Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
European Journal of Forensic Sciences Case Report www.ejfs.co.uk DOI: 10.5455/ejfs.205492 Dental human identification using bitewing radiographs: A case report Rhonan Ferreira Silva1,2, Ademir Franco3, Fernando Fortes Picoli1,2, Livia Graziele Rodrigues4, Roberta Gomes Resende5 Department of Forensic Odontology, Federal University of Goias, Brazil, 2Department of Legal Odontology and Forensic Anthropology, Scientific Police of Goias, Brazil, 3Department of Forensic Odontology, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Belgium, 4 Department of Forensic Odontology, Federal University of Goias, Brazil, 5Department of Oral Radiology, Brazilian Association of Dentistry, State of Goias, Brazil 1 ABSTRACT The present study aims to illustrate the usefulness of bitewing radiographs in Forensic Odontology reporting a case of positive human identification achieved through the comparison between ante-mortem and postmortem dental data. In 2014, a charred human body was referred for identification at the local medicolegal institute. Maxilla and mandible were dissected, enucleated and cleaned for a proper exam. The ante-mortem data consisted of 4 bitewing radiographs and a clinical dental file. The bitewing angulation was reproduced post-mortem manipulating both dental arches, enabling a radiographic comparison of dental evidence. Positive identification was obtained comparing specific morphological and treatment identifiers. The present study highlights the importance of adequate management and storage of dental radiographs, which are potentially useful for legal purposes. Address for correspondence: Rhonan Ferreira Silva, Av. Universitaria, Esquina com 1ª Avenida, Setor Universitario, Goiania, Goias, Brazil, postal code: 74605-220. E-mail:rhonanfs@terra. com.br Received: October 18, 2015 Accepted: November 18, 2015 Published: December 20, 2015 KEY WORDS: Forensic sciences, forensic odontology, bitewing radiology, human identification INTRODUCTION Dentists play an essential part in complex forensic scenarios, such as the identification of putrefied and charred bodies as well as skeletal remains, in which fingerprint analysis becomes unfeasible [1]. Specifically in charred bodies, the anterior teeth are often found fragile or destroyed after exposed to a high temperature. However, the posterior teeth are mostly preserved by the adjacent soft tissue, such as facial muscles, buccal mucosa, and tongue [2,3]. Once the human teeth are preserved, they allow for the registration of post-mortem (PM) data, which will be further compared with ante-mortem (AM) data collected from dental Eur J Forensic Sci ● Jul-Sep 2016 ● Vol 3 ● Issue 3 records of potential victims. Positive human identifications are achieved when the dental identifiers registered PM match the identifiers registered AM [4,5]. Considering that radiographic exams are constantly performed for dental treatment purposes, forensics finds within dentistry a large database for AM information [6-8]. Bitewing radiograph arises as a technique used for detailed investigation of dental crowns and alveolar bone of the posterior teeth. Consequently, bitewings represent great AM/PM materials for dental human identifications in the forensic casework. Based on that the present study aims to report a case of positive human identification achieved after the comparison of AM and PM bitewing radiographs of an unknown charred victim. 31 Silva, et al.: Bitewings in forensic odontology CASE REPORT In 2014, a charred body found inside a burned-out car was referred for cadaveric examination in the local medicolegal institute. The preliminary medical exam revealed that the victim was an adult male deceased due to thermal carbonization. The victim presented charred hands hampering fingerprint analysis, making a necessary dental identification. The dental autopsy was performed with resection of maxilla and mandible through the incision proposed by Luntz and Luntz [9], 1973. The orofacial soft tissue was removed, and bones were cleaned enabling to observe third molars; anterior teeth with charred and fractured crowns; posterior teeth with non-metallic restorations; and rotation of the mandibular right canine [Figure 1]. In parallel, police investigations were conducted to retrieve any AM data from potential relatives of the victim. The investigations resulted in a clinical dental file and 4 bitewing radiographs dated from 2011 [Figure 2]. PM bitewing radiographs were performed reproducing the AM data, enabling a comparative approach [Figure 3]. Outcomes of the AM/PM comparison consisted of morphological and therapeutic similarities in 19 teeth. Five explainable differences in 5 teeth were also detected [Table 1]. From a qualitative scope, the comparison between radiographs highlighted the anatomic pattern of non-metallic restorations in the lower left first molar and in the lower right third molar. Positive identification was achieved linking the deceased body with the missing persons by dental evidence found in bitewing radiographs. DISCUSSION The application and effectiveness of forensic odontology for the identification of charred bodies are consolidated and well supported in the scientific literature and forensic practice [2-8,10,11], becoming considered by Interpol as a primary method for human identification in mass disaster environments [12]. a Considering that the local medico-legal