Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Recent Preprints 1. Environment-Assisted Quantum Transport through Single-Molecule Junctions J, K. Sowa, J. A. Mol, G. A. D. Briggs, and E. M. Gauger, arXiv:1706.02874. 2. Projected gradient descent algorithms for quantum state tomography E. Bolduc, G. C. Knee, E. M. Gauger, J. Leach, arXiv:1612.09531. 3. Quantum-enhanced capture of photons using optical ratchet states, K. D. B. Higgins, B. W. Lovett, E. M. Gauger, arXiv:1504.05849. Refereed Journal Publications 1. Method of images applied to driven solid-state emitters D. Scerri, T. S. Santana, B. D. Gerardot, and E. M. Gauger, Phys. Rev. B 95, 165403 (2017). 2. Vibrational effects in charge transport through a molecular double quantum dot J, K. Sowa, J. A. Mol, G. A. D. Briggs, and E. M. Gauger. Phys. Rev. B 95, 085423 (2017). 3. Photocell Optimization Using Dark State Protection A. Fruchtman, R. Gómez-Bombarelli, B. W. Lovett, E. M. Gauger. Physical Review Letters 117, 203603 (2016) Editor’s Suggestion, covered in ArsTechnica’s Science Section. 4. When do perturbative approaches accurately capture the dynamics of complex quantum systems? A. Fruchtman, N. Lambert, E. M. Gauger. Scientific Reports 6 28204 (2016). 5. Photon-assisted tunneling and charge dephasing in a carbon nanotube double quantum dot A. Mavalankar, T. Pei, E. M. Gauger, J. H. Warner, G. A. D. Briggs, and E. A. Laird. Physical Review B 93, 235428 (2016). 6. Screening nuclear field fluctuations in quantum dots for indistinguishable photon generation R. N. E. Malein, T. S. Santana, J. M. Zajac, A. C. Dada, E. M. Gauger, P. M. Petroff, J. Y. Lim, J. D. Song, and B. D. Gerardot. Physical Review Letters 116, 257401 (2016). 7. Weak-value amplification: state of play, G. C. Knee, J. Combes, C. Ferrie, E. M. Gauger. Quantum Measurements and Quantum Metrology 3, 3237 (2016). 8. Quantum dynamics in a hierarchical non-Markovian environment, A. Fruchtman, B. W. Lovett, S. C. Benjamin, E. M. Gauger. New Journal of Physics 17 023063 (2015). 9. Classical noise assists the flow of quantum energy by ‘momentum rejuvenation’, Y. Li, F. Caruso, E. M. Gauger, S. C. Benjamin. New Journal of Physics 17 013057 (2015). 10. Superabsorption of light via quantum engineering, K. D. B. Higgins, S. C. Benjamin, T. Stace, G. J. Milburn, B. W. Lovett, E. M. Gauger, Nature Communications 5:4705 DOI: 10.1038/ncomms5705 (2014). Selected as a Research Highlight in Nature Photonics, the Oxford Science Blog, Phys.org, and IOP’s PhysicsWorld. 11. When amplification with weak values fails to suppress technical noise, G. C. Knee, E. M. Gauger, Physical Review X 4, 011032 (2014). 12. Quantum thermometry using the ac Stark shift within the Rabi model, K. D. B. Higgins, B. W. Lovett, E. M. Gauger. Physical Review B 88, 155409 (2013). 13. A multi-site variational master equation approach to dissipative energy transfer, F. Pollock, D. McCutcheon, B. W. Lovett, E. M. Gauger, A. Nazir. New Journal of Physics 15 075018 (2013). Invited special issue article. 1 14. Geometric phase gates with adiabatic control in electron spin resonance, H. Wu, E. M. Gauger, R. E. George, M. Möttönen, H. Riemann, N. V. Abrosimov, P. Becker, H.-J. Pohl, K. M. Itoh, M. L. W. Thewalt, J. J. L. Morton. Physical Review A 87 032326 (2013). Corresponding author. 15. Practicality of Spin Chain Wiring in Diamond Quantum Technologies, Y. Ping, B. W. Lovett, S. C. Benjamin, E. M. Gauger. Physical Review Letters 110, 100503 (2013). Research Highlight of the Asian Pacific Physics Newsletter. 16. Quantum sensors based on weak-value amplification cannot overcome decoherence, G. C. Knee, G. A. D. Briggs, S. C. Benjamin, E. M. Gauger. Physical Review A 87, 012115 (2013). 17. Overcoming phonon-induced dephasing for indistinguishable photon sources, T. Close, E. M. Gauger, B. W. Lovett. New Journal of Physics 14 113004 (2012). 18. A new type of radical-pair-based model for magnetoreception, A. M. Stoneham, E. M. Gauger (joint first authorship), K. Porfyrakis, S. C. Benjamin, and B. W. Lovett. Biophysical Journal 102 961968 (2012). Selected for coverage in Le Monde’s weekend supplement. 19. Violation of a Leggett-Garg inequality with ideal non-invasive measurements, G. C. Knee, S. Simmons, E. M. Gauger, J. J. L. Morton, H. Riemann, N. V. Abrosimov, P. Becker, H.