Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Transmission Line Model for Rectangular Waveguides accurately incorporating Loss Effects Konstantin Lomakin [email protected] Institute of Microwaves and Photonics Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg 10 May 2017 Outline ✦ ✦ ✦ ✦ ✦ ✦ Introduction Modeling lossless TE10 Mode Incorporating Loss Effects Impact of Losses on the Phase Coefficient Comparison to Simulation and Measurement Conclusion SPI-2017 Baveno, Italy Konstantin Lomakin Friedrich-Alexander Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg 10.05.2017 2 Introduction Introduction ✦ Rectangular Waveguides (RWG) typically deployed e.g. in mm-wave or space applications ✦ Fundamental mode of RWG: TE10 ✦ Inherently dispersive transmission line ✦ Only two loss-mechanisms: dielectric and conductor ✦ One typical modeling approach: ‣ Phase coefficient: solution of Maxwell’s equations ‣ Attenuation coefficient: perturbation method ✦ Perturbation method does not take into account any impact on phase coefficient y h z SPI-2017 Baveno, Italy Konstantin Lomakin Friedrich-Alexander Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg w x 10.05.2017 4 Current Distribution of the TE10 Mode Transversal Field Components ⇣ ⇡x ⌘ Ey = ✦ jA10 ZF ⌦ sin w ⇣ ⇡x ⌘ p Hx = jA10 ⌦2 1 sin w ✦ Longitudinal Component Hz = A10 cos ⇣ ⇡x ⌘ A10 = w 2Pin p whZF ⌦ ⌦2 1 ⌦ = f /fc Current density in conductive material: r ⇥ H = j!"E + J ' J Distribution of surface currents on the RWG’s walls: Jz,top 1 ˆ = Hx e Jx,top = y Jy xn H(xn ) / Ĥ(xn = 0)e Jx,z z s Jy,right = 1 1 Ĥz e Ĥz e y h y h x w x SPI-2017 Baveno, Italy Konstantin Lomakin Friedrich-Alexander Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg 10.05.2017 5 Modeling lossless TE10 Mode Modelling lossless TE10 Mode 3D model Transmission line model Z’ y Hx 0 dzLo Hz h w z ll ZL,ll ! 2 =j =j 1 (f /fc ) c ZF =q 2 1 (f /fc ) c0 fc = p "r 2w SPI-2017 Baveno, Italy dzC 0 Y’ Ey x q 00 Lo /dz ll = p 0 0 Z Y =j ZL,ll = r 0 ll X 0 = Y =j s s 0 Lo L00o ! 2 L0o C 0 2 0 00 ! Lo Lo ! 2 L00o C 0 1 µ0 w 2 Lo = µ C = " Lo = ⇡2 0 0 Konstantin Lomakin Friedrich-Alexander Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg 00 10.05.2017 7 Incorporating Loss Effects Transmission Line Model for lossy TE10 Mode ✦ Extending lossless model: ✦ Conductor losses due to longitudinal currents: R’ ✦ Conductor losses due to transversal currents: R’’ ✦ Dielectric losses in electric field: 0 0 G = !C tan Il dzL 0 dzR 0 00 L /dz It Model currents ✦ dzC 0 dzG 0 00 R /dz Model holds as long as fields don’t degenerate dramatically SPI-2017 Baveno, Italy Konstantin Lomakin Friedrich-Alexander Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg 10.05.2017 9 Deriving Model Currents ✦ Model currents are derived from field energies and Lo’ and Lo’’ in lossless case: W m,x W m,z 1 = 2 1 = 2 Z Z µHx2 dV 1 0 = Lo dzIl2 2 0 Lo = µ µHz2 dV 1 00 2 = Lo It 2dz µ0 w 2 Lo = ⇡2 ⇡ It = p dz w 2 s p 2Pin ⌦2 ZF ⌦ 2Pin p Z F ⌦ ⌦2 1 1 00 Field distribution Iz = ✦ j Il = p 2 s Z w 0 Z h+ h 2 Jz,top dydx = j ⇡ s p w 2Pin ⌦2 h ZF ⌦ 1 Model current does not explicitly scale with geometry (w,h) like physical current does! SPI-2017 Baveno, Italy Konstantin Lomakin