Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
drh h e oCcea nacaa Ck lM Pea oaPh eCci aloR hcS uh fa ecne rra oChS arahS 3641e کد خبر33e13 - 3333 بهمن3 ،جمعه ia Ck -beea nac eea i Cc ra a lo irCMPS amei h a cMxa CMio drCMPS lo a aCcieSa aS h iM h eh hPPaP kMca eCck r irCMPS e ie McSa xh fa ecnk drCMPS e a Sei eca k Cx xh fa ecn hcS kaC eC h a hkkhe i kMca eCc e r eSa hcnecn aieCcie ePe eai Iranian Public Relations News Network(shara) — Divergent views on where PR should exist are numerous. Should PR be considered a sub-set of marketing? Should it be distinct from marketing and a parallel function? Or should it sit under corporate affairs function with wide ranging responsibilities? The conversation has always centered on whether the role of public relations is to support marketing or whether it serves a broader social function. Having been discussed for decades starting with Richard S. Tedlow in 1979, who studied the history of corporate public relations from 1900 to 1950, and concluded that the public relations function survived during that half century because it fulfilled a broader function. The debate has intensified in recent years as both scholars and practitioners have discussed the relationship of public relations to the concepts of integrated marketing communication and integrated communication. Philip Kotler and William Mindak outlined five alternative arrangements in their studies – (a) PR and marketing to operate as separate but equal functions; (b) both as equal but overlapping functions – sharing product publicity and customer relations; and public relations as a ‘watchdog’ on the social responsibility of marketing; (c) marketing as the dominant function; (d) public relations as the dominant function; (e) and marketing and public relations as a converged function. In current times the debate intensifies when one analyses the way some of the world’s largest organisations structure themselves. Often the communications leader functions as a part of the broader marketing team, in others the communications team functions as a parallel function reporting into the CEO. Whilst in some, the corporate communications leader goes beyond the CEO and reports directly to the company Board. Diving deeper, there are several factors which drive these choices: some of these include the nature of business itself, the complexity of the sector, the regulatory or social scrutiny that an organisation has to deal with and the maturity levels within the organisation. In case of B2C brands within FMCG organisations, each department is singularly fixated toward creating highest level of engagement with the consumer; aligning PR with marketing is a natural choice. In the B2B space, marketing is more one on one, and role of mass communication for creating revenues is limited. In these cases, PR is often a separate function, critical in building a supportive environment for the business to thrive by helping manage stakeholders rather than clients. For companies in highly sensitive or regulated areas, and those dealing with natural resources or the environment, PR assumes the role of public affairs working closely with the legal counsel. Generally, for most organisations in the middle, we witness a process of maturing of sorts – where PR has evolved, from being an extended arm of marketing to a full-fledged separate function reporting into the CEO. Growing needs of organisations to demonstrate social accountability has further added to this shift, with marketing keeping its focus on making the brand look good, while PR takes on a neutral ground, balancing the for-profit and not-for-profit objectives of the business. It is a complex time for communications and marketing professionals today, marked by an explosion of influencers, a voracious demand for content, one-a-day crises, consolidating media outlets, and rapidly expanding social media technologies. Although marketing has traditionally been responsible for the customer, and communications responsible for other stakeholders such as media, government and investors; this dual-structure may be losing its relevance and efficiency in today’s marketplace. It’s not a surprise that companies are responding by merging the communications and marketing functions to respond more quickly and strategically with “one voice”. This drift is often referred to as converged communications, integrated communications and hybridized communications. This trend has been vindicated by a recent global study conducted by Weber Shandwick titled Convergence Ahead: The Integration of Communications and Marketing. A qualitative research involving in-depth telephone interviews with chief communications and marketing officers (CCMOs or CMCOs) of leading global organisations who provided insight into convergence today and conveyed that convergence is fast developing into a trend. The rate of growth of chief communications officers with marketing oversight is on the rise (up 35% since 2012). The findings from the study identified a number of accelerators behind this trend of integration. Among the most pervasive is the role of digital media, content creation and technology play in convergence. Social media and digital technologies have blurred the lines between marketing and communications and these newly integrated roles are better aligned to meet the demands of an ever-changing, increasingly complex and data-driven media environment. Another factor behind the growing convergence is the rising inter-dependence between brand and corporate reputation. CCMOs have found integration invaluable to initiatives involving marketplace repositioning, as well as reputation recovery. Managing larger organisations requires strong coordination, often across regional markets and business units. The integration of communications and marketing demonstrates that there are many factors to take into account when deciding to merge the two, but CCMOs generally agree that the changes in the media environment will increasingly demand organisations re-evaluate the alignment between the two functions. Moving forward, this new trend of convergence will impact entire industries and has the potential to transform the economy as a whole. In the final analysis, the reasons for convergence are embedded in the common ground that both PR and marketing have operated on in the past – both have been major external functions for large organisations; both functions start their planning and analysis from the point of view of satisfying external groups; both heavily rely on stakeholder insights to find points of tension and communication; and both need to create engagement with their stakeholders in a credible manner to create a win-win situation. The only difference visible was that while marketing relied on having full control on the message and medium through paid channels, PR was managed to create results through conviction. In a world of collapsing media structures and democratisation of views through the advent of digital and social mediums, having full control ceases to be a reality, and skills of the PR leaders have become more relevant in the creation of the end impact. Similarly, PR too needs more complex tools today; to track stakeholder insights and open channels of communication, for which rich media collateral requiring sophisticated production support are imperative, something which was previously the bastion of marketing colleagues. Combining these skills offer an obvious strong common force. Despite the promise, challenges abound in making convergence work. The foremost being changing the mindset and culture crystallized over years. It is not as simple as merging the two functions, fiefdoms and personal priorities would persist. Finding experienced staff with dual oversight is another big challenge; for those who are able to embrace the new form, there is a steep learning curve. Lastly, the biggest challenge is RoI and distribution of a central budget which inevitably comes under greater scrutiny with change. “Change before you have to” – Jack Welch, GE “Details matter, it’s worth waiting to get it right” – Steve Jobs, Apple Inc. http://pitchonnet.com/blog/2015/01/22/convergence-public-relations-pr-marketing-road/