Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
MY EXPERIENCE WITH PROSTATE CANCER PATIENTS WHO PRESENTED WITH SIDE EFFECTS OF ANDROGEN DEPRIVATION THEREPY (ADT) SINCE 2007 AND REVIEW OF LITERATURE: ABSTRACT: The major male androgen called Testosterone is required for the determination of male phenotype. It is also necessary for the growth, homeostasis and function of the prostate gland; hence the prostate gland is an androgen – dependent organ. Prostrate cancer is also androgen dependent and androgen suppression is the mainstay of treatment for locally advanced and metastatic disease. Historically, bilateral orchidectomy was the only effective androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). Later on, luteinizing hormone – releasing hormone (LHRH) agonists were introduced to reduce testosterone to castrate levels. These treatment modalities are however palliative leading to a median progression– free survival of 18-20 months and an overall survival of 24-36 months. ADT may be associated with significant and sometimes durable responses, but its potential efficacy is further limited by an array of significant and bothersome side effects that ultimately affect patients quality of life (Qol). The aim of this article is to put together my experiences with patients who presented with side effects of ADT, review of relevant literature and to comment that all intended patients should be properly counselled to avoid regrets and abandonment of care due to troublesome side effects. Key words: Experience, androgen deprivation therapy, side effects. INTRODUCTION: The testes are the major sources of testosterone in men. It is secreted by the Leidig cells of the testes under the influence of luteinizing hormone secreted by the cells of the anterior pituitary gland. The pituitary gland secretion is further controlled by the luteinizing hormone–releasing hormone (LHRH) produced in the hypothalamus. The remaining androgens originate from the supra-renal gland hormones that are enzymatically converted to testosterone and dihydrotestosterone in prostate and peripheral tissues. The growth of normal cells of the prostate gland and also prostate cancer cells are dependent on these hormones. Thus androgen deprivation is one of the main treatment modalities in the management of prostate cancer. Historically, bilateral orchidectomy, which achieves 95% reduction in testosterone levels within 3hours, was the only effective ADT1. Estrogens have also been used for treating metastatic prostate cancer, however, it use has been associated with significant cardiovascular morbidity and even mortality. In the 1980’s, LHRH agonists were introduced to reduce testosterone to castrate levels. After the 1980’s, non-steroidal anti-androgen were developed in addition to steroidal anti-androgen2. Another modality such as maximum androgen blockade, which is a combination of surgical or medical castration and an oral anti androgen, has also been in use. More recently, intermittent androgen suppression has been developed and used. ADT mainly addresses treatment by bilateral orchidectomy or with LHRH agonists plus an anti-androgen. Monotherapy with an anti-androgen is an alternative form of hormone therapy that is associated with fewer side effects and they do not represent a form of medical castration since they elevate rather than lower serum testosterone levels3 . ADT whether medical or surgical provides important quality of life benefits in patients with locally advanced and metastatic prostate cancer. The benefits include but not limited to decreased rates of spinal cord compression, ureteric obstruction, extra-skeletal metastasis and pathological fractures4. On the other hand, it is not clear whether there is an improvement in overall survival in patients with metastatic disease5. However, ADT use is associated with multiple and significant side effects related to decrease of testosterone. Given this, it is considerate to assign patients to ADT only when necessary since not every prostate cancer patient will die due to the disease. The side effects of ADT, from decreased serum testosterone level which may be short term and long term include hot flashes, loss of libido, loss of muscle mass, fatigue, gynaecomastia, cognitive dysfunction, depression, increased risk of fracture, increased incidence of osteoporosis, diabetes and cardiovascular morbidity and mortality-6. A syndrome called andropause has been well studied and documented. It is defined as an age-related decline in serum testosterone levels in older men to below normal range in young men which is associated with a clinical syndrome consistent with androgen deficiency. The syndrome may include decreased pubic and auxiliary hair, reduced physical function, diminished libido, fatigue, depressed mood, decreased generalized well being, hot flashes, osteopenia/osteoporosis and anaemia6. Thus, the side effects of ADT superimposed in aged men with underlying symptoms and signs of andropause can be deleterious. Hence the importance of understanding and recognizing these side effects as well as a thorough discussion about the pros and cons of treatment with the patient are needed. METHOLOGY: This paper is born out of my numerous experiences with patients who presented with side effects of ADT over the years ( since 2007 ). Information were collected from personal interview with them during their routine clinic visits, in accident and emergency room as a result of complications and in male surgical wards when admitted on account of serious side-effects. Patients in this study were on ADT for at least 3 months. ADT used included LHRH (e.g Goserelin and Leuprolide) and bilateral orchidectomy and Bicalutamide or Flutamide) an antiandrogen (e.g. added to each of these treatment modalities . It was a conscious effort to sit with them and document their clinical symptoms, signs on physical examination and necessary imaging techniques to come out with this paper. I will present my experience and review