Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
POSITIONED FOR SUSTAINABLE LONG TERM VALUE CREATION Corporate Presentation – August 2017 Advisories FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS: In the interest of providing Bellatrix’s shareholders and potential investors with information regarding Bellatrix, including management’s assessment of Bellatrix’s future plans and operations, certain statements contained in these presentation materials (collectively, this “presentation”) are forward looking statements or information within the meaning of applicable securities legislation, collectively referred to herein as “forward looking statements”. The forward looking statements contained in this presentation speak only as of the date of this presentation and are expressly qualified by this cautionary statement. Forward looking statements in this presentation include, but are not limited to: statements regarding the quality of the Company’s assets and acreage, the Company’s infrastructure and firm transportation capacity, including the expected timing of completion of Phase 2 of the Alder Flats Gas Plant, the Company’s growth plans and forecasted capital efficiencies and investment returns, the Company’s balance sheet and available liquidity, future production estimates, future drilling locations, 2017 guidance relating to production, production mix, net capital expenditures and production expense, the Company’s net asset value, the Company’s acreage position, the nature and profitability of the Company’s Spirit River acreage, well results, the sustainability of cost reductions, drilling times and capital efficiencies, development metrics, future drilling inventory, the Company’s land position, and the sufficiency and performance of the Company’s infrastructure. To the extent that any forward-looking information contained herein constitute a financial outlook, they were approved by management on August 9, 2017 and are included herein to provide readers with an understanding of the anticipated funds available to Bellatrix to fund its operations and readers are cautioned that the information may not be appropriate for other purposes. Forward looking statements necessarily involve risks, including, without limitation, risks associated with oil and gas exploration, development, exploitation, production, marketing and transportation, loss of markets, volatility of commodity prices, currency fluctuations, imprecision of reserve estimates, environmental risks, competition from other producers, inability to retain drilling rigs and other services, incorrect assessment of the value of acquisitions, failure to realize the anticipated benefits of acquisitions, delays resulting from or inability to obtain required regulatory approvals, actions taken by the Company's lenders that reduce the Company's available credit and ability to access sufficient capital from internal and external sources. Events or circumstances may cause actual results to differ materially from those predicted, as a result of the risk factors set out and other known and unknown risks, uncertainties, and other factors, many of which are beyond the control of Bellatrix. In addition, forward looking statements or information are based on a number of factors and assumptions which have been used to develop such statements and information but which may prove to be incorrect and which have been used to develop such statements and information in order to provide shareholders with a more complete perspective on Bellatrix’s future operations. Such information may prove to be incorrect and readers are cautioned that the information may not be appropriate for other purposes. Although the Company believes that the expectations reflected in such forward looking statements or information are reasonable, undue reliance should not be placed on forward looking statements because the Company can give no assurance that such expectations will prove to be correct. In addition to other factors and assumptions which may be identified herein, assumptions have been made regarding, among other things: the impact of increasing competition; the general stability of the economic and political environment in which the Company operates; the timely receipt of any required regulatory approvals; the ability of the Company to obtain qualified staff, equipment and services in a timely and cost efficient manner; drilling results; the ability of the operator of the projects which the Company has an interest in to operate the field in a safe, efficient and effective manner; the ability of the Company to obtain financing on acceptable terms; field production rates and decline rates; the ability to replace and expand oil and natural gas reserves through acquisition, development of exploration; the timing and costs of pipeline, storage and facility construction and expansion and the ability of the Company to secure adequate product transportation; future commodity