Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Clinical Usefulness of the Kettle Test in Conjunction with the Montreal Cognitive Assessment in a Neurosurgical Population Lauren Nichols, Rowan Castle, Jolene May, Leeza Hawkins, Christy Dorward Royal Hobart Hospital Outline • Assessment of cognition and functional cognition • The Kettle Test • Comparing the Kettle Test to the Montreal Cognitive Assessment Cognition and Daily Function (Sloan & Ponsford, 2008; Hartman-Maeir, Harel & Katz, 2009; Unsworth, 2010; Grohol,2014) Schools of Thought standardised functional cognition observation (Pascale Toglia, Golisz & Goverover, 2009; Unsworth, 2010) pen & paper Occupational Performance Self-care Instrumental ADLS Habits & Routines Less Cognitively Demanding Novel & Challenging Tasks More Cognitively Demanding (Bear, Connors, & Paradiso, 2007; Coster, Haley, Jette, Tao & Siebens, 2007; Sloan & Ponsford, 2008; Pascale Toglia, Golisz & Goverover, 2009) (Bear, Connors, & Paradiso, 2007; Baum & Katz, 2010) Utility of Different Assessments Standardised Pen & Paper Tests Observation of Routines & Habits Standardised Functional Assessments Tests Isolated pre-frontal functions Procedural memory Integration of pre-frontal functions Tells Us Presence of a cognitive deficit Task specific capacity Cognitive capacity for activities (Sloan & Ponsford, 2008; Pascale Toglia, Golisz & Goverover, 2009; Baum & Katz, 2010) The Kettle Test (Hartman-Maeir, Harel & Katz, 2009) The Kettle Test “To evaluate the ability for independent community living of people with identified or suspected cognitive disabilities” (Hartman-Maeir, Armon & Katz, 2005; Hartman-Maeir, Harel & Katz, 2009; Baum & Katz, 2010) Kettle Test Outline Making 2 different hot drinks (Hartman-Maeir, Harel & Katz, 2009) Scoring • Total score 52 • Higher scores indicate more impairment • Functional interpretation - The Global Independence Score ① Independent ② Mild Assistance ③ Significant assistance (Hartman-Maeir, Harel & Katz, 2009) Study Aims MoCA Kettle Sample Population • Tasmania Neurosurgical Unit • State-wide service • Population: • Post-surgical & Mild-moderate head injuries Variables Age Diagnosis Surgery MoCA Kettle Discharge Destination OT Intervention Methods • 30 neurosurgical case files • Retrospective file audit of sample population • Qualitative methodology – Exploratory case study – Pattern matching Results 60% Cases (n=18) MoCA Kettle Both either: no impairment, mild impairment, or severe impairment Results Continued 40% Cases (n=12) Cognitive Impairment Functional Cognitive Impairment (n=5) (n=7) MoCA ✔ MoCA ✔ Kettle Kettle Results Continued – Role of OT Observation and analysis of activities Case Study Bob • 80 years old • Independent • Tertiary educated • Traumatic subdural haemorrhage & burr holes Case Study OT Assessment Functional Cognitive Impairment ✔ MoCA – 30/30 Kettle – Severe Impairment Showed difficulties managing: Self Care Tasks Money Medications Unsafe Situations Reflections 1. Cognitive impairments can exist without functional implications – Minor Neurocognitive Disorder - DSM V 2. Montreal Cognitive Assessment – does not consistently predict functional cognitive deficits 3. Kettle Test + Montreal Cognitive Assessment – more robust assessment of cognition following a neurological event. Lauren Nichols [email protected] References • • • • • Baum, C. M., & Katz, N. (2010). Occupational therapy approach to assessing the relationship between cognition and function. In T. D. Marcotte & I. Grant (Eds.), Neuropsychology of everyday functioning (pp. 6292). New York: The Guildford Press. Bear, M. F., Connors, B. W., & Paradiso, M. A. (2007). Memory systems. In M. F. Bear, B. W. Connors & M. A. Paradiso (Eds.), Neuroscience: Exploring the brain (3rd ed., pp.725-760). Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. Coster, W.,Haley, S. M., Jette, A., Tao, W., & Siebens, H. (2007). Predictors of basic and instrumental activities of daily living performance in persons receiving rehabilitation services. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 88(7), 928-935. Grohol, J. (2014). Symptoms of Minor Neurocognitive Disorder. Psych Central. Retrieved on November 1, 2015, from http://psychcentral.com/disorders/symptoms-of-minor-neurocognitive-disorder/. Hartman-Maeir, A., Harel, H., Katz, N. (2009). Kettle test- A brief measure of cognitive functional performance: Reliability and validity in stroke rehabilitation. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 65(5), 592-599. References •Hartman-Maeir, A., Armon, N., & Katz, N. (2005). "The Kettle Test: A cognitive functional screening test." Unpublished protocol, Helene University, Jerusalem, Israel. •Nasreddine, Z. S., Phillips, N. A., Bedirian, V., Charbonneau, S., Whiltehead, V., Collin, I., Cummings, J. L., & Cherthow, H. (2005). The Montreal Cognitive Assessment: MoCA: A brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 53(1-2), 695-699. •Pascale Toglia, J., Golisz, K. M., & Goverover, Y. (2009). Evaluation and intervention for cognitive perceptual impairments. In E. B. Crepeau, E. S. Cohn, & B. A. B. Schell (Eds.), Willard and Spackman’s occupational therapy (11th ed., pp. 739-776). Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. •Sloan, S., & Ponsford, J., (2008). Assessment of cognitive difficulties following TBI. In J. Ponsford (Ed.), Traumatic brain injury: Rehabilitation for everyday adaptive living (4th ed., pp. 65-102). New York: Psychology Press Ltd. •Unsworth, C. A. (2010). Cognitive and perceptual strategies. In M. Curtin, M. Molineux, & J. Supyk-Mellson (Eds.), Occupational therapy and physical dysfunction: Enabling occupation (6th ed., pp. 607-635). Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone Elsevier.