Download Black Drama Syllabus

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts
no text concepts found
Transcript
Black Drama
Melanie Matthews – [email protected]
336-505-9330
Black American Theater – AFAM 250; THEA 250
Course Meeting Information:
Online Synchronous
MW – 6:00 p.m. – 8:00 p.m.
AFAM 250/THEA 250 is a four credit hour course and it will meet for four instructional hours each week
for 12 weeks. Required work outside of class will typically be no less than two hours for every one hour
in class.
This course satisfies THEA major and minor, AFAM major elective, Diversity in the US, and Sociocultural
Engagement Requirements.
Office Hours
Because Guilford College strongly values personal contact between faculty and students, faculty
members are responsible for holding regular office hours. My office hours for our course will be held
from 5:00 p.m. – 6:00 p.m. and from 8:00 p.m. – 9:00 p.m. Monday and Wednesday. I will be available
via Microsoft Teams, Zoom and Skype.
In the Spring of 1998 at Dartmouth College, a plethora of African-American theater’s most distinguished
scholars and practitioners participated in the National Black Theatre Summit “On Golden Pond.” Chief
among their objectives was to grapple with three questions that surrounded the African-American stage
from its inaugural moments. Does African American theater have a defining aesthetic? And, if so, what
are its tenets and how can we account for them? After several days of conversation and debate, The
Committee on Aesthetics, Standards, and Practices drafted “The Aesthetics Declaration.” The
declaration not only provided a sixteen point list of aesthetic principles unique to Black theatre in the
United States, but also served, and continues to serve, as a programmatic manifesto for “authentic”
Black plays. This course provides a broad survey of canonical African-American plays and playwrights
that shine light on the manifesto’s critical achievements and pitfalls, and offers a panorama of African
American theatrical production spanning from (1850 to 2002). Issues addressed will include: the place of
“plantation performances” in the development of minstrelsy and its mimetic inversions, the central role
played by the pulpit (or African American Christianity) in determining the function of performance
before and after Civil War, the manifestation of so-called “African retentions” in Black theater, the
reworking of these retentions by playwrights associated with the Black Arts Movement, and the various
manners in which African American theater has ritualized theatrical spaces to preserve and create
African-American identity and its cultural values, affinities, and affiliations throughout the course of its
existence.
Reading Assignments by Week
Week 1:
Course Introduction
Introduction- Black Aesthetics on Golden Pond
Week 2:
William Wells Brown’s The Escape, Or, a Leap for Freedom in Black Theatre USA Revised and Expanded
Edition, Vol. 1 : Plays by African Americans from 1847 to Today by Ted Shine, James V. Hatch (Editor) Or:
Purchase e-text online at Amazon; Discussion of The African Grove Theater
Week 3:
Paul Lawrence Dunbar’s In Dahomey, contained in Black Theatre USA Revised and Expanded Edition,
Vol. 1 : Plays by African Americans from 1847 to Today by Ted Shine, James V. Hatch (Editor)
Week 4:
Selections from Loften Mitchell’s Black Drama
Langston Hughes’ Mulatto in Black Theatre USA Revised and Expanded Edition, Vol. 1 : Plays by African
Americans from 1847 to Today by Ted Shine, James V. Hatch (Editor); Discussion of the Harlem
Renaissance
Week 5:
Lorraine Hansberry’s A Raisin in the Sun
Week 6:
James Baldwin’s Blues for Mr. Charlie
Week 7:
Amiri Baraka’s Dutchman
Charles Gordone’s No Place to be Somebody
Week 8:
Ntozake Shange’s for colored girls who have considered suicide/ when the rainbow is ‘enuf…
Week 9:
Charles Fuller’s A Soldier’ Play
Week 10:
August Wilson’s Joe Turner’s Come and Gone
Week 11:
George C. Wolfes’s The Colored Museum
Week 12:
Suzan Lori Parks’ TopDog/ Underdog
Katori Hall’s Slum Village (excerpts)
Grading Breakdown
Attendance/Participation – 30%
Paper #1-20% (5 pages) due Friday of Week 8 at 11:59 pm
Paper #2-20% (5 pages) due Friday of Week 15 at 11:59 pm
Take Home Final-20%- TBA
Take Home Midterm-10 % (short answer) due Friday of Week 7 at 11:59pm
Learning Objectives: This course provides a broad survey of canonical African American plays and
playwrights that offers a panorama of African American theatrical production spanning from (1850 to
