Download Evaluation of WRFchem needs measurements at various sites

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts
no text concepts found
Transcript
Boundary layer experimental data
for evaluation of WRFchem
Facts and status quo:
• WRFchem is well
evaluated for East Coast
• WRF is well evaluated for
test-bed
• WRF did better than the
National Hurricane
Center model for Katrina
Research question to be
addressed:
• How does WRFchem
perform in AK?
N. Mölders, boundary layer
experiment meeting 10-21-2005
Evaluation of WRFchem needs measurements at
various sites inside and outside of Fbks and initial data
From NCEP, EPA, USGS, etc.
• Spatial and temporal distribution
of emission rates from ground
and air traffic, power plants,
households
• Initial background concentration
of air constituents
• NCEP reanalysis data
• Data on vegetation fraction, soil
and vegetation distributions
From boundary layer
experiment
• Hourly data of SO2, NO2, N2O,
H2O2, O3, VOC, HNO3, PM10, PM2.5
concentrations, T, q, v
• Hourly average fluxes of Rnet, H,
LvE, G, P, trace gases
• Vertical profiles of state variables,
concentrations, fluxes desirable at
least at three sites
• Satellite data for cloud distribution
• Active layer depth
• Soil temperature and moisture at
various depths
• …..
N. Mölders, boundary layer
experiment meeting 10-21-2005
Proposed outcomes
• Test case of performance of
WRFchem in the Arctic
• Find niche for
improvement/model further
development
• Make judgment on fate of trace
gases
• Co-authorship for those who
provide data useful for my
research question “How is
WRFchem doing in the Arctic?”
• Maybe proposal for
experiment-modeling study
• ….
N. Mölders, boundary layer
experiment meeting 10-21-2005
From Tetzlaff et al. 2002
Related documents