Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Supplementary 1: Biomass composition and energy requirements of Candida tropicalis Table of Contents Candida tropicalis biomass composition calculation ............................... 1 Overall cellular composition .................................................................................................. 1 Amino acid composition ........................................................................................................ 2 Carbohydrates composition (Brondz and Olsen 1990) .......................................................... 3 DNA composition ................................................................................................................... 3 RNA composition (Dujon et al. 2004) .................................................................................... 4 Lipid composition ................................................................................................................... 4 Growth associated ATP requirement for polymerization ...................................................... 6 Additional biomass components (Xu et al. 2013) .................................................................. 6 Biomass composition summary ............................................................................................. 7 Non-growth associated ATP maintenance (NGAM) requirement ............8 Candida tropicalis biomass composition calculation In the following calculations, general information such as molecular weight (MW) and chemical formula of each compound are obtain from the online PubChem database. Overall cellular composition Component Cellular content (g/gDCW) Reference Protein 0.5300 Batch cultivations in minimal medium RNA 0.0630 (Verduyn et al. Referring to 1990) S.cerevisiae (Verduyn et al. Referring to 1990) S.cerevisiae (Goyal and Referring to C.albicans DNA Lipid 0.0040 0.0395 Remark Khuller 1992) Carbohydrate s 0.4000 (Brondz and Referring to T.glabrata Olsen 1990) Page | 1 Amino acid composition The composition of aspartate cannot be distinguished from that of asparagine and this is also the same for glutamine and glutamate. Thus, we assume equal distribution of the composition within the pairs of amino acids. The molecular weight of the amino acids given in the following table excludes the weight of the water molecule that was lost during the formation of peptide bonds. Amino acid Content(mg/gDCW) MW-H2O(g/mol) mmol/gDCW Aspartate 3.8690 114.11 0.0339 Glutamate 42.5590 128.13 0.3321 Serine 26.4470 87.09 0.3037 Histidine 20.1400 137.16 0.1468 Glycine 22.9490 57.07 0.4021 Threonine 23.7970 101.12 0.2353 Arginine 0.0820 157.21 0.0005 Alanine 37.8950 71.09 0.5330 Tyrosine 29.5740 163.19 0.1812 Cysteine 5.1940 103.16 0.0503 Valine 37.7360 99.15 0.3806 Methionine 45.6330 131.21 0.3478 Phenylalanine 30.3690 147.19 0.2063 Isoleucine 22.5780 113.18 0.1995 Leucine 41.9760 113.18 0.3709 Page | 2 Lysine 68.7410 129.20 0.5321 Proline 20.2990 97.13 0.2090 Glutamine 42.5590 129.13 0.3296 Asparagine 3.8690 114.12 0.0339 Tryptophan 14.4720 186.23 0.0777 Carbohydrates composition (Brondz and Olsen 1990) The total content of carbohydrate was equal to the contents of glucan 1,3 in the biomass function. . Component Content(w/w) MW-H2O mmol/gDCW (g/mol) Mannose 0.2770 162 0.6839 Glucose 0.5180 162 1.2790 Galactose 0.2050 162 0.5061 DNA composition GC content of Candida tropicalis is about 33.2% (Butler et al. 2009). Nucleotide DNA (mol/mol) MW-ppi (g/mol) DNA (mmol/gDCW) dATP 0.3350 312.202 0.0043 dCTP 0.1650 286.16 0.0023 dGTP 0.1650 328.201 0.0020 dTTP 0.3350 303.187 0.0044 Page | 3 RNA composition (Dujon et al. 2004) RNA composition of C. tropicalis, referring to C. glabrata Nucleotide RNA (mol/mol) MW-ppi (g/mol) RNA (mmol/gDCW) mRNA(5%) tRNA(75%) rRNA(20%) ATP 0.3350 0.2950 0.3685 328.20 0.0696 CTP 0.1650 0.2050 0.1164 304.18 0.0273 GTP 0.1650 0.2050 0.0830 344.20 0.0224 UTP 0.3350 0.2950 0.4321 305.16 0.0791 Lipid composition The composition of lipids were calculated from data obtained from (Dey and Maiti 2013). Before we can evaluate the composition of lipids, we need to calculate the average molecular weight of a fatty acid chain based on data reported by Dey and Maiti: Fatty acid (w/w %) Content(w/w) MW(g/mol) mmol/g FA mol % FA C120 4.6 0.046 200.32 0.23 0.0619 C160 24.6 0.246 255.40 0.96 0.2596 C161 3.8 0.038 253.40 0.15 0.0404 C170 1.4 0.014 270.45 0.05 0.0140 C180 50.2 0.502 283.50 1.77 0.4773 C181 15.4 0.154 281.50 0.55 0.1475 Page | 4 Taking the inverse of the sum of the values in the “mmol/g FA” column gives us the average molecular weight of a fatty acid chain to be 269.54 g/mol. Using the data by (Goyal and Khuller 1992), we can evaluate the molecular weights and composition of the phospholipids by adding the weight of the respective number of fatty acid chains to the phosphatecontaining core structure of the phospholipids. We have used the relative abundance of different phospholipids as reported by Goyal and khuller. By