Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
European Journal of Public Health, Vol. 18, No. 1, 19–24 ß The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Public Health Association. All rights reserved. doi:10.1093/eurpub/ckm050 Advance Access published on June 14, 2007 ................................................................................................ Boys soccer league injuries: a community-based study of time-loss from sports participation and long-term sequelae Toomas Timpka1, Olof Risto2, Maria Björmsjö1 Background: Youth soccer is important for keeping European children physically active. The aim of this study is to examine injuries sustained in a community soccer league for boys with regard to age-related incidence, time lost from participation and long-term sequelae. Methods: Primary injury data was collected from a soccer league including 1800 players, comprising approximately 25% of all boys 13–16 years of age in three Swedish municipalities (population 150 000). Injuries were primarily identified based on a time loss definition of sports injury. At the end of the season, a physician interviewed every player who reported injured to determine whether there were any remaining sequelae. If a sequela was confirmed, the physician repeated the interview 6, 18 and 48 months after the end of the season. Results: Forty-four injuries were recorded during 18 720 player game hours (2.4 injuries per 1000 player game hours). The highest injury incidence (6.8 injuries per 1000 player game hours) was recorded in the first-year elite divisions. Thirty-two injuries (73%) were categorized as moderate-severe, and 21 injuries (48%) required medical attention. Eight injuries caused sequelae that remained 6 months after the end of the season, and 3 injuries caused sequelae that lasted 4 years after the injury event. Conclusion: An overall low injury rate makes soccer a suitable sport for inclusion in programmes that promote physical activity among children. When organizing soccer leagues for boys, injury prevention programmes should be provided to adolescent players when they begin playing in competitive divisions. Keywords: adolescents, cohort study design, football, sports injury epidemiology, sports safety promotion ................................................................................................ igorous play, such as participation in physically challenging V games and sports, is essential for physical, mental and social development during childhood.1 In recent decades, the prevalence of obesity and overweight among children and adolescents has been increasing in Europe.2 One reason for this development is a more sedentary lifestyle, where TVwatching and computer games have come to replace physical activity.3 Community-based initiatives to stimulate physical exercise and sports among the young are thus particularly important countermeasures to wide-spread obesity.4 Soccer is the sport with the largest number of participants worldwide. The international federation of soccer associations, FIFA, estimates the number of active players to more than 240 million, representing 300 000 clubs in 204 countries [www.fifa.com (accessed December 2006)]. Most of these players are adolescents and youths. In Europe, almost all children are exposed to soccer at school, and many children participate in organized soccer practice and games in their free time. However, young participants in sports are also known to be at an increased risk for specific types of injuries, e.g. growth plate and apophyseal injuries and heat illness.5 To avoid unnecessary harm, it is today acknowledged that sports participation by children should be guided by a gradual increase of skills performance assessed after a responsible preconditioning programme.6 In this context, it is unsatisfactory that the injury risk in youth soccer has seldom been investigated from a community perspective, in order to adapt physical exercise promotion programmes to reduce injury 1 Section of Social Medicine and Public Health, Department of Health and Society, Linköping University, Sweden 2 Section of Orthopaedics, Faculty of Health Sciences, Linköping University, Sweden Correspondence: Toomas Timpka, Section of Social Medicine and Public Health, Department of Health and Society, Linköping University, SE-581 83 Linköping, Sweden, tel: þ46 13 222383, fax: þ46 13 221865, e-mail: [email protected] risks. Most studies of youth soccer injuries have been based on small populations and short-term consequences.7 Nevertheless, a number of player-specific factors associated with injury risk have been identified, e.g. previous injury and an increasing injury risk with age from late adolescence.8,9 It is also worrying that a career as a soccer