Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
PAKISTAN TO RETURN TO EMERGING MARKETS JULY 2016 MSCI to upgrade Pakistan from Frontier Markets (FM) to Emerging Markets (EM), effective May 2017. improving liquidity in the Pakistani equity market have allowed the country to meet the requirements for a return to emerging market status, which will happen next year. Although the announcement did not come as a major surprise given the positive feedback to MSCI from investors and the liquidity-driven nature of such reclassifications, we believe that Pakistani stocks may benefit from increased demand resulting from a move to Pakistan, at 8.4% of the FM Index, will account for only 0.2% of the EM Index. The upgrades creates a meaningful opportunity for capital appreciation, as passive index followers add exposure and active investors recognize the improving market conditions and stability acknowledged by MSCI in the reclassification. a more benchmarked index. Pakistan is a relatively large and liquid market compared to other frontier countries, but will be overshadowed by the major constituents of the Emerging Markets Index. The country currently represents 8.4% of the MSCI Frontier Markets Index, yet it will have the smallest representation of any country in MSCI’s Emerging Markets Index with a 0.2% weight. In Figure 1, we provide a list of companies MSCI indicates are provisional Pakistan index constituents as it moves to EM. Post-implementation, liquidity may tail off once investors have gained needed exposure. This was the case in Qatar, where liquidity fell to near 10-year lows after joining the EM index, although other countries such as Morocco have seen liquidity trend higher despite having been downgraded from EM to FM in 2013. MSCI announced on June 14 that it will be moving Pakistan from its Frontier Markets Index to Emerging Markets, to take effect in May 2017 during MSCI’s SemiAnnual Index Review. Emerging markets classification is not new territory for Pakistan; the country was previously a member of the index prior to being downgraded in 2008 following a period of market turmoil that halted trading for months in the local Karachi exchange. Pakistan held “standalone” status until markets began to function more normally in 2009 at which time MSCI added the country to the Frontier Markets Index. Since that time, Pakistan has recovered to be one of the strongest performing markets across frontier countries. Recent growth and FIGURE 1 Provisional Pakistan Constituents for the MSCI Emerging Markets Index Oil & Gas Development Habib Bank Market Cap (USD) Index Family Sector Industry Energy Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels 4,786 Large Cap Financials Banks 2,428 Large Cap MCB Bank Financials Banks 2,147 Mid Cap United Bank Financials Banks 1,823 Mid Cap Lucky Cement Materials Construction Materials 1,765 Mid Cap Engro Corporation Materials Chemicals 1,557 Mid Cap Fauji Fertilizer Co Materials Chemicals 1,335 Mid Cap Hub-Power Co Utilities Independent Power & Renewable Electricity Producers 1,153 Mid Cap Pakistan State Oil Co Energy Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels 942 Mid Cap Source: MSCI. The securities mentioned should not be considered a recommendation to buy or sell individual securities. MSCI Copyright MSCI 2016. All Rights Reserved. Unpublished. Proprietary to MSCI. As of 4/19/16. 1 For institutional investor use only. Not to be reproduced or disseminated. MSCI UPGRADE DECISION 2014. MSCI’s upgrade announcement created a material return appreciation catalyst, as the Qatar and the UAE returned 54% and 98%, respectively, from the time that MSCI announced the upgrade to the time that the upgrade was implemented. We believe there is significant opportunity for appreciation for Pakistan as it heads into its upgrade, given the need for passive emerging market investors to rebalance significant capital into this country. As described in our 2015 paper “Transition Strategies Around MSCI Reclassifications” there is evidence of price appreciation in the period from announcement date to implementation date for countries moving into indexes with a higher percentage of assets owned by index tracking strategies. There is also evidence of price appreciation pre-implementation for countries being “upgraded” to an index reflecting higher levels of market development. Both are true in Pakistan’s case, and Figure 2 shows that Pakistan has begun to Pakistan was broadly expected to be upgraded, as it meets almost all of MSCI’s emerging market criteria. Ultimately liquidity tends to be an important driver of MSCI’s decisions, and Pakistan’s relatively broad, liquid profile was a meaningful consideration. In addition to investor response to the proposed upgrade, there was a subjective element that added uncertainty to the upgrade: political risk. While this risk has been limited since the peaceful transition of power to Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif in 2013’s democratic elections, and the current regime’s demonstration of strong support for the private sector has further helped to improve Pakistan’s standing. The country has a long history of political volatility and its market remains susceptible to event-related selloffs. The recent period of relative calm has helped to stabilize the market, but Pakistan remains a market that is highly influenced by political events both at home and throughout the region. outperform both the EM and FM Indexes since May. Index-transition considerations aside, the country’s structural growth story as well as its discount relative to emerging markets today are additional reasons to expect potential price appreciation. Specifically, Pakistan currently trades at a P/E multiple of 10.1x earnings; a discount to both the Frontier Markets Index (10.5x) and Emerging Markets (14.3x). WHAT HISTORY SHOWS There are only two precedents of countries being upgraded from frontier to emerging market status: Qatar and the UAE which were upgraded together in FIGURE 2 ¢ EM ¢ FM ¢ Pakistan YTD Performance: Pakistan, EM and FM Indexes RETURNS (%) 20 15 10 5 0 -5 -10 -15 Jan-16 Feb-16 Mar-16 Apr-16 May-16 Jun-16 Index Source: MSCI Copyright MSCI 2016. All Rights Reserved. Unpublished. Proprietary to MSCI. For illustrative purposes only. It is not possible to invest directly in any index. Every Investment program has the opportunity for losses as well as profits. Past results are not indicative of future results. 2 For institutional investor use only. Not to be reproduced or disseminated. FIGURE 3 ¢ MSCI Emerging Markets ¢ MSCI Frontier Markets Qatar, UAE and Index Performance RETURNS (%) ¢ MSCI Qatar ¢ MSCI United Arab Emirates 120 90 60 30 0 -30 -60 Pre-Announcement 01/01/13 - 06/11/13 Pre-Implementation 06/12/13 - 05/31/14 Post-Implementation 06/01/14 - 06/23/16 Index Source: MSCI Copyright MSCI 2016. All Rights Reserved. Unpublished. Proprietary to MSCI. For illustrative purposes only. It is not possible to invest directly in any index. Every Investment program has the opportunity for losses as well as profits. Past results are not indicative of future results. While UAE and Qatar enjoyed significant rallies in the period between announcement and implementation of the re-classification, the countries retreated after the upgrade. As shown in Figure 3, UAE and Qatar have declined approximately 40% in the two years following their upgrade to EM. Liquidity has also tailed off, with trading volumes for the first five months of 2016 less than half of those registered in the first five months of 2014 leading up to the reclassification. There have been many potential drivers for the selling in the UAE and Qatar including governance concerns at the corporate and country level, their relatively low weight in emerging markets, the drop in oil prices, and sensitivity to emerging markets. Vietnam, and there may be an improving liquidity profiles in other countries with improving fundamentals, including Argentina and Romania. In Acadian’s frontier market portfolios, our policy is to largely follow the S&P Frontier index, so we will continue to actively invest unless S&P also upgrades the country. Pakistan is on the S&P watchlist, and we expect an announcement in late August. Should S&P also upgrade, we would halt further buying of Pakistani securities in our FM portfolios upon implementation. Existing positions would be sold in a transaction-cost sensitive manner rather than being forced out of the portfolio in a single day. CONCLUSION FRONTIER PORTFOLIO IMPACT As Pakistan moves from frontier to emerging market status, MSCI’s Frontier Markets Index will lose a relatively large and liquid market; however, we anticipate improving liquidity from other Asian markets, as well as Romania and Argentina, will fill this gap as these markets mature and evolve. While impacts to emerging market investors may be minor given Pakistan’s small share of the Emerging Markets Index, the reclassification may present an opportunity stemming from increased benchmarking demand. The recent experience of UAE and Qatar gaining emerging market status showed a pattern of price appreciation leading into the implementation date. From the perspective of Acadian’s Frontier Markets strategy, our overweight to Pakistan leaves our portfolios in position to benefit from potential market-wide price appreciation that may occur leading into the implementation date. Our Frontier Market strategy has a significant over-weight in Pakistan and hence if further appreciation occurs, we expect to be well-positioned. Further, existing frontier assets may rotate into other regions as their weights are increased in the reformulated index, boosting the opportunity for price appreciation across frontier countries. The Karachi Stock Exchange is a fairly liquid market, so the upgrade of the