institute follows the parameters of Interpol, dental identification was attempted before DNA analysis, which was further considered not necessary. Specifically, dental identification consists of a comparative procedure, making necessary AM dental records containing unique dental identifiers [2,3,5,8,10,11]. Currently, panoramic and periapical radiographs figure as the most common AM radiographic records due to their constant use for treatment interventions in the dental routine [2,3,5,8,10,11]. Yet bitewings have more specific clinical importance [13] such as: The exam of interproximal surfaces of the posterior teeth, in operative dentistry; the exam of calculus deposits and alveolar bone height, in periodontology; the exam of pulp nodules, in endodontics; the exam of cervical adaptation of prosthetic Table 1: Comparison between ante-mortem and post-mortem identifiers and respective outcomes Tooth* AM (2011) PM (2014) Outcomes 13 # 14 # 15 # 16 # 17 # 18 # 23 # 24 # 25 # 26 # 27 # 28 # 33 # 34 # 35 # 36 # 37 # 38 # 43 # 44 # 45 # 46 # 47 # 48 Sound** Caries (D) Caries (M) NM Class I NM Class I NM Class I Sound** Sound** Sound** NM Class I NM Class I NM Class I Sound** Sound** Sound** NM Class I NM Class I NM Class I Sound** Sound** Sound** NM Class I NM Class I NM Class I Sound NM (DO) NM (MO) NM Class I NM Class I NM Class I Fractured crown Sound NM Class II NM Class I NM Class I NM Class I Fractured crown Sound Sound NM Class I NM Class I NM Class I Sound Sound Sound NM Class I NM Class I NM Class I SI ED ED SI SI SI ED SI ED SI SI SI ED SI SI SI SI SI SI SI SI SI SI SI # AM: Ante-mortem, PM: Post-mortem, NM: Non-metallic restoration, O: Occlusal surface, DO: Distal-occlusal surfaces, MO: Mesial-occlusal surfaces, M: Mesial surface, D: Distal surface; SI: Similarities, ED: Explainable differences, *FDI’s dental notation, **Considering radiographically visible dental parts, #tooth number b Figure 1: Occlusal view of maxilla (a) and mandible (b) after resection 32 Eur J Forensic Sci ● Jul-Sep 2016 ● Vol 3 ● Issue 3 Silva, et al.: Bitewings in forensic odontology From a legal scope, this information highlights the need for major clinical attention with the technical process for radiographic image acquisition, as well as the need for proper storing and updating dental data. Similarly to the other modalities of dentomaxillofacial radiographs, bitewings have essential value as a source of AM information for human identifications. However, this technique seems to have major importance for the comparative identification of charred bodies, once it registers the forensic evidence found in dental crowns of the posterior teeth, which are often found preserved in charred victims. REFERENCES 1. Figure 2: Ante-mortem bitewing radiographs dating from 2011 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. Figure 3: Post-mortem bitewing radiographs dating from 2014 crowns, in prosthodontics; and the exam of anatomic relation between deciduous and permanent teeth, in pediatric dentistry. The usefulness of bitewing radiographs for the identification of charred bodies remains on the fact that bitewings allow for the optimal visualization of the dental crowns of posterior teeth. It directly converges with the fact that in charred bodies the anterior dentition is commonly destroyed by thermal reaction, and the posterior dentition is protected by the adjacent soft tissue [11]. Eur J Forensic Sci ● Jul-Sep 2016 ● Vol 3 ● Issue 3 10. 11. 12. 13. Senn DR, Weems RA. Manual of Forensic Odontology. 5th ed. Boca Raton, USA: CRC Press; 2013. Silva RF, Daruge E Jr, Pereira SD, Almeida SM, Oliveira RN. Identification of charred corpse using dental records. Rev Odontol Cienc 2008;23:90-3. Silva RF, Chaves P, Paranhos LR, Lenza MA, Daruge E Jr. Use of orthodontic records in human identification. Dent Press J Orthod 2011;16:52-7. Silva RF, Ramos DI, Pereira SD, Daruge E, Daruge E Jr. Model cast: Expertise relevance and forensic orientation for filling away. Rev Assoc Paul Cir Dent 2007;61:381-4. Silva RF, Nunes FG, Faria Neto JC, Rege IC, Daruge E Jr. Forensic importance of panoramic radiographs for human identification. RGO 2012;60:527-31. Gonçalves AS, Marcelino JC, Prado MM, Silva RF. Human identification using PA radiographs of the maxillary sinus: Case report. RBOL 2014;1:30-9. Silva RF, Franco A, Saboia LR, Rodrigues LG, Gomes RR, Heit OJ. Identification of a charred body through the radiographic morphology of the frontal sinuses. Ann Forensic Res Anal 2015;2:1014. Silva RF, Franco A, Picoli FF, Nunes FG, Estrela C. Dental identification through endodontic radiographic records: A case report. Acta Stomatol Croat 2014;48:147-50. Luntz LL, Luntz P. Handbook for Dental Identification: Techniques in Forensic Dentistry. 1st ed. Philadelphia, USA: Lippincott and Co.; 1973. Silva RF, Prado MM, Oliveira HC, Daruge E Jr. How many point of concordance are necessary to obtain a positive forensic dental identification. Rev Odontol Univ Cid São Paulo 2009;21:63-8. Silva RF, Prado FB, Agostini R, Kawagushi JT, Silva RF, Daruge E Jr. Human identification based in dental radiographs. Rev Odontol Uniev 2008;10:97-100. Interpol. Disaster Victim Identification Guide. Dundee: Dundee University Press; 2014. White SC, Pharoah MJ. Oral Radiology: Principles and Interpretation. 6th ed. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier; 2009. Source of Support: Nil, Conflict of Interest: None declared. 33