Download Cleaning Validation

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Infection control wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
Supplementary Training Modules on
Good Manufacturing Practices
Validation Part 2:
Cleaning validation
Module 1, Part 2: Cleaning validation Slide 1 of 25
© WHO – EDM Jan 02
Validation
Objectives
To review:

General requirements

Validation protocol requirements

How to check limits

Analytical requirements

Sample methods
Module 1, Part 2: Cleaning validation Slide 2 of 25
© WHO – EDM Jan 02
Validation
Why cleaning validation is so important (1)

Pharmaceuticals can be contaminated by
potentially dangerous substances

Essential to establish adequate cleaning procedures
Module 1, Part 2: Cleaning validation Slide 3 of 25
© WHO – EDM Jan 02
Validation
Why cleaning validation is so important (2)

“Particular attention should be accorded to the
validation of … cleaning procedures” (WHO)

“Cleaning validation should be performed in order
to confirm the effectiveness of a cleaning
procedure” (PIC/S)

“The data should support a conclusion that
residues have been reduced to an ‘acceptable’
level” (FDA)
Module 1, Part 2: Cleaning validation Slide 4 of 25
© WHO – EDM Jan 02
Validation
Possible contaminants

Product residues

Cleaning agent residues and breakdown

Airborne matter

Lubricants, ancillary material

Decomposition residues

Bacteria, mould and pyrogens
Module 1, Part 2: Cleaning validation Slide 5 of 25
© WHO – EDM Jan 02
Validation
Strategy on cleaning validation

Product contact surfaces

After product changeover

Between batches in campaigns

Bracketing products for cleaning validation

Periodic re-evaluation and revalidation
Module 1, Part 2: Cleaning validation Slide 6 of 25
© WHO – EDM Jan 02
Validation
Cleaning validation protocol (1)
Should include :

Objective of the validation

Responsibility for performing and approving
validation study

Description of equipment to be used
Module 1, Part 2: Cleaning validation Slide 7 of 25
© WHO – EDM Jan 02
Validation
Cleaning validation protocol (2)
Should include:

Interval between end of production and cleaning, and
commencement of cleaning procedure

Cleaning procedures to be used

Any routine monitoring equipment used

Number of cleaning cycles performed consecutively

Sampling procedures used and rationale

Sampling locations (clearly defined)
Module 1, Part 2: Cleaning validation Slide 8 of 25
© WHO – EDM Jan 02
Validation
Record of cleaning validation
Should include :

Data on recovery studies

Analytical methods including Limit of Detection and
Limit of Quantitation

Acceptance criteria and rationale

When revalidation will be required

Must have management and QA involvement

Management commitment and QA involvement
Module 1, Part 2: Cleaning validation Slide 9 of 25
© WHO – EDM Jan 02
Validation
Results and reports

Cleaning record signed by operator, checked by
production and reviewed by QA

Final Validation Reports, including conclusions
Module 1, Part 2: Cleaning validation Slide 10 of 25
© WHO – EDM Jan 02
Validation
Personnel

Manual cleaning methods are difficult to
validate

Cannot validate people; can measure proficiency

Must have good training

Must have effective supervision
Module 1, Part 2: Cleaning validation Slide 11 of 25
© WHO – EDM Jan 02
Validation
Microbiological aspects

Include in validation strategy

Analyse risks of contamination

Consider equipment storage time

Equipment should be stored dry

Sterilization and pyrogen contamination
Module 1, Part 2: Cleaning validation Slide 12 of 25
© WHO – EDM Jan 02
Validation
How to sample

Swab/swatch

Rinse fluid

Placebo

The sample transport and storage conditions
should be defined
Module 1, Part 2: Cleaning validation Slide 13 of 25
© WHO – EDM Jan 02
Validation
Swab samples

Direct sampling method

Reproducibility

Extraction efficiency

Document swab locations

Disadvantages



inability to access some areas
assumes uniformity of contamination surface
must extrapolate sample area to whole surface
Module 1, Part 2: Cleaning validation Slide 14 of 25
© WHO – EDM Jan 02
Validation
Rinse samples

Indirect method

Combine with swabs

Useful for cleaning agent residues

pH, conductivity, TOC

Insufficient evidence of cleaning

Sample very large surface areas
Module 1, Part 2: Cleaning validation Slide 15 of 25
© WHO – EDM Jan 02
Validation
Analytical method (1)

Validate analytical method

Must be sensitive assay procedure:

HPLC, GC, HPTLC

TOC

pH

conductivity

UV

ELISA
Module 1, Part 2: Cleaning validation Slide 16 of 25
© WHO – EDM Jan 02
Validation
Analytical method (2)
Check:

Precision, linearity, selectivity

Limit of Detection (LOD)

Limit of Quantitation (LOQ)

Recovery, by spiking

Consistency of recovery
Module 1, Part 2: Cleaning validation Slide 17 of 25
© WHO – EDM Jan 02
Validation
Setting limits (1)

Regulatory authorities do not set limits for
specific products

Logically based

Limits must be practical, achievable and
verifiable

Allergenic and potent substances

Limit setting approach needed
Module 1, Part 2: Cleaning validation Slide 18 of 25
© WHO – EDM Jan 02
Validation
Setting limits (2)

Uniform distribution of contaminants not
guaranteed

Decomposition products to be checked

Setting limits; cleaning criteria:

visually clean

10ppm in another product

0.1% of therapeutic dose
Module 1, Part 2: Cleaning validation Slide 19 of 25
© WHO – EDM Jan 02
Validation
Setting limits: “Visually clean”

Always first criteria

Can be very sensitive but needs verification

Use between same product batches of same
formulation

Illuminate surface

Spiking studies
Module 1, Part 2: Cleaning validation Slide 20 of 25
© WHO – EDM Jan 02
Validation
Setting limits: “10ppm”

Historical

In some poisons regulations

Pharmacopoeias limit test

Assumes residue to be harmful as heavy metal

Useful for materials for which no available
toxicological data

Not for pharmacologically potent material
Module 1, Part 2: Cleaning validation Slide 21 of 25
© WHO – EDM Jan 02
Validation
Setting limits: not more than 0.1%

Proportion of MINIMUM daily dose of current
product carried over into MAXIMUM daily dose
of subsequent product

Need to identify worst case
Module 1, Part 2: Cleaning validation Slide 22 of 25
© WHO – EDM Jan 02
Validation
Other issues

Clean-In-Place (CIP) systems

Placebo studies

Detergent residues; composition should be
known

Scrubbing by hand
Module 1, Part 2: Cleaning validation Slide 23 of 25
© WHO – EDM Jan 02
Validation
Questions for the GMP Inspector to ask

How is equipment cleaned?

Are different cleaning processes required?

How many times is a cleaning process repeated
before acceptable results are obtained?

What is most appropriate solvent or detergent?

At what point does system become clean?

What does visually clean mean?
Module 1, Part 2: Cleaning validation Slide 24 of 25
© WHO – EDM Jan 02
Validation
Conclusion

The manufacturer needs a cleaning validation
strategy

Assess each situation on its merits

Scientific rationale must be developed




equipment selection
contamination distribution
significance of the contaminant
“Visually clean” may be all that is required
Module 1, Part 2: Cleaning validation Slide 25 of 25
© WHO – EDM Jan 02