Download Venice PP Dual Force Main

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Environmental resource management wikipedia , lookup

Environmental history wikipedia , lookup

Environmental psychology wikipedia , lookup

Environmental law wikipedia , lookup

NIMBY wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
City of Los Angeles
Department of Public Works
Bureau of Engineering
Paseo Del Mar Permanent Restoration Project
Draft EIR Public Meeting
May 3, 2017
1
Agenda
• Introductions
• Richard Louie, Project Manager, BOE
• William Jones, Environmental Management Group, BOE
•
•
•
•
•
Project History
Project Description
Estimated Project Schedule
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Process
Purpose of Draft Environmental Impact Report (EIR)
Meeting
• Key Environmental Issues
• Summary of Project Impacts
• Draft EIR Comments
2
Draft EIR Comments
• The following comments will be considered:
• Verbal comments at Draft EIR meeting
• Comment cards at Draft EIR meeting or mailed in
• Written responses to Draft EIR via mail or email
• Submit comments to:
William Jones and Billy Ho
City of Los Angeles Department of Public Works
Bureau of Engineering, EMG
1149 S. Broadway, Suite 600, Mail Stop 939
Los Angeles, CA 90015
Email: [email protected]
[email protected]
• Public comments must be submitted by June 5, 2017
3
Project History
On November 20, 2011 an approximately 400-foot
section of the Paseo Del Mar roadway collapsed
along the coast in the community of San Pedro
4
Project Description
• The primary objective of the
proposed project is to
restore access along Paseo
Del Mar.
• The proposed project would
restore the section of the
Paseo Del Mar roadway that
collapsed in the November
2011 landslide event to its
original function.
• Four alternatives have been
evaluated for environmental
impacts.
5
No Project Alternative
• Required under CEQA to allow decision makers to
compare the impacts of approving the project with the
impacts of not approving the project.
• No construction activities would occur.
• The damaged segment of Paseo Del Mar would remain
closed.
6
Alt. 1 – Bridge Spanning Over Landslide
• Construct single, approximately 380-foot longspan bridge supported on stable ground outside
the limits of the landslide area.
• Limits major earthwork & remediation of existing
landslide area.
7
Alt. 2 – Anchored CIDH Piles with Buttress
• Includes a single row of large diameter, Cast-inDrilled Holes (CIDH) piles near the edge of the
existing slope.
• Piles would connect with a reinforced-concrete
grade beam & tied back with soil anchors.
Reinforced-earth buttress above the piles would
stabilize the head scarp & support new roadway.
8
Alt. 3 – Shear Pins with MSE Wall
• Similar to Alt. 2, however a row of large diameter
piles & a grid of smaller diameter piles would be
constructed below the proposed roadway.
• The piles would handle the vertical loading of the
Mechanically Stabilized Embankment (MSE) wall
& mitigate lateral forces on the existing slope.
9
Dismissed Alternative - Roadway Realignment
• The Initial Study and Notice of Preparation
included the Roadway Realignment Alternative,
which would realign the Paseo Del Mar roadway
into the White Point Nature Preserve.
• During the environmental analysis, it was
determined that this alternative would increase
significant impacts to biological resources, cultural
resources, and recreation.
• Due to public input received during the scoping
process and the increased impacts, this alternative
was eliminated from further analysis.
10
Project Schedule
• Draft EIR Public Review Period
o 60 days: April 6 to June 5, 2017
• Selection of Preferred Alternative, Approval of
Project & EIR – Summer 2017
• Design Phase Complete – Early 2019*
• Start of Project Construction – Late 2019*
* Dependent upon availability of funding
11
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Process
• Required for all discretionary actions
• Informs public & decision makers
• Feasible ways to avoid, reduce, and/or mitigate
impacts
• Considers alternatives
• Discloses significant & unavoidable impacts
• Opportunity to comment on the environmental
issues
12
Purpose of Draft EIR Meeting
• To inform the public about the proposed project
and disclose potential environmental impacts
• To receive comments from the public regarding
environmental concerns
• To inform the public about the CEQA Process
13
CEQA Process
1. Prepare Initial
Study (IS) &
Notice of
Preparation (NOP)
6. Public Review of
Draft EIR
April 6 – June 5 (60
Days)
2. Distribute
IS/NOP
5. Distribute
Draft EIR
3. Public Scoping
Meeting
4. Prepare
Technical Studies
& Draft EIR
7. Prepare Final EIR
with Response to
Comments, Findings
of Fact, Statement of
Overriding
Considerations, and
Mitigation Plan
8. Final EIR
Certification &
Project Approval
9. File Notice of
Determination
(NOD)
14
Key Environmental Issues Addressed in Draft EIR
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Aesthetics
Air Quality
Biological Resources
Cultural Resources
Geology/Soils
Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Hydrology/Water Quality
Land Use/Planning
Noise
Paleontological Resources
•
•
•
•
Recreation
Transportation/Traffic
Tribal Cultural Resources
Effects Found not to be
Significant
• Cumulative Impacts
• Project Alternatives
• Including No Project
Alternative & three
Build Alternatives
15
Comparison of Alternatives
• No Project Alternative:
• Significant and unavoidable impacts to four issue areas, including
aesthetics, geology and soils, hydrology and water quality, and
land use and planning.
• Alternative 1:
• One significant and unavoidable environmental impact related to
construction noise, which is a temporary impact.
• Fewest environmental impacts overall, and no permanent
environmental impacts.
• Environmentally superior alternative.
• Alternatives 2 and 3:
• Similar impacts to each other.
• Both Alternatives 2 and 3 would result in two significant and
unavoidable impacts: aesthetics (permanent impacts) and
construction noise (temporary impact).
• Fewer significant impacts than the No Project Alternative.
16
Public Review Locations
• Review Draft EIR online at:
http://eng.lacity.org/techdocs/emg/projects.htm
• Review Draft EIR at document repositories:
• San Pedro Regional Library, 931 South Gaffey Street,
San Pedro, CA 90731
• Miraleste Library, 29089 Palos Verdes Drive East,
Rancho Palos Verdes, CA 90275
• Council District 15, Harbor District Office, 638 South
Beacon Street, Room 552, San Pedro, CA 90731
• City of Los Angeles Department of Public Works,
Bureau of Engineering, EMG, 1149 S. Broadway, Suite
600, Los Angeles, CA 90015
17
Draft EIR Comments
• The following comments will be considered:
• Verbal comments at Draft EIR meeting
• Comment cards at Draft EIR meeting or mailed in
• Written responses to Draft EIR via mail or email
• Submit comments to:
William Jones and Billy Ho
City of Los Angeles Department of Public Works
Bureau of Engineering, EMG
1149 S. Broadway, Suite 600, Mail Stop 939
Los Angeles, CA 90015
Email: [email protected]
[email protected]
• Public comments must be submitted by June 5, 2017
18
Comments?
19