Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Demystifying State Aid State aid considerations arise whenever public funds selectively provide entities with an “advantage” over their competitors. EU law requires all state aid must be notified to the European Commission (“the Commission”) for approval before it is granted. Breaching this “standstill” obligation can have serious consequences. Those receiving illegal state aid will normally have to repay the aid in full plus interest. Understanding when state aid may exist and what needs to be notified is not always straightforward. Such uncertainty can delay projects and stifle investment. Getting state aid clearance can be a lengthy process and it is important that state aid issues are considered as early in a project as possible. This chart is designed to provide high-level guidance on the key questions which will help you identify whether state aid exists or not and when notification may be required. Additional notes provide more detail on key legal concepts. As ever, much depends upon the particular facts of each case and this guide is not intended as a substitute for specific legal advice. Other legal obligations will also need to be considered on a case by case basis. This chart is based on the law as at October 2014. 1 Must individually notify aid to Commission and cannot implement aid until Commission approval received [see Note I] Are state resources involved? [See note A] Note B State aid rules apply to “undertakings”. Undertakings are entities which are engaged in any form of economic activity and can include not-for-profit organisations, charities and even certain publicly owned entities. Yes No No 2 Is the beneficiary a private sector entity? [See note B] No need to notify 10 Does the aid fall within an existing UK scheme approved by the Commission? Yes No No 9 3 Yes Is the charity/ public body/social enterprise involved in commercial activities and/ or competing with the private sector? Yes No Note A State resources are resources of EU Member States (“MS”). These include funds distributed by central or local government of an MS or other publicly funded bodies within an MS. Aid can take various forms including direct grants or soft loans, as well as measures foregoing revenue such as tax rebates or exemptions, sales or leases of state assets at an undervalue and even acting as a guarantor. Funds distributed directly by the EU are not state resources. Does the aid fall within GBER? [See note H] Note C This is one of the key state aid tests. Firstly there must be a selective advantage (i.e. only certain undertakings will benefit) and secondly the benefit will give recipients an advantage over their competitors. This distortion of competition test has a low threshold. For example, a grant given to one manufacturer to expand its business or a tax exemption granted for a particular technology, will normally be considered to distort competition. Note D The starting point is that any aid given to an undertaking in one Member State is capable of distorting inter-state trade even if products/services are not regularly exported. However, if the aid is given to entities for products or services that are only traded locally, such as a café or tea room, there may be no distortion of inter-state trade. No Yes 4 Does the aid provide the beneficiary with an advantage over its competitors? [See note C] No state aid exists 8 Yes Do SGEI rules apply? [See note G] Note E MEIP provides there will be no aid if the state is acting like any private sector company would on the market. This depends on the circumstances but if the state lends money at or above commercial interest rates, pays the going rate for goods or services or invests in a company on the same terms as a private sector company would then in principle, it is likely MEIP will apply. In contrast, lending to an insolvent company at base rate, or investing in a company without the right to receive a dividend is unlikely to satisfy MEIP. State aid rules apply – a notification may be required Note F When assessing if the threshold is met, remember the “undertaking” includes all parent and subsidiaries and should include all state aid received, even if it comes from a number of different public body grantors. No Yes No 5 Is there a distortion of interstate trade? [See note D] No Yes 7 Yes Has the de minimis threshold been exceeded? i.e. has the undertaking received aid which in total exceeds €200,000 in any rolling 3 year period? [See note F] Yes 6 Does the market economy investor principle (MEIP) apply? [See note E] No Note G Special rules apply to services of general economic interest (SGEIs). SGEI’s take many forms but the undertaking must always be formally “entrusted” with carrying out public service obligations. Common examples of SGEIs include social housing, certain public health services, and ferry services to remote areas. You should seek specific legal advice if you consider SGEI rules are likely to apply because a notification may still be necessary. Separate de minimis rules apply to SGEIs. Note H EU rules provide that certain types of state aid, primarily for SMEs, are automatically acceptable as their positive benefits outweigh any negative impact from any distortion of competition. This aid can be granted without first needing to notify the Commission for approval if certain conditions apply. The relevant conditions are set out in the General Block Exemption (or GBER). Topics covered include aid for training, R+D, SME investment and some forms of environmental protection, and for sport and recreational infrastructure. Note I In the UK, state aid notifications to the Commission can only be made via BIS. Approvals can take between 6-18 months or sometimes even longer. If aid is notifiable, it cannot be implemented until approval is received. Aid which is granted without the correct approval will normally need to be repaid by the aid recipient in full (plus interest). Case Study 1 Case Study 2 Case Study 3 A local business is seeking funding to help it expand its speciality chocolates business and has approached a local authority for help. If the Local authority, subject to identifying appropriate powers, were to lend the company the money and charge a commercial rate of interest or invest in the company, for example, by taking shares in the company which will pay out dividends in due course then it is likely that MEIP would apply and no aid would exist. If the amount involved was below €200,000 and the company had not received any other “aid” from a public sector body in the last 3 years, the de minimis principle could be relied on and no aid would exist. In all other cases, as the company is clearly engaged in commercial activity, there would be a presumption that any aid could distort trade between Member States and so further work would be needed to ascertain whether in the circumstances aid exists and notification may be required. A charity is renovating an old castle using privately raised funds. It has approached the local councils to ask for help in building facilities for visitors, explaining that it has received similar assistance from a number of councils in other areas in the past few years. Although the entity requesting assistance is a charity, the visitors facilities are likely to involve an element of commercial activity so state aid rules may apply. De minimis is unlikely to apply as the charity appears to have received public money on a number of occasions. Much will depend upon the precise facts – will the facilities in question be a small gift shop and tea room, or a much larger visitors centre which is likely to be marketed internationally as a key visitor attraction? The smaller the facilities and the more locally based the target audience, the more likely it is that there will be no distortion of inter-state trade and therefore no aid. A county council has decided to fund a training programme for local unemployed people. The programme will be run by local businesses (but wholly funded by the council) and will teach various transferable skills in the hope of moving unemployed people into work. If the de minimis threshold is not met by any companies to whom aid is provided to then no state aid would exist. However, the county council must be careful to ensure that the funds are provided in a fair manner and no businesses are given any ‘special treatment’. Depending on the size of the company then even if the aid is not de minimis, the aid may be “approved” under the General Block Exemption Regulation. The GBER may apply if (i) at least 60% of the training provided is in transferable rather than specific skills; (ii) the aid is proportionate and limited to the amount necessary to cover the cost of the training; and (iii) the training is provided in a transparent way ensuring equal treatment of all applications and is effectively monitored by the council. The GBER is also more likely to apply if the aid is provided to an SME rather than a large company. If the GBER applies then, although state aid exists, there is no need for it to be notified to the Commission. © King & Wood Mallesons. This guide was developed by King & Wood Mallesons in conjunction with the LGA and Local Partnerships. Warning: this document has been created for general guidance purposes only and specific legal advice should always be sought when dealing with any particular set of facts or circumstances. 22679