Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Experimental conference summary General features of RHIC collisions Particle multiplicity Energy density Stopping E-M dissociation From SPS to RHIC Anisotropic flow Inverse slopes HBT Strangeness Open issues Charmonium Dielectrons Photons Energy loss O. Drapier IWPQGP 2001, Sept. 7 th 1 Multiplicity RHIC 130 GeV with quenching STAR PHENIX BRAHMS No jet quenching B. Jacak O. Drapier IWPQGP 2001, Sept. 7 th 2 Multiplicity RHIC 200 GeV BRAHMS Theory 1999 200 AGeV PHOBOS 2001 Syst PHOBOS 2000 PRL 85 (2000) 3100 & nucl-ex/0108009 M.Baker, J.J.Gaardhoje The increase is moderate … Good news for LHC people O. Drapier IWPQGP 2001, Sept. 7 th 3 Multiplicity BRAHMS 200AGEV 200 GeV PHOBOS 130 GeV PHOBOS UA5 200 GeV Data from nucl-ex/0108009 M.Baker, J.J.Gaardhoje BRAHMS: Central 0-6% N(ch)d= 5100±300 dN(ch)/d (=0) =61050 FWHM of distribution = 7.9 1.0 O. Drapier IWPQGP 2001, Sept. 7 th 4 Energy density e 4.6 GeV/fm3 > 50% higher than at CERN Phenix 130 GeV O. Drapier IWPQGP 2001, Sept. 7 th B. Jacak 5 Stopping Antiproton/proton ratio P.Jones, J.J.Gaardhoje O. Drapier IWPQGP 2001, Sept. 7 th 6 Stopping pbar/p More stopping in central collisions No PT dependence of pbar/p ratio BRAHMS 130 GeV Preliminary PHENIX 130 GeV preliminary O. Drapier IWPQGP 2001, Sept. 7 th B.Jacak, J.J.Gaardhoje, P.Jones7 Electromagnetic dissociation Important issue for luminosity measurement & LHC 1n EM dissociation selected by ZDC coincidences n n n and TMA Veto in BRAHMS NLO 2n LO J.J.Gaardhoje O. Drapier IWPQGP 2001, Sept. 7 th 8 Anisotropic flow Ex.: NA49 A.Poskanzer O. Drapier IWPQGP 2001, Sept. 7 th 9 Anisotropic flow RHIC: V2 component (elliptic flow) STAR PRL 86, (2001) 402 || < 1.3 0.1 < pt < 2.0 SPS RQMD AGS P.Jones, A.Poskanzer O. Drapier IWPQGP 2001, Sept. 7 th 10 Anisotropic flow Anisotropy shows a clear centrality and PT dependence R.Lacey O. Drapier IWPQGP 2001, Sept. 7 th 11 HBT Source size systematics does not exhibit qualitative differences fro SPS to RHIC P.Jones O. Drapier IWPQGP 2001, Sept. 7 th 12 HBT STAR F.Retiere O. Drapier IWPQGP 2001, Sept. 7 th 13 Inverse slopes SPS and RHIC results K.Safarik, D.Rohrich O. Drapier IWPQGP 2001, Sept. 7 th 14 Inverse slopes & HBT @ SPS, Tfo 100 MeV, <v> 0.55c Tfo somewhat higher @ RHIC Tth [GeV] p K- At chi square minimum Tth = 0.13 [GeV] <r >= 0.52 [c] - 0 O. Drapier 0.4 0 <r > [c] 0.4 IWPQGP 2001, Sept. 7 th P.Jones 15 Strangeness Kaons @ RHIC Increase with centrality Not qualitatively different from SPS SPS P.Jones, C.Roy O. Drapier IWPQGP 2001, Sept. 7 th 16 Strangeness Strange baryons : onset ? K.Safarik O. Drapier IWPQGP 2001, Sept. 7 th 17 Strangeness New proton nucleus data Onset or continuous increase ? K.Kadjia O. Drapier IWPQGP 2001, Sept. 7 th 18 Strangeness Energy dependence ? Maximum ~ 40 GeV ? M.Gazdzicki O. Drapier IWPQGP 2001, Sept. 7 th 19 Strangeness Rhic results P.Jones, C.Roy O. Drapier IWPQGP 2001, Sept. 7 th 20 Charmonium Interpretation of the NA50 results Problem with low Et A.Romana Data > normal absorption ??? Comovers far above normal absorption How does it reproduce S-U and p-A ? NA50 Y2K data … O. Drapier IWPQGP 2001, Sept. 7 th 21 Charmonium How well do we know J/y prod ? p-A Nucl. absorption cross section -y cross section Color octet New results expected NA50 Y2K data PHENIX NA60, lighter ions M.Leitch Which interpretation for charmonium production @ LHC ? Recombinations Feed-down from beauty decay Thermal production ? O. Drapier IWPQGP 2001, Sept. 7 th 22 Low mass dileptons Last CERES result @ 40 GeV D.Miskowiec O. Drapier IWPQGP 2001, Sept. 7 th 23 Low mass dileptons NA60 can provide new elements E.Scomparin O. Drapier IWPQGP 2001, Sept. 7 th 24 Direct photons WA98 T.Awes O. Drapier IWPQGP 2001, Sept. 7 th 25 High PT High PT depletion in hadron spectra With respect to p-p Central wrt peripheral B.Jacak O. Drapier IWPQGP 2001, Sept. 7 th 26 High PT Clearly seen by both STAR & PHENIX Preliminary QM01 O. Drapier Preliminary QM01 IWPQGP 2001, Sept. 7 th P.Jones 27 conclusion RHIC : Particle multiplicity not as high as expected few years ago So far, no big surprise with Enegy density Stoping Flow Expansion Strangeness ?? Open issues Charmonium Low mass dileptons Photons Jet Quenching promising issue² O. Drapier IWPQGP 2001, Sept. 7 th 28