relevant literature on this subject. RESULTS: Patients were seen with numerous side effects ranging from mild to severe disabilities. The side effects included sexual dysfunction (including loss of libido and erectal dysfunction), changes in body composition (e.g gynaecomastia and reduced muscle mass and tone) cognitive defect, sleep disturbance, hot flashes, anaemia with fatigue that required frequent blood transfusions. The less common ones were relationship changes, fracture, diabetes, osteoporosis. Flare phenomenon was not encountered because of concomittant use of antiandrogen with LHRH agonist. DISCUSSION: The principle of ADT is to achieve serum testosterone concentration as low as possible to minimize stimulation of prostate cancer cells. Serum testosterone concentrations that correspond to castrate levels have generally been set at less than 50ng/dl (<1.7nmol/l)7. However, most men achieve levels below 20ng/dl (0.7nmol/l) after orchidectomy and it has been suggested that castration levels should be redefined to reflect this threshold8. Unfortunately, decreased testosterone levels are well known with their short-term and long-term adverse effects. The frequently encountered side effects in this study included: SEXUAL DYSFUNCTION: Sexual dysfunction prominently noticed are erectal dysfunction and loss of libido. Normal testosterone level is necessary for these processes to remain normal. Erectal dysfunction (ED) is a complex neurovascular phenomenon modulated by several biochemical and physiological factors 9. The biochemical marker identified here is testosterone which is the target in ADT. Low testosterone levels have a direct effect on penile function by causing venous leak in prostate cancer patients and phosphodiesterase -5 inhibitor works poorly in low testosterone environment10. However, it has been of note that a significant decrease in testosterone level is observed in the aging process11. Also among aging males, there is a high prevalence of diabetes mellitus and hypertension which can also contribute to ED in their different ways. Gurbuz et al11 also found out that many older men have sexual dysfunction at baseline prior to ADT initiation and this should be identified before treatment is commenced. ED can be quite devastating to both patients and partners. Casey et al12 noted that ED can significantly affect the self-esteem, self perception and quality of life of younger, sexually active men especially when coupled with the side effects of ADT on muscle and fat distribution. Loss of libido was also encountered top on the list in this study. It had been quite distressing to these patients exacerbated by ADT use. Not all men on ADT have loss of libido, suggesting that other factors may impact severity such as testosterone level and or age. Ideally, the potential impact on all aspects of sexual function needs to be assessed through forth-right discussion between patients, their partners and their health care provider before starting ADT. The ADT survivor group has recognized that patient’s lack of preparation for such sexual changes results in regrets, anger or depression13. ANAEMIA: Anaemia was another common or frequent side effect noticed in these patient’s population who received repeated blood transfusions and frequent hospital admissions. Association between androgen and erythropoiesis had been known for several decades. Androgens stimulate haemopoietic system via mechanisms that include stimulation of erythropoietin release, increasing bone marrow activity and iron incorporation into red cells14. Men with advanced or metastatic prostate cancer are prone to developing anaemia due to several causes. It could be due to blood loss as the cancer cells infiltrate the prostatic urethra and bladder mucosa with subsequent sloughing or replacement of the bone marrow with metastatic cells and thereby halting erythropoiesis. Moreover, testosterone increases the production of erythrogenesis–stimulating proteins, so that ADT may cause or exacerbate anaemia by indirectly inhibiting erythropoiesis 12. Anaemia can also result from anorexia common in these patients. HOT FLASHES (FLUSHES): This was one of the most common and early side-effects. Patients described a perception of intense heat in the head, neck region and abdomen lasting briefly with subsequent cooling and sweating. They were usually anxious. Some reported multiple episodes in a day while others perceived it occasionally. It is actually a vasomotor phenomenon caused by inappropriate stimulation of thermoregulatory centres in the hypothalamus resulting in peripheral vasodilatation15. Aetiologically, hot flashes in men under ADT develop due to acute withdrawal of sex hormone similar to what happens in women at the onset of menopause. ADT disrupts the equilibrium of the neurotransmitters (NT) increasing the levels of NT, norepinephrine and Serotonin and hormones including testosterone. This effect in turn is postulated to deregulate the haemostatic mechanism of the thermoregulatory centres in the preoptic zone of the hypothalamus16. However, hot flashes may also be experienced on aging males who are not on ADT, relating well known decrease in testosterone level with aging. Results of a survey by Spetz A. et al17 showed that a third of uncastrated men aged 55-75 years experienced hot flashes of whom 15% had bothersome hot flashes. GYNAECOMASTIA: This was reported by many patiets and very embarrassing. Usually very painful. Some patients actually requested for surgery or out right change of medications. This actually led to poor drugs compliance by these patients. It is caused by an increase in the ratio of estrogen to androgen when on ADT. Gynaecomastia usually starts within the first year of hormonal treatment and is initially reversible. After it is present for about a year, however, hyalinization and fibrosis occur, which are irreversible18. MOOD AND COGNITIVE CHANGES: This was also frequently reported by these patients on ADT. The mere diagnosis of