Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
The Academy of Economic Studies Bucharest Doctoral School of Banking and Finance CURRENT ACCOUNT DEFICIT DETERMINANTS: AN EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS ON ROMANIA MSc. Student: Hândoreanu Cătălina Supervisor: Prof. Moisă Altăr Bucharest, June 2002 Introduction Literature review A brief characterization of Romanian current account Econometric estimations Concluding remarks Introduction Important measure of macroeconomics performance Current account deficit: - country’s development possibilities - saving-investment imbalance Mexican (1994) and Asian (1997) crises Literature Review Different theoretical models that show determinants of current account dynamics and relation between factors and current account Intertemporal approach Empirical evidence Literature Review-Intertemporal Approach Current account deficit: outcome of forwardlooking dynamic saving and investment decision by expectation of productivity growth, government spending and interest rates Obstfeld and Rogoff (1994, 1995) Cashin and McDermott (1996) Ostry (1997) Callen and Cashin (1999) Kim, Hall and Buckle (2001) Literature Review- Empirical evidence Panel data Different factors Chinn and Lee (1998) Calderon, Chong and Loayza (1999) Roubini Wachtel (1999) Chin and Prasad (2000) Calderon, Chong and Zanforlin (2001) Lane and Milesi-Ferretti (2002) A brief characterization of Romanian current account Until 1989 - current account surplus Since 1990 - current account deficit Current account deficit of 8.5% of GDP in 1990 Another peak of 7.2% of GDP in 1998 Sudden reduction of current account deficit in 1999 and 2000 Fig.1 Econometric estimations (1) Abreviation Variable CAD Ratio between current account and industrial output COV Coverage of imports through exports BUG Ratio between gouvernment buget balance and industrial output DEBT Ratio between external debt and industrial output FDI Ratio between foreign direct investments and industrial output NFA Ratio between net forigne assets and industrial output EXR Logharitmated exchange rate growth DIFI Interest rate differential DUMMY Dummy variable for January and February 1997 I used Perron unit roots test Current account deficit do not have structural break Perron Results Fig.2 Econometric estimations (2) Equation that will be estimated: CAD = 1COV +2BUG +3 EXR Estimation method: Two Stages Least Squares Econometric estimations (3) First step: the selection of instrumental variables Candidates for the role of instrumental variables: -three periods lagged values of endogenous variables -present and three periods lagged values of exogenous variables The selection of the instrumental variables is based on the statistical significance of the candidate variables in the regression of the endogenous variables on all the candidate variables Instrumental variables resulted: [CAD(-1), BUG, BUG(-3), EXR(-2), DDEBT(-2), DNFA(-1), DIFI(-2) DUMMY] Econometric estimations (4) Dependent Variable: CAD Method: Two-Stage Least Squares Date: 06/25/02 Time: 11:29 Sample(adjusted): 1994:04 2001:09 Included observations: 90 after adjusting endpoints Instrument list: CAD(-1) BUG BUG(-3) EXR(-2) DDEBT(-2) DIFI(-2) DNFA(-2) DUMMY Variable Coefficient COV BUG EXR 0.39612 0.176707 -0.086338 R-squared Adjusted R-squared S.E. of regression F-statistic Prob(F-statistic) 0.444492 0.431722 0.043238 6.845768 0.001733 Test Q-stat(12) LM(12) White(12) Ramsey Std. Error 0.12577 0.102724 0.022904 t-Statistic Prob. 3.149563 1.720209 -3.769576 Mean dependent var S.D. dependent var Sum squared resid Durbin-Watson stat Value p - value 10.351 0.588 12.09805 0.437838 5.779059 0.76181 0.376504 0.687395 0.0022 0.0889 0.0003 -0.077642 0.057356 0.162647 2.044938 Econometric estimations (5) Final equation: CAD = 0.396120*COV + 0.176707*BUG – 0.086338*EXR (3.149963) (1.720209) (-3.769576) ELASTICITY ELASTICITY Concluding remarks There is: - a positive correlation between “twin deficits” - a positive correlation between current account deficit and coverage imports through exports - a negative correlation between current account deficit and exchange rate Positive correlation between