Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
LOOKING BACK controversy concerning whether it was necessary to assume more than one memory system, with Conrad’s work being cited as evidence for a temporary acoustic system, in contrast to the more stable system in long-term memory. However, Conrad had not tested other kinds of similarity, and so I decided Alan Baddeley describes the origins of the multi-component model of I would use words rather than letters working memory and, compare acoustic similarity with similarity of meaning. My experimental setup was rather basic, a room full of volunteers, a noise source that could be switched on or off and myself reading out able to generate memorable codes for sequences of five words. The results were t is now more than 40 years since every UK post town based on the letter clear; a big effect of phonological Graham Hitch and I published our structure of English. By this time, similarity, a small but significant effect of paper proposing to extend the earlier meaning, and no effect of noise level over concept of short-term memory (STM) into however the Post Office had already settled on the current system, so they and above what could be accounted for a more complex and ambitious working by mishearing. My bosses Broadbent and memory model (Baddeley & Hitch, 1974). were never used. My work linking language structure Conrad agreed that this was an interesting We suggested replacing one STM system to memory did, however, lead to my result, theoretically if not practically, and with three inter-related subsystems, first short-term memory experiment, I was encouraged to go ahead and explore emphasising our assumption that its demonstrating to three eminent Harvard it further. The telephone project was function was to hold information while professors, George Miller, Gerry Bruner passed on to Patrick Rabbitt who had just working on it; a memory system that and Leo Postman, arrived at the Unit (using a helps us to think. Our original model that their paper more sensitive method he was remains at the centre of the current showing an able to show a small effect of version (Baddeley, 2012). The “What we found was more influence of noise). In collaboration with multicomponent model did not, of complex, and in the long language structure my friend Harold Dale, we course, emerge fully formed. Hence I was run more interesting” on perception was went on to demonstrate that intrigued by the invitation to reflect on in fact based on the pattern changed how it all began, and to supplement an memory (Baddeley, dramatically under standard longearlier account elsewhere, of the way in 1964a). Their paper was also criticised term memory conditions, finding which the model subsequently developed by an up-and-coming young Canadian meaning to be all important and sound (Baddeley & Hitch, 2007). psychologist, Endel Tulving. I pointed out relatively unimportant. On the basis of My first job involved working at that he was wrong too (Baddeley, 1964b); these results I began to conclude that the MRC Applied Psychological Unit in I seem to have been rather a pugnacious there were two separate memory storage Cambridge on the design of postcodes. young man! systems: a short-term system relying on My supervisor was Conrad, currently I was then switched to working an acoustic code and a long-term system best known for his discovery of the based on meaning. importance of acoustic similarity in verbal on finding an improved method for measuring the quality of telephone links. This view rapidly proved too simple; short-term memory. He showed that The idea was that the negative impact of semantic effects can occur dramatically errors in recalling strings of letters tended a noisy signal would be exaggerated if the in standard STM tasks such as memory to be similar in sound to correct items message had to be held in memory, hence span; span for unrelated words is around (e.g. b for v) and that sequences of providing a more sensitive measure of the five and for meaningful sentences nearer similar-sounding items (e.g. b g v t c) link. I speculated that the measure might 15. Furthermore, we must have were harder to remember than dissimilar be even more sensitive if the items to be acoustic/phonological long-term memory, (f k w j q). My task however, was remembered were similar in sound – otherwise how could we learn the sound concerned with long-term memory for Conrad’s acoustic similarity effect – and of new words? The increasingly postal codes. I applied the recently proceeded to test this. influential neuropsychological evidence developed field of information theory to By this time there was a very active was also inconsistent with my simple verbal long-term memory (LTM) and was How it all began references I 334 Atkinson, R.C. & Shiffrin, R.M. (1968). Human memory: A proposed system and its control processes. In K.W. Spence & J.T. Spence (Eds.) The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory. (Vol. 2, pp.89–195). New York: Academic Press. Baddeley, A.D. (1964a). Immediate memory and the ‘Perception’ of letter sequences. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 16, 364–367. Baddeley, A.D. (1964b). The redundancy of letter-sequences and spaceinformation. American Journal of Psychology, 77, 322. Baddeley, A. (2012). Working memory, theories models and controversy. The Annual Review of Psychology, 63, 12.11–12.29. Baddeley, A.D. & Hitch, G.J. (1974). Working memory. In G.A. Bower (Ed.) Recent advances in learning and motivation (Vol. 8, pp.47–89). New York: Academic Press. Baddeley, A. & Hitch, G. (2007). Working memory: Past, present… and future query. In N. Osaka, R.H. Logie & N. D'Esposito (Eds.) The cognitive neuroscience of working memory (pp.1-20). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Baddeley, A.D. & Warrington, E.K. (1970). Amnesia and the distinction between long- and short-term memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 9, 176–189. Cermak, L.S. & Reale, L. (1978). Depth of processing and retention of words by alcoholic Korsakoff patients. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory, 4, 165–174. Craik, F.I.M. & Lockhart, R.S. (1972). Levels of processing. A framework for vol 28 no 4 april 2015 looking back UNIVERSITY OF STIRLING ARCHIVES view. Despite earlier claims that amnesic but processing it semantically and relating remembering strings of digits, while patients showed semantic encoding performing the various tasks that were it to existing knowledge was by far the deficits (Cermak & Reale, 1978), the assumed to depend upon shortmost effective. Problems also came from alcoholic Korsakoff patients on which term/working memory. The longer the neuropsychology, where patients with this conclusion was drawn subsequently digit sequence, we argued, the more STM grossly impaired verbal STM were studied proved to have subtle frontal lobe capacity should be used up and the by Shallice and Warrington (1970); damage. Patients with a dense, but pure greater the disruption. according to the modal model, defective amnesia showed no semantic encoding What we found was more complex, STM should lead to grossly impaired difficulties (Baddeley & Warrington, and in the long run more interesting LTM, which it did not. Furthermore, if 1970). than this. Concurrent digit load slowed the system acted as a working memory, I was not alone in my enthusiasm performance down, but had an effect that such patients should have massive for exploring the field of short-term was far from catastrophic. Hence in one problems in their daily lives. They didn’t. memory. Demonstrations of apparently At this point many investigators into STM study people solved simple reasoning clear differences between long- and shorttasks while holding from zero to eight moved on to other more recently term memory led to the generation of digits, showing a nice a large number of experimental linear increase in paradigms and many models. One reasoning time, book, for example, had 13 chapters but performing at each with a different model. One a consistent five per model, however, became dominant, cent error rate so much so as to be named the ‘modal regardless of load. model’. This model was proposed by We showed similar Atkinson and Shiffrin (1968), who also effects in studies of claimed it to be a working memory verbal memory and of model which, in addition to providing prose comprehension. short-term storage, was capable of such Our attempt to complex activities as selecting account for this strategies, controlling input to LTM, pattern of results guiding retrieval and much else. The resulted in three model was also expressed proposed components mathematically, although the examples that still form the provided were limited to the learning core of the of meaningless verbal items. multicomponent By the end of the 1960s however, model, namely problems with the modal model were an attentionally starting to emerge. The assumption limited control system that material held in the short-term (the central executive), The research started at Sussex, but was continued and store would automatically transfer to a system for holding published from Stirling LTM, with duration in store linked to sequences of amount learned, proved unjustified. acoustic/speech-based information developing areas, such as levels of Failure to address the issue of type of (the phonological loop) and its visual processing and semantic memory. material and method of encoding created equivalent (the visuo-spatial sketchpad). It was at this point, with me at the even more problems. These came to a At this point I received an invitation age of 37, that my head of department head with a paper by Craik and Lockhart to submit a chapter to an influential gently suggested I should perhaps (1972), who introduced the concept of annual series entitled Recent Advances in consider seeking my first research grant. levels of processing whereby learning Learning and Motivation (It is interesting I applied to work on the link between depended on what was done with the to reflect that if this happened today, our long- and short-term memory, asking for material rather than how long it was held head of department would strongly advise a postdoc and a research assistant. The in STM. For example, processing a word against publishing in a volume that would committee decided it was too expensive in terms of its visual appearance led to not be eligible for the REF and would not but happily cut the research assistant not poor retention, making a phonological register on the SCI citation count. Instead the postdoc, Graham Hitch. I knew judgement about it improved retention, we would have had to publish as a series Graham as a master’s student, converting of separate papers, in each case struggling from a Cambridge physics degree to with sceptical referees concerned at our experimental psychology. He had just excessive speculation.) We hesitated; the finished a PhD under Donald Broadbent model was clearly not yet complete (it on STM, and proved (and still proves) memory research. Journal of Verbal still isn’t!), but it seemed too good an to be an ideal colleague and collaborator. Learning & Verbal Behavior, 11, 671–684. opportunity to miss and Baddeley and It seemed an inauspicious time to Shallice, T. & Warrington, E.K. (1970). Hitch (1974) duly appeared. We would be entering the field of STM, given its Independent functioning of verbal have been amazed – indeed, I am still problems and the fact that we did not memory stores: A neuropsychological study. Quarterly Journal of Experimental amazed! – that it would still be cited four have access to patients with the STM Psychology, 22, 261–273. decades later. deficits that were so theoretically important. Happily, we hit on the idea of turning our students into ‘patients’, not by I Alan Baddeley is Professor of Psychology at removing chunks of their left hemisphere, the University of York but by keeping it occupied in [email protected] read discuss contribute at www.thepsychologist.org.uk 335 Copyright of Psychologist is the property of British Psychological Society and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.