-J. Pohl, K. M. Itoh, M. L. W. Thewalt, G. A. D. Briggs, S. C. Benjamin. Nature Communications 3:606 (doi: 10.1038/ncomms1614) (2012). 20. Measurement-based quantum computing with a spin ensemble coupled to a stripline cavity, Y. Ping, E. M. Gauger, S. C. Benjamin. New Journal of Physics 14 013030 (2012). 21. Proposed spin amplification for magnetic sensors employing crystal defects, M. Schaffry, E. M. Gauger, J. J. L. Morton, S. C. Benjamin. Physical Review Letters 107 207210 (2011). Corresponding author. Editor’s Suggestion and selected for a Physics synopsis. 22. Creating nuclear spin entanglement using an optical degree of freedom, M. Schaffry, B. W. Lovett, and E. M. Gauger. Physical Review A 84, 032332 (2011). 23. A general approach to quantum dynamics using a variational master equation: Application to phonondamped Rabi rotations in quantum dots, D. P. S. McCutcheon, N. S. Dattani, E. M. Gauger, B. W. Lovett, A. Nazir. Physical Review B 84, 081305 (Rapid Communication) (2011). 24. Coherent state transfer between an electron and nuclear spin in 15 N @C60 , R. M. Brown, A. M. Tyryshkin, K. Porfyrakis, E. M. Gauger, B. W. Lovett, A. Ardavan, S. A. Lyon, G. A. D. Briggs, and J. J. L. Morton. Physical Review Letters 106, 110504 (2011). 25. Sustained quantum coherence and entanglement in the avian compass, E. M. Gauger, E. Rieper, J. J. L. Morton, S. C. Benjamin, and V. Vedral. Physical Review Letters 106, 040503 (2011). Editor’s Suggestion and coverage in New Scientist, Science News, Wired, as well as in the popular press. 26. Quantum metrology with molecular ensembles, M. Schaffry, E. M. Gauger, J. J. L. Morton, J. Fitzsimons, S. C. Benjamin, and B. W. Lovett. Physical Review A 82, 042114 (2010). 27. Phonon-induced Rabi frequency renormalization of optically driven single InGaAs/GaAs quantum dots, A. J. Ramsay, T. M. Godden, S. J. Boyle, E. M. Gauger, A. Nazir, B. W. Lovett, A. M. Fox, and M. S. Skolnick. Physical Review Letters 105, 177402 (2010). 28. Heat pumping with optically driven excitons, E. M. Gauger, and J. Wabnig. Physical Review B 82 073301 (2010). 29. Entangling remote nuclear spins linked by a chromophore, M. Schaffry, V. Filidou, S. D. Karlen, E. M. Gauger, S. C. Benjamin, H. L. Anderson, A. Ardavan, G. A. D. Briggs, K. Maeda, K. B. Henbest, F. Giustino, J. J. L. Morton, and B. W. Lovett. Physical Review Letters 104 200501 (2010). 2 30. Damping of exciton Rabi rotations by acoustic phonons in optically excited InGaAs/GaAs quantum dots, A. J. Ramsay, A. V. Gopal, E. M. Gauger, A. Nazir, B. W. Lovett, A. M. Fox, and M. S. Skolnick. Physical Review Letters 104 017402 (2010). 31. Fluid transport at low Reynolds number with magnetically actuated artificial cilia, E. M. Gauger, M. Downes, and H. Stark. European Physical Journal E 28 231 (2009). 32. Robust adiabatic approach to optical spin entangling in coupled quantum dots, E. M. Gauger, A. Nazir, S. C. Benjamin, T. M. Stace, and B. W. Lovett. New Journal of Physics 10 073016 (2008). 33. Strategies for entangling remote spins with unequal coupling to an optically active mediator, E. M. Gauger, P. P. Rohde, A. M. Stoneham, and B. W. Lovett. New Journal of Physics 10 073027 (2008). 34. High Fidelity All-optical control of quantum dot spins: Detailed study of the adiabatic approach, E. M. Gauger, A. Nazir, S. C. Benjamin, and B. W. Lovett. Physical Review B 77 115322 (2008). 35. Numerical study of a microscopic artificial swimmer, E. Gauger and H. Stark. Physical Review E 74 021907 (2006). Comments and Conference Papers 1. Comment on “Quantum Coherence and Sensitivity of Avian Magnetoreception”, E. M. Gauger, S. C. Benjamin. Physical Review Letters 110 178901 (2013). 2. Comment on “A scattering quantum circuit for measuring Bell’s time inequality: a nuclear magnetic resonance demonstration using maximally mixed states”, G. C. Knee, E. M. Gauger, G. A. D. Briggs, S. C. Benjamin. New Journal of Physics 14 058001 (2012). 3. Effect of detuning on the phonon induced dephasing of optically driven InGaAs/GaAs quantum dots, A. J. Ramsay, T. M. Godden, S. J. Boyle, E. M. Gauger, A. Nazir, B. W. Lovett, A. V. Gopal, A. M. Fox, and M. S. Skolnick. Invited conference paper ICPS 2010 in the Journal of Applied Physics 109, 102415 (2011). 3