology CT Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology MRI Scar Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology Angiomyolipoma? Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology Angiomyolipoma? Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology CT No fat density Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology What to do? Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology US guided biopsy Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology Epithelioid cells Adipocyts Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology Courtesy from Dr Letovanek Adipocyts Courtesy from Dr Letovanek Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology Epithelioids cells Percutaneous biopsy formed He has per iopsy of us b percutaneo asses renal m Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology Percutaneous biopsy • Sensitivity for diagnosis of malignancy 80-92% • Specificity 83-100% • Seeding of the needle track is possible – Extremely rare (estimated at less than 0.01%) – Six cases described • Major complications rare – Hematuria may occur – Self-limited bleeding frequent 1. Brierly RD, Thomas PJ, Harrison NW, Fletcher MS, Nawrocki JD, Ashton-Key M. Evaluation of fine-needle aspiration cytology for renal masses. BJU Int 2000; 85:14-18. 2. Caoili EM, Bude RO, Higgins EJ, Hoff DL, Nghiem HV. Evaluation of sonographically guided percutaneous core biopsy of renal masses. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2002; 179:373-378. 3. Lechevallier E, Andre M, Barriol D, et al. Fine-needle percutaneous biopsy of renal masses with helical CT guidance. Radiology 2000; 216:506-510. 4. Silverman SG, Gan YU, Mortele KJ, Tuncali K, Cibas ES. Renal masses in the adult patient: the role of percutaneous biopsy. Radiology 2006; 240:6-22. Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology Hyperechoic mass Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology No characterization Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology US guided biopsy Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology Renal cell carcinoma Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology Angiomyolipoma? Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology Angiomyolipoma? Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology Enhanced CT Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology US guided biopsy Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology Renal cell carcinoma Percutaneous biopsy • Established indications – Patients with a renal mass and known extrarenal primary malignancy – Patients with a renal mass and imaging findings that suggest unresectable renal cancer – Patients with a renal mass and surgical comorbidity – Patients with a renal mass that have been caused by an infection • Emerging indications – Patients with a small (< 3 cm) hyperattenuating, homogeneously enhancing renal mass – Patients with a renal mass considered for percutaneous ablation 1. Brierly RD, Thomas PJ, Harrison NW, Fletcher MS, Nawrocki JD, Ashton-Key M. Evaluation of fine-needle aspiration cytology for renal masses. BJU Int 2000; 85:14-18. 2. Caoili EM, Bude RO, Higgins EJ, Hoff DL, Nghiem HV. Evaluation of sonographically guided percutaneous core biopsy of renal masses. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2002; 179:373-378. 3. Lechevallier E, Andre M, Barriol D, et al. Fine-needle percutaneous biopsy of renal masses with helical CT guidance. Radiology 2000; 216:506-510. 4. Silverman SG, Gan YU, Mortele KJ, Tuncali K, Cibas ES. Renal masses in the adult patient: the role of percutaneous biopsy. Radiology 2006; 240:6-22. Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology Percutaneous radiofrequency ablation • Thermal ablation technique – Temperature in excess of 48-50° C – Coagulation necrosis and cellular death • Indications – If radical nephrectomy would render the patient anephric – Presence of significant comorbidities – Tumor size strong predictor of outcome (< 4cm) – Exophytic tumors • Complications – Lower as compared to partial or radical nephrectomy (0-11%) 1. Boss A, Clasen S, Kuczyk M, Schick F, Pereira PL. Image-guided radiofrequency ablation of renal cell carcinoma. Eur Radiol 2007; 17:725-733. 2. Silverman SG, Gan YU, Mortele KJ, Tuncali K, Cibas ES. Renal masses in the adult patient: the role of percutaneous biopsy. Radiology 2006; 240:6-22. 3. Zagoria RJ, Traver MA, Werle DM, Perini M, Hayasaka S, Clark PE. Oncologic efficacy of CT-guided percutaneous radiofrequency ablation of renal cell carcinomas. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2007; 189:429-436. Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology Radiofrequency ablation Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology Immediate post-treatment control Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology 3 months post-treatment Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology Small solid mass Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology Non enhanced CT Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology Contrast enhanced CT Arterial phase Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology Venous phase MRI Haste Axial T2 Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology MRI in / out of phase Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology Fat poor angiomyolipoma Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology 1. Milner J, McNeil B, Alioto J, et al. Fat poor renal angiomyolipoma: patient, computerized tomography and histological findings. J Urol 2006; 176:905-909. Conclusion • Many hyperechoic solid renal masses are AML but… • Some hyperechoic solid renal masses are RCC • These masses need further characterization – CT – MRI • When CT or MRI fail to characterize the lesion Percutaneous biopsy Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology