Download Total respiratory resistance and reactance in ankylosing spondylitis

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Bag valve mask wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
Eur Resplr J
1991, 4, 945-951
Total respiratory resistance and reactance in ankylosing
spondylitis and kyphoscoliosis
J.A. van Noord*, M. Cauberghs, K.P. Van de Woestijne, M. Demedts
Total respiratory resistance and reactance in ankylosing spondylitis and
kyphoscoliosis. JA. van Noord, M. Cauberghs, K.P. Van de Woestijne, M.
Demedts.
ABSTRACT: Ankylosing spondylitis and kyphoscoliosis both alter the
function of the lung by modifying the mechanical properties of the thoracic
cage. The purpose of the present study was to assess the changes in total
respiratory resistance (Rrs) and reactance (Xrs) in these patients and to
compare these data with conventional pulmonary function tests.
In 16 patients with ankylosing spondylitis and seven with kyphoscoliosis we
measured lung volumes, maximal flows, diffusing capacity, airway resistance,
lung compliance and Rrs and Xrs between 2-26 Hz by means of the forced
oscillation technique (FOT).
In the patients with ankylosing spondylitis mean total lung capacity was
83% predicted (range 60-105%). Mean values of Rrs were normal; there
was a small decrease in Xrs at the lowest frequency. In the patients with
kyphoscoliosis mean total lung capacity (TLC) was 41% predicted for arm
span (range 26-75%). Mean Rrs was elevated with a negative frequency
dependence, and mean Xrs was decreased.
The observed differences in Rrs and Xrs between the two groups of patients
are related to differences in severity of the restriction. There is evidence that
the changes in Rrs and Xrs in both groups are mainly attributable to an
increase in chest wall resistance and a decrease in chest wall compliance,
while in the patients with kyphoscoliosis an increase in airway resistance and
a decrease in lung compliance also intervenes.
Eur Respir J., 1991, 4, 945-951.
The clinical disorders of ankylosing spondylitis and
kyphoscoliosis, like strapping of the rib cage in healthy
subjects, affect the movements of the thoracic cage and
modify the mechanical properties of lungs and chest wall
[1, 2]. In clinical practice, measurements of chest wall
recoil are seldom performed, as it is very difficult to
obtain reliable data in untrained subjects. The forced
oscillation technique (FOT) is a potential tool to investigate disorders of the chest wall, as it provides
information on the mechanical behaviour of airways,
lungs and chest wall. The method is simple to perform,
rapid, non-invasive and demands only passive cooperation of the patient. It allows evaluation of total
respiratory impedance over a wide range of frequencies
and provides values of its two components, i.e. total
respiratory resistance (Rrs), which is the sum of airway,
lung tissue and chest wall resistance, and of total
respiratory reactance (Xrs), which is a function of the
elastic and inertial properties of the respiratory system
[3, 4].
In healthy adult subjects, Rrs does not vary or increases
only slightly with frequency (positive frequency dependence) in the range of commonly investigated frequencies,
Laboratory for Pneumology, University Hospitals,
Catholic University, Leuven, Belgium.
• Present address: Dept of Pulmonary Diseases,
De Wever Hospital, Heerlen, The Netherlands.
Correspondence: M. Demedts, K.liniek voor
Longziekten, Universitaire Ziekenhuizen,
Weligerveld 1, B-3041 Pellenberg, Belgium.
Keywords: Ankylosing spondylitis; forced
oscillation technique; kyphoscoliosis; respiratory
impedance.
Received: April 2, 1990; accepted after revision
Apri117, 1991.
This study was supported by a grant from the
"Nederlands Astma Fonds" and the "Fonds voor
Geneeskundig Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek".
2-30 Hz; Xrs increases markedly with frequency: its
value is negative below 10-12 Hz (the resonant
frequency), and positive at higher frequencies [4-6]. In
pathological conditions of lungs and airways Rrs is
generally increased with negative frequency dependence
(i.e. lower values at higher frequencies); Xrs is reduced
at all frequencies [6-10]. In a previous study [11], we
found that strapping of the rib cage in healthy subjects
caused similar changes in Rrs and Xrs: increase of Rrs
at low oscillatory frequencies, resulting in a negative
frequency dependence, and a decrease of Xrs with a
shift of the resonant frequency to higher values. By
partitioning the impedance of lungs and chest wall by
means of an oesophageal balloon, we demonstrated that
the changes of Rrs and Xrs were mainly the result of the
altered mechanics of the chest wall.
To our knowledge, no report exists about the influence
of ankylosing spondylitis and kyphoscoliosis on Rrs and
Xrs, measured with the forced oscillation technique. The
purpose of the present study was to measure Rrs and Xrs
at various frequencies in these patients, to compare the
data obtained with routine lung function tests and to
evaluate the implications of the method for clinical use.
J.A. VAN NOORD ET AL.
946
Patients and methods
Patients
Sixteen patients, 2 females and 14 males, with
ankylosing spondylitis, and 7 patients, 5 females and 2
males, with kyphoscoliosis were selected for the study.
The diagnosis of ankylosing spondylitis was made
according to the classical New York criteria [12].
Patients with a history or clinical evidence of chronic
obstructive lung disease or other complicating pulmonary
disorders were excluded, and the ratio forced expiratory
volume in one second/vital capacity had to be more than
70%.
Methods
Vital capacity (VC), total lung capacity (TLC),
functional residual capacity (FRC), residual volume (RV),
and forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) were
obtained by standard methods of spirometry and
multi-breath helium equilibration. Peak expiratory flow
(PEF) and maximal flow at 50% of the forced vital
capacity (MEF,J were obtained from MEFV curves
recorded at the mouth with a Lilly-type pneumotachograph and integrator. Highest values of three
manoeuvres were retained. Diffusing capacity of the
lung for carbon monoxide {DLCO) was determined with
the single-breath method; breath-holding time was
calculated after JoNEs and MBADE [13] and alveolar
volume (VA) was determined as the sum of the inspired
volume and RV, measured separately with the
multi-breath helium equilibration technique. Results were
related to the reference values of the European
Community of Coal and Steel (ECCS) [14]. Because a
flexion deformity in ankylosing spondylitis sometimes,
and in kyphoscoliosis systematically, reduces the
height of the patient, results were related to predicted
values for height before the onset of the disease in the
patients with ankylosing spondylitis and to
predicted value for arm span in the patients with kyphoscoliosis.
Airway resistance (Raw) and specific airway
conductance (sGaw) were measured in a constant-volume
plethysmograph (Jaeger body test) at a respiratory rate of
about 0.5 Hz. The slope of the mouth flow-box pressure
loop was determined by connecting the points of
0.5 l·s·1 above and below the zero flow line and midway
between the ascending and descending limbs of the loop.
The means of three measurements, expressed in absolute
values, are reported. Static transpulmonary pressurevolume curves were determined during apnoea's
from volume, obtained by integration of the flow signal
at the mouth, and oesophageal pressure (oesophageal
balloon: length 10 cm, perimeter 5 cm, containing 0.5
ml of air, positioned at 40 cm from the nares). The
static expiratory compliance was calculated as the mean
slope (of three curves) between FRC and FRC +0.5 I.
For maximal inspiratory transpulmonary pressure the
highest values of three manoeuvres was selected. Values
of elastic lung recoil were related to the reference values
of YERNAULT et al. [15).
Rrs and Xrs were determined by means of a
forced oscillation technique described in detail previously
[3, 4]. Briefly, a pseudorandom noise signal, containing
the harmonics of 2 Hz up to 26 Hz (2, 4, 6, ..., 26 Hz)
is applied at the mouth. The harmonics have a flat
amplitude spectrum and appear in random order. The
signal is repeated every 0.5 s; its total peak-to-peak
amplitude is less than 0.2 kPa at the mouth. Pressure
and flow signals, recorded by two identical differential
transducers Validyne MP4S (:t0.2 kPa) are digitized at a
frequency of 128 Hz and split up into time blocks of
4 s. Four successive blocks are recorded and submitted
without preliminary filtering to a fast Fourier transform,
yielding the frequency content of pressure and flow for
each of the investigated frequencies. From the auto- and
crosspower spectra, averaged over the four time blocks,
a resistance (Rrs) and reactance value (Xrs) of the
respiratory system and a coherence function are
computed. Only Rrs and Xrs values with a coherence
function equal to or exceeding 0.95 were retained,
resulting in the elimination of the 2 Hz values in
most subjects. The measurements were repeated at
least thrice; the mean of three satisfactory measurements
is given. To describe the Rrs and Xrs vs frequency
(f) relationships, the mean of Rrs and Xrs (Rrs and Xrs),
and the average values of the first and second derivatives
of Rrs and Xrs with respect to frequency (respectively,
Rrs<1>, Rrs<%>, Xrs(l>, Xrs<2>) were calculated from
6-26 Hz according to a method described previously
[5]. The first and second derivatives represent,
respectively, the slope and the curvature of the Rrs-fand
Xrs-f relationships. Measured values of Rrs and Xrs
were compared to the reference values of UNnsaR et al.
[5].
Correlation coefficients between the various lung
function measurements were computed.
Results
Conventional lung function tests
Mean values of the lung function tests are presented
in table 1. In the patients with ankylosing spondylitis
mean TLC and VC were slightly reduced, whereas
mean RV and FRC were approximately normal.
However, the latter values showed substantial
interindividual variability above and below the predicted
values. Mean values of DLCO, Raw and static lung
compliance were within the normal range. In the
patients with kyphoscoliosis, static lung volumes were
all severely reduced, RV being least affe.cted. There
was a small increase in airway resistance, however, due
to the decrease in FRC, sGaw was normal; by virtue
of selection the ratio FEV1NC was also normal. Static
lung compliance and transpulmonary pressure at TLC
were decreased.
947
CHEST WALL DEFORMITIES AND RESPIRATORY IMPEDANCE
Table 1. - Mean values (±so) of the pulmonary function
tests in ankylosing spondylitis and kyphoscoliosis
Ankylosing spondylitis Kyphoscoliosis
nz16
Age
Height/span
Weight
VC
RV
TLC
FRC
RVtrLC
FRC([LC
FEV1
FEV1NC
PEF
MEF.so
Tt.co
Kco
Raw
sGaw
C!..st
Ptp, max
yrs
cm
kg
% pred.
% pred.
% pred.
% pred.
% pred.
% pred.
% pred.
%
% pred.
% pred.
% pred.
% pred.
kPa·t1·s
kPa·'·s·1
% pred.
% pred.
39±13
170±6
68±9
79:14
94:21
83:13
95±22
112±19
111±17
79±13
81:7
93±23
75:14
96:17
101%20
0.12±0.03
2.45:0.66
91±15
85:t21
n=7
40:7
162±8
47±11
36±21
51±12
41±18
42±13
134±28
114±23
36±24
83±7
46:21
47±31
68:9•
119:40•
0.28:0.14
2.73±1.01
37±19
67±9
In ankylosing spondylitis original height at the onset of
the disease, and in kyphoscoliosis arm span are given. VC:
vital capacity; RV: residual volume; TLC: total lung capacity;
FRC: functional residual capacity; FEV1: forced expiratory
volume in one second; MEF.so: maximal expiratory flow at 50%
of the forced vital capacity; PEF: peak expiratory flow rate;
TLCO: single-breath diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide;
Kco: TLco over lung volume; Raw: airway resistance; sGaw:
specific airway conductance; C!..st: static lung compliance; Ptp,
max: transpulmonary pressure at TLC. • : because of severe
restriction not available in four patients.
0.4
0.2
0.0
4
8
12
16
20
24 Hz
8
12
16
20
24Hz
Xrs
0.2 kPa·r 1·s
0.0
-0.2
-0.4
4
Fig. 1. - Total respiratory resistance (Rrs) (top) and reactance (Xrs)
(bottom) as a function of frequency in 16 patients with ankylosing
spondylitis. Shaded areas represent normal ranges [5).
Kyphoscoliosis
Total respiratory resistance and reactance
Individual values of Rrs and Xrs vs frequency of all
patients are shown in figures 1 and 2. ln the ankylosing
spondylitis patients the Rrs curves showed a certain
amount of scatter, but they were nearly all within normal
Limits. However, the positive frequency dependence of
Rrs, usually found in healthy subjects, was absent. The
Xrs vs frequency curves were mostly within normal
limits, except for the 4 Hz value which was decreased
in a few subjects (fig. 1). ln the kyphoscoliosis patients
the range of the Rrs curves was very large, varying from
normal to very abnormal values with relatively small
negative frequency dependence (especially at higher
frequencies) {fig. 2). ln most patients Xrs was reduced,
especially at low frequencies. Figure 3 illustrates the
difference in mean impedance between the two groups.
!!!._the_Lnkylosing spon.Qy!itis patients, mean values of
Rrs, Rrs<'>, Rrs(l) and Xrs were normal, but the mean
values of Xrs at 6 Hz (p<O.OOl), of Xrs<'> (p<O.Ol) and
of Xrs(2>(p<O.Ol) were significantly different from the
predicted values [5). In the kyphoscoliosis patients,
mean Rrs was significantly increased with a clear
negative frequency dependence and Xrs was decreased
(p<O.OOl).
4
8
12
16
20
24 Hz
8
12
16
20
24 Hz
Xrs
kPa·r 1·s
-0.2
-0.4
-0.6
4
Fig. 2. - Total respiratory resistance (Rrs) (top) and reactance (Xrs)
(bottom) as a function of frequency in 7 patients with kyphoscoliosis.
Shaded areas represent normal ranges [5].
J.A. VAN NOORD ET AL.
948
Table 3. - Correlation coefficients between total
respiratory resistance, reactance and routine lung
function Indices in kyphoscoliosis
Rrs
0.6 kPa·r1·s
0.5
Kyphoscoliosis
0.4
0.3
Ankyloslng
~---------------- spondylitis
0
10
30 Hz
20
Xrs
0.2 kPa·r 1·s
Ankylosing
spondylitis
0.1
Kyphoscoliosis
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0
10
30 Hz
20
Fig. 3. - Mean total respiratory resistance (top) and reactance
(bottom) as a function of frequency in 16 patients with ankylosing
spondylitis and in 7 patients with kyphoscoliosis.
Table 2. - Correlation coefficients between total
respiratory resistance, reactance and routine lung
function indices in ankylosing spondylitis
VC
% pred.
TLC
% pred.
FRC
% pred.
FEVINC%
Raw
kPa·t1·s
Ct.st
% pred.
Rrs
kPa·/·1·s
Rrs(l}
kPa·t1·s2
Xrs
kPa·fl.s
0.24
-0.05
-0.41
-0.64••
0.65 ..
0.28
0.34
o.5o•
0.45
0.24
-0.15
0
0.34
0.66••
0.87**
0.34
-0.17
0.02
Number of patients: 16. •: p<0.05; ••: p<O.Ol. Rrs, Rrs(l>; mean
value of respiratory resistance (Rrs) and first derivative (slope)
of Rrs, respectively; Xrs: mean value of respiratory reactance
(Xrs). For further abbreviations see legend to table 1.
Correlations between the various measurements
Tables 2 and 3 show the results of the correlation
analysis, relating mean Rrs and its slope and mean Xrs
to the most relevant conventional lung function tests. In
the ankylosing spondylitis patients, mean level of Rrs
turned out to be correlated with Raw and with the FEV/
VC ratio. There was a weak correlation between the
VC
TLC
FRC
FEV1NC
Raw
Ct.st
% pred.
% pred.
% pred.
%
kPa·t1·s
% pred.
Rrs
kPa·/·1·s
Rrs<1>
kPa·t1·s2
Xrs
kPa·fl.s
-0.58
-0.61
-0.72
-0.39
0.41
0.33
0.63
0.59
0.21
0.71
-0.75
0.94•
o.8o•
o.8o•
0.70
0.71
-0.58
0.93•
Number of patients: 7. •: p<O.OS.
legends to tables 1 and 2.
For abbreviations see
mean slope of Rrs and TLC. Mean level of Xrs was
correlated satisfactorily with TLC and FRC. In other
words, as TLC decreased, the mean slope of Rrs tended
to decrease (from positive to zero, or to negative) and
Xrs shifted towards lower values (i.e. resonant frequency
moved to higher frequencies). There was no significant
correlation between VC and RV, Raw or lung compliance.
In the kyphoscoliosis patients mean slope of Rrs was
correlated with lung compliance, and mean level of Xrs
with VC, TLC and lung compliance. There was a significant relationship between VC and RV (r=0.87,
p<0.01), VC and Raw (r= -0.75, p<O.OS), and VC and
lung compliance (r = 0.84, p<O.OS).
Discussion
In this study the patients with ankylosing spondylitis
had no major functional restriction in contrast to the
patients with kyphoscoliosis. Indeed, in the patients with
ankylosing spondylitis mean VC was 79% predicted
(lowest value was 53% predicted). Mean values of RV
and FRC were about normal, but showed marked
variations above and below the reference values.
According to the literature, the most consistent finding
in ankylosing spondylitis is the reduction in VC, which
in most studies is on average 70% predicted, with a
lower limit of about 50% [16-26]. The reduction in VC
is limited because the diaphragmatic excursions are
unimpaired and even greater than normal [24, 27]. Most
authors have found an increased RV and a normal or
increased FRC [18, 2~22, 24]. However, normal [16,
19] or decreased values [25] of RV have been reported.
These discrepancies may be caused by difference in stage
of the disease and to a large extent by differences in
reference values. Indeed, whatever the reported change
in RV, be it an increase [20], a decrease [25], or no
change [19], it appears that the ratios RV!TLC are
remarkably similar among these studies: 40, 36 and 37%,
respectively.
In contrast, all patients with kyphoscoliosis showed a
severe restrictive pattern. These observations are in line
with previous reports [1, 28-30], that, depending on the
angle of scoliosis, static lung volumes can reach
CHEST WAll DEFORMITIES AND RESPIRATORY IMPEDANCE
extremely low values, RV being reduced least. Unlike
ankylosing spondylitis there is a downward displacement
of the resting pulmonary position.
The difference in average pulmonary restriction between
the two groups is reflected in the Rrs and Xrs vs frequency
curves. In the patients with ankylosing spondylitis mean
values of Rrs and Xrs were within normal range, except
for the absence of the slightly positive frequency
dependence of Rrs, generally obser ved in healthy
subjects [4, 6] and for a small decrease in Xrs at the
lowest frequency with a steepening of the slope of the
Xrs curve. The patients with most restriction showed,
in addition, a small negative f requency dependence of
Rrs. As the latter patients had all values of airways
resistance and lung compliance within normal limits, the
changes of Rrs and Xrs are likely to be related more to
alterations in chest wall mechanics than in airway or
pulmonary mechanics. Raw is of course an important
determinant of Rrs, which explains the significant correlation between both variables (table ~but, unlike the
findings in obstructive lung disease [8] Rrs< 1> and Xrs were
related to TLC rather than to Raw. As the mean value
of Rrs is virtually independent of the oscillatory frequency,
one might conclude that the respiratory system behaves
homogeneously and can be suitably described by a
single compartment resistance-inertancc-compliance (RIC)
system. lf so, the difference between the mean value of
Rrs and of Raw, i. e. 0.16 kPa·f·Ls, can be attributed to
the resistance of the tissues, probably mainly that of the
chest wall. This value is larger than the value of 0.05
kPa·[·1·s for chest wall resistance, measured by NAGELS
et al. [4] in healthy subjects, at a frequency of 4Hz. To
our knowledge, there are no reports in the literature on
the chest wall resistance in ankylosing spondylitis. From
Xrs, the dynamic compliance of the respiratory system
(Crs, dyn) can be calculated using the equation
Xrs =-1/(2n/ Crs, dyn). At an oscillatory frequency of
4Hz the mean Crs, dyn was 0.29 l·kPa·1, which is less
than the value of 0.61 l·kPa·1 that we found in healthy
subjects (11). SHARP et al. (31], measuring chest
wall and total respiratory compliance in 21 patients
with ankylosing spondylitis during voluntary relaxation,
found the total respiratory compliance to be decreased
in most subjects and to be well correlated with VC. In
the subgroup of patients with a TLC value larger
than 4.5 I, as was the case in the majority of our
patients, mean total respiratory compliance was 0.84
l·kPa·1 and chest wall compliance was 1.44 z.kPa·1,
or about two-thirds of the expected value. The latter
value of total compliance is larger than our calculated
value, which can be explained by the mechanical
inhomogeneity of the chest wall (32) and the influence
of respiratory muscle activity (33], two factors
which make chest wall compliance dependent of the
frequency at which measurements are performed
(apnoea, spontaneous breathing or forced oscillation
frequency).
In the patients with kyphoscoliosis, mean Rrs was
considerably increased especially at low frequencies and
Xrs was decreased. There are several factors which may
contribute to these changes. Firstly, although sGaw was
949
normal, Raw was increased because of a marked decrease in FRC. It has been demonstrated that an increase
in Raw, whether central or peripheral, systematically
results in a negative frequency dependence of Rrs and a
decrease in Xrs, due to the influence of the shunt
impedance of the proximal airways (34, 35]. Secondly,
the compliance of the longs was decreased, together
with a decrease in transpulmonary pressure at TLC, which
is a typical feature of pulmonary restriction caused by a
reduced motion of the chest wall. In diffuse interstitial
lung diseases, a fall in compliance of the lungs, together
with an increase in tissue resistance also causes a small
increase in Rrs at low frequencies and a decrease of Xrs
[9]. Yet, the changes in Rrs and Xrs l n kyphoscoliosis
are too large to be attributed to the observed small increase
in Raw and decrease in lung compliance. Accordingly,
it is likely that the changes in mechanical properties of
the chest wall in kyphoscoliosis play an important role.
Us ing the mid-position shift method in patients with
idiopath ic scoliosis, KAFER [30] fo und that in the
subjects with a VC of about 1 I (which is similar to the
mean VC value in our group) chest wall compliances
were markedly reduced: 0.04-0.5 l·kPa·1• As VC, Raw,
lung compliance and chest wall compliance are highly
interrelated in this disorder [30] (table 3) correlation
analysis proved not to be very useful for the interpretation of the changes in Rrs and Xrs. In particular, the
correlation between Raw and Rrs is difficult to interpret,
as, on the one hand, Raw is dependent on the degree
of restriction and, on the other hand, Raw is probably
not the major determinant of Rrs in our patients (see
below).
The other approach in analysing impedance data is to
fit a specifjc model of the respiratory system to the
experimental data. As in kyphoscoliosis many properties
of airways, lungs and chest wall are altered, resulting
in a marked increase and negative freque ncy dependence
of Rrs and decrease of Xrs, this analysis requires a
complex model, taking into account, in addition to
elements representing airways and tissues of lungs and
chest wall, the influence of the upper airway, and
probably also that of intrathoracic airway wall compliance,
and of gas compressibility. We fitted the 13-parameter
model, described previously [9, 10), on the data,
incorporating in the model the measured values of Raw,
lung compliance and gas compressibility and adjusting
the values of chest wall compliance and resistance in
order to obtain a good fit with the measured average Rrs
and Xrs vs frequency curves. This was possible if chest
wall resistance was increased to 0.6 kPa·P·s and
compliance decreased to 0.08l·kPa·1• These figures should
be regarded with caution, as approximations are highly
dependent on this type of model; indeed, the latter was
not validated by formal modelization techniques.
In conclusion, this study suggests that in disorders of
the chest wall there is not only a decrease in chest wall
compliance but also an increase in chest wall resistance.
The scatter of values of Rrs and Xrs in normal subjects
is too large to detect the small changes in Rrs and Xrs
induced by ankylosing spondylitis. This result is
connected with the fact that chest wall resistance only
950
J.A. VAN NOORD ET AL.
accounts for a minor fraction of Rrs [4, 36]; also, a
moderate decrease in chest wall compliance, for instance
by a factor of two has a limited influence on Xrs.
For comparison rib cage strapping, causing a decrease
in TLC of 31%, induced a reduction in Xrs resulting in
a slight increase in the resonant frequency from 6.3 to
10.6 Hz (11]. DB TRoYBR [37], imposing a similar
restriction, demonstrated that this caused a reduction in
chest wall compliance of more than 50%. Rrs and Xrs
curves, thus, lack sensitivity to detect changes in chest
wall mechanics. However, when a considerable
difference is present between Raw and Rrs, this might
suggest an increase in tissue resistance (of lungs and of
chest wall). In advanced kyphoscoliosis considerable
changes in Rrs and Xrs are found which are the results
of the combined effects of changes in mechanics of
airways, lungs and chest wall. The differences in Rrs
and Xrs between the two disorders are probably related
to the severity of the restriction and do not correspond to
different mechanisms, since the two kyphoscoliosis
patients with restriction similar to the ankylosing
spondylitis patients also demonstrated values of Rrs and
Xrs within the normal range.
References
1. Bergofsky EH. - Respiratory failure in disorders of the
thoracic cage. Am Rev Respir Dis, 1979, 119, 643-669.
2. Caro CG, Butler J, DuBois AB. - Some effects of
restriction of chest cage expansion on pulmonary function in
man: an experimental study. J Clin Invest, 1960, 39, 573-583.
3. Unds~r FJ, Nagels J, Demedts M, Billiet L, Van de
Woestijne KP. - A new method to determine frequency
characteristics of the respiratory system. J Appl Physiol, 1976,
41, 101-106.
4. Nagels J, Unds~r FJ, Van der Linden L, Cl6ment J, Van
de Woestijne KP. - Mechanical properties of lungs and chest
wall during spontaneous breathing. J Appl Physiol: Respirat
Environ Exercise Physiol, 1980, 49, 408-416.
5. Unds~r FJ, Cl~ment J, Van de Woestijne KP. - Normal
values of total respiratory resistance and reactance determined
by forced oscillations. Influence of smoking. Chest, 1982, 8,
586-591.
6. Van den Elshout FJJ, Van de Woestijne KP, Folgering
HTM. - Variations of respiratory impedance with lung
volume in bronchial hyperreactivity. Chest, 1990, 98,
358-364.
7. Van Noord JA, Q~ment J, Van de Woestijne KP, Demedts
M. - Total respiratory resistance and reactance as a
measurement of response to bronchial challenge with
histamine. Am Rev Respir Dis, 1989, 139, 921-926.
8. Van Noord JA, Clement J, Smeets J, Van de Woestijne
KP, Demedts M. - Total respiratory resistance and reactance
in patients with asthma, chronic bronchitis and emphysema.
Am Rev Respir Dis, (in press).
9. Van Noord JA, Clement J, Cauberghs M, Mertens I, Van
de Woestijne KP, Demedts M. - Total respiratory resistance
and reactance in patients with diffuse interstitial lung disease.
Eur Respir J, 1989, 2, 846-852.
10. Van Noord JA, Wellens W, Qarysse I, Cauberghs M,
Van de Woestijne KP, Demedts M. - Total respiratory resistance and reactance in patients with upper airway obstruction.
Chest, 1987, 92, 475--480.
11. Van Noord JA, Demedts M, Cl~ment J, Cauberghs M,
Van de Woestijne KP. - Effects of rib cage and abdominal
restriction on total respiratory resistance and reactance. J Appl
Physiol, 1986, 61, 1736-1740.
12. Bennett PH, Wood PHN. - Population studies of the
rheumatic diseases. Excerpta Medica Foundation, Amsterdam,
1968, 456--457.
13. Jones RS, Meade F. - A theoretical and experimental
analysis of anomalies in the estimation of pulmonary diffusing
capacity by the single-breath method. Q J Exp Physiol, 1961,
46, 131-143.
14. Quanjer PH (ed). - Standardized lung function testing.
Report Working Party "Standardization of lung function tests".
European Community for Coal and Steel. Luxembourg. Bull
Eur Physiopathol Respir, 1983, 19 (Suppl. 5), 1-95.
15. Yemault JC, Baran D, Englert M. - Effect of growing
and aging on the static mechanical lung properties. Bull Eur
Physiopathol Respir, 1977, 13, 777-788.
16. Rogan MC, Needham CD, McDonald I. - Effect of
ankylosing spondylitis on ventilatory function. Clin Sci, 1955,
14, 91-96.
17. Renzetti AD Jr, Nicholas W, Dutton RE Jr, Jivoff L. Some effects of ankylosing spondylitis on pulmonary gas
exchange. N Engl J Med, 1960, 262, 215-218.
18. Zorab PA. - The lungs in ankylosing spondylitis. Q J
Med, 1962, 31, 267-280.
19. Miller JM, Sproule BJ. - Pulmonary function in
ankylosing spondylitis. Am Rev Respir Dis, 1964, 90,
376-382.
20. Hart FD, Emerson PA, Gregg I. - Thorax in ankylosing
spondylitis. Ann Rheum Dis, 1963, 107, 22, 11-18.
21. Gacad G, Hamosh P. - The lung in ankylosing
spondylitis. Am Rev Respir Dis, 1973, 107, 286-289.
22. Citrin DL, Boyd G, Bradley GW. - Ventilatory function
and transfer factor in ankylosing spondylitis. Scot Med J, 1973,
18, 109-113.
23. Ozalp M, Weimann G. - Die klinische Bedeutung der
eingeschrlinkte Atemfunktion bei ankylosierender Spondylitis.
Z Rheumatol, 1974, 33, 214-222.
24. Grirnby G, Fugl-Meyer A, Blomstrand A. - Partitioning
of the contributions of the rib cage and abdomen to ventilation
in ankylosing spondylitis. Thorax, 1974, 29, 179-184.
25. Stewart RM, Ridyard JB, Pearson JD. - Regional lung
function in ankylosing spondylitis. Thorax, 1976, 31,
433-437.
26. Wiirkert K, Rohde IU, Gilfrich IU, Schulz V, Griesheirner
M. - St~rung der Atemfunktion bei Spondylitis Ankylosans.
Med Welt, 1981, 32, 1074-1076.
27. Josenhans WT, Wang CS, Josenhans G, Woodburg JFL.
- Diaphragmatic contribution to ventilation in patients with
ankylosiog spondylitis. Respiration, 1971, 28, 331-346.
28. Bergofsky EH, Thrino EM, Fishman AP. - Cardiorespiratory failure in kyphoscoliosis. Medicine (Baltimore), 1959,
38, 263-317.
29. Caro CO, Dubois AB. - Pulmonary function in
kyphoscoliosis. Thorax, 1961, 16, 282-290.
30. K.afer ER. - Idiopathic scoliosis. Mechanical properties
of the respiratory system and the ventilatory response to carbon
dioxide. J Clin Invest, 1975, 55, 1153-1163.
31. Sharp IT, Sweany SK, Henry JP, Pietras RJ, Meadows
WR, Amaral E, Rubenstein HM. - Lung and thoracic
compliances in ankylosing spondylitis. J Lab Clin Med, 1964,
63, 254-263.
32. Peslin R, Papin J, Duvivier C, Richalet J. - Frequency
response of the chest: modeling and parameters estimation. J
Appl Physio~ 1975, 39, 523-534.
33. Bamas GM, Heglund NC, Yager D, Yoshuo K, Loring
CHEST WALL DEFORMITIES AND RESPIRATORY lMPEDANCE
SH, Mead J. - Impedance of the chest wall during sustained
respiratory muscle contraction. J Appl Physiol, 1989, 66,
360-369.
34. Michaelson ED, Grassman ED, Peters WR. - Pulmonary
mechanics by spectral analysis of forced random noise. J Clin
Invest, 1975, 56, 1210-1230.
35. Peslin R, Duvivier C, Gallina C, Cervantes P. - Upper
airway artifact in respiratory impedance measurement. Am Rev
Respir Dis, 1985, 132, 712-714.
36. Grimby G, Takishima T, Graham W, Macklem P, Mead J.
- Frequency dependence of flow resistance in patients with
obstructive lung disease. J Clin Invest, 1968, 47, 1455-1465.
37. De Troyer A. - Mechanics of the chest wall during
restrictive thoracic strapping. Respiration, 1980, 39, 241-250.
Resistance respiratoire totale et reactance dans la spondylite
ankylosante et la cyphoscoliose. J.A. van Noord, M. Cauberghs,
KP. Van de Woestijne, M. Demedts.
REsUME: La spondylite ankylosante et la cyphoscoliose ont
en commun une alt6ration de la fonction pulmonaire par
modification des propri6t6s m6caniques de la cage thoracique.
L'objectif de 1'6tude est d'appr6cier les modifications de la
r6sistance respiratoire totale (Rrs) et de la r6actance (Xrs) chez
ces patients, et de comparer ces donn6es aux tests de fonc.tion
pulmonaire conventionnels.
951
Chez 16 patients atteints de spondylite ankylosante et chez
7 cyphoscoliotiques, nous avons mesure les volumes
pulmonaires, les d6bits maximaux, la capacit6 de diffusion, la
r6sistance des voies a6riennes, la compliance pulmonaire, ainsi
que Rrs et Xrs entre 2 et 26 Hz au moyen de la technique
d'oscillation forcee (FOT).
Chez les patients atteints de spondylite ankylosante, la
capacite pulmonaire totale moyenne est de 83% des valeurs
predites (extreme: 60 ~ 105%). Les valeurs moyennes de Rrs
soot normales; il y a une 16g~re diminution de Xrs ~ la fr6quence
la plus basse. Chez les cyphoscoliotiques, la 1LC moyenne
est de 41% des valeurs predites pour l'envergure (extreme: 26
i\ 75%). La Rrs moyenne est augmentee, avec une d6pendance
n6gative ~ 1'6gard de la fr6quence. La Xrs moyenne est
diminuee.
Les differences observees dans Rrs et Xrs entre les deux
groupes de patients sont en relation avec les diff6rences de
gravit6 du syndrome restrictif. n apparait que les modifications
de Rrs et de Xrs dans les deux groupes sont principalement
attribuables i\ une augmentation de la r6sistance de la paroi
thoracique et i\ une diminution de la compliance de cette paroi,
alors que chez les patients atteints de cyphoscoliose une
augmentation de la r6sistance des voies a6riennes et une
diminution de la compliance pulmonaire interviennent
6galement.
Eur Respir J., 1991, 4, 945-951.