Download Extracting dynamic structural information from laser

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts
no text concepts found
Transcript
International workshop on quantum many-body problems,
in particle, nuclear, and atomic physics
Da Nang, 8-11/ 3/ 2017
EXTRACTING DYNAMIC STRUCTURAL INFORMATION
FROM LASER-INDUCED ELECTRON DIFFRACTION
SPECTRA
Vu Tran Dinh Duy,
Ho Chi Minh City University of Education
Atomic, Molecular & Optical physics
group
at HCMUE
Photo
Matter – strong field laser interaction
Tunneling
Acceleration
Photoelectron
Recombinati
on
HHG
Elastic
scattering
HATI
Returning
Nonsequential
double
Why are these phenomena important?
• Contain target’s signature
• Interaction takes place in atto – femto second
scale -> information with high temporal resolution
Suitable tool to study ultra-fast
atomic or molecular physics
High-energy above threshold ionization
Zhangjin Chen, Anh-Thu Le, Toru Morishita, and C. D. Lin, Phys. Rev. A, 79, 033409
(2009)
3.17 Up ≤ E ≤
10 Up :
exclusively
rescattered
electron
E ≤ 3.17
Up :
dominated
by direct
electron
Semi circle: collection of
rescattered electron with
incoming momentum kr
k z  k cos    A(tr ) mkr cos  r
k y  k sin   kr sin  r
Quantitative rescattering theory
Zhangjin Chen, Anh-Thu Le, Toru Morishita, and C. D. Lin, Phys. Rev. A, 79, 033409 (2009)
Rescattered
electron
distribution
D(k ,  )  W (kr ,  r ) (kr ,  r )
Laser-free
differential cross
section
Distribution of
returning electron
wave
Returning electron wave is weakly
dependent of scattering angle
 D(k ,  )   (kr ,  r )
Quantitative rescattering theory
Zhangjin Chen, Anh-Thu Le, Toru Morishita, and C. D. Lin, Phys. Rev. A, 79, 033409 (2009)
Extracted cross section is
fairly independent of laser
parameters
Laser-induced electron
diffraction (LIED)
Done!
Differential cross section
Desired information
Retrieve structure from cross section
Cosmin I. Blaga et al, Nature 483 (2012)
Trial structure
1
DCS 1
Ab initio
calculation
Trial structure
2
DCS 2
Trial structure
3
DCS 3
Experimental
DCS
Model
calculation
Best-fit trial
structure
Desired
information
Retrieve structure from cross section
Cosmin I. Blaga et al, Nature 483 (2012)
•
•
Independent Atoms Model (IAM) to generate theoretical
DCS
Molecule = collection of free atoms, omitting multiple
scattering
F   f i exp(iq.R i )
Scattering
amplitude of
free component
atoms
I ( )  | F |
2
Scatterin
gwave
Incomin
g wave
Spatial
phase
  | f i ( ) |   f i ( ) f j ( )
2
*
i j
IA: background
term
sin qRij
qRij
Molecular
Interference
Factor (MIT)
Molecul
ar
structur
e
Retrieve structure from cross section
Cosmin I. Blaga et al, Nature 483 (2012)
•
•
-
Each point at different time is obtained by changing laser parameters
(long wavelength -> long time)
Problems
IAM does not describe collision at low impact energy
Experiments are confined to long wavelength laser (mid-infrared
laser)
→ cannot probe at short time after ionization
Our solution: multiple scattering
Hayashi Shigeo and Kuchitsu Kozo, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn
41, 5, (1976)
•
Multiple scattering (MS) theory:
Including higher-orders scattering inside molecule
analytically
Scattering wave
Incoming wave
f 21
f12
1
2
Multiple scattering theory
• Up to 2
nd
order scattering
1
F 
k  | T k
4
Incoming
wave
1
i ( k k  ).R j

k  | T j k  e
f j.
4
Outgoing
wave
T  T j  Tt  T j GTt  T j GTt
1

k  | T j GTt k
4
2 i i  k .R j k .Rt 
1/2
l3

e
i
A
A
J
(
kR
)(2
l

1)
(2
l

1)(2
l

1)



l1 , j l2 ,t l3
jt
1
2
3
k
l1 ,l2 ,l3
 l1 l2 l3


0
0
0


Y
m3
 m3 *
l2
Al  eil sin  l

 l1 l2
m3 * µ
$
$
$
(k , k )Yl3 (R tj , k ) 
 0 m3
for  l is the phase shift
l3 

m3
Experimental DCS:
T W Shyn, and G R Carignan, Phys.
Rev. A 22, 3 (1980)
T W Shyn, W E Sharp, and G R
Carignan, Phys. Rev. A 17, 6
(1978)
New model MS produces
better differential cross
section than IAM
Test on gas phase electron diffraction
Collisi By IAM
on
By MS
energ
y
20
-
1.293
(7.1%)
30
1.697
1.201
(0.5%)
O2: R(41%)
exp = 1.208 Å
40
1.604
1.165
(33%)
(3.5%)
50
1.372
(14%)
1.193
(1.2%)
-: error > 50% or not single
local minimum inside
search zone
Collisi By IAM
on
By MS
energ
y
20
-
1.174
(7.0%)
30
-
1.042
(5.1%)
= 1.098
Å
1.157
(5.4%)
N2: Rexp
40
-
Structural retrieval from LIED data
Differential cross section
of CO2
15 eV
30 eV
C Cornaggia, J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys.
42 (2009)
  795 nm, I  0.83 1014 W/cm 2
 E  15 eV
Structural retrieval from LIED data
• Compared to gas phase electron diffraction, LIED
differs in two points
- the collision is e – ion -> require long-ranged
Coulomb potential
- Incoming electron flux depends on molecule
orientation through ionization rate -> weighted
average
Mulliken charge
analysis
+ 0.173
+ 0.654
+ 0.173
Ionization rate:
- Experimental
data
- Calculate by MOADKDomagoj Pavičić et al, Phys. Rev. Lett 98,
Collision energy = 15eV

Collision energy = 30eV

| Rbest  fit  R0 |
R0
 1.9%
| Rbest  fit  R0 |
R0
 16%
THANK YOU FOR YOUR
ATTENTION
Related documents