Download Transmission Line Model for Rectangular Waveguides

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts
no text concepts found
Transcript
Transmission Line Model for Rectangular
Waveguides accurately incorporating Loss Effects
Konstantin Lomakin
[email protected]
Institute of Microwaves and Photonics Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg
10 May 2017
Outline
✦
✦
✦
✦
✦
✦
Introduction
Modeling lossless TE10 Mode
Incorporating Loss Effects
Impact of Losses on the Phase Coefficient
Comparison to Simulation and Measurement
Conclusion
SPI-2017 Baveno, Italy
Konstantin Lomakin
Friedrich-Alexander Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg
10.05.2017
2
Introduction
Introduction
✦
Rectangular Waveguides (RWG) typically deployed e.g. in mm-wave or space applications
✦
Fundamental mode of RWG: TE10
✦
Inherently dispersive transmission line
✦
Only two loss-mechanisms: dielectric and conductor
✦
One typical modeling approach:
‣ Phase coefficient: solution of Maxwell’s equations
‣ Attenuation coefficient: perturbation method
✦
Perturbation method does not take into account any impact on phase coefficient
y
h
z
SPI-2017 Baveno, Italy
Konstantin Lomakin
Friedrich-Alexander Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg
w
x
10.05.2017
4
Current Distribution of the TE10 Mode
Transversal Field Components
⇣ ⇡x ⌘
Ey =
✦
jA10 ZF ⌦ sin
w
⇣ ⇡x ⌘
p
Hx = jA10 ⌦2 1 sin
w
✦
Longitudinal Component
Hz = A10 cos
⇣ ⇡x ⌘
A10 =
w
2Pin
p
whZF ⌦ ⌦2
1
⌦ = f /fc
Current density in conductive material: r ⇥ H = j!"E + J ' J
Distribution of surface currents on the RWG’s walls:
Jz,top
1 ˆ
= Hx e
Jx,top =
y
Jy
xn
H(xn ) / Ĥ(xn = 0)e
Jx,z
z
s
Jy,right =
1
1
Ĥz e
Ĥz e
y
h
y
h
x
w
x
SPI-2017 Baveno, Italy
Konstantin Lomakin
Friedrich-Alexander Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg
10.05.2017
5
Modeling lossless TE10 Mode
Modelling lossless TE10 Mode
3D model
Transmission line model
Z’
y
Hx
0
dzLo
Hz
h
w
z
ll
ZL,ll
!
2
=j =j
1 (f /fc )
c
ZF
=q
2
1 (f /fc )
c0
fc = p
"r 2w
SPI-2017 Baveno, Italy
dzC
0
Y’
Ey
x
q
00
Lo /dz
ll
=
p
0
0
Z Y =j
ZL,ll =
r
0
ll
X
0 =
Y
=j
s
s
0
Lo
L00o
! 2 L0o C 0
2
0
00
! Lo Lo
! 2 L00o C 0 1
µ0 w 2
Lo = µ C = " Lo =
⇡2
0
0
Konstantin Lomakin
Friedrich-Alexander Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg
00
10.05.2017
7
Incorporating Loss Effects
Transmission Line Model for lossy TE10 Mode
✦
Extending lossless model:
✦
Conductor losses due to longitudinal currents: R’
✦
Conductor losses due to transversal currents: R’’
✦
Dielectric losses in electric field:
0
0
G = !C tan
Il
dzL
0
dzR
0
00
L /dz
It
Model currents
✦
dzC
0
dzG
0
00
R /dz
Model holds as long as fields don’t degenerate dramatically
SPI-2017 Baveno, Italy
Konstantin Lomakin
Friedrich-Alexander Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg
10.05.2017
9
Deriving Model Currents
✦
Model currents are derived from field energies and Lo’ and Lo’’ in lossless case:
W m,x
W m,z
1
=
2
1
=
2
Z
Z
µHx2 dV
1 0
= Lo dzIl2
2
0
Lo = µ
µHz2 dV
1 00 2
=
Lo It
2dz
µ0 w 2
Lo =
⇡2
⇡
It = p dz
w 2
s
p
2Pin ⌦2
ZF ⌦
2Pin
p
Z F ⌦ ⌦2
1
1
00
Field distribution
Iz =
✦
j
Il = p
2
s
Z
w
0
Z
h+
h
2
Jz,top dydx = j
⇡
s
p
w 2Pin ⌦2
h
ZF ⌦
1
Model current does not explicitly scale with geometry (w,h) like physical current does!
