Download fkh250 con

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts
no text concepts found
Transcript
Understanding and Predicting Transcription Factor Specificities
Richard S. Mann
C2B2/MAGNet Center Third Annual Retreat
April 11, 2008
Signal Transduction
Transcriptional control by multiprotein complexes
p50
p65
Signal integration
Vast combinatorial ensembles with a
min number of factors
Evolvability
from Wolberger C., 1999
Drosophila Hox genes
Abd-B
lab
abd-A
Dfd
Ubx
Scr
Antp
Dave Kosman, UCSD
Hox factors: molecular architects of morphological diversity
D. melanogaster
zen
lab
bcd
pb
ftz
Dfd
Scr
head
Antp
thorax
Ubx
abd-A
abd-B
abdomen
A
P
Mus musculus
Hoxa1
Hoxa2
Hoxa3
Hoxa4
Hoxa5
Hoxa6
Hoxa7
Hoxb1
Hoxb2
Hoxb3
Hoxb4
Hoxb5
Hoxb6
Hoxb7
Hoxc4
Hoxc5
Hoxc6
Hoxd1
Hoxd3
Hoxd4
Hoxa9
Hoxa10
Hoxa11
Hoxa13
Hoxb8
Hoxb9
Hoxa13
Hoxc8
Hoxc9
Hoxc10
Hoxc11
Hoxc12
Hoxc13
Hoxd8
Hoxd9
Hoxd10
Hoxd11
Hoxd12
Hoxd13
Adapted from Perason J.C. et al., 2005
Problem of Hox specificity: Paradox 1
Homeodomain
YPWM
linker N-term
arm
1
Lab
Pb
Dfd
Scr
Antp
Ubx
Abd-A
Abd-B
helix 1
10
20
helix 2
30
helix 3
40
50
60
TYKWMQ(109)NNSGRTNFTNKQLTELEKEFHFNRYLTRARRIEIANTLQLNETQVKIWFQNRRMKQKKRV
EYPWMK(28) PRRLRTAYTNTQLLELEKEFHFNKYLCRPRRIEIAASLDLTERQVKVWFQNRRMKHKRQT
IYPWMK(17) PKRQRTAYTRHQILELEKEFHYNRYLTRRRRIEIAHTLVLSERQIKIWFQNRRMKWKKDN
IYPWMK(14) TKRQRTSYTRYQTLELEKEFHFNRYLTRRRRIEIAHALCLTERQIKIWFQNRRMKWKKEH
LYPWMR (8) RKRGRQTYTRYQTLELEKEFHFNRYLTRRRRIEIAHALCLTERQIKIWFQNRRMKWKKEN
FYPWMA (7) RRRGRQTYTRYQTLELEKEFHTNHYLTRRRRIEMAHALCLTERQIKIWFQNRRMKLKKEI
RYPWMT(24) RRRGRQTYTRFQTLELEKEFHFNHYLTRRRRIEIAHALCLTERQIKIWFQNRRMKLKKEL
LHEWTG (3) VRKKRKPYSKFQTLELEKEFLFNAYVSKQKRWELARNLQLTERQVKIWFQNRRMKNKKNS
identical residues make DNA contacts
Paradox 2: most Hox proteins bind to very similar ‘AT’ rich binding sites
Paradox 3: residues important for specificity are usually disordered
Ubx
YPWM
Exd
Passner, Aggarwal
Salivary
Gland
D. Andrew; BioEssays 23:901-911
A
P
Fkh
Distinct properties of Hox-Exd binding sites
fkh250
Exd
Scr
AGATTAATCG
paralog
specific
fkh250con
Exd
Hox
AGATTTATGG
shared
Ryoo et al., 1999
fkh250con
fkh250
His–12
Arg3
Passner, Jain, Aggarwal
fkh250 has two minor groove width minima that dictate electrostatic potential
Rohs, Sosinsky, Honig
Recognition of DNA SHAPE
‘Specific’ Hox-DNA contacts
Base-specific hydrogen bonds
‘General’ Hox-DNA contacts
homeodomain
YPWM
linker N-term
arm
helix 1
helix 2
helix 3
‘Specific’ Hox-DNA contacts
‘General’ Hox-DNA contacts
homeodomain
YPWM
linker N-term
arm
helix 1
helix 2
helix 3
‘Specific’ Hox-DNA contacts
‘General’ Hox-DNA contacts
homeodomain
YPWM
linker N-term
arm
helix 1
helix 2
What are the
global DNA
binding specificities?
helix 3
What are the
range of DNA
recognition modes?
How general is
this mechanism?
‘Specific’ Hox-DNA contacts
‘General’ Hox-DNA contacts
homeodomain
YPWM
linker N-term
arm
helix 1
helix 2
What are the
global DNA
binding specificities?
helix 3
What are the
range of DNA
recognition modes?
How general is
this mechanism?