country next year will represents a loss of asset class liquidity for frontier markets. However, our portfolios are attuned to the low liquidity nature of this asset class and will be able to rebalance our 17% Pakistan portfolio exposure across other frontier countries. Further, we believe there are other sources of liquidity to offset the impact this upgrade. For example, other Asian markets are similarly liquid, including Bangladesh and 3 For institutional investor use only. Not to be reproduced or disseminated. GENERAL LEGAL DISCLAIMER Acadian provides this material as a general overview of the firm, our processes and our investment capabilities. It has been provided for informational purposes only. It does not constitute or form part of any offer to issue or sell, or any solicitation of any offer to subscribe or to purchase, shares, units or other interests in investments that may be referred to herein and must not be construed as investment or financial product advice. Acadian has not considered any reader’s financial situation, objective or needs in providing the relevant information. negative impact on investment results. We have in place control systems and processes which are intended to identify in a timely manner any such errors which would have a material impact on the investment process. Acadian Asset Management LLC has wholly owned affiliates located in London, Singapore, Sydney, and Tokyo. Pursuant to the terms of service level agreements with each affiliate, employees of Acadian Asset Management LLC may provide certain services on behalf of each affiliate and employees of each affiliate may provide certain administrative services, including marketing and client service, on behalf of Acadian Asset Management LLC. The value of investments may fall as well as rise and you may not get back your original investment. Past performance is not necessarily a guide to future performance or returns. Acadian has taken all reasonable care to ensure that the information contained in this material is accurate at the time of its distribution, no representation or warranty, express or implied, is made as to the accuracy, reliability or completeness of such information. Acadian Asset Management LLC is registered as an investment adviser with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. Registration of an investment adviser does not imply any level of skill or training. Acadian Asset Management (Japan) is a Financial Instrument Operator (Discretionary Investment Management Business). Register Number DirectorGeneral Kanto Local Financial Bureau (Kinsho) Number 2814. Member of Japan Investment Advisers Association. This material contains privileged and confidential information and is intended only for the recipient/s. Any distribution, reproduction or other use of this presentation by recipients is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient and this presentation has been sent or passed on to you in error, please contact us immediately. Confidentiality and privilege are not lost by this presentation having been sent or passed on to you in error. Acadian Asset Management (Singapore) Pte Ltd, (Registration Number: 199902125D) is licensed by the Monetary Authority of Singapore. Acadian Asset Management (Australia) Limited (ABN 41 114 200 127) is the holder of Australian financial services license number 291872 (“AFSL”). Under the terms of its AFSL, Acadian Asset Management (Australia) Limited is limited to providing the financial services under its license to wholesale clients only. This marketing material is not to be provided to retail clients. Acadian’s quantitative investment process is supported by extensive proprietary computer code. Acadian’s researchers, software developers, and IT teams follow a structured design, development, testing, change control, and review processes during the development of its systems and the implementation within our investment process. These controls and their effectiveness are subject to regular internal reviews, at least annual independent review by our SSAE 16 auditor. However, despite these extensive controls it is possible that errors may occur in coding and within the investment process, as is the case with any complex software or data-driven model, and no guarantee or warranty can be provided that any quantitative investment model is completely free of errors. Any such errors could have a Acadian Asset Management (UK) Limited is authorized and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority (‘the FCA’) and is a limited liability company incorporated in England and Wales with company number 05644066. Acadian Asset Management (UK) Limited will only make this material available to Professional Clients and Eligible Counterparties as defined by the FCA under the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive. 4 For institutional investor use only. Not to be reproduced or disseminated