taking into consideration that the total cellular lipid composition is 0.0395 g/gDCW, we can calculate the individual lipid composition: Phospholipid Content(g/g Core phospholipid) MW No. of Lipid mmol/g mmol/gDCW FA MW(g/mol) phosholipid PC 0.2014 312.230 2 851.31 0.23657657 0.0009 PE 0.1358 269.150 2 808.23 0.168021479 0.0006 PI 0.1208 388.220 2 927.3 0.130270678 0.0005 PS 0.1656 383.290 2 922.37 0.179537496 0.0007 PA 0.0360 226.080 2 765.16 0.047076326 0.0002 Sterol composition data given for C.albicans by (Ghannoum, Swairjo, and Soll 1990) is converted to biomass composition using the values of 0.0395 g lipid/gDCW given by Goyal and Khuller.. Component Content(w/w lipid) MW(g/mol) mmol/g lipid mmol/gDCW Lanosterol 0.1050 426.3862 0.2463 0.00136 Page | 5 Squalene 0.0280 410.3913 0.0682 0.00038 Ergosterol 0.7600 396.3392 1.9175 0.01060 Growth associated ATP requirement for polymerization The ATP requirement for polymerization of each species is obtained from (Verduyn, 1991). Polymer g/gDCW mmol ATP/g polymer mmol ATP/gDCW Protein 0.53 37.7 19.981 Carbohydrate 0.4 12.8 5.12 RNA 0.063 26 1.638 DNA 0.004 26 0.104 Total growth associated ATP requirement is 26.843 mmol ATP/gDCW. Additional biomass components (Xu et al. 2013) We include some essential metabolites in the biomass composition so as to qualitative account for the essentiality of their synthesis pathways. The composition of these metabolites is summarized in the following table: Molecule MW (g/mol) w/w soluble mmol / gDCW pool FAD 783.54 0.1000 0.0012 Thiamine(1+) diphosphate 422.30 0.1000 0.0022 NAD 662.42 0.1000 0.0014 NADP 740.39 0.1000 0.0012 COA 763.51 0.1000 0.0012 Page | 6 FMN 456.00 0.1000 0.0020 5-Methyltetrahydrofolate 458.46 0.1000 0.0020 Biomass composition summary Metabolite mmol/gDCW Metabolite mmol/gDCW Aspartate 0.0339 FAD 0.0012 Glutamate 0.3321 Thiamine(1+) diphosphate 0.0022 Serine 0.3037 NAD 0.0014 Histidine 0.1468 NADP 0.0012 Glycine 0.4021 COA 0.0012 Threonine 0.2353 FMN 0.0020 Arginine 0.0005 5-Methyltetrahydrofolate 0.0020 Alanine 0.5330 dATP 0.0043 Tyrosine 0.1812 dCTP 0.0023 Cysteine 0.0503 dGTP 0.0020 Valine 0.3806 dTTP 0.0044 Methionine 0.3478 CTP 0.0273 Phenylalanine 0.2063 GTP 0.0224 Isoleucine 0.1995 UTP 0.0791 Leucine 0.3709 Lanosterol 0.00136 Lysine 0.5321 Squalene 0.00038 Proline 0.2090 Ergosterol 0.01060 Glutamine 0.3296 PC 0.0009 Page | 7 Asparagine 0.0339 PE 0.0006 Tryptophan 0.0777 PI 0.0005 13BDglcn 2.46 PS 0.0007 triglyc 0.02 PA 0.0002 Non-growth associated ATP maintenance (NGAM) requirement The NGAM refers to the amount of ATP required by the cell even when it is not growing. This energy consumed for purposes other than the production of new cell material has been extensively reviewed (Van Bodegom 2007). In this study, we determined the NGAM requirement for our chemostat experiment using a conventional method of finding the yintercept of the plot of glucose uptake rate against dilution rate (Pirt 1982). By maximizing ATP turnover under the glucose uptake constraint of 1 mmol/gDCW-hr, the ATP yield is evaluated as YATP, max = 17 mol ATP/ mol glucose. Using this value and the yintercept (0.2292 mmol glucose/gDCW-hr), we can calculate the NGAM requirement to be about 3.8964 mmol ATP/gDCW-hr. Page | 8 References Van Bodegom, Peter. 2007. “Microbial Maintenance: A Critical Review on Its Quantification.” Microbial Ecology 53: 513–23. Brondz, I., and I. Olsen. 1990. “Multivariate Analyses of Cellular Carbohydrates and Fatty Acids of Candida Albicans, Torulopsis Glabrata, and Saccharomyces Cerevisiae.” Journal of Clinical Microbiology 28: 1854–57. Butler, Geraldine et al. 2009. “Evolution of Pathogenicity and Sexual Reproduction in Eight Candida Genomes.” Nature 459: 657–62. Dey, P., and M. K. Maiti. 2013. “Molecular Characterization of a Novel Isolate of Candida Tropicalis for Enhanced Lipid Production.” Journal of Applied Microbiology 114: 1357– 68. Dujon, Bernard et al. 2004. “Genome Evolution in Yeasts.” Nature 430: 35–44. Ghannoum, M A, I Swairjo, and D R Soll. 1990. “Variation in Lipid and Sterol Contents in Candida Albicans White and Opaque Phenotypes.” Journal of medical and veterinary mycology : bi-monthly publication of the International Society for Human and Animal Mycology 28: 103–15. Goyal, S, and G K Khuller. 1992. “Phospholipid Composition and Subcellular Distribution in Yeast and Mycelial Forms of Candida Albicans.” Journal of medical and veterinary mycology : bi-monthly publication of the International Society for Human and Animal Mycology 30: 355–62. Pirt, S J. 1982. “Maintenance Energy: A General Model for Energy-Limited and EnergySufficient Growth.” Archives of microbiology 133: 300–302. Verduyn, C, E Postma, W a Scheffers, and J P van Dijken. 1990. “Physiology of Saccharomyces Cerevisiae in Anaerobic Glucose-Limited Chemostat Cultures.” Journal of general microbiology 136: 395–403. Xu, Nan et al. 2013. “Reconstruction and Analysis of the Genome-Scale Metabolic Network of Candida Glabrata.” Molecular bioSystems 9(2): 205–16. Page | 9