Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Boundary layer experimental data for evaluation of WRFchem Facts and status quo: • WRFchem is well evaluated for East Coast • WRF is well evaluated for test-bed • WRF did better than the National Hurricane Center model for Katrina Research question to be addressed: • How does WRFchem perform in AK? N. Mölders, boundary layer experiment meeting 10-21-2005 Evaluation of WRFchem needs measurements at various sites inside and outside of Fbks and initial data From NCEP, EPA, USGS, etc. • Spatial and temporal distribution of emission rates from ground and air traffic, power plants, households • Initial background concentration of air constituents • NCEP reanalysis data • Data on vegetation fraction, soil and vegetation distributions From boundary layer experiment • Hourly data of SO2, NO2, N2O, H2O2, O3, VOC, HNO3, PM10, PM2.5 concentrations, T, q, v • Hourly average fluxes of Rnet, H, LvE, G, P, trace gases • Vertical profiles of state variables, concentrations, fluxes desirable at least at three sites • Satellite data for cloud distribution • Active layer depth • Soil temperature and moisture at various depths • ….. N. Mölders, boundary layer experiment meeting 10-21-2005 Proposed outcomes • Test case of performance of WRFchem in the Arctic • Find niche for improvement/model further development • Make judgment on fate of trace gases • Co-authorship for those who provide data useful for my research question “How is WRFchem doing in the Arctic?” • Maybe proposal for experiment-modeling study • …. N. Mölders, boundary layer experiment meeting 10-21-2005 From Tetzlaff et al. 2002