prices; currency, exchange and interest rates; the regulatory framework regarding royalties, taxes and environmental matters in the jurisdictions in which the Company operates; and the ability of the Company to successfully market its oil and natural gas products. Readers are cautioned that the foregoing list is not exhaustive of all factors and assumptions which have been used. As a consequence, actual results may differ materially from those anticipated in the forward-looking statements. Additional information on these and other factors that could affect Bellatrix’s operations and financial results are included in reports on file with Canadian and United States securities regulatory authorities and may be accessed through the SEDAR website (www.sedar.com), through the SEC website (www.sec.gov), and at Bellatrix’s website (www.bellatrixexploration.com). Furthermore, the forward looking statements contained herein are made as at the date hereof and Bellatrix does not undertake any obligation to update publicly or to revise any of the included forward looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as may be required by applicable securities laws. NON-GAAP MEASURES Throughout this presentation, the Company uses terms that are commonly used in the oil and natural gas industry, but do not have a standardized meaning presented by International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”) and therefore may not be comparable to the calculations of similar measures for other entities. Management believes that the presentation of these non-GAAP measures provide useful information to investors and shareholders as the measures provide increased transparency and the ability to better analyze performance against prior periods on a comparable basis. CAPITAL PERFORMANCE MEASURES In addition to the non-GAAP measures described above, there are also terms that have been reconciled in the Company’s financial statements to the most comparable IFRS measures. These terms do not have any standardized meaning prescribed by IFRS and therefore may not be comparable with the calculations of similar measures for other entities. These terms are used by management to analyze operating performance on a comparable basis with prior periods and to analyze the liquidity of the Company. This presentation contains the term “total net debt” which is not recognized measures under GAAP. Therefore reference to total net debt may not be comparable with the calculation of a similar measure for other entities. The Company’s calculation of total net debt excludes other deferred liabilities, deferred capital obligations, long-term risk management contract liabilities, decommissioning liabilities, and deferred tax liabilities. Total net debt includes the working capital deficiency, long term loans receivable, convertible debentures (liability component), current bank debt and long term bank debt. DRILLING LOCATIONS In this presentation, the Company has disclosed certain drilling locations associated with Bellatrix's interest in the Spirit River and Cardium plays. Of the 381 net Spirit River drilling locations identified herein, 86 are proved locations, 30 are probable locations and 265 are unbooked locations. Of the 206 net Cardium drilling locations identified herein, 92 are proved locations, 29 are probable locations, and 85 are unbooked locations. Proved locations and probable locations are derived from Bellatrix’s independent reserve report prepared by InSite Petroleum Consultants Ltd. as at December 31, 2016 and account for drilling locations that have associated proved and/or probable reserves, as applicable. Unbooked locations are internal estimates based on the Company’s prospective acreage and an assumption as to the number of wells that can be drilled per section based on industry practice and internal review. Unbooked locations do not have attributed reserves or resources. Unbooked locations as disclosed herein have been identified by management as an estimation of the Company's multi-year drilling activities using information including applicable geologic, seismic, engineering, production, pricing assumptions and reserves information. There is no certainty that Bellatrix will drill all unbooked drilling locations and if drilled there is no certainty that such locations will result in additional oil and gas reserves, resources or production. The drilling locations on which Bellatrix actually drill wells will ultimately depend upon the availability of capital, regulatory approvals, seasonal restrictions, oil and natural gas prices, costs, actual drilling results, additional reservoir information that is obtained and other factors. While the majority of Bellatrix's unbooked locations are extensions or infills of the drilling patterns already recognized by the Company's independent qualified reserves evaluator, other unbooked drilling locations are farther away from existing wells where management may have less information about the characteristics of the reservoir and therefore there may be more uncertainty whether wells will be drilled in such locations and if drilled there may be more uncertainty that such wells will result in additional oil and gas reserves, resources or production. INITIAL RATES OF PRODUCTION References in this presentation to initial production rates associated with certain wells are useful in confirming the presence of hydrocarbons, however such rates are not determinative of the rates at which such wells will commence production and decline thereafter and are not indicative of long term performance or of ultimate recovery. While encouraging, readers are cautioned not to place reliance on such rates in calculating the aggregate production for the Company. The Company cautions that such production rates should be considered to be preliminary. BOE PRESENTATION: The term barrels of oil equivalent (“boe”) may be misleading, particularly if used in isolation. A boe conversion ratio of six thousand cubic feet of natural gas to one barrel of oil equivalent (6 mcf/ 1 bbl) is based on an energy equivalency conversion method primarily applicable at the burner tip and does not represent a value equivalency at the wellhead. Given that the value ratio based on the current price of crude oil as compared to natural gas is significantly different from the energy equivalency of 6:1, utilizing a conversion on a 6:1 basis may be misleading as an indication of value. All boe conversions in this presentation are derived from converting gas to oil in the ratio of six thousand cubic feet of gas to one barrel of oil. ESTIMATED ULTIMATE RECOVERY (EUR): In this presentation, estimated ultimate recovery represents the estimated ultimate recovery associated with the type curves presented which are based on the assumptions used by InSite Petroleum Consultants Ltd. to estimate Bellatrix's proved plus probable reserves per well as evaluated effective December 31, 2016 based on forecast prices and costs. There is no certainty that such Bellatrix will ultimately recover such volumes from the wells it drills. CURRENCY: All dollar amounts in this presentation are Canadian dollars unless otherwise identified. RESERVES INFORMATION: Unless indicated otherwise, reserve estimates and related future net revenue and other reserves information is derived from Bellatrix’s independent reserve report prepared by InSite Petroleum Consultants Ltd. as at December 31, 2016 using forecast prices and costs. Land acreage information is as available at December 31, 2016, unless otherwise noted. TYPE CURVE AND CAPITAL EFFICIENCY: In this presentation information relating to the type curve, half cycle economics and capital efficiency for Bellatrix's Spirit River wells have been presented. The type curve set forth herein is based on all Bellatrix operated, Notikewin and Falher B wells drilled between October 2012 and September 2015, and represents the mean (P50) performance curve. Half cycle economics are based on Bellatrix's current expectations of drill, complete, equip and tie-in costs per well (and excluding land, seismic and related costs). Capital efficiency is a measure of expected capital expenditures per well based on half cycle economics divided by average first year production results (IP365) based on the type curve presented. The type curve and capital efficiency numbers have been presented to provide readers with information on the assumptions used for management's budgeting process and future planning. The half cycle economics and capital efficiencies may not be achieved on future wells as a result of a number of factors including the risks identified above under "Forward Looking Statements" and as such are not reliable indicators of future performance. In addition, there is no certainty that future wells will generate results to match historic type curves presented herein. Half cycle economics and capital efficiencies are not terms that have standardized meanings and therefore such calculations may not be comparable with the calculation of similar measures for other entities. FINANCIAL INFORMATION: Unless otherwise stated, financial information is based upon Bellatrix’s audited consolidated financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015. 2 Corporate Profile MARKET SUMMARY TSX / NYSE: BXE Average Daily Volume1 Canada: ~165,000/ U.S.: ~100,000 Shares Outstanding2 49.4 million basic / 51.2 million diluted Market Capitalization3 $162 million Bank Debt4 $13 million Senior Notes due 2020 US$250 million Convertible Debentures $50 million Enterprise Value3 $545 million 2016 Exit Production 31,500 boe/d 2017 Estimated Exit Production 36,500 boe/d 2016 Exit to 2017 Exit Growth >15% 2017 Natural Gas Weighting 76% Three month average at August 8, 2017 Share count at July 6, 2017 (post consolidation). Diluted shares include options but exclude shares potentially issuable on conversion of convertible debentures as the convertible debentures are included in the net debt calculation 3 Calculated using August 8, 2017 share price (C$3.27/share). Enterprise value includes market capitalization plus total net debt of $383 million as at June 30, 2017. Total net debt includes bank debt, $16 million adjusted working capital deficiency, the liability component of the convertible debentures, and assumes conversion of US notes at Cdn/US $1.2983 as at June 30, 2017. 4 Bank debt reflects $13 million outstanding on the Credit Facilities at June 30, 2017 1 2 3 Ticker Symbol Investment Highlights HIGH QUALITY ASSETS & ACREAGE • • • • Dominant core acreage position in west central Alberta Spirit River represents one of North America’s lowest supply cost natural gas plays Consistently deliver top ranked well productivity results Asset portfolio provides balance of natural gas and oil/liquids weighted opportunities INFRASTRUCTURE OWNERSHIP & CONTROL • Ownership and control of strategic infrastructure including pipelines, compression, and processing facilities Infrastructure control creates significant barriers to competition within core area TAKEAWAY CAPACITY & MARKET EGRESS • PROFITABLE GROWTH STRONG LIQUIDITY 4 • • • • • • • • • Secured firm transportation over approximately 120% of current gross operated natural gas volumes Maintain firm service contracts through owned & third party processing plants Long term NGL fractionation agreements in place for 100% of volumes Defined three year outlook provides line of sight for +/-15% compound annual production volume growth Top tier capital efficiencies and cost profile deliver full cycle sustainable profitability Current commodity prices drive strong forecast investment returns 89% unused capacity on bank credit facilities at June 30, 2017 Liquidity enhanced on May 9, 2017 with bank credit facilities increasing to $120 million (from $100 million) and reconfirmed at $120 million post-closing of Strachan asset sale No term debt maturities until May 2020 and September 2021 Note: 89% unused capacity on bank credit facilities at June 30, 2017 and references $13 million bank debt relative to credit facilities of $120 million. Unused capacity excludes outstanding letters of credit. Reintroducing Bellatrix NEW LEADERSHIP • Brent Eshleman appointed President, CEO and a member of the Board of Directors on February 15, 2017 • Max Lof appointed Executive Vice President & CFO on June 19, 2017 TRANSFORMATIONAL CHANGES COMPLETED IN 2016 & 2017 Strategic repositioning efforts completed which includes increased asset concentration, a materially stronger balance sheet and an enhanced net asset value • June 30, 2017 January 1, 2016 Change Total net debt $383 million $718 million Reduced 46% Bank debt $13 million $341 million Reduced 96% Core areas = 99% of total production Core areas = 83% of total production Sold Strachan, Harmattan & Pembina Cardium Sharpening our focus on the highest value core assets1 Current core area (Greater Ferrier, Willesden Green & Pembina areas) production % of total based on first week of August 2017 field level estimates; year end 2015 core area production based on January 2016 field estimates. 1 5 Production (boe/d) Maintain Production Volumes While Achieving Significant Debt Reduction Average Production Flat Q1/16 to Q2/17 40,000 30,000 20,000 10,000 0 Q1/16 Q2/16 Q3/16 Q4/16 Q1/17 Q2/17 $800 Debt ($MM) $700 $600 Total Net Debt Reduced 46% from Q1/16 to Q2/17 $500 $400 $300 $200 $100 $0 Q1/16 Q2/16 Net Bank Debt 6 Q3/16 Q4/16 U.S. Senior Notes Q1/17 Convertible Debentures Net bank debt includes bank debt outstanding and working capital deficiency; convertible debentures include liability component Q2/17 Material Deleveraging & Strategic Repositioning SUCCESSFULLY RAISED APPROXIMATELY $440 MILLION IN THE PAST 16 MONTHS OVER MULTIPLE TRANSACTIONS WITH MINIMAL PRODUCTION DIVESTED # Transaction 1 Facilities monetization 2 Announcement Gross Proceeds Production sold Date boe/d $MM 13-May-16 $75 0 35% Alder Flats Plant sale 07-Jul-16 $113 0 3 Bought deal financings 19-Jul-16 $80 0 4 Pembina non-core asset sale 19-Sep-16 $47 930 5 CDE Flow-through financing 04-Oct-16 $10 0 6 Harmattan non-core asset sale 05-Dec-16 $80 3,076 7 Strachan non-core asset sale 14-Jun-17 $35 1,750 $440 5,756 Total FOCUS REMAINS ON STRATEGIC POSITIONING AND CORE VALUE OPTIMIZATION 7 Note: Bought deal financings refer to the issuance of $50 million aggregate principal amount of 6.75% extendible unsecured subordinated convertible debentures and 25,000,000 subscription receipts (subsequently converted into common stock of Bellatrix) for aggregate gross proceeds of $80 million as announced on July 19, 2016 CDE flow-through financing refers to private placement “flow-through” basis in respect of Canadian Development Expenses (“CDE”) resulting in gross proceeds of $10 million announced on October 4, 2016 Balance Sheet & Financial Flexibility Effective capital resource management, balancing