Download Clinical Usefulness of the Kettle Test in Conjunction with the

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts
no text concepts found
Transcript
Clinical Usefulness of the Kettle Test in Conjunction
with the Montreal Cognitive Assessment in a
Neurosurgical Population
Lauren Nichols, Rowan Castle, Jolene May, Leeza Hawkins, Christy Dorward
Royal Hobart Hospital
Outline
• Assessment of cognition and functional cognition
• The Kettle Test
• Comparing the Kettle Test to the Montreal Cognitive Assessment
Cognition and Daily Function
(Sloan & Ponsford, 2008; Hartman-Maeir,
Harel & Katz, 2009; Unsworth, 2010;
Grohol,2014)
Schools of Thought
standardised
functional cognition
observation
(Pascale Toglia, Golisz & Goverover, 2009; Unsworth, 2010)
pen & paper
Occupational Performance
Self-care
Instrumental ADLS
Habits & Routines
Less Cognitively Demanding
Novel & Challenging Tasks
More Cognitively Demanding
(Bear, Connors, & Paradiso, 2007; Coster, Haley, Jette, Tao & Siebens, 2007; Sloan &
Ponsford, 2008; Pascale Toglia, Golisz & Goverover, 2009)
(Bear, Connors, & Paradiso, 2007; Baum & Katz, 2010)
Utility of Different Assessments
Standardised
Pen & Paper
Tests
Observation of
Routines & Habits
Standardised
Functional
Assessments
Tests
Isolated pre-frontal
functions
Procedural memory
Integration of pre-frontal
functions
Tells Us
Presence of a cognitive
deficit
Task specific capacity
Cognitive capacity for
activities
(Sloan & Ponsford, 2008; Pascale Toglia, Golisz & Goverover, 2009;
Baum & Katz, 2010)
The Kettle Test
(Hartman-Maeir, Harel & Katz, 2009)
The Kettle Test
“To evaluate the ability for
independent community living
of people with
identified or suspected cognitive disabilities”
(Hartman-Maeir, Armon & Katz, 2005; Hartman-Maeir, Harel & Katz,
2009; Baum & Katz, 2010)
Kettle Test Outline
Making 2 different hot drinks
(Hartman-Maeir, Harel & Katz, 2009)
Scoring
• Total score 52
• Higher scores indicate more impairment
• Functional interpretation - The Global Independence Score
① Independent
② Mild Assistance
③ Significant assistance
(Hartman-Maeir, Harel & Katz, 2009)
Study Aims
MoCA
Kettle
Sample Population
• Tasmania Neurosurgical Unit
• State-wide service
• Population:
•
Post-surgical
&
Mild-moderate head injuries
Variables
Age
Diagnosis
Surgery
MoCA
Kettle
Discharge Destination
OT Intervention
Methods
• 30 neurosurgical case files
• Retrospective file audit of sample population
• Qualitative methodology
– Exploratory case study
– Pattern matching
Results
60% Cases (n=18)
MoCA
Kettle
Both either: no impairment, mild impairment, or severe impairment
Results Continued
40% Cases (n=12)
Cognitive Impairment
Functional Cognitive Impairment
(n=5)
(n=7)
 MoCA
✔ MoCA
✔ Kettle
 Kettle
Results Continued – Role of OT
Observation and analysis of activities
Case Study
Bob
• 80 years old
• Independent
• Tertiary educated
• Traumatic subdural
haemorrhage & burr holes
Case Study
OT Assessment
Functional Cognitive Impairment
✔ MoCA – 30/30
 Kettle – Severe Impairment
Showed difficulties managing:
Self Care Tasks
Money
Medications
Unsafe Situations
Reflections
1. Cognitive impairments can exist without functional implications
– Minor Neurocognitive Disorder - DSM V
2. Montreal Cognitive Assessment
– does not consistently predict functional cognitive deficits
3.
Kettle Test + Montreal Cognitive Assessment
– more robust assessment of cognition following a neurological
event.
Lauren Nichols
[email protected]
References
•
•
•
•
•
Baum, C. M., & Katz, N. (2010). Occupational therapy approach to assessing the relationship between
cognition and function. In T. D. Marcotte & I. Grant (Eds.), Neuropsychology of everyday functioning (pp. 6292). New York: The Guildford Press.
Bear, M. F., Connors, B. W., & Paradiso, M. A. (2007). Memory systems. In M. F. Bear, B. W. Connors &
M. A. Paradiso (Eds.), Neuroscience: Exploring the brain (3rd ed., pp.725-760). Philadelphia: Lippincott
Williams & Wilkins.
Coster, W.,Haley, S. M., Jette, A., Tao, W., & Siebens, H. (2007). Predictors of basic and instrumental
activities of daily living performance in persons receiving rehabilitation services. Archives of Physical Medicine
and Rehabilitation, 88(7), 928-935.
Grohol, J. (2014). Symptoms of Minor Neurocognitive Disorder. Psych Central. Retrieved on November 1,
2015, from http://psychcentral.com/disorders/symptoms-of-minor-neurocognitive-disorder/.
Hartman-Maeir, A., Harel, H., Katz, N. (2009). Kettle test- A brief measure of cognitive functional
performance: Reliability and validity in stroke rehabilitation. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy,
65(5), 592-599.
References
•Hartman-Maeir, A., Armon, N., & Katz, N. (2005). "The Kettle Test: A cognitive functional screening test."
Unpublished protocol, Helene University, Jerusalem, Israel.
•Nasreddine, Z. S., Phillips, N. A., Bedirian, V., Charbonneau, S., Whiltehead, V., Collin, I., Cummings, J. L., &
Cherthow, H. (2005). The Montreal Cognitive Assessment: MoCA: A brief screening tool for mild cognitive
impairment. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 53(1-2), 695-699.
•Pascale Toglia, J., Golisz, K. M., & Goverover, Y. (2009). Evaluation and intervention for cognitive perceptual
impairments. In E. B. Crepeau, E. S. Cohn, & B. A. B. Schell (Eds.), Willard and Spackman’s occupational therapy
(11th ed., pp. 739-776). Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
•Sloan, S., & Ponsford, J., (2008). Assessment of cognitive difficulties following TBI. In J. Ponsford (Ed.),
Traumatic brain injury: Rehabilitation for everyday adaptive living (4th ed., pp. 65-102). New York: Psychology Press
Ltd.
•Unsworth, C. A. (2010). Cognitive and perceptual strategies. In M. Curtin, M. Molineux, & J. Supyk-Mellson
(Eds.), Occupational therapy and physical dysfunction: Enabling occupation (6th ed., pp. 607-635). Edinburgh:
Churchill Livingstone Elsevier.
Related documents