Download European Institutions update

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts
no text concepts found
Transcript
XBRL Days and Eurofiling
Workshop
Piotr Madziar – European Commission
Rome, 5-7 May 2014
20-21/02/2014
1
Context
EP, Barroso II financial
initiatives:

SSM, ESAs

BRIS

Accounting Directive

Transparency

CRDIV

Solvency
Main Challanges
Timing:
•
EBA now
•
BRIS 2015
•
TD 2016
•
Solvency.
2
Barroso II Commission – some achievements
SSM
OTC
ESAs
TD
AQR
SME accounts
CRDIV
Stress tests
ICT standardisation
agenda
European Semester
BRIS
EMIR
European Stability
Mechanism
Digital
Agenda
CBV/ROV/RegOrg
CEN/DPM.
3
Brussel’s role
Level 1 leader:
Propose EU directives
Negotiate with EP and Council
Publish framework Legislation (Directives)
Level 2 – typically assistance only:
Monitor ITS development (incl. DPM, taxonomies,
implementation etc.)
Comfort EP and Council (if necessary)
Publish ITS
4
Level 1 examples:
ESMA will develop draft ESEF (like XBRL) and submit it to
COM by end 2016. All issuers will file ESEF annual financial
reports as of 1/1/2020, ESMA will develop and run EEAP
where all regulatory info (now in OAMs), single cross-border
search etc. will be available.
BRIS: COM will develop and run BRIS, an exchange
platform assuring cross-border multi-language access,
unique identification, features, universal search etc.
5
2014 -2020 EP Hot topics
Solvency?
Fiscal Union?
Transparency of budgets incl. transactional level
EU economic monitoring and risk management
Standardisation
• Blend private industry standards with official ones
• EU endorsement of int’l standards
Digital economy
•
Complete digital agenda
•
Translate achievements into growth advantages
•
Data privacy and security
6
Non – TD criteria
There are several strategic issues that should play a role once the Commission
considers the adoption of the ITS:
- We promote interoperability, burden reduction and re-use of data,
- We support international standards, especially if their adoption in the EU
enhances financial stability, free trade and investments
- We promote open data in open standards
Several strategic EU acts and docs, G8 an G20 declarations etc. outline those
objectives.
7
Duplication of fiscal and supervisory data
Tax
administration
costs
Fiscal Data
(VAT, CIT,
PIT…
Business
Register /
Corporate
Transparency
costs
Corporate
Data
OAM
OAM
Data
Financial
supervision
(ESAs, their
members, ECB…
Cost of
statistics…
Supervisory
Data
Statistical
Data
Business
8
Simplification & burden reduction - SBR concept
Taxation
Business
Register /
Corporate
Data costs
Transparency
OAM
Financial
supervision
Statistics
(VAT, CIT,
PIT…
Repository of reusable data
Business
9
XBRL -> national GAAPs issue
EU core taxonomy
IFRS for all EU issuers
Basis
EU Accounting directive
IFRS
Options
• National regulatory extensions?
• Company extensions?
IFRS for SME?
Pros
• Brand new Directive
• Two birds in one shot – electronic reporting
requirement in Accounting Directive resolved
• True ESEF
• Completion of IAS reform of 2002
Cons
•
•
•
•
• In 2002 IFRS was selectively applied
for a reason
• IFRS for SME received mixed views in
the EU.
Is it still ESEF?
Is national framework cost-efficient?
Who will do it?
May require extensive review of national GAAPs
10
XBRL challenges
Learn, test and use at the same time
Legacy systems, business case
National rules and practices
Due process for EU adoption of international standards
11
Thanks for your attention! Questions?
All the comments are of personal nature and cannot be taken for an official position
of the Commission.
12
Related documents