SPI-2017 Baveno, Italy
Konstantin Lomakin
Friedrich-Alexander Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg
10.05.2017
10
Modelling Conductor Losses
✦
Physical loss power inside conductive material gathered from current densities
✦
R’ and R’’, together with the model currents must yield the same loss power:
1
Z
Longitudinal currents
Jz2 dV
Field distribution
1
Z
= dzR
0
0
Il2
R =
2
h
Model
Transversal currents
2
Jx,y
dV
SPI-2017 Baveno, Italy
1 00 2
=
R It
dz
2w (w + 2h)
R =
h⇡ 2
Konstantin Lomakin
Friedrich-Alexander Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg
00
10.05.2017
11
Impact of Losses on the Phase
Coefficient
Additional Impact on Phase Coefficient
✦
Penetrating magnetic fields in conductors (skin effect) associated with:
✦
Current densities and conductor loss (taken into account by R’ and R’’)
✦
Magnetic field energy in conductive material: Inner Inductance
0
R
2
Li =
=
!
! h
00
00
R
2w (w + 2h)
Li =
=
!
!h⇡ 2
0
✦
0
0
0
00
00
00
L = Lo + Li
L = Lo + Li
Final equations for propagation coefficient and characteristic impedance:
s
✓
◆
1
0
0
= (R + j!L )
+
G
+
j!C
R00 + j!L00
s
✓
◆
1
0
0
0
0
Z = (R + j!L )/
+
G
+
j!C
R00 + j!L00
SPI-2017 Baveno, Italy
0
0
Konstantin Lomakin
Friedrich-Alexander Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg
10.05.2017
13
Comparison to Simulation and
Measurement
Simulation of RWG with different heights
✦
Finite conductivity, identical in all simulated hollow RWGs;
✦
Ideal smooth surfaces in simulation and proposed model; w = 4mm
✦
Continuous lines: proposed model; dashed: HFSS simulation;
✦
Full wave field solver and proposed model deliver almost identical responses
20
15
10
2
in 1/m
4
↵ in 1/m
h = 1 mm
h = 2 mm
h = 3 mm
Perturbation Method
h = 1 mm
h = 2 mm
h = 3 mm
5
0
37
37.5
SPI-2017 Baveno, Italy
38
38.5
39
Frequency in GHz
39.5
40 37.3
37.35
37.4
37.45
Frequency in GHz
Konstantin Lomakin
Friedrich-Alexander Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg
0
37.5
10.05.2017
15
Measurement: WR10 Waveguide
✦
TRL calibration at waveguide flange
✦
Material: brass; Exact conductivity unknown
✦
Fabrication tolerances not exactly known
✦
Possible reason for apparently low conductivity: Surface Roughness
Estimation from phase coefficient: ~0.5 MS/m
Estimating w from phase coefficient: ~2.49 mm
20
Measurement
Proposed Model
/
0
15
10
1.2
↵ in 1/m
Measurement
Proposed Model
Perturbation Method
1.4
5
1
60
61
SPI-2017 Baveno, Italy
62
63
64
Frequency in GHz
65
66
60
70
80
90
Frequency in GHz
Konstantin Lomakin
Friedrich-Alexander Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg
100
110
0
10.05.2017
16
Conclusion
Conclusion
✦
Transmission Line Model for RWG only requiring geometry and material parameters
✦
Analytical equations describing propagation characteristics with respect to losses
✦
Very efficient in terms of computation time
✦
Basic principle: Perturbation Method formulated in Transmission Line Model
✦
Inner inductance accounts for the impact of losses on the phase coefficient
✦
Model is easily extendable to include surface roughness effects
✦
Model potentially enables higher precision of waveguide measurements & calibration
SPI-2017 Baveno, Italy
Konstantin Lomakin
Friedrich-Alexander Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg
10.05.2017
18
Thank You very much for Your Attention
Related documents