player into adulthood has been reported to increase the risk for early development of osteoarthritis caused by knee injuries, such as meniscus and anterior cruciate ligament injuries and by high loads on knee joints.10 A recent study indicates that the development of osteoarthritis among adult ex-soccer players is associated with poor health-related quality of life after retirement from the sport.11 Despite the importance of youth soccer in keeping European children physically active, the community-level significance of injury side effects and the extent to which these injuries can cause a player long-term sequelae have not been investigated. Since this knowledge is available, adequate safety measures can be implemented, thus improving the efficiency of physical exercise promotion programmes among children. Even though professional soccer academies for youth players have been in operation for several decades, youth soccer in Europe is mainly organized in amateur clubs. In these community settings, coaches have limited education in injury prevention12 and injury patterns are seldom recorded and analysed.13 The responsibility for coordinating safety measures for youth soccer competitions therefore lies on the community soccer associations that organize the leagues. The aim of this study is to examine the occurrence of injuries in a large community youth soccer league with regard to age-related incidence, time lost from participation and long-term sequelae. The study only includes boys’ teams. The girls’ soccer league was in the study community organized according to skill level and not age, which meant that many adolescent girls played on senior-level teams. Results are to be applied to planning community-level programmes that promote physical activity among children and youth sports. 20 European Journal of Public Health Methods A prospective cohort design was used for the study. The primary data collection was conducted during the 2001 season in the Swedish soccer association league for boys 13–16 years of age in the Eastern district of Östergötland county, Sweden. The injury definition included any injury occurring during soccer games that resulted in one or more of the following: medical attention, the inability to complete the game, or missing a subsequent soccer session. The injuries were divided into three severity categories based on a combination of time lost and tissue damage definitions of sports injuries: minor (1–7 days lost from soccer), moderate-severe (8 days or more lost from soccer), and disabling (restricted function 6, 18 and 48 months after the season). This definition is compatible with the time loss section in the international consensus definition of soccer injury.14 The league included 93 teams and about 1800 players representing soccer clubs in three municipalities (total population 150 000). The player population comprised 25% of all boys in the actual age intervals. During the study season, there was one league pool for each birth year from 1988 to 1985 (U14–U17). The birth-year league pools were divided into divisions of 8–12 teams each. According to league rules, a team was allowed to use any number of under-aged players and two over-aged players in each game. The maximum number of players to be used in a game was 16, i.e. 11 starting players and 5 substitutes. Free substitution was allowed during all games. The Eastern League district cooperated with the Western League district of the regional soccer association in forming an elite division for each group of boys aged 15 and 16 years (U16–U17). To qualify for these divisions, play-off divisions were arranged for U15 players. 694 games were played during the study season with a duration of either 2 35 min (U14) or 2 40 min (U15–U17). One U17 team was excluded from the study due to a coach change in the middle of the season. Before the start of the season, the regional soccer association office informed each club, the aims and procedures of the injury registration. The protocol for the primary injury identification prescribed that for each injury sustained during the season, a questionnaire was to be completed by the head team coach directly after the game. The data collected included the time of injury, the injured player’s team position, the coach’s judgement of the cause of injury, any rule-break associated with the injury event, and whether or not the injured player was wearing all prescribed and suggested protective equipment. The anatomic location of the injury, its type, and whether the player previously had sustained a similar injury were also recorded. All questionnaires were sent to the league office together with the official score sheets. The game reports contained data on the name and birth year of each participating