Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Supplementary Materials and Methods Small RNA isolation and library generation Total RNA (5-50 μg/sample) was size-fractionated by denaturing PAGE and adapter oligonucleotides were ligated at both ends of the small RNA molecules. After reverse transcription (Invitrogen), cDNA was PCR-amplified twice. A PmeI digestion (New England Biolabs) was performed in between the two rounds of PCR to degrade the 19- and 24-mer used during the size fractionation procedure. Finally, the purified PCR products were quality controlled by Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer (Agilent Technologies) to assess acceptable and comparable features and then sequenced using 454 technology (454 Life Science) at the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, thanks to Agnes Viale’s help. To minimize batch-dependent effects, all primary samples (both muscle and tumors) were processed in parallel from RNA extraction throughout the whole library preparation procedure. Primer sequences are listed below. Lentiviral vectors and siRNAs Conditional NpBI-22 and NpBI-378 lentiviral vectors were generated by PCR amplification, respectively, of the pre–miR-22 and pre-miR-378 loci from human genomic DNA. The PCR products were cloned into the SacII and KpnI sites of pCCL.sin.PPT.hPGK.GFPWpre vector provided by Luigi Naldini (San Raffaele-Telethon Institute for Gene Therapy, Milano, Italy), previously described (1). Conditional NpBI lentiviral vectors were generated by subcloning the bidirectional tetracycline-responsive element–GFP cassette from pBI vector (Clontech) into pCCL.sin.PPT.hPGK.GFPWpre-miR-22 . Concentrated lentiviral vector stocks were produced as previously described (2). To obtain regulatable expression of miRNAs, cells were transduced first with a lentiviral vector expressing the reverse tetracycline transactivator (rtTA) (Tet-on system) and subsequently with the responder vector. To promote inducible vector expression, cells were treated 1 with 1 µg/ml of doxycycline for the indicated times. NpBI-22 Delta_miR vector was generated from NpBI-22 vector according to Agilent Technologies Mutagenesis kit protocol. Human TACC1 CDS was purchased from Open Biosystems/Dharmacon, sequence validated and subcloned into the BamHI/SalI restriction sites of the pCCL.sin.PPT.hPGK.GFPWpre vector. Human RAB5B CDS was PCR amplified from genomic DNA, sequence validated and sub-cloned into the BamHI/SalI restriction sites of the pCCL.sin.PPT.hPGK.GFPWpre vector. PLKO.1 lentiviral vectors expressing shRNA against TACC1 (code: TRCN0000275917) and the control shRNA (code: SHC002) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. Isoform-specific siRNAs against RAB5A, B and C were kindly provided by Dr. Letizia Lanzetti and sequences are available on request. Negative Control siRNA from ThermoFisher (Cat#4611G) was used as a control. Transient transfections were performed with Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen) following standard procedures. Oligonucleotides used for miRNAs and RAB5B amplification are listed below. Sensor vector generation and reporter assays The GFP-TACC1 wild type or mutated sensor vectors (containing two repetitions of the two miR22 MREs) were obtained by annealing oligonucleotides listed below. Annealed oligonucleotides were then subcloned into the SacII/KpnI sites of the aforementioned lentiviral vector. GFP sensor vectors and 50nM synthetic pre-miRNA (miRNA precursor hsa-miR-22, PM10203 ThermoFisher) were co-transfected in HEK 293T cells with Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Cells were harvested after 48 hours and green fluorescence was measured by flow cytometry using CellQuest Software. The Luciferase-RAB5B sensor vectors (containing the three miR-22 MREs) were obtained by annealing oligonucleotides listed below. Primers #1 contain the first two MREs (wild type or mutated), while primers #2 contain the last MRE (wild type or mutated). The Luciferase-ERBB3 sensor vectors (containing the miR-22 MRE) were obtained by annealing oligonucleotides listed below. For both RAB5B and ERBB3, annealed oligonucleotides were subcloned into psiCHECKTM-2 vector (Promega) downstream of Renilla 2 luciferase using the XhoI/NotI restriction sites. The psiCHECKTM-2 vectors were co-transfected with 50 nM synthetic pre-miRNA (miR-22, see details above) in HEK 293T cells with Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen) and the luciferase assay was performed with the Dual-Luciferase Reporter Assay System (Promega). Luminescence was measured with the ‘Dual Glo’ protocol of the GloMax Multi Detection System (Promega) 48 hours post-transfection. The luciferase signal obtained from Renilla was normalized against Firefly luciferase intraplasmid control. Pre-miR-22 promoter fragments were generated by PCR using murine genomic DNA as a template. Amplified fragments were digested with EcoRV/HindIII, cloned into pGL4-basic luciferase reporter vector (Promega) and sequenced. Mutant constructs were made by site-directed mutagenesis using the QuikChange Mutagenesis Kit (Stratagene). Oligonucleotides used are listed below. All mutant constructs were verified by sequencing. Vectors were cotransfected into NIH 10T½ NpBI-MyoD cells along with 1:10 of pRL-TK Renilla control vector using Lipofectamine 2000. 12 hours after transfection, fresh medium with or without doxycycline was added. 48 hours later, cells were lysed and assayed for Luciferase and Renilla expression as described above. Renilla values were used to normalize for differences caused by unequal transfection efficiency. Scratch wound assay Cells were plated at sub-confluence. For rescue experiments, cells were plated in the presence of doxycycline and wounds were made 24h after plating. For loss of function experiments, wounds were made 24h after transfection. Several wounds were made across the confluent cell monolayer in replicate wells using a standard 1ml pipette tip, then cells were washed twice with PBS and incubated in DMEM 10% FBS. Wound areas were calculated with ImageJ from multiple pictures (5X magnification) taken for each condition at the indicated times. Percentage of wound closure was calculated as previously described (3). 