Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
16-1 Chapter 16 McGraw-Hill International Pay Systems © 2005 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. 16-2 Exh. 16.3: Social Contracts and Pay Setting SOCIAL CONTRACT Highly Centralized Localized McGraw-Hill Argentina Brazil Canada France Hong Kong Mexico Singapore U.K. U.S.A. Local Systems Czech Republic Germany India Israel Japan Korea Slovakia Slovenia Sector/Industry -wide Systems PAY SETTING SYSTEMS Austria Belgium Cuba Hungary Poland Sweden Nationwide Systems © 2005 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. 16-3 Hofstede’s Cultural Dimensions Power Distance Uncertainty Avoidance Individualism Masculinity Long-term McGraw-Hill – Collectivism – Femininity – Short-term © 2005 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. 16-4 Exhibit 16.5: Union Density McGraw-Hill © 2005 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Exhibit 16.6: Employment Practices Differ Among Nations: The Cost of an Employee The hourly cost of a production worker in manufacturing . . . . . . is made up from the salary paid directly to the worker before deductions . . . . . . and what an employer pays in social insurance and labor taxes. What those extra costs are as a percentage of salary. France $17.97 $12.36 $5.61 45.4% Germany $28.28 $20.94 $7.34 35.1% United States $18.24 $14.34 $3.90 27.2% Japan $19.37 $16.52 $2.85 17.3% Britain $15.47 $13.47 $2.00 14.8% McGraw-Hill 16-5 © 2005 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Exhibit 16.11: Strategic Similarities and Differences: An Illustrated Comparison Japan Objectives Internal Alignment McGraw-Hill United States 16-6 Germany Long-term focus High commitment Egalitarian – internal fairness Flexible workforce Control cash flow with bonuses Short / intermediate focus High commitment Performance – market – meritocratic Flexible workforce Cost control; varies with performance Long term High commitment Egalitarian – fairness Person based: age, ability, performance determines base pay Many levels Small pay differences Work based: jobs, skills, accountabilities Work based: jobs and experience Fewer levels Larger pay differences Many levels Small pay differences Highly trained Cost control through tariff negotiations © 2005 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Exhibit 16.11: Strategic Similarities and Differences: An Illustrated Comparison Japan External Competitiveness Employee Contribution McGraw-Hill United States 16-7 Germany Monitor age – pay charts Consistent with competitors Market determined Tariff based Compare on variable and performance-based pay Same as competitors Bonuses vary with performance only at higher levels in organization Performance appraisal influences promotions and small portion of pay increases Bonuses an increasing percentage of total pay Tariff negotiated bonuses Increases based on individual, unit, and corporate performance Smaller performance bonuses for managers © 2005 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Exhibit 16.11: Strategic Similarities and Differences: An Illustrated Comparison Japan Advantages Disadvantages McGraw-Hill United States Supports commitment and security Greater predictability for companies and employees Flexibility – person based Supports performance – competitor focus Costs vary with performance High cost of aging work force Discourages unique contributors Discourages women and younger employees Skeptical workers, less security Fosters “What’s in it for me?” No reward for investing in long-term projects Focus on short-term payoffs (speed to market) 16-8 Germany Supports commitment and security Greater predictability for companies and employees Companies do not compete with pay Inflexible; bureaucratic High social and benefit costs Not a strategic tool © 2005 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. 16-9 Shift in Strategic Global Focus Focus of strategic global approaches – Avoid matching national systems Involves aligning the total pay system with the global business strategy Challenges Managers must rethink international compensation in the face of global competition Align global pay with the way business is aligned McGraw-Hill © 2005 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Objectives of Compensation and Benefits for Expatriates 16-10 Attract and retain employees who are qualified for foreign assignments Provide an incentive to leave the home country for a foreign assignment Maintain a given standard of living Take into consideration expatriates’ career and family needs Facilitate reentry into the home country at the end of a foreign assignment McGraw-Hill © 2005 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. 16-11 Exhibit 16.14: Balance Sheet Approach Equivalent salary and allowances, host country $10,200 Base-country currency Relocation Bonus McGraw-Hill $1,500 Base-country salary $7,000 Taxes $2,000 Housing $2,000 Taxes $1,000 Allowances paid by company Housing $700 Goods and Services $2,000 Goods and Services Reserve $1,000 Reserve © 2005 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.