player, penalties and scores. Two weeks after the injury event, the reporting coach was contacted to record the length of the player’s absence from soccer. At the end of the season, interviews were conducted with all head coaches to ensure that no injuries had been missed. Thereafter, a physician interviewed every player reported injured to investigate whether there were any remaining sequelae. If a sequela was confirmed, the physician repeated the interview 6, 18 and 48 months after the end of the season. The final set of interviews was conducted in September 2005. The Regional Ethical Review Board in Linköping approved the study protocol before data collection. Injury incidence (injuries per 1000 player game hours) was used to compare injury occurrence between the age-defined league divisions. It was assumed that 11 players on each team were at risk during the official game playing time for each match. No adjustments for non-effective game time or penalty time were made in the calculations. The study protocol did not include recording the actual game playing time for any individual player. Data on the identity of players and their age was collected from official match reports. Confidence intervals were calculated for estimates of injury incidence. To avoid intra-player dependence (multiple reinjuries in individual players) in the analyses, only one injury was accounted for each player. All analyses were performed using the SPSS software package (version 13.0). Results During the study season, 694 games were played with a duration of either 2 35 min (U14) or 2 40 min (U15–U17). Each team was exposed to injury risk during 14–22 games. The total exposure to soccer corresponded to 18 720 player game hours. In total, 44 injuries were recorded, corresponding to 2.4 injuries per 1000 player game hours (table 1). The highest injury incidence (6.8 injuries per 1000 player game hours) was recorded in the elite qualification divisions for U15 players. Thirty-two injuries (73%) were categorized as moderatesevere, and 21 injuries (48%) received medical attention. Injury causes and types Sixty-eight percent of the injuries were contact injuries. Collision was the most common cause of injury (29%), followed by being kicked (24%) (table 2). Ten injury events (23%) were reported to have been directly associated with intentional foul play. The team position of the injured players Table 1 Total and non-minor injury rates by age and skill level Level U14 community U15 community U15 elite qualification U16 community U16 elite U17 elite Total Injuries n Risk exposure (hours) Incidence/1000 h (95% CI) Total non-minor Total non-minor Total non-minor Total non-minor Total non-minor Total non-minor Total non-minor 9 5 0 0 16 14 4 4 9 5 6 4 44 32 5184 5184 2079 2079 2361 2361 2640 2640 3227 3227 3227 3227 18 718 18 718 1.7 1.0 0 0 6.8 6.0 1.5 1.5 2.8 1.6 1.9 1.2 2.4 1.7 0.8–3.3 0.3–2.3 0–1.8 0–1.8 3.9–11.0 3.2–9.9 0.4–3.9 0.4–3.9 1.3–5.3 0.5–3.6 0.7–4.0 0.3–3.2 1.7–3.2 1.2–2.4 Non-minor injuries (moderate-severe causing absence from practice or games longer than 1 week) are shown separately. Boys community soccer league injuries was not found to significantly influence the risk for sustaining an injury, but there was a tendency for an increase in relative injury risk among forwards. Playing in an attacking position was associated with a 1.45 times higher (95% CI 0.71–2.96) relative risk for injury than other playing positions. Eight injuries (18%) were classified as reinjuries, but only four of these primary injuries had been sustained during soccer play. The two most common injury types were contusion (29%) and ligament sprain (27%), followed by fracture (15%) (table 3). Two of the six lateral ankle sprains were classified as Table 2 Injury causes in numbers and percent (95% CI) Injury cause n Percent Collision Blow, player Strain Fall Blow, ball Foul tackle Turn Other NA Total 12 10 5 4 3 2 1 4 3 44 29 24 12 10 7 5 2 10 100 NA ¼ not applicable for analysis. Table 3 Injury types in numbers and percent Injury type n Contusion Sprain Fracture Rupture, tendon Strain, muscle Cut Dental injury Concussion Other NA Total 12 11 6 4 2 2 1 1 2 3 44 Percent n Percent 29 27 15 10 5 5 2 2 5 9 9 6 3 2 1 – – 2 28 28 19 9 6 3 – – 6 100 32 100 Non-minor injuries (moderate-severe causing absence from practice or games longer than 1 week) are shown separately. NA ¼ not applicable for analysis. 