exchange rate and both exports and imports Annual data are necessary The current account deficit in 1990-2000 (millions USD) 0 -500 -1000 -1500 -2000 -2500 -3000 -3500 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 Perron Unit Root Test The test formula is the following: k y t t DU t DTt D( Tb ) t y t 1 a i y t i t i 1 where: yt – the value of the serie at time t - constant t – time 0, t Tb DU = 1, otherwise 0, t Tb DTt = t Tb , otherwise 1, t Tb D(Tb) = 0, otherwise Tb – the point of structural break yt-1 – the value of the serie at time t-1 yt-i – the first differential lag of the serie k – number of lags t – residuals ,,,,,ai – coeficients Unit Root Tests Variable Tipe Variable Tipe CAD I(0) DEBT I(1) COV I(0) NFA I(1) BUG I(0) EXR I(0) FDI I(0) DIFI I(0) Time Series Used 0. 2 1. 4 0. 1 1. 2 0. 0 1. 0 - 0. 1 0. 8 - 0. 2 0. 6 - 0. 3 94 0. 4 0. 1 0. 0 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 - 0. 1 - 0. 2 94 95 96 97 CA 98 99 00 - 0. 3 94 01 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 CO V BUG 5. 0 10 0. 6 5 4. 9 0. 4 0 4. 8 0. 2 -5 4. 7 - 10 0. 0 - 15 4. 6 - 0. 2 - 20 4. 5 - 25 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 94 95 96 EXR 97 98 99 00 - 0. 4 94 01 95 96 97 DI FI 2 0. 3 1 0. 2 0 0. 1 -1 0. 0 - 0. 1 94 -2 95 96 97 98 FDI 99 00 01 98 DNFA 94 95 96 97 98 DDEBT 99 00 01 99 00 01 The exchange rate impact upon exports and imports Dependent Variable: EXPORTS Method: Least Squares Date: 06/26/02 Time: 08:55 Sample(adjusted): 1994:02 2001:09 Included observations: 92 after adjusting endpoints Convergence achieved after 11 iterations Variable Coefficient Std. Error t-Statistic EXR AR(1) 0.331975 0.997416 0.072878 0.002738 R-squared Adjusted R-squared S.E. of regression Sum squared resid Log likelihood Durbin-Watson stat 0.882853 0.881552 0.029718 0.079482 193.9424 2.372216 Mean dependent var S.D. dependent var Akaike info criterion Schwarz criterion F-statistic Prob(F-statistic) Inverted AR Roots 1 4.55523 364.2273 Dependent Variable: IMPORTS Method: Least Squares Date: 06/26/02 Time: 08:55 Sample(adjusted): 1994:02 2001:09 Included observations: 92 after adjusting endpoints Convergence achieved after 5 iterations Prob. 0.0000 0.0000 0.368053 0.086347 -4.172661 -4.11784 678.2672 0 Variable Coefficient Std. Error t-Statistic EXR AR(1) 0.104319 0.904892 0.011854 0.046427 R-squared Adjusted R-squared S.E. of regression Sum squared resid Log likelihood Durbin-Watson stat 0.808817 0.806693 0.046502 0.194622 152.7479 2.392183 Mean dependent var S.D. dependent var Akaike info criterion Schwarz criterion F-statistic Prob(F-statistic) Inverted AR Roots 0.9 8.799959 19.49051 Prob. 0.0000 0.0000 0.443278 0.105767 -3.277129 -3.222307 380.7534 0 Positive correlation between exchange rate and imports and exports Dependent Variable: IMPORTS Method: Least Squares Date: 06/28/02 Time: 23:34 Sample(adjusted): 1994:02 2001:09 Included observations: 92 after adjusting endpoints Convergence achieved after 5 iterations Dependent Variable: EXPORTS Method: Least Squares Date: 06/28/02 Time: 23:31 Sample(adjusted): 1994:02 2001:09 Included observations: 92 after adjusting endpoints Convergence achieved after 4 iterations Variable Variable Coefficient Std. Error t-Statistic Prob. EXR DUMMY AR(1) 0.10181 0.011673 8.721709 0.095804 0.033295 2.877456 0.909302 0.045106 20.15938 R-squared Adjusted R-squared S.E. of regression Sum squared resid Log likelihood Durbin-Watson stat 0.825194 0.821265 0.044715 0.177951 156.8673 2.405291 Inverted AR Roots 0.91 0.0000 0.0050 0.0000 Mean dependent var 0.443278 S.D. dependent var 0.105767 Akaike info criterion -3.34494 Schwarz criterion -3.26271 F-statistic 210.0674 Prob(F-statistic) 0.0000 Coefficient Std. Error t-Statistic Prob. EXR DUMMY AR(1) 0.091886 0.018252 5.034189 0.083219 0.021331 3.901332 0.955637 0.036133 26.44742 R-squared Adjusted R-squared S.E. of regression Sum squared resid Log likelihood Durbin-Watson stat 0.890569 0.88811 0.028883 0.074247 197.0765 2.275998 Inverted AR Roots 0.96 0.0000 0.0002 0.0000 Mean dependent var 0.368053 S.D. dependent var 0.086347 Akaike info criterion -4.21906 Schwarz criterion -4.13682 F-statistic 362.1486 Prob(F-statistic) 0.0000