Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
WATER/WASTEWATER ADVISORY COMMITTEE WATER PRE-APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS GENERAL REQUIREMENTS All potential water applicants requesting state-administered grant or loan funds to finance water facility improvements must complete a Water/Wastewater Advisory Committee (WWAC) preapplication, consisting of the pre-application cover sheet, a preliminary engineering report and a clearinghouse form SF-424. The original and FIVE (5) copies of the completed pre-application package must be mailed to: Dave Fenter, WWAC Chairman Arkansas Natural Resources Commission 101 Capitol Ave., Suite 350 Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 Each pre-application will be reviewed by the WWAC as follows: 1. An original pre-application and FIVE (5) copies are submitted to the Arkansas Natural Resources Commission (ANRC). 2. The ANRC will send a copy of all pre-application materials to the following WWAC members and funding and regulatory agencies: A. B. C. D. E. F. Arkansas Natural Resources Commission Arkansas Department of Health Community Resource Group USDA, Rural Development State Clearinghouse Economic Development Administration (if required) 3. WWAC meets once a month on the first Wednesday of each month. WWAC preapplications must be submitted by the 15th of the month to be included in the agenda. Preapplication submitted after the 15th will not make the agenda. 4. After thorough review of the pre-application, the WWAC will reply in writing to the applicant. If the pre-application is acceptable, the WWAC will outline the logical funding sources to which a full application should be submitted. The WWAC may, in the same letter or in a separate comment letter, list pertinent comments regarding technical, operational or financial aspects of the project. Substantial comments by the WWAC must be resolved before the project can be recommended for approval. Each agency on the WWAC will receive copies of all WWAC correspondence. 5. Each funding agency will follow its normal application process. Applicants seeking federal funding for the same project must submit an application to the federal agency from which funds are requested. 6. If an application varies significantly from the pre-application, or if the facts involving a project have changed such that the feasibility of the proposed solution warrants further investigation, any individual WWAC agency may request a full WWAC review for the project again. 7. Assistance will be recommended only to the extent necessary to complete project activities over and above private/local efforts, and for solutions considered feasible by the WWAC. REQUIRED ENGINEERING REPORT CONTENT Submit a comprehensive preliminary engineering report specific to the problem being examined. Documentation of any health hazards; deficiencies concerning source, treatment or distribution; National Primary Drinking Water Regulation violations; or other negative impacts currently being experienced should be included if pertinent to the project. The preliminary engineering report must consist of: 1. A narrative discussing project background and need, number of customers affected, and type of customer (residential, commercial, industrial and agricultural). 2. An evaluation and comparison of all feasible alternatives. Each alternative must include its basis of design and any advantages and disadvantages for that alternative related to construction, operation or maintenance. 3. Detailed cost estimates for each alternative including capital costs, operation and maintenance, debt service and reserve costs. 4. Current and proposed rate structure(s). 5. A listing of the necessary environmental permits for the project, both federal and state. 6. Project timetable. 7. Project map identifying the service area, land acquisition, source development projects, building structures and water lines. 8. Current and proposed average water usage and existing treatment capacity (if water is purchased, provide maximum amount of water that can be purchased and treatment capacity of seller). Report Considerations It is the WWAC’s policy to recommend the most cost effective use of public monies by promoting source, treatment and distribution systems that provide the highest quality water and service while maintaining realistic and reasonable customer rates. 1. System Consolidation - It is the policy of the WWAC and the State Water Plan to promote the regionalization concept for water supply, treatment and distribution. Regionalization usually results in more cost-effective use of public monies. Small water systems have historically had greater operation and maintenance problems, are financially less viable, are less able to develop, operate and maintain water source and treatment projects, and has a higher incidence of drinking water standards violations. All of these result in poorer service and water quality to the customer. If an existing public water system can feasibly serve a proposed project, the engineer must address the possibility of securing water from this source, including an upgrade or expansion of the existing system. If a new system is proposed and it is feasible to serve an existing water system, that option must be examined. 2. Engineering Design – Each alternative must include the basis for engineering design including preliminary design calculations. The report should identify and address average, peak daily and maximum instantaneous demands, if applicable. Design considerations include: a. b. c. Source development – adequacy of water quality and quantity, sources of contamination and possible mitigation, treatment required, environmental feasibility and existing available sources. Treatment – current and projected capacity, type and suitability of treatment and current and future drinking water standards. Distribution – current and proposed type, location and volume of usable storage; current and proposed pumping facilities for both high service and booster pump stations; flow and pressure requirements of transmission and distribution lines. 3. Cost Estimate – Each alternative must include an itemized construction estimate and estimated costs for related items including applicable fees for connection, development, land, easements, geotechnical, legal, engineering, construction observation, administration, equipment, interest, refinancing and contingencies. 4. Operating Expense – If an existing system, provide an itemized listing of the current operating budget including existing debt service. For each proposed alternative, include estimates for operation and maintenance costs including labor and benefits, utilities, taxes, insurance, materials, chemicals, water fees, routine repairs and outside services such as consultants, accountants and lab work, if applicable. Operating expenses must also include any proposed debt service and a replacement reserve for major and emergency maintenance of at least 10% of the O&M budget. Every public water system is required to have a licensed operator. Most systems have administrative personnel as well. Operating revenues must be reasonable to support the type and size of system proposed. Alternatives with lower maintenance and operating expenses, if available, must be emphasized. 5. Rate Structure – A rate structure must be included that will satisfy the capital, operating and debt expenses for the proposed alternative. The report must include: a. b. Current water rates including the minimum charge, the charge for a residential customer using 4,000 gallons per month and the current miscellaneous charges such as meter deposit, tapping fee, meter setting, etc. Proposed water rates including charge and residential rate for 4,000 gallons per month as well as any changes proposed for miscellaneous fees. A critical review of current and proposed rates, including water and sewer rates if applicable, will be made. If low, capability of the water system to support additional loan debt service will be examined; if high, the viability of the project will be evaluated in light of possible grant funds, if available. 6. Project Timetable – Include a timetable for the project and identify any regulatory or administrative deadlines. Identify time frames for: a. b. c. d. 7. Preparation of plans and specifications Regulatory review/bidding Begin construction Complete construction and project startup Projects Maps – Submit legible maps for the project outlining the proposed service area and the location of all lines, pump stations, storage tanks, source and treatment facilities. The maps should also include other pertinent information such as natural boundaries, contour elevations and existing systems.