His–12 and Arg3 are among Scr’s ‘signature’ residues
YPWM
His–12
LINKER
HOMEODOMAIN
Arg3
Lab
Pb
Dfd
Scr
Antp
Lab
XD1
mA1
hB1
xA1
CB1
MB1
PB
HB2
HB3
HD3
MB3
DFD
CD4
MD4
HD4
MA4
HA4
CA4
CB4
MB4
HC4
MC4
XB4
Scr
MA5
HA5
MB5
HB5
XB5
HC5
ANT
CB8
MB8
XB8
CD8
MD8
MC8
UBX
XB7
HB7
MB7
XA7
CA7
MA7
ABA
MC6
HC6
XC6
MB6
HB6
Ubx
AbdA
Hox6
SSIPTYKWMQLKRNVP
SYVSTFDWMKVKRNPP
SPAQTFDWMKVKRNPP
PTARTFDWMKVKRNPP
GPTQTFDWMKVKRNPP
SRARTFDWMKVKRNPP
LTPRTFDWMKVKRNPP
DSVPEYPWMKEKKTSR
PPAPEFPWMKEKKSAK
LTKQIFPWMKESRQTS
ISKQIFPWMKESRQNS
LTKQIFPWMKESRQTS
GERIIYPWMKKIHVAG
QPAVVYPWMKKVHVNS
QPAVVYPWMKKVHVNS
QPAVVYPWMKKVHVNS
KEPVVYPWMKKIHVSA
KEPVVYPWMKKIHVSA
KEPVVYPWMKKIHVST
KEPVVYPWMKKVHVST
KEPVVYPWMRKVHVST
KQPIVYPWMKKIHVST
KQPIVYPWMKKIHVST
QDPVVYPWMKKAHISK
NPPQIYPWMKRVHLGT
AQPQIYPWMRKLHISH
AQPQIYPWMRKLHISH
QTPQIFPWMRKLHISH
QSPQIFPWMRKLHINH
QSPQIFPWMRKLHINH
QPPQIYPWMTKLHMSH
MPSPLYPWMRSQPGKC
SPTQLFPWMRPQAAAG
SPTQLFPWMRPQAAAG
SPTQLFPWMRPQAAGR
SPAQMFPWMRPQAAPG
SPSQMFPWMRPQAAPG
SPSLMFPWMRPHAPGR
SNHTFYPWMAIAGECP
ANLRIYPWMRSAGADR
SNFRIYPWMRSSGTDR
SNFRIYPWMRSSGPDR
SHFRIYPWMRSSGPDR
ANFRIYPWMRSSGPDR
ASFRIYPWMRSSGPDR
ADLPRYPWMTLTDWMG
ASIQIYPWMQRMNSHS
ASIQIYPWMQRMNSHS
GSIQIYPWMQRMNSHS
CSTPVYPWMQRMNSCN
CSTPVYPWMQRMNSCN
Paralog-specific
‘signature’ residues
surrounding the
YPWM motif
Fkh250
Fkh250con
Scr
Kd ~10nM
Kd ~12nM
Kd ~20nM
Kd ~40nM
Kd >300nM
Kd ~30nM
Dfd
Ubx
Dfd is a repressor of fkh250
Fkh250
Dfd
Two steps in Hox specificity
Hox
Hox binding site
DNA binding
cofactors
Hox binding
site
Regulation
Act
Rep
‘Specific’ Hox-DNA contacts
‘General’ Hox-DNA contacts
homeodomain
YPWM
linker N-term
arm
helix 1
helix 2
What are the
global DNA
binding specificities?
helix 3
What are the
range of DNA
recognition modes?
How general is
this mechanism?
Cognate Sequence Identifier (CSI)
Aseem Ansari
Correlation between Exd and Dfd binding
Karl Haucshild and Aseem Ansari
Exd+Scr
Exd+Ubx
Sequences that prefer
Scr-Exd
Sequences that prefer
Ubx-Exd
Exd
Dfd
Karl Haucshild and Aseem Ansari
‘Specific’ Hox-DNA contacts
‘General’ Hox-DNA contacts
homeodomain
YPWM
linker N-term
arm
helix 1
helix 2
What are the
global DNA
binding specificities?
helix 3
What are the
range of DNA
recognition modes?
How general is
this mechanism?
Hox cofactor DNA
Scr
Exd
fkh250
Dfd
Exd
fkh250
Lab
Exd
Lab48/95
Ubx
Exd
DllR
AbdA
Exd
DllR
AbdA
En
DllR
?
Xiangshu Jin
DNA shape varies among Hox binding sites
Fkh250con
Fkh250
All Hox?
Scr, Dfd
DllR
Lab48/95
Ubx, AbdA
Lab
Lab
Ebner
Lab
Remo Rohs, Barry Honig
‘Specific’ Hox-DNA contacts
‘General’ Hox-DNA contacts
homeodomain
YPWM
linker N-term
arm
helix 1
helix 2
What are the
global DNA
binding specificities?
helix 3
What are the
range of DNA
recognition modes?
How general is
this mechanism?
Rohit Joshi
Jonathan Passner
Rinku Jain
Aneel Aggarwal
Remo Rohs
Alona Sosinsky
Barry Honig
Xiangshu Jin
Karl Hauschild
Aseem Ansari
Andrea Califano
Related documents