Download vitamin d inhibits cancer cell proliferation through nuclear exclusion

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts
no text concepts found
Transcript
VITAMIN D INHIBITS CANCER CELL PROLIFERATION THROUGH
NUCLEAR EXCLUSION AND DECREASED ACTIVITY OF
CYCLIN-DEPENDENT KINASE 2
Zhengying Wang*, Eddy S. Yang, and Kerry L. Burnstein
Department of Molecular and Cellular Pharmacology, University of Miami
School of Medicine, 1600 NW 10th Ave (R-189), Miami, FL, 33136, USA
*[email protected]
INTRODUCTION. 1,25-(OH)2 vitamin D3 [1,25(OH)2D3], the active metabolite
of vitamin D, inhibits proliferation of a variety of tumor cells including prostate
(reviewed in 1) as well as head and neck cancer. 1,25(OH)2D3 effects are
mediated by the vitamin D receptor, which is necessary but not sufficient for
1,25(OH)2D3-mediated growth inhibition (1,2). In the human prostate cancer cell
line LNCaP, 1,25(OH)2D3-mediated growth inhibition correlates with modestly
increased levels of cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor p27kip1, robust inhibition of
cyclin-dependent kinase 2 (CDK2) activity and consequent accumulation of cells
in the G1 phase of the cell cycle (2). While 1,25(OH)2D3 does not affect p27
mRNA levels or the rate of p27 synthesis, pulse-chase analysis revealed that
1,25(OH)2D3
increased p27 protein half-life in LNCaP cells. p27
phosphorylation at Thr187 by CDK2 targets p27 for Skp2-mediated degradation.
Consistent with inhibition of phosphorylation-dependent p27 degradation,
1,25(OH)2D3 decreased levels of phospho-Thr187 p27. Thus, stabilization of
p27 is one mechanism for 1,25 D inhibition of CDK2 activity (3). Since the
nuclear localization of CDK2 is necessary for its activation, we investigated the
regulation of CDK2 activity more comprehensively by studying 1,25(OH)2D3
effects on the subcellular localization of CDK2 and assessed the relationship
between 1,25(OH)2D3-mediated growth inhibition and CDK2 localization.
METHODS. For direct immunofluorescence imaging, LNCaP or AT-84 cells
were transfected with a fusion protein YFP-Cdk2, after 48hr of 1,25(OH)2D3
treatment, cells were fixed and observed under a fluorescent microscope.
Immunofluorescence labeling was performed as previously reported (3), and
indirect immunofluorescence imaging was performed by laser scanning confocal
fluorescent microscopy. The fluorescence intensity in confocal images was
determined by ImageJ software (rsb.info.nih/gov/ij/). Subcellular fractionation
was performed as reported previously (3). LNCaP stable cell lines expressing a
nuclear-targeted CDK2 were established by geneticin selection after transfection,
and expression confirmed by western blot analysis.
RESULTS. 1,25(OH)2D3 treatment of LNCaP cells resulted in decreased nuclear
CDK2 levels as assessed by subcellular fractionation and both direct and indirect
fluorescence image analysis. Fluorescence imaging of head and neck squamous
cell carcinoma AT-84 cells also revealed nuclear exclusion of CDK2 in response
to 1,25(OH)2D3 treatment. To assess the relationship between
1,25(OH)2D3-mediated growth inhibition and CDK2 nuclear exclusion, we
generated LNCaP cells stably expressing a nuclear-targeted CDK2-NLS fusion
protein. The resulting LNCaP/CDK2-NLS cells were relatively resistant to growth
inhibition by 1,25(OH)2D3 treatment compared to LNCaP Neo control cells. As
expected, CDK2 remained predominately in the nucleus following 1,25(OH)2D3
treatment in LNCaP/CDK2-NLS. Further, CDK2 activity was only modestly
inhibited by 1,25(OH)2D3 in LNCaP cells expressing the nuclear-targeted CDK2
compared to LNCaP Neo.
DISCUSSION. These data suggest that the antiproliferative effects of
1,25(OH)2D3 are mediated in large part by nuclear exclusion of CDK2 which has
the two-pronged effect of increasing p27 levels and decreasing CDK2 activity.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT. These studies are supported by National Cancer
Institute CA107705.
REFERENCES
1. Burnstein, K.L. (2002) Antiproliferative effect of vitamin D in prostate cancer
cells. In Steroid Hormones and Cell Cycle Regulation (Burnstein, K.L., ed.). pp.
173-190, Kluwer Academic Press, Norwell, MA
2. Zhuang. S-H., Burnstein. K.L. (1998) Endocrinology. 139: 1197-1207
3. Yang, E.S., and Burnstein, K.L. (2003) J. Biol. Chem. 278, 46862-46868