liquidity and flexibility Debt maturities (C$) Q2/17 Q1/17 LONGER DATED TERM DEBT MATURITIES $350 $300 $250 $200 $150 $100 $50 $0 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Bank debt $13MM at June 30, 2017 One financial covenant is Senior Debt/EBITDA Bellatrix has no term debt maturities until 2020 & 2021. $120MM credit facility at May 9, 2017 (increased by $20 million from previous levels) Maximum Senior Debt/EBITDA ratio of 3.0x US$250MM notes (C$315MM at June 30, 2017) mature May 15, 2020 Next semi-annual redetermination November 2017 8 Q4/16 Undrawn 3.5 3.0 2.5 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0 Q3/16 Utilized CREDIT FACILITY CONTAINS ONE FINANCIAL COVENANT Senior Debt/EBITDA BANK DEBT $13MM AT JUNE 30, 2017 1 Q2/17 ratio was 1.06x well below financial covenant $13 million outstanding on the Credit Facilities (before deducting outstanding letters of credit) at June 30, 2017 C$50MM convertible debenture mature Sept 30, 2021 2017 Outlook & Guidance INITIAL 2017 ANNUAL GUIDANCE (JANUARY 5, 2017) PREVIOUSLY SET 2017 ANNUAL GUIDANCE (JUNE 26, 2017) REVISED CHANGE 2017 ANNUAL FROM INITIAL GUIDANCE (AUGUST 10, 2017) 33,500 35,000 34,500 35,500 36,000 36,500 +/-15% +/-15% >15% 76 24 76 24 76 24 Total net capital expenditures1 $105.0 $120.0 $120.0 Property disposition – cash2 Total net capital expenditures after property disposition - cash Expenses Production expense ($/boe)3 - ($34.5) ($34.5) $105.0 $85.5 $85.5 $19.5 $9.00 $9.00 $8.75 $0.25 Production (boe/d) 2017 Average daily production 2017 Exit production 2017 Growth (2016 exit to 2017 exit) Production mix (%) Natural gas Crude oil, condensate and NGLs Capital Expenditures ($MM) Net capital spending includes exploration and development capital projects and corporate assets, and excludes property acquisitions and dispositions. Net capital spending also excludes the previously received prepayment portion of Bellatrix's partner’s 35% share of the cost of construction of Phase 2 of the Alder Flats Plant during calendar 2017. 2 Property disposition – cash refers to the Strachan asset sale and does not include transaction costs or adjustments. 3 Production expenses before net processing revenue/fees. 1 9 2,500 1,500 Commodity Price & Currency Risk Management STRONG FIXED PRICE NATURAL GAS RISK MANAGEMENT PROTECTION % of total forecast 2017 gas volumes 80% 70% $3.19 $3.33 60% 50% 40% $3.06 $3.06 $3.06 $3.06 Q1/18 Q2/18 Q3/18 Q4/18 30% 20% 10% 0% Q3/17 Q4/17 AECO Swap (C$/Mcf) NATURAL GAS HEDGES AECO fixed price swap contracts: • • • 117.0 MMcf/d @ C$3.19/Mcf (Q3 2017) 102.2 MMcf/d @ C$3.33/Mcf (Q4 2017) 66.1 MMcf/d @ C$3.06/Mcf (2018) 10 PROPANE HEDGES Conway propane swap contracts: • • • 1,500 bbl/d @ 50.7% WTI (Q3-Q4 2017) 500 bbl/d @ 51.5% WTI (Q3-Q4 2017) 1,000 bbl/d @ 47.0% WTI (2018) CURRENCY HEDGES USD foreign exchange forward contract summary: • $62.5MM @ 1.308 USD/CAD (value date May 2020) Percent of forecast volumes based on the mid-point of updated (August 10, 2017) 2017 average production guidance of 36,000 boe/d (76% natural gas weighted). Natural gas hedges converted from $/GJ to $/Mcf based on an assumed average corporate heat content of 40.3 Mj/m3. Conway propane price referenced as a percentage of WTI in U.S. dollars. All hedges denominated in Canadian dollars unless otherwise noted. Highly Concentrated Land Base DOMINANT ACREAGE POSITION WEST CENTRAL ALBERTA CORE AREA Highly focused land base in the prolific Deep Basin of Alberta Control of significant infrastructure (facilities, pipelines, compression) creates barriers to competition ~100 Kilometers (60 Miles) 99% of total corporate production and 100% of capital investment focused in the Greater Ferrier, Willesden Green & Pembina areas of Alberta FERRIER WILLESDEN GREEN GREATER PEMBINA Alberta ~77 Kilometers (48 Miles) 11 1 2 Reflects % of June 2017 average field volumes and excludes divested Strachan area which closed June 26, 2017 Proved and Probable and unbooked locations as at December 31, 2016 Production1 (% of total): 99% P+P net locations2: 248 Unbooked net locations2: 444 Total net drilling locations: 692 Concentrated Multi-Zone Acreage DEEP BASIN MULTI-ZONE ACREAGE Deep Basin is highly coveted for: • Sweet, liquids rich natural gas • Sweet, light gravity crude oil • Multi-zone hydrocarbon charged formations • Low production cost with no formation water • Year round access Benefits of multi-zone development: • Pad drilling reduces above ground footprint • Lease sizes minimized • Manufacturing style approach • Half-cycle returns expected longer term as subsequent formation development utilizes existing lease pads, pipelines, and infrastructure 12 TVD: True vertical depth 4,600 ft TVD— 6,200 ft TVD— — Belly River — Cardium — Second White Specs 7,400 ft TVD— — Viking — Notikewin 7,700 ft TVD— — Falher A — Falher B — Wilrich — Glauconite — Ostracod — Ellerslie — Rock Creek 11,200 ft TVD— — Nordegg — Duvernay Spirit River Focused Spirit River