21 grade 2–3 (ligament partially or completely torn), while the remaining four sprains were classified as grade 1 (ligament stretched). The six fractures consisted of two clavicle fractures, two forearm fractures, one rib fracture and one fractured toe. The body region most susceptible to injury was lower extremities, accounting for 58% of all injuries, whereas the trunk and head accounted for 30%, and the upper extremities for 12% of all injuries (table 4). Injury severity and remaining disability The mean rehabilitation time off soccer practice or competition was 26.3 days (range 1–180 days). At the 48-month follow-up interview, all 32 players who qualified for the interview were physically active. For the injuries categorized as moderate-severe, the absence period was 35.3 days (range 10–180 days). Eight (25%) of these 32 injuries caused a restriction of physical performance (pain, decreased range of motion, instability) that remained 6 months after the end of the season (table 4), and the restriction remained 18 months after the season for five (16%) injuries. Three injuries (9% of all moderate-severe injuries) caused a reduction in function that lasted 4 years after the injury event, corresponding to 0.2 disabling injuries per 1000 player game hours. One boy sustained a reduction in the ability to rotate and flex his right arm following a forearm fracture as a U14 player. Another U14 player who had injured three teeth was still under dental care. This boy was still playing soccer. The third youth player who reported remaining restricted function had suffered a grade 2–3 sprain of his right ankle as a U15 player. He was able to return to his team following a 6-month rehabilitation period, but had thereafter suffered from several spells of reinjury. Even though at the time of the interview he was playing soccer with a semi-rigid orthosis, he had relative ankle weakness and reported occasional pain. Discussion Soccer is the most popular youth sport in Europe. The vision of the European Federation of Football Associations (UEFA) is that all children in Europe are offered the opportunity to play soccer [www.uefa.com (accessed August 2006)]. In this epidemiological study of a large community soccer league involving approximately 25% of the adolescent boys in a Swedish community, we found, similar to studies based on Table 4 Anatomic injury localization displayed in numbers (percent) Anatomic location Foot Ankle Hand/wrist/forearm Heada Knee Lower back Hip/groin Lower leg Thigh, front Groin Thigh, back Abdomen NA Total Total injuries n (%) 7 (17) 6 (15) 5 (12) 5 (12) 4 (10) 3 (7) 3 (7) 2 (5) 2 (5) 2 (5) 1 (2) 1 (2) 3 44 (100) Non-minor injuries n (%) 7 4 5 1 2 3 3 2 2 1 1 1 (22) (13) (16) (3) (6) (9) (9) (6) (6) (3) (3) (3) 32 (100) after 6 months n (%) Loss of function after 18 months n (%) after 48 months n (%) 3 1 1 1 2 (37) (12) (12) (12) (25) 2 (40) 1 (20) 1 (20) 1 (33) 1 (33) 1 (33) 8 (100) 5 (100) 1 (20) 3 (100) Non-minor injuries (moderate-severe causing absence from practice or games longer than 1 week), and injuries causing longterm loss of function due to tissue damage are shown separately. a: Including dental injuries. NA ¼ not applicable for analysis. 22 European Journal of Public Health smaller populations,15,16 that the overall injury incidence was relatively low. However, the majority of the recorded injuries caused long absence from the short soccer season, and every second injury required healthcare treatment. Three of the 1800 players participating in the league during the season sustained an injury that caused a lasting restriction of physical function. In a recent Canadian study involving a random sample of 21 adolescent soccer teams (aged 12–18), a certified athletic therapist conducted weekly assessments of injuries sustained during games and practice.17 The injury definition used was the same as in the present study, i.e. the record included any injury occurring in soccer that resulted in one or more of the following: medical attention, the inability to complete a session, or missing a subsequent session. The Canadian study reported findings similar to ours regarding the association between injury risk, age and level of competition. For instance, the risk of injury in the U14 age group was the greatest in the most elite division. An apparent difference is that a higher game injury incidence (7.6 injuries per 1000 player game hours) was reported in the Canadian setting. A closer analysis, however, shows that 52% of all reported injuries resulted in an absence of only 1 day. If these injuries are separated, the incidence rate is reduced to 2.7 injuries per 1000 player game hours. Moreover, the incidence of injuries causing seven or more days absence reported in the Canadian study (1.3 injuries per 1000 player hours) is lower than the corresponding number found in the present study (1.7 injuries per 1000 player game hours). The difference in minor injury reporting can be explained by the fact that a therapist examined all injuries in the Canadian setting, while in the present study, injuries were recorded by team coaches and