Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Lessons learnt from assessing ecoefficiency in the field of electric mobility STOA Lunch Debate Brussels, May 07, 2013 Rainer Zah, Quantis Peter de Haan, Ernst Basler + Partner 1 From Hype to Analysis Again and again: hoping for new mobility technologies that are sustainable without need for changing behavior: – Electric cars of the 90ies – Natural gas cars – Hybrid cars – Hydrogen cars – Electric cars of today … but emobility is not THE solution… When is emobility part of the solution („opportunity“), when is it part of the problem („risk“)? 2 Scope of the study Future development of cars, power supply and user behavior for the years 2012, 2020, 2035 und 2050. eMobility = electric engine + >50% power from grid: H2-cars and hybrids are excluded Combustion engine 3 Methods Future development of car components (Literature study) Future development of power supply (Gov. Scenarios) Environmental impact assessment Env. Impacts of future electric cars (LCA) Emobility penetration model (ABM) Env. Impacts of Swiss fleet 4 energy density on battery level (Wh/kg) Batteries as key factor for emobility penetration range? 500km 150km 5 Costs on battery level ($/kWh) Potential development of battery costs 6 Methods Future development of car components Future development of power supply Environmental impact assessment Env. Impacts of future electric cars Emobility penetration model Env. Impacts of Swiss fleet 7 Development of Life Cycle GHG Emissions 80% <10% greenhouse gas emissions compact-cars (kg CO2-eq/km) 8 The role of the electricity mix BEV; certified eco-power, CH, real BEV; governmental scenario, CH, real BEV; consumer mix, CH, real BEV; natural gas power plant , EU, real BEV; consumer mix, EU, real BEV; coal power plant , EU, real ICE; EU-goal 2025, 70g/km CH, NEDC ICE; EU-goal 2025, 70g/km CH, real ICE; Canadian oil sands CH, real Greenhouse gas emissions (g CO2-eq./km) 9 Methods Future development of car components Future development of power supply Environmental impact assessment Env. Impacts of future electric cars Emobility penetration model Env. Impacts of Swiss fleet 10 Many forecasts are higher then the technical production capacity of electric cars! vEK2011: Szen. 1 80% vEK2011: Szen. 2 vEK2011: Szen. 3 70% B2009: Baseline-Szen. 60% B2009: Szen. teure Energie B2009: Szen. EV-Subventionen 50% Alpiq (2009) 40% ZB2010: konservatives Szen. ZB2010: optimistisches Szen. 30% asa (2011): mittleres Szen. 20% asa (2011): hohes Szen. Shell (2009): Trend-Szen. 10% Shell (2009): alternatives Szen. 0% 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 Produktionskapazität Maximum global production capacity 11 Percentage sales Electric mobility will never reach 100%; Co-existence with ICE cars even after 2050 12 Methods Future development of car components Future development of power supply Environmental impact assessment Env. Impacts of future electric cars Emobility penetration model Env. Impacts of Swiss fleet 13 How are GHG emissions developing? Greenhouse gas emissions of the Swiss individual car fleet relative to 2012 Lessons learnt… Focus on efficiency for all cars: positive impacts on all aspects. Indirect support of electric mobility. Reduces risk for wrong incentives From mineral oil tax to road tax: start smooth transition soon. This supports also mixed mobility for long distance driving. Focus on recycling: improve component reuse and recycling of lithium and rare metals from electeric cars. Rebound effects: equal taxes per km. Continue with taxes for possessing a car (even a small car). 15 free access: www.ta-swiss.ch Project team Ernst Basler + Partner AG Dr. Peter de Haan, Denise Fussen, Dr. Katrin Bernath, Frank Bruns Project team EMPA Dübendorf Dr. Rainer Zah, Marcel Gauch, Dr. Hans-Jörg Althaus, Dr. Patrick Wäger, Rolf Widmer 16