Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
SUPPLEMENTAL FIGURE 1 Disruption of the mouse Epha2 locus on chromosome 4 by homologous recombination 17, 37. (A) Schematic showing the disruption site in exon 5, and location of PCR genotyping primers (Table S1). (B) PCR amplification across the 5´ and 3´ boundaries of the disruption site in genomic (g)DNA (lanes 1-4), and in cDNA following reverse transcription (lanes 5-8), respectively. Lane 2 confirms the 5´-disruption boundary in gDNA, and lane 8 confirms the 3´-disruption boundary in cDNA. (C-D) Sequence analysis of PCR amplicons from panel B that cross the 5´ and 3´ ends of the disruption site. (C) Wild-type 5´-end showing reading frame flanking an endogenous HindIII site in exon-5 (B, lane 1). (D) Disrupted 5´-end showing change in reading-frame after the HindIII site (B, lane 2) at codon 428 from the translation start codon (ATG). This is predicted to result in a nonsense mutation (p.F428LfsX85) with the addition of 84 novel amino acids before premature termination of protein translation at an in-frame translation stop-codon (TGA) located 85 codons downstream within the targeting vector (data not shown). (E) Wild-type 3´end showing reading frame for correct splicing of transcript between exon-5 and exon-6 (B, lane 5). (F) Disrupted 3´-end showing incorrect splicing of transcript between the targeting vector (neo cassette) and exon-6 (B, lane 8). Mouse tail genotyping, lens total RNA extraction, reverse transcript (RT)-PCR, and DNA sequencing were performed as described 38.