players. In the latter situation, the free substitution rule made it possible to allow fatigued players with apparently self-limiting minor injuries (minor contusions, bruises and blisters) to rest for the remaining game without any further evaluation of the injury. Even though the results from Canada and Sweden are similar in many aspects, a remaining difference is that no fractures were reported in the Canadian data. A possible explanation for this can be that the Canadian study only covered slightly more than one-fifth of the game exposure time covered by the present study, thereby possibly missing rare injuries. However, despite these differences, both studies indicate that while the overall occurrence of non-minor injuries in boys youth soccer is low, the injury incidence increases rapidly with the introduction to an elite level of play. This implies that injury prevention measures should particularly target players making the transition to competitive league divisions. One possible intervention could be to raise the age for separation of the competitive divisions from the community league to the U17 level, when players are more mature. Such an intervention would require the involvement of the soccer federations that formulate policies and allocate resources in order to achieve a coordinated implementation of programme actions. Such a change in policy would have to take into account sport-specific factors, e.g. the skill development of players aiming for a professional career.18 Physical contact with opponent players through collisions, blows and foul tackles caused 63% of the injuries in the youth league. Consequently, moderation of aggressive and careless play has the potential to decrease injury rates. It has been pointed out that coaches play a central role for socialization in youth soccer.19 An obvious opportunity to moderate aggressive play is, therefore, to influence the behaviour of the coaches in the dressing room and during games. Fair play means accepting responsibility for the long-term internal and moral interests of a particular sport.20 In youth soccer, taking this responsibility would require a behaviour that promotes the sport as a diversion intended to be fun and pleasurable for all participants, and that a spirit of moderation and generosity should dominate it (www.fifa.com [accessed December 2006)]. If fair-play norms are to have any impact, the principles of sportsmanship have to be honoured by all participants and contributors to the youth soccer league, from the soccer federations and league organizers to the coaches, parents and players. It is possible that increasing competition and the pressure to win experienced by youth coaches may be an obstacle to teaching fairness, and the opposite may be conveyed to many young athletes. Commitment to the moral principles of sportsmanship among the young is an acknowledged goal for school physical education, and school programmes have also been reported successful with regard to changes in moral development in children between grades 4 and 6.21 Nevertheless, few studies have addressed the impact of fair-play interventions in the youth sports context. It has been shown that certified youth coaches, in general, rank having fun, learning life skills, being part of a team, developing confidence, and the excitement of competition as the most important outcomes for the youth they coach.22 However, the vast majority of youth soccer clubs in the study setting, as in most European countries, rely primarily on parent volunteers to serve as coaches. Most of these volunteer coaches have not received formal training to prepare them for all aspects of the role as a youth sports coach. The self-described needs and concerns of these volunteer coaches have recently been described.23 It should thus be possible to provide more training for volunteer coaches in accepting responsibility for the long-term internal and moral interests of the sport, e.g. in containing or preventing inappropriate parent behaviours. The training of volunteer coaches should also include information on injury risks and risk factors. Under-estimation of injury risk has been found to be associated with a increase in risk of injury in the youth soccer context.24 The mean period of absence from soccer recorded in the present study was 26.3 days. This number is close to the mean period of absence of 21.9 days recorded in a prospective study of 3805 injuries sustained in English youth academy football.25 Even though the rate of reinjury was only 3% in that study (as compared to 18% in the present one), the English youth academy study concluded that the links between tissue damage, rehabilitation, musculoskeletal development and the onset of youth-related conditions such as Sever’s