Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Modelling of 2D radiative transfer in quiescent prominences Structure of the presentation – Modelling of prominences – Grid of models – Contribution functions – Results and analyses – Conclusion Two dimensional Kippenhahn-Schlüter model Two dimensional Kippenhahn-Schlüter model Kuperus-Raadu model 2D radiative transfer equation Modelling of 2D radiative transfer in quiescent prominences – Heasley a Mihalas (1976) – non-LTE model with inclusion of MHS and radiative transfer – Mihalas et al. (1978) – the first 2D model – Heinzel et al. (1987) – inclusion of PRD – Fontenla et al. (1996) – multi-threat model – Anzer a Heinzel (1999) – inclusion of PCTR – Heinzel a Anzer (2001) – generalisation of MHS for 2D 2D models of the quiescent prominences Motivation – the different orientation of the magnetic field lines towards the observer (Heinzel et al. 2001) Model – 12-level Hydrogen atom – MHS equations of 2D K-S type – numerical solution of radiative transfer by ALI method (Auer and Paletou 1994) with usage of SC (Kunasz and Auer 1988) Short Characteristics method (SC) Two-dimensional magnetic dip model The temperature structure The magnetic dip The density structure Grid of models Constant parameters The geometrical shape of the prominence threats of each model The dependence of profiles on magnetic field orientation Contribution functions Contribution functions – A1 Lb Conclusion – Multi-threat model – Inclusion of the velocity field – Creation of 3D code – Comparison of synthetic profiles with observed profiles on SOHO Who says that Solar Physics is boring ?