Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
CANCER FATIGUE Cancer fatigue • Characterized by feelings of tiredness, weakness, and lack of energy, distinct from the “normal” drowsiness experienced by healthy individuals in that it is not relieved by rest or sleep. • It occurs both as a consequence of the cancer itself and as a side effect of cancer treatment, although the precise underlying pathophysiology is largely unknown. Chemotherapy side effects Hofman M et al. The Oncologist 2007;12:4-10. Measuring cancer fatigue • Visual Analog Scale (VAS) • Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI) • The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy instrument • Multidimensional Fatigue Symptom Inventory- Short Form • Etc.. Campos et al Annals of Oncology 2010 Multifactorial pathogenesis Physiological factors Sociodemographic Factors Anemia Age Uremia Sex Hyperparathyroidism Race Medication Employment Status Inflammation Physical Inactivity Comorbidities Cancer Fatigue Marital Status Education Social Support Physiological/ Behavioral factors Anxiety Depression Sleep Disorders Substance Use Cancer-Related Factors Organ effect: pulmonary fibrosis, myopaty, carnitine loss and deficiency Pain and its treatment Frequency of chemotherapy Multi-disciplinary approaches to improve cancer fatigue Targeted area Interventions Increase health care provider awareness • Education of prevalence, importance and severity of fatigue • Training at identifying symptoms of fatigue Improve measurement of fatigue • Development of criteria for defining fatigue • Development of improved fatigue scales • Use of ecological momentary assessment for measurement of day-to-day and diurnal variation in fatigue • Development of improved survey modalities such as telephone interview, computer-assisted interview, and proxy administration of interviews to reduce selection bias • Frequent screening for fatigue Address gaps in understanding pathogenesis of fatigue • Role of cytokines Jham M et al. 2008 Am J Kidney Dis, 55(2):353-365 Multi-disciplinary approaches to improve cancer fatigue Targeted area Interventions Test potential therapies for fatigue Non-pharmacological • Nutritional therapy • Sleep therapy and sleep hygiene • Exercise • Stress management • Cognitive-behavioral treatment of depression • Energy Conservation • Acupressure • Treatment of substance abuse and dependence Pharmacological • Hematopoeitics • Antidepressants • Anxiolytics • Levocarnitine • Human growth hormone Improving social support for patients with fatigue • Family members and care providers education and training • Addressing caregiver fatigue • Frequent screening for fatigue Carnitine loss with carboplatin treatment LC ALC Urinary excretion (µ moles/day) 1000 ** 800 600 400 200 * 0 Day -1 Day 0 * p<0.05; ** p<0.01 Mancinelli A et al. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 2007; 60:19-26 Day +1 Day +6 Free Carnitine plasma levels in chemotherapy 58.00 Free Carnitine levels Group 54.00 Newly Diagnosed / No Prior Chemotherapy 50.00 Prior Chemotherapy 46.00 42.00 38.00 34.00 30.00 Before Before chemotherapy One week after chemotherapy Time (1 week) After Newly Diagnosed / No Prior Chemotherapy Mean (95% CI) 41.00 (36.67–45.33) Prior Chemotherapy Mean (95% CI) 41.55 (36.36–46.73) 50.59 (45.49–55.60) 40.12 (34.89–45.35) Hockenberry MJ et al. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol 2009;31:664–669 Total Carnitine plasma levels in chemotherapy 64.00 Total Carnitine levels Group 60.00 Newly Diagnosed / No Prior Chemotherapy 56.00 Prior Chemotherapy 52.00 48.00 44.00 40.00 36.00 Before Before chemotherapy One week after chemotherapy Time (one week) After Newly Diagnosed / No Prior Chemotherapy Mean (95% CI) 47.70 (42.88–52.51) Prior Chemotherapy Mean (95% CI) 47.52 (42.05–52.98) 57.12 (51.71–62.59) 46.00 (40.53–51.47) Hockenberry MJ et al. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol 2009;31:664–669 L-Carnitine reduces cancer fatigue Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI) Scores before and after L-Carnitine Median BFI Score 80 70 * ** * ** 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Pre All patients (ITT, n = 27) Post Responders (n = 17) Cruciani et al., Journal of Pain and Symptom Management 2006; 32(5):551-559 * p < 0.001 ** p < 0.001 L-Carnitine improves the Depressed Mood Center for Epidemiologica Studies-Depression (CES-D) Scores before and after L-Carnitine Median CES-D Score 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 ** * * ** 10 0 Pre All patients (ITT, n = 27) Post Responders (n = 17) Cruciani et al., Journal of Pain and Symptom Management 2006; 32(5):551-559 * p < 0.001 ** p = 0.001 Results: Quality of Sleep (ESS) Comparisons of ESS Scores before and after L-Carnitine supplementation. Median ESS Score 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 * ** * ** 10 0 Pre All patients (ITT, n = 27) Post Responders (n = 17) Cruciani et al., Journal of Pain and Symptom Management 2006; 32(5):551-559 * p = 0.001 ** p = 0.003 Results: Fatigue Dose Response L-Carnitine Dose Response for Fatigue (Brief Fatigue Inventory score) 100 Free carnitine Total carnitine BFI Mean 80 60 40 20 0 250 750 1250 1750 2250 2750 3000 Dose of L-Carnitine (mg/day) Analysis of the 17 patients, who after 1-week supplementation, had increased serum carnitine levels (“responders“). Each bar represents a dosing group. There was significant dose response for total carnitine (r = 0.54, p = 0.03) and for free carnitine (r = 0.56, p = 0.02). Decrease in fatigue scores (BFI) also showed a significant dose response (r = -0.61, p = 0.01). Cruciani et al., Journal of Pain and Symptom Management 2006; 32(5):551-559 L-Carnitine reduces cancer fatigue Multidimensional Fatigue Symptom Inventory – Short Form questionnaire Mean Scores Mean Subscale Scores 30 25 p < 0.05 20 p < 0.001 15 10 5 0 t0 t1 t2 • Fatigue reduced significantly after 2 weeks (t1 p < 0.05) and 4 weeks (t1 p < 0.001) treatment with 6g oral L-Carnitine. Gramignano G et al., Nutrition 2006; 22: 136-145 Gramignano G et al., Nutrition 2006; 22: 136-145 10 8 6 4 2 0 -2 -4 -6 -8 t0 t1 t2 * * * p < 0.05. T2, 2 week of treatment. General Physical Emotional Mental Vigor Evaluation of the General, Physical, Emotional, Mental and Vigor subscales showed a statistically significant difference between baseline (t0) and 4 wk(t2) of treatment for both the general scale (p < 0.05) and the physical scale (p < 0.05). L-Carnitine improves Quality of Life • Quality of Life improved significantly according to both QoL-OS and EQ-5DVAS QoL-OS Scores EQ-5DVAS Score 30 25 80 t0 t1 t2 70 * 20 15 10 * 60 50 20 10 * * p < 0.05 40 30 * p < 0.05 5 p < 0.001 * 0 0 Functional Physical Social/Family Emotional Fatigue Histograms represent the mean scores of part A subscales of the questionnaire on quality of life with a focus on oxidative stress (Functional, Physical, Emotional, Social and Family and Fatigue). Evaluation of the subscale scores showed a statistically significant difference between mean values at baseline (t0) versus w week (t2) of treatment (p < 0.05) in each subscale. Gramignano G et al., Nutrition 2006; 22: 136-145 Gramignano G et al., Nutrition 2006; 22: 136-145 t0 t1 t2 Histograms represent the mean scores of the EQ-5D visual analog scale. The difference between the mean score at baseline (t0) and after 2 weeks (t1) and 4 weeks (t2) of treatment with L-Camitine supplementation was statistically significant for t1 and t2 versus t0 (p < 0.05 and p < 0.001, respectively). L-carnitine on cancer fatigue Main Clinical Trials No. and type of patients LC Dose Results 12, advanced tumour Gramignano 2006 6 g/day os 4 weeks Fatigue decreased significantly, particularly for the General and Physical scales and quality of life. Lean body mass and appetite increased significantly. Levels of reactive oxygen species decreased and glutathione peroxidase increased 50, Graziano 2002 4 g/day os 7 days Fatigue ameliorated in 45 patients and the mean Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Fatigue score was 34.9 (± 5.4; standard deviation) (p < 0.001). All patients achieved normal plasma carnitine levels. 9, solid or haematological tumours undergoing anthracycline therapy De Leonardis 1985 3 g/day os 3 days before treatment LC treatment reduce anthracycline-dependent acute cardiotoxicity and also positively affect the cardiac contractility during chemotherapy. 1 g iv day of treatment 3 g/dayos 3 days after treatment 104, advanced gynecological cancer Macciò 2012 4 g/day os 4 months Improvement of lean body mass, resting energy expenditure, fatigue, and global quality of life. 60, cancer-related anorexia/cachexia syndrome Madeddu 2012 4 g/day os 4 months Significant improvement of lean body mass and physical performance.