disease and Osgood– Schlatter’s disease deserve further attention. This suggestion is also warranted in light of our findings. It is possible that the disability caused by the forearm fracture observed in this study could have been avoided if the fusion of the ossified epiphyses to the shaft of the bone had been staged,26 and closely followed in parallel to the healing of the fracture. Similarly, even though ankle sprains are generally believed to be benign and selflimiting, several studies report a significant proportion of athletes with ankle sprains that have persistent symptoms for years.27 Closer examination of ankle sprains is also recommended, in accordance with our data, where two players reported repeated reinjuries and one player a lasting disability. Such surveillance would involve immediate examination, a diagnosis including grading of the sprain, early introduction of treatment and regular follow-ups. As regards treatment of inversion ankle sprains, controlled studies28,29 report positive effects both from the use of semi-rigid orthosis, and coordination training using ankle discs. The injury rates and types recorded in this study suggest that regular medical surveillance is not required during boys’ soccer league games, while coaches and officials should have basic training in the management of sports injuries. In contrast, clubs with teams in competitive league divisions should be able to consult a physiotherapist or physician specialist in sports medicine in order to customise individual rehabilitation programmes for players with longterm injuries. Boys community soccer league injuries This study has several limitations that must be taken into consideration when interpreting results. Since it was found impractical to record exposure data from soccer practice in the community setting, injuries sustained during practice sessions were not included in the data collection. The incidence of practice injuries in youth soccer has been reported to be considerably lower than during games.8,17 However, the exclusion of data from practice settings may lead to overuse injuries being under-reported, since children found to be suffering from progressively developing overuse symptoms are probably advised to rest from games and practice. Also, only two concussions were reported in the present study, one of these as a secondary finding to a cut on the forehead. Both of these injured players were allowed by their coaches and parents to return to play within 2 weeks. An additional limitation of the present study is that the coaches had not received training in evaluating any possible concussions. Recent studies have pointed out that when evaluating the effects of blows to the head, symptoms of headache > 3 h, difficulty concentrating > 3 h, retrograde amnesia, or loss of consciousness indicate a more severe injury.30 The report card used in this study did not include this level of specificity. Future studies of community youth soccer injuries, however, must be extended with these variables for the assessment of concussion signs and symptoms based on return-to-play timelines. Soccer provides an important opportunity for physical exercise and leisure for large groups of European children and adolescents. We found that the occurrence of non-minor injuries in a large community youth soccer league was low, but also that the incidence increased with age and level of competition. By focussing the study design on a large population and a long-term follow-up, we were able to record sequelae of rare but important non-self limiting injuries, e.g. fractures and dental injuries. Findings suggest that soccer is a suitable sport for inclusion in programmes that promote physical activity among children. However, when organizing soccer leagues for boys, injury prevention programmes should be provided to adolescent players when they begin playing in competitive divisions. Such programmes should be evidence-based,31 and be planned in cooperation with the relevant soccer federations responsible for league administration. Acknowledgements The study was supported by a grant from The Swedish Centre for Sports Research (CIF). Conflict of interest: None declared. Key points Youth soccer injuries have seldom been investigated from a community perspective with the purpose of adapting physical exercise promotion programmes to reduce hazards. In a large community youth soccer league, we found a low occurrence of non-minor injuries, but the incidence increased with the level of competition and injuries causing long-term sequelae were rare but consequential. The overall low injury rate makes soccer a suitable sport for inclusion in programmes that promote physical activity among children. Injury prevention programmes should be provided to adolescent soccer players when they begin playing in competitive league divisions. 