Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Radio Broadcasts from Superconducting strings µ Danièle Steer (APC) I Yi-Fu Cai (McGill) Eray Sabancilar, Tanmay Vachaspati (Arizona State U.) PRD 86 043521 PRD 85 (2012) 023530 Tuesday, February 4, 2014 [D.Thornton et al, 1307.1628, Science; D.Lorimer et al, 0709.4301, Science] A population of fast radio bursts at cosmological distances 1Jy = 10 −26 W m2 Hz Brightest astronomical radio sources: 1 ∼ 100Jy Redshifts z~ 0.5-1. Comoving distances ≤1 Gpc. Isolated bursts, rate < 0.025/hour. Tuesday, February 4, 2014 [D.Thornton et al, 1307.1628, Science; D.Lorimer et al, 0709.4301, Science] A population of fast radio bursts at cosmological distances 1Jy = 10 −26 W m2 Hz Brightest astronomical radio sources: 1 ∼ 100Jy Radio frequency interference from a mobile phone 1km away transmitting 0.5W at 1800MHz ∼ 109 Jy Redshifts z~ 0.5-1. Comoving distances ≤1 Gpc. Isolated bursts, rate < 0.025/hour. Tuesday, February 4, 2014 [D.Thornton et al, 1307.1628, Science; D.Lorimer et al, 0709.4301, Science] A population of fast radio bursts at cosmological distances Characteristic dispersion in frequency due to scattering of radio waves as propagate through ionized turbulent galactic medium ∆ts ∼ ν −4 [Lee and Jokipii 1976,...] SOURCE? Redshifts z~ 0.5-1. Comoving distances ≤1 Gpc. Isolated bursts, rate < 0.025/hour. Tuesday, February 4, 2014 [D.Thornton et al, 1307.1628, Science; D.Lorimer et al, 0709.4301, Science] A population of fast radio bursts at cosmological distances Characteristic dispersion in frequency due to scattering of radio waves as propagate through ionized turbulent galactic medium 1230 MHz ∆ts ∼ ν −4 [Lee and Jokipii 1976,...] SOURCE? Redshifts z~ 0.5-1. Comoving distances ≤1 Gpc. Isolated bursts, rate < 0.025/hour. Tuesday, February 4, 2014 • Oscillating loops of superconducting cosmic strings? γ, g µ I • Act as antennas. Emit EM radiation in wide range of frequencies ω , from radio to gamma • Also emit GWs [Vachaspati&Vilenkin, Damour&Vilenkin,....] [Vilenkin&Vachaspati, Blanco-Pillado&Olum, Berezinsky et al, Cheng et al, Cai et al....] – Power emitted from a loop of length L decays exponentially with ω for ωL � 1 – exception: from cusps and kinks and kink-kink collisions, which emit short bursts of radiation in certain special directions – If an observer/experiment lies in one of those directions : stronger signal • How many radio bursts of observed duration ∆ and flux S can be expected from a cosmological network of loops of superconducting strings of tension µ, carrying current I? Tuesday, February 4, 2014 Event rate of radio bursts from superconducting string loops • fixed observed frequency ν0 = 1230 MHz • integrated over duration of bursts • chosen values of parameters: Gµ = 10−10 , I = 105 GeV cusps kinks An experiment sensitive to mJy fluxes would observe ~100 radio bursts from kinks/day kink collisions Tuesday, February 4, 2014 ~1/day from cusps 1) Dynamics of superconducting strings: assumptions two free parameters µ, I 2) Power emitted in photons L(t) = Li − ΓGµ(t − ti ) Γγ + Γg 3) Event rate from from cusps/kinks/kink-kink collisions as a function of : S = observed flux ∆ = observed burst duration Tuesday, February 4, 2014 1) Dynamics of superconducting strings: assumptions • Models with extra fields can often support currents in the string core [Witten ’85, P. Peter ’92, ’93, B.Carter, C.Ringeval, Davis&Shellard, Hindmarsh, Baboul&Piran&Spergel...] • Microphysics complicated, backreaction generally non-negligible; determining effective action hard • eg: U(1) x U(1) σ condensate |Φ| w Σ = σ(r)eiφ(t,z) Aµ string (Φ, Bµ ) radius 0.15 w = (∂z φ)2 − (∂t φ)2 C 0.1 µ • space-like currents (w>0) T 0.05 Imax 0 -0.1 Tuesday, February 4, 2014 0 i 0.1 I • Important point: maximum current Imax w [P. Peter] c2L dT =− dµ • Assumptions: 1) string dynamics given by NG action. µ=T √ 2) Strings all carry same constant current I with Imax ∼ q µ Corresponding current density � µ (3) � σ)) J µ (t, �x) = I dσ X,σ δ (�x − X(t, • Typical values we shall take Gµ = 10−10 Tuesday, February 4, 2014 I = 105 GeV Imax ∼ 1012 GeV I 2) Power emitted in photons • Power emitted per unit frequency, per unit solid angle d 2 Pγ ω2 L µ 2 = |Jω | . dωdΩ 2π 4π ∝I , µ � M± (k) = � L 0 �µ dσ± eik·X± /2 X± , • (Nearly) standard saddle-point/discontinuity analysis in ωL � 1 limit dPγc – cusp ∼ I 2L dωdΩ emitted in a cone of opening angle θω = (ωL)−2/3 dPγk I 2 Lψ – kink ∼ dωdΩ (ωL)2/3 emitted in a fan-shape of solid angle Ω ∼ 2πθω – kink-kink dPγk 2 Pγc √ burst of duration ∼ 1/ω 2 I Lψ emitted in all directions ∼ dωdΩ (ωL)2 • Integrating Pγ ∼ = Γγ I µ ∼ 10 Tuesday, February 4, 2014 burst of duration δt ∼ L2/3 ω −1/3 0 ≤ ψ = sin2 (θ/2) ≤ 1 • Power emitted in GW: Pg = Γg Gµ I∗ ∼ 105 GeV θ 3) Estimated event rate of radio bursts from cusps/kinks/kink-kink collisions as a function of S, ∆ • Number/unit time/unit spatial volume of cusp, kink, and kink-kink bursts of OBSERVED frequency νo from loops of length L at redshift z Loop distribution in matter era physical volume element in matter era • Leading to dṄ (L, z) = . . . −m̃/3 ν0 ... CL1(z) [L + ΓGµt0 (1 + z)−3/2]2 • Event rate higher the lower the frequency (radio). Tuesday, February 4, 2014 dL dz “standard” [Vilenkin+ Shellard] loops distribution 3) Estimated event rate of radio bursts from cusps/kinks/kink-kink collisions as a function of S, ∆ • Number/unit time/unit spatial volume of cusp, kink, and kink-kink bursts of OBSERVED frequency νo from loops of length L at redshift z Loop distribution in matter era physical volume element in matter era S, ∆ • Leading to dṄ (L, z) = . . . −m̃/3 ν0 ... CL1(z) [L + ΓGµt0 (1 + z)−3/2]2 • Event rate higher the lower the frequency (radio). Tuesday, February 4, 2014 dL dz “standard” [Vilenkin+ Shellard] loops distribution • Observed duration of burst ∆= � • Observed intrinsic duration 1/ν0 ∆t2 + ∆t2s • time delays generated by scattering of radio waves in intergalactic medium (z, ν0 ) • Observed energy flux per frequency interval from cusp/kink/kink-kink bursts on a loop of length L at a distance r(z) from loop 1 L d2 P S≈ r(z)2 2∆ dνo dΩ • giving finally dṄ (S, ∆) So.................. Range of observable parameters for the Parkes survey: Tuesday, February 4, 2014 Event rate of radio bursts from superconducting string loops • fixed observed frequency ν0 = 1230 MHz • integrated over duration of bursts • chosen values of parameters: Gµ = 10−10 , I = 105 GeV cusps kinks An experiment sensitive to mJy fluxes would observe ~100 radio bursts from kinks/day kink collisions Tuesday, February 4, 2014 ~1/day from cusps Integrating out over duration and flux kinks cusps kinks cusps kink-kink Tuesday, February 4, 2014 Conclusion • 3 kinds of transient EM bursts from superconducting strings: – bursts from cusps are strong and highly beamed – bursts from kinks are weaker and less beamed – bursts from kink-kink collisions are the weakest and not beamed • Bursts occur in all frequency bands, but are wide in radio, thin in gamma rays • So event rate is largest for radio => radio transients most likely to find superconducting strings • For canonical parameters, event rates are high ~ several a day a 1 Jy flux for chosen I, µ • If none are observed => constraints on I, µ • Radiation is linearly polarised, which may be used to distinguish it from other astrophysical sources Might expect bursts at other frequencies, GW bursts, and perhaps an accompanying burst of neutrinos.... Tuesday, February 4, 2014 Tuesday, February 4, 2014