Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Asia-Pacific and Latin-America Interregional Forum on Managing for Results Fiscal Decentralization in LAC: An overview Vicente Fretes Cibils May 20-22, 2013 Mexico City Content • Context • Objectives • Challenges • Lessons Context • Decentralization Political Fiscal Administrative Context • Measuring decentralization Context • Political and administrative decentralization Number of countries with first time (year) of subnational elections in LAC 16 First time elections (countries) 14 5 12 10 8 2 States Municipalities 6 10 4 2 7 1 2 2 2 Before 60s 1960-1979 1 0 1980-1989 1990-1999 Source: Daughters and Harper (2007) updated by Rafael de la Cruz Recent: Uruguay (Municipalities 2010), Bolivia (2005) and Peru (2002) Estates 2000-2010 Context • Political and administrative decentralization Countries with subnational elections in LAC Cummulative number of countries with subnational elections 25 22 21 Municipalities 20 Estates 15 14 10 10 8 6 5 4 2 1 1 0 Before 60s 1960-1979 1980-1989 Source: Daughters and Harper (2007) updated by Rafael de la Cruz Recent: Uruguay (Municipalities 2010), Bolivia (2005) and Peru (2002) Estates 1990-1999 2000-2010 Context • Political and administrative decentralization First time (year) of subnational elections in LAC Country Municipal State Country Municipal States Argentina 1983 1983 Guatemala 1985 -- Bahamas 1997 -- Honduras 1982 -- Belize 1981 -- Mexico 1917 1917 Bolivia 1985 2005 Nicaragua 1992 -- Brazil 1982/85 1982 Panama 1995 -- Chile 2004 -- Paraguay 1991 1993 Colombia 1988 1991 Peru 1980 2002 Ecuador 1983 1983 Uruguay 2010 -- El Salvador 1985 -- Venezuela 1989 1989 Source: Daughters and Harper (2007) updated by Rafael de la Cruz Recent: Uruguay (Municipalities 2010), Bolivia (2005) and Peru (2002) Estates Context • Fiscal decentralization Subnational revenue and expenditure in LAC 11.0 10.5 Total Revenues As percentage of GDP 10.0 Total Expenditures 9.5 9.0 8.5 8.0 7.5 7.0 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Source: IDB, Sub-National Database Simple average of Selected countries - Argentina, Bolivia, Brasil, Chile, Colombia, Ecuador, México, Panamá and Perú Context • Fiscal decentralization Subnational expenditure as percentage of General Government expenditure North America* 49 Europe 25 36 8 21 South Asia 11 18 LAC Africa Middle east 18 South pacific (*) Excludes Mexico Source: World Bank and 2010, GOLD Report II, Local Government Finance: The Challenges of the 21st Century North America, East-Asia, Europe, South Asia, Latin-America, Africa and Middle East (Mexico is in LAC) East Asia Context • Fiscal decentralization 1980-1997 Indicators Source: World Bank and 2010, GOLD Report II, Local Government Finance: The Challenges of the 21st Century North America, East-Asia, Europe, South Asia, Latin-America, Africa and Middle East (Mexico is in LAC) Context • Regional fiscal decentralization Subnational expenditure as percentage of General Government Expenditure Focus of decentralization Intermediate level (state or provinces) Level of fiscal decentralization (sub-national public expenditures/total, in %) More than 20% Between 10 and 20% Argentina (49.3) Brazil (47.2) Mexico (32.1) Venezuela (26.3) Peru (18.9) Colombia (44.0) Bolivia (24.7) Ecuador (18.2) Uruguay (13.9) Chile (13.4) Honduras (12.3) Guatemala (10.3) Local level (municipalities) Source: IDB, Sub-National Database Less than 10% Trinidad Tobago (7.2) Paraguay (6.2) El Salvador (5.8) Nicaragua (5.2) Panama (3.2) Dominican Rep. (2.9) Costa Rica (2.6) Barbados (0.0) Bahamas (0.0) Objectives Decentralization - Allocation efficiency - Redistribution - Stability Growth Objectives • Fiscal decentralization and growth Share of subnational expenditure versus economic growth in OECD Sub-national Expenditures (% of total expenditures) Source: Image from ThieBen 2000: Data IMF. Challenges • Governance • Revenue mobilization • Expenditure quality • Debt Challenges • Governance De-concentration Coordination Devolution Autonomy Challenges • Revenue mobilization—High vertical imbalance Central Government transfers as % of Subnational income (2006-2009) Industrial (Average) 26 LAC (Average) 56 Bolivia 86 Mexico 78 Ecuador 68 Peru 55 Colombia 51 Argentina 48 Brazil 33 Chile 31 - 20 40 60 Source: Mininisterios de Finanzas de Bolivia, Ecuador, Peru, Argentina; INEG y SHCP Para México; Ernesto Stein para Brazil; y DIPRES para Chile 80 100 Challenges • Revenue mobilization in LAC They depend heavily on direct transfers from central governments Income structure of subnational governments in LAC 9 8 1.0 0.9 7 % of GDP 6 0.9 5 4 4.4 4.1 3.3 Others Transfers 3 Own revenue 2 1 2.2 2.6 2.7 2000 2005 2010 0 Source: Ministerios de Finanzas de Bolivia, Ecuador, Perú, Argentina; INEG y SHCP Para México; Ernesto Stein para Brasil; y DIPRES para Chile Challenges • Revenue mobilization in LAC High dependency on direct transfers from central governments Challenges • Expenditure quality—Social Selected social spending by Government level -1970-2000. In percent of total government spending Challenges • Expenditure quality—Education Seems to be more effective in centralized countries such as Chile and Uruguay—higher scores in an international exam and more efficient resource allocation Education Quality and Efficiency in Latin America, 2006-2009 PISA Scores Countries Latin America & Caribbean Argentina Brazil Chile Colombia Mexico Uruguay Source: CAF, 2012. As % of Max. Score 76.0 70.3 71.0 78.7 70.5 74.9 76.8 Efficiency Index Inputs & Inputs only Environment 0.94 0.81 0.86 0.92 0.86 0.83 0.95 0.94 0.81 0.86 0.90 0.88 0.85 0.93 Challenges • Expenditure quality—Health Also in health—the efficiency index show slightly better results for the more centralized (and developed). Health Indicators and Efficiency in Latin America, 2000-2009 Survival Rate Countries Per 1,000 Argentina Bolivia Brazil Chile Colombia Mexico Panama Paraguay Peru Dominican Rep. Trinidad & Tobago Uruguay Venezuela Source: CAF, 2012. 982 928 971 990 977 978 975 973 968 964 965 984 979 Efficiency Index (Inputs Only) 0.83 0.60 0.80 0.91 0.83 0.84 0.76 0.82 0.81 0.71 0.62 0.85 0.81 Life Expectancy at Birth Years 75 65 71 78 72 75 75 71 72 72 69 75 73 Efficiency Index (Inputs Only) 0.78 0.56 0.68 1.00 0.86 0.82 0.85 0.73 0.82 0.75 0.54 0.82 0.73 Challenges • Debt Subnational debt as percentage of GDP 8 Subnational debt as % of GDP 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 1996 2000 2005 Source: IDB, Sub-National Database Simple average of Selected countries - Argentina, Bolivia, Brasil, Chile, Colombia, and México 2010 Lessons • Governance – Frameworks for transfers of responsibilities and resources, coordination • Revenue mobilization – Conventional and alternatives • Expenditure quality – Performance based • Debt – Sub-national fiscal rules