23 References 1 Pellegrini AD, Smith PK. Physical activity play: the nature and function of a neglected aspect of play. Child Dev 1998;69:577–98. 2 Janssen I, Katzmarzyk PT, Boyce WF, et al. Health behaviour in school-aged children obesity working group. Comparison of overweight and obesity prevalence in school-aged youth from 34 countries and their relationships with physical activity and dietary patterns. Obes Rev 2005;6:123–32. 3 Fox KR. Childhood obesity and the role of physical activity. J Roy Soc Health 2004;124:34–9. 4 Flynn MAT, McNeill DA, Maloff B, et al. Reducing obesity and related chronic disease risk in children and youth: a synthesis of evidence with ‘best practice’ recommendations. Obes Rev 2006;7(suppl 1): 7–66. 5 Demorest RA, Landry GL. Prevention of pediatric sports injuries. Curr Sports Med Rep 2003;2:337–43. 6 Dollard MD, Pontell D, Hallivis R. Preconditioning principles for preventing sports injuries in adolescents and children. Clin Pediatr Med Surg 2006;23:191–207. 7 Giza E, Micheli LJ. Soccer injuries. Med Sport Sci 2005;49:140–69. 8 Dvorak J, Junge A. Football injuries and physical symptoms. A review of the literature. Am J Sports Med 2000;28:S3–9. 9 Kucera KL, Marshall SW, Kirkendall DT, et al. Injury history as a risk factor for incident injury in youth soccer. Br J Sports Med 2005;39:462. 10 Roos H. Are there long-term sequelae from soccer?. Clin Sports Med 1998;17:819–31. 11 Turner AP, Barlow JH, Heathcote-Elliott C. Long term health impact of playing professional football in the United Kingdom. Br J Sports Med 2000;34:332–6. 12 Cunningham A. An audit of first aid qualifications and knowledge among team officials in two English youth football leagues: a preliminary study. Br J Sports Med 2002;36:295–300. 13 Finch CF, Hennessy M. The safety practices of sporting clubs/centres in the city of Hume. J Sci Med Sport 2000;3:9–16. 14 Fuller CW, Ekstrand J, Junge A, et al. Consensus statement on injury definitions and data collection procedures in studies of football (soccer) injuries. Br J Sports Med 2006;40:193–201. 15 Peterson L, Junge A, Chomiak J, et al. Incidence of football injuries and complaints in different age and skill-level groups. An J Sports Med 2000;28:S51–7. 16 Kibler WB. Injuries in adolescent and preadolescent soccer players. Med Sci Sport Exer 1993;25:1330–2. 17 Emery CA, Meeuwisse WH, Hartmann SE. Evaluation of risk factors for injury in adolescent soccer: implementation and validation of an injury surveillance system. Am J Sports Med 2005;33:1–10. 18 Timpka T, Ekstrand J, Svanstrom L. From sports injury prevention to safety promotion in sports. Sports Med 2006;36:733–45. 19 Pilz GA. Nurturing fair play in competitive sports. Results from a study on competitively oriented youth soccer [article in German]. Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz 2005;48:881–90. 20 Keating JW. Sportsmanship as a moral category. In: Morgan WJ, Meier KV, editors. Philosophic inquiry in sports. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics Press, 1995: 144–51. 21 Gibbons SL, Ebbeck V, Weiss MR. Fair play for kids: effects on the moral development of children in physical education. Res Q Exerc Sport 1995;66:247–55. 22 Lesyk JJ, Kornspan AS. Coaches’ expectations and beliefs regarding benefits of youth sport participation. Percept Mot Skill 2000;90:399–402. 23 Wiersma LD, Sherman CP. Volunteer youth sport coaches’ perspectives of coaching education/certification and parental codes of conduct. Res Q Exer Sport 2005;76:324–38. 24 Kontos AP. Perceived risk, risk taking, estimation of ability and injury among adolescent sport participants. J Pediatr Psychol 2004;29:447–55. 24 European Journal of Public Health 25 Price RJ, Hawkins RD, Hulse MA, et al. The Football Association medical research programme: an audit of injuries in academy youth football. Br J Sports Med 2004;38:466–71. 29 Handoll HH, Rowe BH, Quinn KM, et al. Interventions to prevent ankle sprains. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2001;3:CD000018. 26 Pappas AM. Elbow problems associated with baseball during childhood and adolescence. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1982;164:30–41. 30 Asplund CA, McKeag DB, Olsen CH. Sport-related concussion: factors associated with prolonged return to play. Clin J Sport Med 2004;14:339–43. 27 Anandacoomarasamy A, Barnsley L. Long term outcomes of inversion ankle injuries. Br J Sports Med 2005;39:e14. 31 Finch C. A new framework for research leading to sports injury prevention. J Sci Med Sport 2006;9:3–9. 28 Tropp H, Askling C, Gillquist J. Prevention of ankle sprains. Am J Sports Med 1985;13:259–62. Received 1 September 2006, accepted 30 April 2007