3 Oligonucleotides Oligonucleotides used for miRNA library generation Adapter oligonucleotides: 3’_adapter: 5’-TCGTATGCCGTCTTCTGCTTG-3’; 5’_adapter: 5’-GUUCAGAGUUCUACAGUCCGACGAUC-3’. PCR primers: st 1 _PCR_for: 5’-AATGATACGGCGACCACCGACAGGTTCAGAGTTCTACAGTCCGA-3’; 1st_PCR_rev: 5’-CAAGCAGAAGACGGCATACGA-3’; 2nd_PCR_for: 5’-GCCTCCCTCGCGCCATCAGAATGATACGGCGA-3’; nd 2 _PCR_rev: 5’-GCCTTGCCAGCCCGCTCAGCAAGCAGAAGACG-3’. PmeI digestion oligonucleotides: 19-mer: 5’-CGUACGCGGGUUUAAACGA-3’; 24-mer: 5’-CGUACGCGGAAUAGUUUAAACUGU-3’. Oligonucleotides used for Northern blot anti–miR-22: 5′-ACAGTTCTTCAACTGGCAGCTT-3′; anti–miR-378: 5′-CCTTCTGACTCCAAGTCCAGT-3′; anti-U6: 5′-TGTGCTGCCGAAGCGAGCAC-3′. Oligonucleotides used for lentiviral vectors production Oligos for NpBI-22 and NpBI-378 lentiviral vectors: pre–miR-22_for: 5’-CAGCGAGGTTAACAGCTTCCGCGG-3’; pre–miR-22_rev: 5′-CTGGTACCGGTGATGGTATCAGGGATGG-3′; pre–miR-378_for: 5′-TGCCGCGGGCGAGCCTAGCTAGCAGAAA-3′; pre–miR-378_rev: 5′-CTGGTACCTCACATGCAAACACTGCTCA-3′. Oligos for NpBI-22 Delta_miR lentiviral vector: Delta_miR_for: 5’-GACCCAGCTAAAGGACACAGTTGAAGAACTG-3’; Delta_miR_rev: 5’-CAGTTCTTCAACTGTGTCCTTTAGCTGGGTC-3’. Oligos for RAB5B lentiviral vector: RAB5B_for: 5’-ggatccATGACTAGCAGAAGCACAGCTA-3’; RAB5B_rev: 5’-gtcgacTCAGTTGCTACAACACTGGCTC-3’. Oligonucleotides used for sensor vectors generation TACC1_WT_for1: 5’-GGAAAAGGAAAGTAGAAGGCAGCTGCCGATAAAAGGAAAGTAGAAGGCAGCTGCA-3’; TACC1_WT_for2: 5’-AGCTTATAAAGGTAACAAAGGGCAGCTCACGATATAAAGGTAACAAAGGGCAGCTCAGGTAC-3’; TACC1_WT_rev1: 5’-AGCTTGCAGCTGCCTTCTACTTTCCTTTTATCGGCAGCTGCCTTCTACTTTCCTTTTCCGC-3’; TACC1_WT_rev2: 5’-CTGAGCTGCCCTTTGTTACCTTTATATCGTGAGCTGCCCTTTGTTACCTTTATA-3’; TACC1_MUT_for1: 5’-GGAAAAGGAAAGTAGAACCGTCGACCCGATAAAAGGAAAGTAGAACCGTCGACCA-3’; TACC1_MUT_for2: 5’-AGCTTATAAAGGTAACAAAGCCGTCGAGACGATATAAAGGTAACAAAGCCGTCGAGAGGTAC-3’; TACC1_MUT_rev1: 5’-AGCTTGGTCGACGGTTCTACTTTCCTTTTATCGGGTCGACGGTTCTACTTTCCTTTTCCGC-3’; TACC1_MUT_rev2: 5’-CTCTCGACGGCTTTGTTACCTTTATATCGTCTCGACGGCTTTGTTACCTTTATA-3’; RAB5B_WT_for1: 5’-TCGAGTTCAGCAACAAACACCAGGCAGCTGTTCATATGTAGATAAAACTACCAGTGGCAGCTACTA-3’; RAB5B_WT_for2: 5’-AGCTTTGAAGTTCTTTCTCTGTGCAGCTTTCCGC-3’; RAB5B_WT_rev1: 5’-AGCTTAGTAGCTGCCACTGGTAGTTTTATCTACATATGAACAGCTGCCTGGTGTTTGTTGCTGAAC-3’; RAB5B_WT_rev2: 5’-GGCCGCGGAAAGCTGCACAGAGAAAGAACTTCAA-3’; RAB5B_MUT_for1: 5’- TCGAGTTCAGCAACAAACACCATTAGTACGTTCATATGTAGATAAAACTACCAGTTTAGTACACTA-3’; RAB5B_MUT_for2: 5’-AGCTTTGAAGTTCTTTCTCTGTTAGTACTTCCGC-3’; RAB5B_MUT_rev1: 5’-AGCTTAGTGTACTAAACTGGTAGTTTTATCTACATATGAACGTACTAATGGTGTTTGTTGCTGAAC-3’; RAB5B_MUT_rev2: 5’-GGCCGCGGAAGTACTAACAGAGAAAGAACTTCAA-3’; ERBB3_WT_for: 5’-TCGAGAGATCTCAGGGAGCATTTAATGGCAGCTAGC-3’; ERBB3_WT_rev: 