Download Networks and consciousness

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts
no text concepts found
Transcript
Networks and consciousness
Donald Steiny
Overall
• Won’t even try to solve AI
• More about problems than solutions
• Introduce the idea of networks and how they
relate to some of the problems in this area
Today
•
•
•
•
•
Review of behaviorism
Review of cognitive psychology
Review of systems and the AI paradigm
Discussion of relational thinking and networks
Examples of how networks lead to new
descriptions
• Some potential applications
Basic behavioral model
The idea
• No such thing as cause and effect – Hume
– Not a property of things.
– Just a consequence of repeated observations
– A matter of faith – the fallacy of induction
• The solution?
– Scientific laws are based on repeated observation
– Psychology could become “scientific.”
But …
• It is not possible to recognize a balanced set of
symbols without memory.
Aaabbbbaaa
It is, however, possible to precisely describe the
memory required by push down store automata,
which lead to computer languages like C and
Pascal.
This lead to “mental processes” and cognitive
psychology
Meanwhile
• Shannon and Weaver
– Formulation of information and redundancy
• Norbert Weiner – Cybernetics
– Feedback
– Control
• Representation of everything as symbols and a
complete science of symbols
And in economics
• Revealed preferences
• Failure of micro explanations
– Coase and Williamson
• Behavioral explanations
– Bounded rationality (Simon)
– Heuristics and biases (Kahneman)
• Still at dyad level
• Macro structures are epiphenomena
Systems
• Systems
– Have inputs and outputs
– They transform their inputs
– They have a boundary
– They have subsystems
– They are part of a larger systems
– Inputs/Outputs can be viewed as symbols
But …
• Symbols are always dependent on context.
What Bateson called a frame was extensively
developed by Erving Goffman.
– He’s a student
– ASCII interpreted as EBCDIC
Over in sociology land
• Harvard Department of Social Relations
– Talcott Parsons
• Functionalist sociology
• The dream of a unified paradigm
– Harrison White
• Network sociology
• Methods that assume heterogeneity
• The middle range of action
Atomic Actors
• Where is action located?
– What is space?
– Cartesian space locates action at a point
• Minds
• Consciousness
• Etc
• Atomic theories
– Rational action
– Systems theory
Relational View – boys and girls
Networks as spaces
• Analogy: each of are members of multiple
networks.
• This is similar to an n-dimensional space, the
difference being that any point can be in an
arbitrary intersection of dimensions.
• Over time the configuration of dimensions
switches so points are generally not in a fixed
set of dimensions.
Identity
• Each network provides a frame of reference
• Different things are salient in each network.
Structural equivalence
Advice leaders
Expressive leader
Is the dot at the front or back?
What is a person?
• When you talk to me who are you talking to?
–
–
–
–
My immortal soul?
My lips?
A story you tell yourself?
Folk psychology is key
• Is an action mine or your interpretation of it?
How could we know? How could we remember?
• “a god” existing at the confluence of networks.
Style
• Holds us together across identities
• Helps choose our stories or actions
• Persons are styles
– Napoleon
– Bill Clinton
• War/fashion
• Sets the tone for our actions
What about a company?
• Or a country or “big business” or anything that
causes things.
• Back to the old problem that behaviorism had
• These live in our heads so the same problem
of making repeated observations about
people applies to larger structures
Social roles
•
•
•
•
Preexisting (structure)
Fairly fixed
Live in everyone’s heads
Held in place by control.
Stories and accountings
• We account for, explain what we observe
– The swinging rope experiement
– Hume’s cause – Wittgenstein’s intention
• Standard sets of stories are both guides for
action explanations – Durkheim/Heddigger
• We are tied together into networks by these
rhetorics
• Common sense is an underlying accounting
Our location
• Is point of view
• Determines what we can access as
accountings.
• Is affected by control pressures from others
(our interpretations are in the light of others)
Social networking
• New security models use networks:
Granovetter diagrams
• We have multiple identities, seeing it on line
makes it salient
• Facebook security model problem
– Assumes single identity
Culture and meaning
• Culture is the set of available accountings and
the control effort to adopt it.
• Meaning is carried across network domains as
we go from pointing.
A source of - disciplines
•
•
•
•
Like situated cognition (Hutchens)
The way we work together
Very hard to see, no ties
Influenced by style
– Chinese making a company
– Finns making a company
– Silicon Valley making a company
• Source of stories and accountings (ties)
The problem of action
•
•
•
•
Magical thinking
Fundamental Attribution Error
The great man hypothesis
Creativity and innovation as combinations of
borrowing and salience
• Accountings and stories
• Beliefs and values are explanations, not causes
How does this relate to AI
• The problem is more complex than it is made
out to be
• Reducing reality to symbols won’t work