Friedrich-Alexander Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg 10.05.2017 10 Modelling Conductor Losses ✦ Physical loss power inside conductive material gathered from current densities ✦ R’ and R’’, together with the model currents must yield the same loss power: 1 Z Longitudinal currents Jz2 dV Field distribution 1 Z = dzR 0 0 Il2 R = 2 h Model Transversal currents 2 Jx,y dV SPI-2017 Baveno, Italy 1 00 2 = R It dz 2w (w + 2h) R = h⇡ 2 Konstantin Lomakin Friedrich-Alexander Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg 00 10.05.2017 11 Impact of Losses on the Phase Coefficient Additional Impact on Phase Coefficient ✦ Penetrating magnetic fields in conductors (skin effect) associated with: ✦ Current densities and conductor loss (taken into account by R’ and R’’) ✦ Magnetic field energy in conductive material: Inner Inductance 0 R 2 Li = = ! ! h 00 00 R 2w (w + 2h) Li = = ! !h⇡ 2 0 ✦ 0 0 0 00 00 00 L = Lo + Li L = Lo + Li Final equations for propagation coefficient and characteristic impedance: s ✓ ◆ 1 0 0 = (R + j!L ) + G + j!C R00 + j!L00 s ✓ ◆ 1 0 0 0 0 Z = (R + j!L )/ + G + j!C R00 + j!L00 SPI-2017 Baveno, Italy 0 0 Konstantin Lomakin Friedrich-Alexander Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg 10.05.2017 13 Comparison to Simulation and Measurement Simulation of RWG with different heights ✦ Finite conductivity, identical in all simulated hollow RWGs; ✦ Ideal smooth surfaces in simulation and proposed model; w = 4mm ✦ Continuous lines: proposed model; dashed: HFSS simulation; ✦ Full wave field solver and proposed model deliver almost identical responses 20 15 10 2 in 1/m 4 ↵ in 1/m h = 1 mm h = 2 mm h = 3 mm Perturbation Method h = 1 mm h = 2 mm h = 3 mm 5 0 37 37.5 SPI-2017 Baveno, Italy 38 38.5 39 Frequency in GHz 39.5 40 37.3 37.35 37.4 37.45 Frequency in GHz Konstantin Lomakin Friedrich-Alexander Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg 0 37.5 10.05.2017 15 Measurement: WR10 Waveguide ✦ TRL calibration at waveguide flange ✦ Material: brass; Exact conductivity unknown ✦ Fabrication tolerances not exactly known ✦ Possible reason for apparently low conductivity: Surface Roughness Estimation from phase coefficient: ~0.5 MS/m Estimating w from phase coefficient: ~2.49 mm 20 Measurement Proposed Model / 0 15 10 1.2 ↵ in 1/m Measurement Proposed Model Perturbation Method 1.4 5 1 60 61 SPI-2017 Baveno, Italy 62 63 64 Frequency in GHz 65 66 60 70 80 90 Frequency in GHz Konstantin Lomakin Friedrich-Alexander Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg 100 110 0 10.05.2017 16 Conclusion Conclusion ✦ Transmission Line Model for RWG only requiring geometry and material parameters ✦ Analytical equations describing propagation characteristics with respect to losses ✦ Very efficient in terms of computation time ✦ Basic principle: Perturbation Method formulated in Transmission Line Model ✦ Inner inductance accounts for the impact of losses on the phase coefficient ✦ Model is easily extendable to include surface roughness effects ✦ Model potentially enables higher precision of waveguide measurements & calibration SPI-2017 Baveno, Italy Konstantin Lomakin Friedrich-Alexander Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg 10.05.2017 18 Thank You very much for Your Attention