5’-GGCCGCTAGCTGCCATTAAATGCTCCCTGAGATCTC-3’; ERBB3_MUT_for: 5’-TCGAGAGATCTCAGGGAGCAGAACCGTTACTAGGGC-3’; ERBB3_MUT_rev: 5’-GGCCGCCCTAGTAACGGTTCTGCTCCCTGAGATCTC-3’; 22.0_for: 5’-TGGATATCTGTCCTCCCTCAGACTCCTG-3’; 22.1_for: 5’-TGGATATCGGCTTGGAACTTGGAACAAA-3’; 22.2_for: 5’-TGGATATCAACTCATTTGGCCTGTCACC-3’; 22_rev: 5’-CAAAGCTTTCCTAAAAGGAAGGGGAGGA-3’; 22.1 I mut_for: 5’-GCCTGGAATTCATACtgGAcaTACCCGGAATGTGC-3’; 22.1 I mut_rev: 5’-GCACATTCCGGGTAtgTCcaGTATGAATTCCAGGC-3’; 22.1 II mut_for: 5’-CTCCTGCCTTTGGTtgGCcaTCCTCCCTCAGACTC-3’; 22.1 II mut_rev: 5’-GAGTCTGAGGGAGGAtgGCcaACCAAAGGCAGGAG-3’. 4 Oligonucleotides used for real-time PCR analysis RAB5A_for: 5’-CAACGGGCCAAATACGGGAAAT-3’; RAB5A_rev: 5’-CAGCCCCAATGGTACTCTCTTGAA-3’; RAB5B_for: 5’-GACTAGCAGAAGCACAGCTAGG-3’; RAB5B_rev: 5’-GAACTGCCCTTTGACAAAACGTAAT-3’; RAB5C_for: 5’-GGAACTGAGTTGGAGGTCCCC-3’; RAB5C_rev: 5’-TTGACAGATCTTGTTCCCAGCAGC-3’; HuPO_for: 5’-GCTTCCTGGAGGGTGTCC-3’; HuPO_rev: 5’-GGACTCGTTTGTACCCGTTG-3’. Oligonucleotides used for ChIP assay MCK_enhancer_for: 5’-AGGGATGAGAGCAGCCACTA-3’; MCK_enhancer_rev: 5’-CAGCCACATGTCTGGGTTAAT-3’; IgH_enhancer_for:5’-GCCGATCAGAACCAGAACACCTGC-3’; IgH_enhancer_rev: 5’-TGGTGGGGCTGGACAGAGTGTTTC-3’; MiR-22_oligoA_for: 5’-ATGTACCCGGAATGTGCAAG-3’; MiR-22_oligoA_rev: 5’-CAGGAGTCTGAGGGAGGACA-3’; MiR-22_oligoB_for: 5’-GGGCAGAGAGAAGTGGACAG-3’; MiR-22_oligoB_rev: 5’-CTAGGGTGGGCAACTTTCAA-3’. Antibodies Antibodies for FACS Anti-MHC Hybridoma Bank (University of Iowa) Alexa-555 Invitrogen Antibodies for Western blot Anti-MHC Santa Cruz Biotechnology Anti-RAB5B (A-20) Santa Cruz Biotechnology Anti-Actin Sigma-Aldrich Anti-TACC1 Sigma-Aldrich Anti-P-MAPK Sigma-Aldrich Anti-GAPDH Cell Signaling Technology Anti-P-EGFR (Tyr-1068) Cell Signaling Technology Anti-P-ERBB3 (Tyr-1197) Cell Signaling Technology Anti-P-Akt (Ser-473) Cell Signaling Technology Anti-ERBB3 Millipore Anti-P-RB (Ser780) Cell Signaling Technology Anti-Cyclin D3 Santa Cruz Biotechnology Anti-Cyclin A Santa Cruz Biotechnology Anti-cleaved Caspase-3 Cell Signaling Technology Anti-HSP90 Cell Signaling Technology Antibodies for immunohistochemistry Anti-Ki67 Dako Anti-cleaved Caspase-3 Cell Signaling Technology Anti-Myogenin Hybridoma Bank, University of Iowa Antibodies for ChIP Anti-MyoD (M-318) Santa Cruz Biotechnology Anti-acetyl-histone H3 Millipore Rabbit IgG Cell Signaling Technology 5 Supplementary References 1. Follenzi A, Ailles LE, Bakovic S, Geuna M, Naldini L. Gene transfer by lentiviral vectors is limited by nuclear translocation and rescued by HIV-1 pol sequences. Nat Genet. 2000;25(2):217–22. 2. Taulli R, Scuoppo C, Bersani F, Accornero P, Forni PE, Miretti S, et al. Validation of met as a therapeutic target in alveolar and embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma. Cancer Res. 2006;66(9):4742–9. 3. Chen P-I, Schauer K, Kong C, Harding AR, Goud B, Stahl PD. Rab5 isoforms orchestrate a “division of labor” in the endocytic network; Rab5C modulates Rac-mediated cell motility. PloS One. 2014;9(2):e90384. 6