2002). Issues addressed will include: the place of 'plantation performances' in the development of
minstrelsy and its mimetic inversions, the central role played by the pulpit (of African American
Christianity) in determining the function of performance before and after the Civil War, the
manifestation of so-called 'African retentions' in Black theatre, the re-workings of theses retentions by
playwrights associated with the Black Arts Movement, and the various manners in which African
American theatre has ritualized theatrical spaces to preserve and create African American identity and
its cultural values, affinities, and affiliations throughout the course of its existence. Our writers will
include William Wells Brown, Paul Lawrence Dunbar, Langston Hughes, Lorraine Hansberry, James
Baldwin, Amiri Baraka, Ntozake Shange, Suzan-Lori Parks, August Wilson, and Charles Fuller.
Americans with Disabilities Act and Accommodations
Guilford College facilitates and supports the implementation of reasonable accommodations including
resources and services for students with documented disabilities, chronic medical conditions, temporary
disability, or pregnancy complications resulting in difficulties with accessing learning opportunities.
Students requesting academic accommodations must first self-identify and register with the Accessibility
Resource Center (ARC) located in Hege Library, Office 217. The Directors will meet with the student to
create an individual accommodation plan (IAP). ARC will provide the accommodation letters to
instructors at the student’s request when providing any classroom and/or testing accommodations.
Please notify ARC the first week of classes to discuss your accommodations needs. More information
and relevant policy documents about the types of accommodations and services offered, disability
determination, and the student registration process can be found on the Guilford College ARC site.
Guilford College Honor Code
Academic honesty and integrity represent central elements of the liberal arts education at Guilford
College. As scholars pursuing knowledge and truth, informed by the Quaker testimony on integrity, we
seek a community where each member acts responsibly and honorably in all activities and at all times.
Acts of dishonesty represent a serious offense at Guilford College. The academic honor code is violated
when anyone claims credit, implicitly or explicitly, for work and ideas that are not her or his own.
Violations of the academic honor code include, but are not limited to, plagiarism, unauthorized
collaboration, and unauthorized use of materials.
Plagiarism. Guilford defines plagiarism broadly as presenting the interpretations, wording, images or
original conceptions of others as one’s own without appropriate acknowledgement. Appropriate
acknowledgement within the context of this courses, requires you to use footnotes to specific
quotations longer than two words and indirect quotations. Further, all sources used in the production of
the written work should be listed in a bibliography at the end of each work. The charge of plagiarism
applies to any and all academic work whether done inside or outside the classroom and whether
submitted as a rough draft or a final product.
Unauthorized Collaboration. Students may not combine efforts on any and all academic work, done
inside or outside the classroom, submitted to an instructor as a rough draft or a final product, unless
specifically permitted by the instructor. Although instructors should clearly define the limits of
collaboration allowed, the absence of any instructions indicates that collaboration is not permitted.
When uncertain, the student should seek clarification from the instructor. In cases of unauthorized
collaboration, any student giving aid is as responsible as the recipient, unless the former is unaware that
she/ he has provided aid. A student who seeks unauthorized aid is responsible for participating in
unauthorized collaboration whether the aid was given or received. The charge of unauthorized
collaboration applies to any and all academic work whether done inside or outside of the classroom and
whether submitted as a rough draft or a final product.
Unauthorized Use of Materials. It is the student’s responsibility to ascertain what materials may be used
in any and all academic work whether done inside or outside of the classroom and whether submitted
as a rough draft or a final product. The submission for credit of the same written work in more than one
course is not permitted without the prior permission of both instructors.