Download 10531_2017_1366_MOESM2_ESM

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

page
1
page
2
page
3
Document related concepts
no text concepts found
Transcript 
Online Resource 2
Variables used for analyses
Spatio-temporal analyses of local biodiversity hotspots reveal the importance of historical land-use
dynamics
Biodiversity and Conservation
Anda Fescenko*, Thomas Wohlgemuth
* University of Latvia, Faculty of Biology, Jelgavas 1, LV-1004 Riga, Latvia; E-mail: [email protected]
OR2: Variables used for analyses across scales. Neighbourhood radii rn of spatial scales: S1=250 m; S2=800 m; S3=1400 m; S4=2500 m; S5=5500 m.
Short name
Description
Source
Unit
S0
Response variable
WKHs
woodland key habitats
Explanatory variables
a) Historical
Stand & landscape level
CONT
forest continuity
F2010
forest cover in 2010 (1)
F1910
forest cover in 1910 (2)
F1860
forest cover in 1860 (3)
F1790
forest cover in 1790 (4)
Landscape level (per one 500x500m cell)
CH12
forest cover change 1910 to 2010
CH23
forest cover change 1860 to 1910
CH34
forest cover change 1790 to 1860
NP1910
number of forest patches in 1910
NP1860
number of forest patches in 1860
NP1790
number of forest patches in 1790
PD1910
patch density in 1910
PD1860
patch density in 1860
PD1790
patch density in 1790
b) Environmental
Stand & landscape level
ELEV
elevation above sea level
SWET
soil wetness (dry, moderate, wet)
SRICH
soil fertility (oligo-, meso-, eutrophic)
DRY-MIN
dry growing conditions
SFS
ha, %
binomial
Fescenko
et al.2014
SFS
Fescenko
et al.2014
"
categorical
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
%
"
"
number
"
"
number/ha
"
"
GISL
SOIL
"
SFS
categorical
"
"
ha, %
ha, %
"
"
"
Range at various scales (S)
S1
S2
S3
S4
S5
0.1-59
0-1
0-100
0-1
0-75
0-1
0-30
0-1
0-17
0-1
0-8
0-1
1-4
1-4
1-4
1-4
1-4
3-4
0-59
0-59
0-59
0-59
0-100
0-100
0-100
0-100
0-100
0-100
0-100
0-100
0-100
0-97
0-100
0-100
0-98
0-85
0-99
0-100
1-90
1-79
0.3-90
0-90
- -95, 100
- -100, 100
- -100, 100
0-5
0-5
0-3
0-100
0-99
0-100
-42, 99
-100, 91
-100, 100
0-2.7
0-2.2
0-1.3
0-42
0-31
0-32
-22, 91
-87, 71
-94, 96
0-2.0
0-1.6
0-1.2
0-22
0-26
0-13
-8, 64
-52, 33
-71, 67
0-1.4
0-1.2
0-1.0
0-17
0-12
0-7
-2, 44
-31, 13
-43, 42
0.03-1.2
0.03-1.0
0-3.8
1-11
0-7
0-4
1-5.9
0.3-3
0.3-3
0-99
1-5.6
0.5-3
0.5-3
0-92
1-5.2
0.7-2.7
0.7-3.0
0-72
1-5.0
0.9-2.2
0.8-3.0
0-58
1-6
1-3
1-3
0-39
1-6
1-3
1-3
0-100
WET-PEAT
WET-MIN
DRAIND
OLDF
TRICH
DISTUR
wet growing conditions on peat soils
wet growing conditions on mineral soils
drained forest
old forests
tree species richness
last 20 yrs disturbances (fire, wind,
diseases, clear-cuts, thinning)
RIVERS
total length of rivers and streams
Landscape level (per one 500x500m cell)
BOGS
bogs
ROADS
total length of the roads
GLADES
forest glades, meadows
VILL
distance to the nearest village
NP2010
number of forest patches in 2010
PD2010
patch density in 2010
N-STAND
number of forest stands
MA-STAND mean area of stand
"
"
SFS
"
"
"
"
ha, %
"
number
ha, %
"
SFS, GISL
m
SFS, GISL
"
"
GISL
SFS
"
"
"
%
m
%
m
number
number/ha
number
ha
0-59
0-37
0-45
0-59
1-9
0-28
0-100
0-99
0-100
0-100
1-6
0-52
0-66
0-71
0-98
0-71
0-4.8
0-22
0-40
0-58
0-93
0-53
0-4.1
0-16.6
0-27
0-39
0-68
0-40
0-3.5
0-9.5
0-17
0-23
0-41
0-29
0-2.3
0-6.3
0-4885
0-4503
0-2980
0-2411
0-1759
2-1089
-
0-100
0-1580
0-93
0-8058
1-9
0.1-100
1-47
0.1-24.5
0-100
0-1004
0-32
0-7768
0.1-4
0.1-47
0.4-27.4
0-4.1
0-100
0-760
0-13
0-7480
0.1-2.9
0.1-29
0.2-20.2
0-1.9
0-99
0-584
0-6
0-6917
0.1-2.3
0.1-18
0.1-12.7
0-1.0
0-59
0-318
0-3
0-8058
0.1-1.6
0.4-13.0
0.1-8.4
0-0.6
Related documents