Growth SPIRIT RIVER PRODUCTION GROWTH 2010 30,000 Spirit River 24,000 45% 18,000 30% 12,000 15% 6,000 Spirit River % of Total Other June 2017 Other Spirit River May 17 Jan 17 Sep 16 May 16 Jan 16 Sep 15 May 15 Jan 15 Sep 14 May 14 Jan 14 Sep 13 May 13 Jan 13 Sep 12 May 12 Jan 12 Sep 11 May 11 Jan 11 Sep 10 0 May 10 0% Average Monthly Production (boe/d) 60% Jan 10 Spirit River % of Total Company Volumes 75% Monthly Production (boe/d) Low cost Spirit River volumes comprise a growing proportion of total corporate production (~75%) Processing facilities and Firm Transportation (FT) capacity in place to facilitate growth 13 Spirit River - The Quiet Giant WESTERN CANADA 2016 WELLS – CALENDAR DAY PRODUCTION BY ZONE Spirit River Montney L Mannville Viking Bakken Glauconitic Cardium Duvernay Shaunavon Colorado Mississippian Charlie Lake 0 10,000 20,000 30,000 40,000 50,000 60,000 Calendar average daily cumulative volumes (boe/d) 2016 WELL (BOE) VOLUMES BY ZONE Other Spirit River Montney 14 Spirit River accounted for ~33% of total Western Canada hydrocarbon volumes (boes) from new wells drilled in 2016 Source: Data from Canadian Discovery Ltd.; excludes oilsands and thermal oil wells/volumes 70,000 80,000 2016 WELL (MCF) VOLUMES BY ZONE Other Montney Spirit River Spirit River accounted for ~50% of total Western Canada natural gas volumes (Mcf) from new wells drilled in 2016 Spirit River Geology Summary • Broad, thick, extensive sand rich valleys in Notikewin, Falher and Wilrich members • Tight sandstone: long life reserves with long term hyperbolic decline profile • Average thickness 25 to 40 meters (approximately 80 to 130 feet) SPIRIT RIVER STACKED SANDS One square mile section schematic — Notikewin • Up to three wells per zone to fully develop a section — Falher A • Porosity 6 to 18%; permeability 1 to 3 mD — Falher B • Open and closed fracture systems evident in rock core and to a lesser degree in rock cuttings 15 — Wilrich Spirit River Liquids Rich Gas BXE Land Sections1 GREATER FERRIER AREA CORE SPIRIT RIVER PLAY 204 Gross 112 Net BXE Net Drilling Inventory2 86 proved 30 probable 265 unbooked 381 total • True vertical formation depth ~2,250 meters (~7,400 feet) • Currently drilling one mile laterals • Average 17 frac stages per well with 40 tonnes per stage Spirit River (Notikewin/Falher/Wilrich) provides significant upside 16 1 2 Includes Ferrier, Willesden Green, and greater Pembina. Acreage as at June 30, 2017 Proved, Probable, and unbooked locations as at December 31, 2016 and excludes Strachan area North American Supply Cost Comparison $4.00 $3.50 Henry Hub (US$/MMbtu) $3.00 $2.50 $2.00 $1.50 $1.00 $0.50 $0.00 17 Economics assume 15% Before tax IRR, assumes $US0.83 = $CDN1.00, US$0.75/MMbtu AECO basis, and a 20:1 oil-to-gas pricing ratio; Note (*): Bellatrix economics assume to be free of GORR Source: RBC Capital Markets Research Spirit River All-In Profitability C$2.50/GJ C$3.00/GJ Full cycle F&D costs $/Mcfe ($0.85) ($0.85) Cash costs ($2.14) ($2.18) $/Mcfe Sales price $/Mcfe $3.91 $4.42 Profit $/Mcfe $0.92 $1.39 Profit margin % 24% 31% Half Cycle IRR % 35% 62% 18 Full Cycle F&D costs Drill Complete Equip & tie in Half cycle costs Land/seismic/facilities Full cycle costs $1.7MM $1.6MM $0.7MM $4.0MM $1.1MM $5.1MM EUR (P50) Full cycle F&D 6.0 Bcfe $0.85/Mcfe Cash costs C$2.50/GJ C$3.00/GJ Royalties (est @ 8%) Operating costs 1 Transport2 G&A2 Interest & financing2 Total costs $0.31/Mcfe $0.75/Mcfe $0.26/Mcfe $0.34/Mcfe $0.48/Mcfe $2.14/Mcfe $0.35/Mcfe $0.75/Mcfe $0.26/Mcfe $0.34/Mcfe $0.48/Mcfe $2.18/Mcfe Sales price C$2.50/GJ C$3.00/GJ Total sales price3 $3.91/Mcfe $4.42/Mcfe Note: Numbers may not add due to rounding 1 Incremental operating costs assume $0.56/Mcf for natural gas through third party plants, $0.20/Mcf for gas processed through BXE Alder plant and $8.00/bbl for oil/condensate. Assumed split is 80% 3rd party / 20% BXE plant. Includes estimated attributed operating cost impact from $75 million facilities disposition announced May 13, 2016. 2 Representative transport, G&A and interest costs based on average first half 2017 corporate costs 3 Sales prices assume AECO at $2.84/Mcf ($2.50/GJ) or $3.41/Mcf ($3.00/GJ) as per scenario with NGL pricing: ethane @ $10/bbl, propane @ $15/bbl, butane @ $30/bbl and condensate @ $60/bbl incorporating liquids extraction capabilities given mix of gas through third party and BXE Alder Flats Plant. Delivering on our 2017 Objectives 2017 RESULTS OUTPERFORMING TYPE CURVE EXPECTATIONS 20 18 Producing day volumes (MMcf/d) 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 0 30 60 2017 Wells 19 90 120 150 180 Days 2017 Average Historical daily well production (natural gas only) versus Bellatrix representative 5.2 Bcf type curve 210 240 270 300 BXE Spirit River 5.2 Bcf Type Curve 330 360 Spirit River Well Costs & Capital Efficiencies FOCUSED CAPITAL COST REDUCTIONS Long Reach $6.0 $3.0 $2.0 Long Reach $4.0 Long Reach Costs ($millions) $5.0 Equip & Tie-in Complete Drill $1.0 $0.0 2015 - 24 wells 2016 - 19 wells 2017 - 8 wells DRIVES STRONG CAPITAL EFFICIENCIES (IP365 ESTIMATE) AVERAGING ~$8,000/BOE/D Capital Efficiency ($/boe/d) 20,000 Spirit River IP365 Capital Efficiency ($/boe/d) Full Capital Program Average 15,000 10,000 5,000 0 20 2015 - 24 wells 2016 - 19 wells 2017 - 8 wells Note: IP365 forecasts based on initial well productivity, reservoir characteristics, and full year well production modeling Capital efficiency calculated as gross well costs (drill, complete, equip and tie-in) divided by gross IP365 production expectation of Falher B and Notikewin wells drilled Analysis of operated wells only and does not include promoted spend within historical JV development. Two June 2017 Spirit River wells excluded from analysis due to limited time on-stream Enduring Efficiency Gains AVERAGE SPIRIT RIVER DRILLING CURVES SPUD TO RIG RELEASE BY YEAR 0 Days (Spud to Rig Release) 20 2014 Spirit River Average 500 15 2015 Spirit River Average 1,000 2017 Spirit River Average 1,500 2,000 5 0 2,500 3,000 2015 2016 2017 $3.0 $2.5 3,500 4,000 4,500 5,000 0 5 10 Days Spud to Rig Release 21 2014 DRILL COST BY YEAR Drill Cost ($MM) Measured Depth (m) 10 2016 Spirit River Average 15 20 $2.0 $1.5 $1.0 $0.5 $0.0 2014 2015 Note: Comparative drilling curves based on one mile Bellatrix “hybrid” drilling style which constitutes technique employed for majority of wells drilled since 2014 2016 2017 Spirit River Development Comparison COMPARATIVE 2015 & 2016 SPIRIT RIVER COST & EFFICIENCY METRICS $5.0 BXE 15 10 5 0 Industry BXE Reported costs 7.0 Completion cost Industry IP90 Gas rate 6.0 Drill cost $4.0 $3.0 $2.0 $1.0 $0.0 20 5.0 4.0 3.0 2.0 1.0 BXE Industry 0.0 Proppant per stage (tonnes) 5 25 BXE Industry Capital efficiency ($/boepd) 10 $6.0 Number of completion days 30 Days to complete 15 0 Well costs ($ millions) Frac stages IP90 (MMcf/d) Number of stages 20 70 Avg proppant placed per stage 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 7,000 BXE IP90 Capital efficiency 6,000 5,000 4,000 3,000 2,000 1,000 0 BXE Bellatrix is an industry leader in the development of the Spirit River play 22 Source: Canadian Discovery Frac Database. Data sourced December 2016. Calendar data based on spud date. Industry Industry Representative Spirit River Inventory Required to Maintain Production Volumes Approximately 14 net Spirit River wells1 per year maintains production in the mid 30 mboe/d range through 2020 Represents scenario of drilling of only 15% of net Spirit River well inventory 40 Production (mboe/d) 30 20 10 0 Jan-17 Jul-17 Base Jan-18 Beginning net location inventory Net locations drilled Ending net location inventory % drilled of total inventory 23 2017 Jul-18 2017 381 14 367 4% Jan-19 2018 2018 367 14 353 4% Jul-19 2019 353 14 339 4% 2019 Jan-20 2020 339 14 325 4% Jul-20 2020 Total 381 56 325 15% Assumes phased drilling development with average well results in line with Bellatrix Spirit River type curve. Representative example only as future budgets, drill plans ,and anticipated well results are uncertain Cardium Light Oil Resource Play BXE Land Sections1 155 Gross 99 Net BXE Net Drilling Inventory2 92 proved 29 probable 85 unbooked 206 total Cardium Resource Play Summary Largest accumulation of light oil in the WCSB Approximately 20,000 square miles Approximately 1.9 Billion bbls produced to date Cardium provides light oil exposure with material optionality to improving prices Remains a key focus formation for Bellatrix long-term within its core areas 24 1 2 Acreage as at June 30, 2017 Proved, Probable, and unbooked locations as at December 31, 2016, numbers exclude Strachan area Conventional (vertical) Cardium development Expanded (horizontal) Cardium development Cardium wells Strategic Land Position GREATER FERRIER/BRAZEAU/WILLESDEN GREEN AREAS OF WEST CENTRAL ALBERTA Pembina Brazeau Ferrier Willesden Green 25 Bellatrix Peyto TAQA Cenovus Tourmaline Westbrick Source: Accumap, company presentations and various public sources Greater Ferrier Area Infrastructure Overview GREATER FERRIER EXISTING INFRASTRUCTURE ACCESS: Infrastructure gives Bellatrix control of production and growth Working interest or operatorship in 3 major gas processing facilities 9 compressor sites 4 oil batteries BELLATRIX ALDER FLATS PLANT Bellatrix 25% owner and operator • Keyera 70% owner • O’Chiese 5% owner Phase I - 110 MMcf/d inlet capacity (on-stream May 2015) Phase II - 120 MMcf/d inlet capacity (in service 2018, remaining BXE cost plus prepayment capital ~$25MM) • C2 Recovery 57% • C3 Recovery 99% • C4+ Recovery 100% Strategic advantage from owned infrastructure – lowered costs and guaranteed access 26 GREATER FERRIER AREA STRATEGIC INFRASTRUCTURE Drill Bit Focused PLANT INVESTMENT & CONSTRUCTION COMPLETE Q2/18 Major compressor stations, pipelines and Bellatrix Alder Flats Plant capital investment nearing completion Proportion of incremental capital to drilling & completion expected to increase Increased drill bit directed capital positions Bellatrix to deliver enhanced corporate capital efficiency rates in 2018 & 2019 Plant Plant 20% 10% 0% 2014 2015 2016 DRILLING DRILLING 30% DRILLING 60% 40% Plant Plant 70% 50% Plant Land, G&G, and other capital 80% DRILLING % of Total E&D Capital Expenditures 90% ALLOCATION OF TOTAL CORPORATE E&D CAPITAL EXPENDITURES DRILLING 100% DRILLING • • • BXE Alder Flats Plant Facilities & equipment (excluding BXE Plant) Drilling & completion capital 2017E 2018E 2019E Drilling and completion capital includes capitalized items Note: Capital expenditures and development plans beyond 2017 represent management estimates, as formal plans have not been approved. For representation purposes 2018 & 2019 1 27 capital investment levels assume similar capital spending levels as 2017 for each category, with assumed completion of Phase 2 of the Bellatrix Alder Flats Plant in H1/2018. 1 BXE Alder Flats – Superior Operational Performance in Core West Central AB Area SUPERIOR & CONSISTENT PLANT PERFORMANCE Highest Utilization Bellatrix Alder Flats Bellatrix Alder Flats 3rd Party Plant 3rd Party Plant 3rd Party Plant 3rd Party Plant 3rd Party Plant 3rd Party Plant 3rd Party Plant 3rd Party Plant 3rd Party Plant 3rd Party Plant 3rd Party Plant 3rd Party Plant 3rd Party Plant 3rd Party Plant 3rd Party Plant 3rd Party Plant 3rd Party Plant 3rd Party Plant 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% January 2016 to June 2017 utilization (%) 100% BXE Alder Flats has averaged a 97% utilization rate since July 1, 2015 28 FUEL/DISPOSITION EFFICIENCY Most efficient 0.0% 2.0% 4.0% January 2016 to June 2017 Disposition % of Receipts BXE Alder Flats ranks best in group as the most efficient plant Source: Bellatrix internal data and Alberta Energy Regulator (AER) Note plant efficiency compares monthly receipts versus licensed gas capacity for third party plants. BXE Alder compares monthly gas receipts versus sales capacity Note: Fuel disposition efficiency includes fuel, flared and vented dispositions as a % of input plant receipts Third party plants include greater Ferrier area gas plants: Tidewater Brazeau River Complex, Conoco Sand Creek, Conoco Alder Flats, Keyera Minnehik Buck Lake, Keyera Nordegg, Keyera Brazeau East, Keyera West Pembina, Keyera Brazeau North, Obsidian Crimson Lake Ample Takeaway Capacity & Market Egress AMPLE FIRM TRANSPORTATION IN PLACE FOR CURRENT & GROWTH VOLUMES • Firm Transportation (FT) agreements in place representing ~120% of current gross operated volumes at multiple receipt points along the Nova Gas Transmission Ltd. (NGTL) system • Additional FT capacity secured upon completion of Phase 2 of Alder Flats Plant to facilitate increased forecast growth volumes ALBERTA NATURAL GAS MARKET EGRESS ALBERTA Montney FIRM SERVICE PROCESSING CAPACITY • Maintain firm service capacity through several natural gas processing plants to ensure unfettered delivery capability for current & forecast growth volumes • Multiple staggered third party processing contract maturities to align with anticipated in-service date of Phase 2 of Alder Flats Plant AMPLE FRACTIONATION CAPACITY SECURED • Long term agreements in place provide 100% coverage for current and forecast NGL volume growth 29 Alliance Pipeline BXE core west central area ideally situated on the NGTL system, downstream of Montney & northern Deep Basin areas, with ~120% firm transportation capacity Nova Gas Transmission Ltd. (NGTL) System Pipelines Compelling Investment Opportunity SUSTAINABILITY Excellent Organic Growth Potential Competitive Economics PROFITABILITY LONG TERM GROWTH De-risked Leading Well Results Technically Astute 30 Corporate Information BOARD OF DIRECTORS W.C. (Mickey) Dunn Chairman Murray L. Cobbe SENIOR OFFICERS Brent A. Eshleman, P.Eng. President & CEO Max Lof, CFA Executive Vice President & CFO John H. Cuthbertson, QC Brent A. Eshleman, P.Eng Charles R. Kraus, Esq. Executive Vice President, General Counsel & Corporate Secretary Lynn Kis, P.Eng Keith E. Macdonald, CPA, CA Thomas E. MacInnis, B.Comm, MBA Garrett Ulmer, P.Eng Chief Operating Officer Steve G. Toth, CFA Vice President, Investor Relations Steven J. Pully, CPA, CFA Murray B. Todd, B.Sc., P.Eng. ADDRESS 1920, 800 – 5th Avenue SW Calgary, Alberta Canada T2P 3T6 Keith S. Turnbull, B.Sc., CPA, CA Tel: (403) 266-8670 Fax: (403) 264-8163 www.bellatrixexploration.com [email protected] 31 BANKERS National Bank of Canada Alberta Treasury Branches The Bank of Nova Scotia Canadian Western Bank EVALUATION ENGINEERS InSite Petroleum Consultants Ltd. REGISTRAR & TRANSFER AGENT Computershare Trust Company of Canada AUDITORS KPMG LLP EXCHANGE LISTING The Toronto Stock Exchange - BXE The New York Stock Exchange – BXE RATING AGENCIES Moody’s Investor Service Inc. Corporate Rating: B3 Senior Notes Rating: Caa1 Standard and Poor’s Rating Service Corporate Rating: B Senior Notes Rating: B bellatrixexploration.com