Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
XBRL Days and Eurofiling Workshop Piotr Madziar – European Commission Rome, 5-7 May 2014 20-21/02/2014 1 Context EP, Barroso II financial initiatives: SSM, ESAs BRIS Accounting Directive Transparency CRDIV Solvency Main Challanges Timing: • EBA now • BRIS 2015 • TD 2016 • Solvency. 2 Barroso II Commission – some achievements SSM OTC ESAs TD AQR SME accounts CRDIV Stress tests ICT standardisation agenda European Semester BRIS EMIR European Stability Mechanism Digital Agenda CBV/ROV/RegOrg CEN/DPM. 3 Brussel’s role Level 1 leader: Propose EU directives Negotiate with EP and Council Publish framework Legislation (Directives) Level 2 – typically assistance only: Monitor ITS development (incl. DPM, taxonomies, implementation etc.) Comfort EP and Council (if necessary) Publish ITS 4 Level 1 examples: ESMA will develop draft ESEF (like XBRL) and submit it to COM by end 2016. All issuers will file ESEF annual financial reports as of 1/1/2020, ESMA will develop and run EEAP where all regulatory info (now in OAMs), single cross-border search etc. will be available. BRIS: COM will develop and run BRIS, an exchange platform assuring cross-border multi-language access, unique identification, features, universal search etc. 5 2014 -2020 EP Hot topics Solvency? Fiscal Union? Transparency of budgets incl. transactional level EU economic monitoring and risk management Standardisation • Blend private industry standards with official ones • EU endorsement of int’l standards Digital economy • Complete digital agenda • Translate achievements into growth advantages • Data privacy and security 6 Non – TD criteria There are several strategic issues that should play a role once the Commission considers the adoption of the ITS: - We promote interoperability, burden reduction and re-use of data, - We support international standards, especially if their adoption in the EU enhances financial stability, free trade and investments - We promote open data in open standards Several strategic EU acts and docs, G8 an G20 declarations etc. outline those objectives. 7 Duplication of fiscal and supervisory data Tax administration costs Fiscal Data (VAT, CIT, PIT… Business Register / Corporate Transparency costs Corporate Data OAM OAM Data Financial supervision (ESAs, their members, ECB… Cost of statistics… Supervisory Data Statistical Data Business 8 Simplification & burden reduction - SBR concept Taxation Business Register / Corporate Data costs Transparency OAM Financial supervision Statistics (VAT, CIT, PIT… Repository of reusable data Business 9 XBRL -> national GAAPs issue EU core taxonomy IFRS for all EU issuers Basis EU Accounting directive IFRS Options • National regulatory extensions? • Company extensions? IFRS for SME? Pros • Brand new Directive • Two birds in one shot – electronic reporting requirement in Accounting Directive resolved • True ESEF • Completion of IAS reform of 2002 Cons • • • • • In 2002 IFRS was selectively applied for a reason • IFRS for SME received mixed views in the EU. Is it still ESEF? Is national framework cost-efficient? Who will do it? May require extensive review of national GAAPs 10 XBRL challenges Learn, test and use at the same time Legacy systems, business case National rules and practices Due process for EU adoption of international standards 11 Thanks for your attention! Questions? All the comments are of personal nature and cannot be taken for an official position of the Commission. 12