cancer in a patient is enough to demoralize and also blunt his mood. Depression is a normal aspect of adjustment to a diagnosis of cancer. Hormonal therapy has also been shown to cause neurologic impairment, manifested by decreased cognitive function, mood and self esteem while also negatively affecting memory and attention19. Low levels of testosterone are significantly associated with depression in elderly men and testosterone replacement appears to reduce depressive symptoms in such patients20. Cognitive side-effects are apparent almost immediately as shown in a recent 3month neoadjuvant trial and appear to be reversible after completing treatment; however, sometimes the effects are only partially reversible at one year21. The linkage between depression and low levels of serum testosterone remain unclear and indeed may be related to patient’s age and co-morbidities as it is more common in men over age 65 years22. Only one report by Rosenblatt and Mellow addressed the issue between depression and ADT in prostate cancer patients. They reported 3 patients who developed severe depression after starting either a Gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist or a GnRH agonist and an anti-androgen. In this report, depression was refractory to medical treatment and improved only after discontinuation of the androgen blockade. Nevertheless, those patients had multiple other possible aetiologies of depression, including new cancer diagnosis, histories of alcohol abuse and many other comorbidities23. Although, there appear to be specific mechanisms for testosterone to directly impact cognition, it is possible that the side effects of androgen ablation therapy (e.g. hot flashes, fatigue and anaemia) may contribute indirectly to impaired cognition24. FATIGUE AND SLEEP DISTURBANCES: Fatigue as a feeling of extreme physical and mental tiredness was one of the frequently reported side effect of ADT use. This can be caused by anaemia which is common in prostate cancer patients. ADT also contribute to anaemia by promoting testosterone deficiency. Comorbidities e.g. diabetes mellitus and hypertension can also contribute to fatigue. Hot flashes have been specifically linked to insomnia and disrupted sleep patterns and have been shown to contribute to depression in elderly patients on ADT25. RELATIONSHIP CHANGES: In a few of the patients their relationships were strained due in most cases to sexual dysfunction. Few of the men interviewed were widowers and aged and so their relationship issues were not bothersome as against the relatively younger ones who expressed great concern about their marriage. Reduced libido can result in withdrawal of emotional and physical intimacy26 and can also lead to significant partner distress27. In general, partners of prostate cancer sufferers describe even more distress than their partners28. MUSCULOSKELETAL MORBIDITY: This was marked by bone pain which was frequently seen in those with metastatic disease with or without treatment. Bone fractures were few because of incorporation of Bisphosphonate in the treatment regimen. Skeletal X-Rays obviously showed evidence of osteoporosis (reduced bone density). It is known that bone turn-over and development are androgen dependent. Androgen deprivation causes 3-5% annual bone decrease in bone mineral density (BMD) and prostate cancer patients on ADT have a 6-17% lower BMD than eugonodal men with prostate cancer29. Mittan et al in their work demonstrated a significant loss of bone in men with prostate cancer receiving GnRH30. Androgen ablation is a cause of skeletalrelated events associated with significant morbidity and mortality even for patients with non-metastatic prostate cancer. Risk factors for osteoporotic fractures include the duration of ADT (>3years), age (mainly through decreased testosterone level) ethnicity (Caucasians patients are at greater risk) smoking, lower body mass index (BMI) and medications (e.g Glucocorticoids)31. METABOLIC SYNDROME: Most of the patients seen with diabetes were diagnosed before ADT was commenced and all patients were screened with a fasting blood sugar (FBS) estimation on presentation bearing in mind that urinary frequency is common in both conditions. Another study is ongoing to unravel the relationship between ADT use and development of diabetes. However, Gustavo FC32 in his review noted that ADT is associated with several metabolic disorders such as increased incidence of hyperglycaemia, insulin resistance, metabolic syndrome and dyslipidaemia. According to the Adult treatment panel III criteria, metabolic syndrome is present if three of the following five criteria are met: fasting plasma glucose level more than 110mg/dl, serum triglyceride level > 150mg/dl, serum high density lipoprotein (HDL) level less than 40mg/dl, waist circumference more than 102cm and blood pressure of > 130/85mmHg33. COST OF ANDROGEN DEPRIVATION DRUGS: Although this is not directly a side effect of these medications, poor compliance also stemed from financial constraints. Having in mind the population of men in focus; most of them are retirees whose pensions may not be forth coming and meager. They got financially distressed on commencement and could not continue with this treatment which was the best option for them in tandem with their disease state. CONCLUSION: ADT has come to stay as the treatment of choice for locally advanced and metastatic prostate cancer. Aside from the benefits derived from ADT use with associated significant and sometimes durable responses, it is not considered a curative measure. Most importantly, numerous bothersome side effects have been known that may adversely affect the quality of life of both the patient and his partner. Therefore, before starting ADT, the patient and his partner should be properly counselled. Other co-morbidities should be sort for and addressed in the course of evaluation, knowing that these diseases can be more fatal that prostate cancer let alone the morbid side effects of ADT.